Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable Bioenergy Production, Land and Nitrogen Use

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biodiversity, Biofuels, Agroforestry and Conservation Agriculture

Part of the book series: Sustainable Agriculture Reviews ((SARV,volume 5))

Abstract

In recent years the challenge of reducing the reliance on petroleum and natural gas with the energy produced by agricultural crops has received a renewed interest. However, many scientists have expressed serious reservations about the real benefit of a widespread diffusion of crops grown for energy feedstocks. While a diversification of energy portfolio is strongly needed, one of the greatest scientific challenge for the near future is to identify land use options that minimize negative impact on food prices and greenhouse gases emissions. The objective of this article is to discuss the following topics: (i) competition for land: bioenergy versus food; (ii) bioenergy crops and nitrogen cycling; (iii) plant traits to be targeted for improving land and nitrogen use efficiency; and (iv) the debated role of legumes. Because fertile land, suitable for food production, is a dwindling resource, the production of feedstocks for biofuels should be enhanced by exploiting favourable plant characteristics in marginal land areas. We point out that a rethinking of the concept of marginal land is necessary: not only areas poorly suited to grain crops production owing to low soil fertility, but also land unsuited to produce food owing to food safety reasons. Yet, whether a land area is marginal or not should be evaluated not only from the economic standpoint, but also from the ecological and environmental points of view. Moreover, grain crops residues should be exploited for bioenergy production providing that well devised height of cuttings assure the maintenance of soil organic matter. The main message of this review is that bioenergy should be seen as a complementary product of food and feed production, to be attained by optimized land and nitrogen use. Emphasis is given to the contribution that dedicated perennial lignocellulosic crops might provide in sustainable bioenergy production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ammann C, Spirig C, Fischer C, Leifeld J, Neftel A (2007) Interactive comment on “N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels” by P. J. Crutzen et al. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 7:S4779–S4781. www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/S4779/2007

  • Angelini GL, Ceccarini L, Bonari E (2005) Biomass yield and energy balance of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) cropped in central Italy as related to different management practices. Euro J Agron 22:375–89.doi:10.1016/j.eja.2004.05.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer B, Struik PC, Sanders J (2008) Using an energetic and exergetic lifecycle analysis to assess the best applications of legumes within a biobased economy. Biomass Bioenerg 32:1175–1186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JE, Lobell DB, Field CB (2009) Greater transportation energy and GHG offset from bioelectricity than Ethanol. Science 324:1055–1057. doi:10.1126/Science.1168885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cassman KG, Liska AJ (2007) Food and fuel for all: realistic or foolish? Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 1:18–23. doi:10.1002/bbb.3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceotto E (2005) The issues of energy and carbon cycle: new perspectives for assessing the environmental impact of animal waste utilization. Bioresource Technol 96:191–196. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.05.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceotto E (2008) Grasslands for bioenergy production. Agron Sustain Dev 28:47–55. doi:10.1051/agro:2007034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Eviner VT (2003) Biogeochemistry of terrestrial primary production. In: Schlesinger WH (ed) Biogeochemistry, vol 8; Holland HD, Turekian KK (eds) Treatise on geochemistry. Elsevier-Pergamon, Oxford, pp 215–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Crews TE, Peoples MB (2004) Legume versus fertilizer sources of nitrogen. Agr Ecosyst Environ 10:279–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ, Mosier AR, Smith KA, Winiwarter W (2008) N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmos Chem Phys 8:389–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ, Mosier A, Smith K, Winiwarter W (2009) Atmospheric N2O releases from biofuel production systems: a major factor against “CO2 Emission Savings”: a global view. In: Zerefos C, Contopoulos G, Skalkeas G (eds) Twenty years of ozone decline. Proceedings of the symposium for the 20th anniversary of the Montreal protocol, pp 67–70. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2469-5

    Google Scholar 

  • DeHaan LR, Weisberg S, Tilman D, Fornara D (2009) Agricultural and biofuel implications of a species diversity experiment with native perennial grassland plants. Agric Ecosyst Environ (in press). doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.10.017

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Candilo M, Ceotto E, Diozzi M (2008) Comparison of 7 ligno-cellulosic biomass feedstock species: 6-years results in the Low Po Valley. In: Rossi Pisa P (ed) 10th congress of the European society of agronomy, Bologna, multi-functional agriculture, agriculture as a resource for energy and environmental preservation. Ital J Agron/Rivista di Agronom 3(suppl. 3):481–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater LE, Wagoner P, Sarrantonio M (1998) Legume based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature 396:262–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erisman JW, van Grinsven H, Leip A, Mosier A, Bleeker A (2009). Nitrogen and biofuels; an overview of the current state of knowledge. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst (in press). doi:10.1007/s10705-009-9285-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewers RM, Scharlemann JPW, Balmford A, Green RE (2009) Do increases in agricultural yield spare land for nature? Global Change Biol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01849.x

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) Livestock long shadows, environmental issues and options. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome. The livestock, environment and development (LEAD) Initiative website: www.virtualcenter.org. Chapter 3: Livestock role in climatic change and air pollution, pp 79–133

  • Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319:1235–1238. doi:10.1126/science.1152747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT, Jones AD, O’Hare M, Kammen DM (2006) Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311:506–508. doi:10.1126/science.1121416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway JN, Cowling EB (2002) Reactive nitrogen and the world: 200 years of change. Ambio 31:64–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway JN, Cowling EB, Seitinger SP, Socolow RH (2002) Reactive nitrogen: too much a good thing? Ambio 31:60–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway JN, Aber JD, Erisman JW, Seitzinger SP, Howarth RW, Cowling EB, Cosby BJ (2003) The nitrogen cascade. BioScience 53(4):341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway JN (2005) The global nitrogen cycle. In: Schlesinger WH (ed) Biogeochemistry, vol 8; Holland HD, Turekian KK (eds) Treatise on geochemistry. Elsevier-Pergamon, Oxford, pp 557–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai Z, Freney JR, Martinelli LA, Seitzinger SP, Sutton MA (2008) Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320:889–892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goudriaan J, Kropff MJ, Rabbinge R (1991) Mogelijkheden en beperkingen van biomassa als energiebron. Energie Spectrum 6:171–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudriaan J, van Laar HH (1994) Modelling potential crop growth processes. Textbook with exercises. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Granda CB, Zhu L, Holtzapple MT (2007) Sustainable liquid biofuels and their environmental impact. Environ Prog 26:233–250. doi:10.1002/ep

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green RE, Cornell SJ, Scharlemann JPW, Balmford A (2005) Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 308:550–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gressel J (2008) Transgenic are imperative for biofuel crops. Plant science 174:246–263. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.11.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helsel ZR (1992) Energy and alternatives for fertilizer and pesticide use. In: Fluck RC (ed) Energy in farm production, vol 6. In: Stout BA (ed) Energy in world agriculture. Energy in world agriculture, Amsterdam pp 177–202

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2004) International energy authority: biofuels for transport: an international perspective, chap. 6. www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2004/biofuels2004.pdf

  • IFA (2009) International fertilizer industry association: fertilizers, climate change and enhancing agricultural productivity sustainably, 1st edn. IFA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC ( 2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, prepared by the national greenhouse gas inventories programme. In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application, vol 4, chap 11. IGES, Hayama, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JMF, Coleman MD, Gesch R, Jaradat A, Reicosky Don Mitchell R, Wilhelm WW (2007) Biomass-bioenergy crops in the United States: a changing paradigm. Am J Plant Sci Biotechnol 1(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen NR, Goulding KWT (2001) On farm technologies and practices to improve nitrogen use efficiency. In: Follett RF, Hatfield JL (eds) Nitrogen and the environment: sources, problems and management. Elsevier Science B.V, Amsterdam, pp 335–369

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koh LP, Ghazoul J (2008) Biofuels, biodiversity, and people: understanding the conflicts and finding opportunities. Biol Conserv 141:2450–2460. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koning NBJ, Van Ittersum MK, Becx GA, Van Boekel MAJS, Brandenburg WA, Van Den Broek JA, Goudriaan J, Van Hofwegen G, Jongeneel RA, Schlere JB, Smies M (2008) Long term global availability of food: continued abundance or new scarcity? NJAS – Wageningen J Life Sci 55:229–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafond GP, Stumborg M, Lemke R, May WE, Holzapfel CB, Campbell CA (2009) Quantifying straw removal through baling and measuring the long-term impact on soil quality and wheat production. Agron J 101:529–537. doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0118x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Pimentel D (2007) Biofuels from crop residues. Soil and Tillage Res 93:237–238. doi:10.1016/j.still.2006.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis RS, Amthor JS (1999) Yield potential, plant assimilatory capacity, and metabolic efficiencies. Crop Sci 39:1584–1596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis RS, Connor DJ (1992) Crop ecology: productivity and management in agricultural systems, chap 15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 400–427

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • López-Bellido RJ, Castillo JE, López-Bellido L (2008) Comparative response of bread and durum wheat cultivars to nitrogen fertilizer in a rainfed Mediterranean environment: soil nitrate and N uptake and efficiency. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 80:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lövenstein HM, Rabbinge R, van Keulen H (1992) World food production. Textbook 2: biophysical factors in agricultural production. Open University, Herleen

    Google Scholar 

  • MacAdam JW, Nelson CJ (2003) Physiology of forage plants. In: Barnes RF, Jerry Nelson C, Collins M, Moore KJ (eds) Forages, 6th edn. Iowa State Press, Blackwell Publishing Company, pp 73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeish RS (1992) The origins of agriculture and settled life. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannion AM (1997) Agriculture and environmental change. Temporal and spatial dimensions. Wiley, Chichester, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosier AR (2001) Exchange of gaseous nitrogen compounds between terrestrial systems and the atmosphere. In: Follett RF, Hatfield JL (eds) Nitrogen and the environment: sources problems and management. Elsevier Science B.V, Amsterdam, pp 291–309

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mosier A, Kroeze C, Nevison C, Oenema O, Seitzinger S, van Cleemput O (1998) Closing the global N2O budget: nitrous oxide emissions through the agricultural nitrogen cycle. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 52:225–248. doi:10.1023/A:1009740530221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nonhebel S. (1997) Harvesting the sun’s energy using agro-ecosystems. Wageningen: DLO research institute for agrobiology and soil fertility. Quantitative approaches in systems analysis no.13

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonhebel S (2005) Renewable energy and food supply: will there be enough land? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 9:191–201. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2004.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz R, Sayre KD, Govaerts B, Gupta R, Subbarao GV, Ban T, Hodson D, Dixon JM, Ortiz-Monasterio JI, Reynolds M (2008) Climate change: Can wheat beat the heat? Agri Ecosyst Environ 126:46–58. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce F (2006) Fuels gold. Are biofuels really the greenhouse-busting answer to our energy woes? NewScientist 2570:36–41. www.newscientist.com

  • Pierce FJ, Rice CW (1988) Crop rotations and its impact on efficiency of water and nitrogen use. In: Hargrove (ed) Cropping strategies for efficient use of water and nitrogen. ASA Special Publ. 51. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 21–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D (1992) Energy inputs in production agriculture. In: Fluck RC (ed) Energy in farm production, vol 6. In: Stout BA (ed) Energy in world agriculture. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, NL, pp 13–29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Porter JR, Chirinda N, Felby C, Olesen JE (2008) Biofuels: putting current practice in perspective. Science 320:1421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick WJJ, Hallet JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL, Mielenz JR, Murphy R, Templer R (2006) The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311:484–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Randal GW, Goss MJ (2001) Nitrate losses to surface water through subsurface, tile drainage. In: Follett RF, Hatfiled JL (eds) Nitrogen in the environment: sources, problems, and management. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 95–122

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raun WR, Johnson GV (1999) Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agron J 91:357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Righelato R, Spracklen DV (2007) Carbon mitigation by biofuels or by saving and restoring forests? Science 317:902. doi:10.1126/science.1141361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson GP, Dale VH, Doering OC, Hamburg SP, Melillo JM, Wander MM, Parton WJ, Adler PR, Barney JN, Cruse RM, Duke CS, Fearnside PM, Follett RF, Gibbs HK, Goldemberg J, Mladenoff DJ, Ojima D, Palmer MW, Sharpley A, Wallace L, Weathers KC, Wiens JA, Wilhelm WW (2008) Sustainable biofuels redux. Science 322:49–50. doi:10.1126/science.1161525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe RL, Street NR, Taylor G (2009) Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:271–290. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle GJA, Powell CE, Gordon AJ (1979) The respiratory costs of nitrogen fixation in soybean, cowpea and white clover.II. Comparisons of the costs of nitrogen fixation and the utilization of combined nitrogen. J Exp Bot 30(114):145–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu TH (2008) Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–1240. doi:10.1126/science.1151861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR, Cassman KG (1999) Green revolution still too green. Nature 398:556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (1994) Energy in world history. Westview Press, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (2001) Enriching the earth. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (2002) Nitrogen and food production: proteins for human diets. Ambio 31:126–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiertz JHJ (2009) Nitrogen, sustainable agriculture and food security. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. doi:10.1051/agro/2008064

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiertz JHJ, Ewert F (2009) Crop production and resource use to meet the growing demand for food, feed and fuel: opportunities and constraints. NJAS Wageningen J Life Sci 56–64:281–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoeglehner G, Narodoslawsky M (2009) How sustainable are biofuels? Answer and further questions arising from an ecological footprint perspective. Bioresource Technol 100:3825–3830. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C (2006) Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 314:1598–1600. doi:10.1126/science.1133306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA, Hill J, Larson E, Lynd L, Pacala S, Reilly J, Searchinger T, Somerville C, Williams R (2009) Beneficial biofuels – the food, energy, and environment Trilemma. Science 325:270–271. doi:10.1126/science.117790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees W (1993) How big is our ecological footprint – a handbook for estimating a community’s carrying capacity. Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler J (2007) The impact of biofuels on the right to food. UN Report of the special Rapporteur on the right to food. http://www.righttofood.org/A/62/289

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. C.R.A. – CIN, Centro di ricerca per le colture industriali, Bologna, Italy

    Enrico Ceotto & Mario Di Candilo

Authors
  1. Enrico Ceotto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mario Di Candilo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Ceotto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. INRA-CMSE-PME, rue Sully 17, Dijon, 21000, France

    Eric Lichtfouse

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ceotto, E., Di Candilo, M. (2010). Sustainable Bioenergy Production, Land and Nitrogen Use. In: Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Biodiversity, Biofuels, Agroforestry and Conservation Agriculture. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9513-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation