Butterflies in Australian Conservation Legislation

Chapter

Abstract

As elsewhere in the world, much of the impetus for butterfly conservation in Australia has arisen through particular species being signaled as ‘threatened’ in some way and, progressively, through the inclusion of such taxa in formal advisory or legislative schedules of ‘protected species’, a step which may oblige further attention and, if needed, practical conservation management. In general, such listings have been an important part of conservation advocacy, but may cause strong reactions and have not always led to adequate practical management. Australia’s conservation legislation caters widely for threatened species, and operates at the twin levels of Commonwealth and individual State or Territory. The latter vary considerably in the provisions and coverage of the acts, and the contexts and implications for butterflies are discussed below.

Keywords

Precautionary Principle Data Deficient Conservation Significance Critically Endanger Butterfly Conservation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beale JP (1997) Comment on the efficacy of Queensland nature conservation legislation in relation to Acrodipsas illidgei (Waterhouse and Lyell) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Theclinae). Pacif Conserv Biol 3: 392–396Google Scholar
  2. Beale JP, Zalucki MP (1995) Status and distribution of Acrodipsas illidgei (Waterhouse and Lyell) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) at Redland Bay, southeastern Queensland, and a new plant association record. J Aust Entomol Soc 34: 163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaumont LJ, Hughes L (2002) Potential changes in the distribution of latitudinally restricted Australian butterfly species in response to climate change. Global Change Biol 8: 954–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell PJ (2002) Survey of known sites and potential habitat for the Marrawah skipper in northwest Tasmania. Nature Conservation Branch. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, HobartGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell PJ, Miller B (2005) Marrawah skipper discovered at penguin. For Prac News 6:1–2Google Scholar
  6. Bryant S, Jackson J (1999) Tasmania’s threatened fauna handbook. What, where and how to protect Tasmania’s threatened animals? Parks and Wildlife Service, HobartGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke G, Spier-Ashcroft F (2003) A review of the conservation status of selected Australian non-marine invertebrates. Environment Australia/National Heritage Trust, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbet PS, Brooks SJ (2008) Dragonflies. New Naturalist 106. Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunn KL, Kitching RL, Dexter EM (1994) The conservation status of Australian butterflies. Report to Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenslade P (1999) What entomologists think about listing species for protection. pp. 345–349 in Ponder W, Lunney D (eds) The other 99%. The conservation and biodiversity of invertebrates. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, MosmanGoogle Scholar
  11. Grund R (2004) South Australian butterflies. Data sheet. Candalides noelkeri Braby and Douglas (Golden-rayed Blue). (http://users.sa.chariot.net.au/∼rbg/noelkeri_ds.htm, accessed July 2009)
  12. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Fox R, Telfer MG, Willis SG, Asher J, Huntley B (2002) Responses of butterflies to twentieth century climate warming: implications for future ranges. Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 269: 2163–2171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN, Gland and CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. New TR (2008a) Legislative inconsistencies and species conservation status: understanding or confusion? The case of Riekoperla darlingtoni (Plecoptera) in Australia. J Insect Conserv 12: 1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. New TR (2008b) Conserving narrow range endemic insects in the face of climate change: options for some Australian butterflies. J Insect Conserv 12: 585–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. New TR (2009) Insect species conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. New TR, Sands DPA (2004) Management of threatened insect species in Australia, with particular reference to butterflies. Aust J Entomol 43: 258–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neyland M (1994) The ecology and conservation status of three rare hesperiid butterflies in Tasmania. Wildlife Report 94/3. Parks and Wildlife Service, TasmaniaGoogle Scholar
  19. Neyland M (2001) Ecology and conservation of the Marrawah skipper (Oreisplanus munionga) in Tasmania. Tasm Nat 123: 48–56Google Scholar
  20. Neyland M, Bell P (2000) Ecology and conservation of the Chaostola skipper butterfly (Antipodia chaostola leucophaea) in Tasmania. Tasm Nat 122: 47–54Google Scholar
  21. Peters RL, Darling JDS (1985) The greenhouse effect and nature reserves. BioScience 35: 707–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sands DPA, New TR (2002) The Action Plan for Australian Butterflies. Environment Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  23. Sands DPA, New TR (2008) Irregular diapause, apparency and evaluating conservation status: anomalies from the Australian butterflies. J Insect Conserv 12: 81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. TSS (Threatened Species Section) (2006) Draft Greater Freycinet Region Threatened Species Recovery Plan 2006–2010. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, HobartGoogle Scholar
  25. Wainer JW, Yen AL (2009) The heath sand-skipper butterfly Antipodia chaostola (Meyrick 1888) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in Central Gippsland, Victoria. Vict Nat 126: 192–202Google Scholar
  26. Yen A, Butcher R (1997) An overview of the conservation of non-marine invertebrates in Australia. Environment Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyLa Trobe UniversityVictoriaAustralia

Personalised recommendations