Advertisement

Household and Living Arrangement Projections for the 50 States, Washington DC, and Relatively Large Counties in the U.S.

  • Yi Zeng
  • Kenneth C. Land
  • Danan Gu
  • Zhenglian Wang
Chapter
Part of the The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis book series (PSDE, volume 36)

Abstract

In this chapter presents projections of households and living arrangements for the five decades from 2000 to 2050 with medium, small, and large family scenarios, for each of the 50 states, DC, six counties of Southern California, and the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area. Among many interesting numerical outcomes of household and living arrangements projections with medium, low, and high bounds, the aging of American households over the next few decades across all states/areas is particularly striking.

Keywords

Census Bureau Population Projection Demographic Rate Average Household Size Union Dissolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Cherlin, A. J. (1992). Marriage, divorce, remarriage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ediev, D. (2007). On projecting the distribution of private households by size. Vienna Institute of Demography Working paper, 4/2007.Google Scholar
  3. Hughes, M. E., & Waite, L. J. (2002). Health and household context: Living arrangements and health in late middle age. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Spain, D. (1997). Societal trends: The aging baby boom and women’s increased independence. Report prepared for the US Department of Transportation, DTFH 61-97-P-00314.Google Scholar
  5. U.N. (United Nations). (2013). World population prospects: The 2012 revision. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  6. Wang, Z. (2009a). Households and living arrangements forecasting and the associated database development for Southern California six counties and the whole Region, 2000–2040 (In response to RFP No. 09-043-IN of SCAG: Household Projection Model Development: Simulation Approach) (Technical report No. 09–02 of Households and Consumption Forecasting Inc.).Google Scholar
  7. Wang, Z. (2009b). Household projection and living arrangements projections for Minneapolis-St Paul region, 2000–2050 (Technical report No. 09–03 of Households and Consumption Forecasting Inc.).Google Scholar
  8. Wang, Z. (2011a). The 2011 updating of households and living arrangements forecasting for Southern California six counties and the whole region, 2000–2040. (Technical report No. 11–01 of Households and Consumption Forecasting Inc.).Google Scholar
  9. Wang, Z. (2011b). The 2011 updating of household projection and living arrangements projections for Minneapolis-St Paul region, 2000–2050. (Technical report No. 11–02 of Households and Consumption Forecasting Inc.).Google Scholar
  10. Zeng, Y., Land, K. C., Wang, Z., & Gu, D. (2013a). Household and living arrangements projections at the sub-national level: An extended cohort-component approach. Demography, 50, 827–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi Zeng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kenneth C. Land
    • 3
  • Danan Gu
    • 4
  • Zhenglian Wang
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Center for Study of Aging and Human Development Medical SchoolDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.National School of Development Center for Healthy Aging and Development StudiesPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Sociology and Center for Population Health and Aging Population Research InstituteDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  4. 4.Population DivisionUnited NationsNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.Center for Population Health and Aging Population Research InstituteDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  6. 6.Household and Consumption Forecasting, Inc.Chapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations