Media representational practices are vitally important to conceptions of challenges and possibilities for action to address the issue of anthropogenic climate change. They shape processes between science, policy and the public and thereby influence issues of governance and practices in our everyday lives and livelihoods in the twenty-first century. Many complex factors contribute to media representation practices: external (such as political economic challenges associated with corporate media consolidation) as well as internal influences (such as contributions from the deployment of journalistic norms). In this chapter, I touch on salient and swirling factors that contribute to how issues, events and information have often become climate ‘news’n about anthropogenic climate change. To the extent that these pressures have led to problematic representational practices, media coverage of climate change has contributed to misperceptions, misleading debates, and divergent understandings. Such practices are therefore detrimental to efforts that seek to enlarge rather than constrict the spectrum of possibility for appropriate responses to various environmental challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abarbanel, A. and T. McClusky (1950). Is the world getting warmer? Saturday Evening Post 22, 23, 57: 60–63.
AC Nielsen (2007). Global Omnibus Survey. Oxford, UK, AC Nielsen.
Bagdikian, B. (2004). The Media Monopoly. Boston, Beacon Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London, Sage.
Bennett, W. L. (2002). News: The Politics of Illusion. New York, Longman.
Bord, R. J., R. E. O'Connor, and A. Fisher (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Understanding of Science 9: 205–218.
Boykoff, M. T. (2007a). Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003–2006. Area 39(4): 470–481.
Boykoff, M. T. (2007b). From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transactions of the Institute for British Geography 32(4): 477–489.
Boykoff, M. T. (2008). The real swindle, Nature Reports Climate Change 2(2): 31–32.
Boykoff, M. T. and J. M. Boykoff (2004). Bias as balance: Global warming and the U.S. Prestige Press. Global Environmental Change 14(2): 125–136.
Boykoff, M. T. and J. M. Boykoff (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case study of U.S. mass-media coverage. Geoforum 38(6): 1190–1204.
Boykoff, M. T. and S. R. Rajan (2007). Signals and noise: Mass-media coverage of climate change in the USA and the UK. European Molecular Biology Organization Reports 8(3): 1–5.
Carvalho, A. and J. Burgess (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis 25(6): 1457–1469.
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. London, ITDG Publishing
Collins, H. M. and R. Evans (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science 32(2): 235–296.
Corbett, J. B. and J. L. Durfee (2004). Testing public (un) certainty of science: Media representations of global warming. Science Communication 26(2): 129.
Cowen, R. (1957). Are Men Changing the Earth's Weather? Christian Science Monitor. Boston, Massachusetts, USA 13.
Demeritt, D. (2001). The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91(2): 307–337.
Doyle, G. (2002). Media Ownership: The Economics and Politics of Convergence and Concentration in the UK and European Media. London, Sage Publications.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Graber, D. (2000). Media Power in Politics. Washington D.C., CQ Press.
Gupta, J. (2001). Our Simmering Planet: What to Do About Global Warming? New York, NY, Zed Books.
IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policymakers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Kaempffert, W. (1956). Science in review: Warmer climate on Earth may be due to more carbon dioxide in the air. New York Times. New York: 191.
Krosnick, J. A., A. L. Holbrook, L. Lowe, and P. S. Visser (2006). The origins and consequences of democratic citizens' policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Climatic Change 77(1): 7–43.
Leggett, J. K. (2001). The carbon war: Global warming and the end of the oil era. New York, Routledge.
Lorenzoni, I. and N. F. Pidgeon (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change 77(1): 73–95.
McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Urbana and Chicago, University of Illinois Press.
Miller, B. (1997). Political action and the geography of defense investment: Geographical scale and the representation of the Massachusetts Miracle. Political Geography 16: 171–185.
Nelkin, D. (1987). Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York, W.H. Freeman.
New York Times (1932). Next great deluge forecast by science. New York Times. New York: 4.
Nisbet, M. C. and C. Mooney (2007). Framing science. Science 316(6 April): 56.
Sarewitz, D. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science and Policy 7: 385–403.
Shabecoff, P. (1988). Global warming has begun, expert tells senate. New York Times. New York: A1.
Smith, J., Ed. (2000). The Daily Globe: Environmental Change, the Public and the Media. London, Earthscan Publications Ltd.
Starr, P. (2004). The Creation of the Media: Political Origins of Modern Communications. New York, NY, Basic Books.
Ungar, S. (2000). Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: Climate change versus the ozone hole. Public Understanding of Science 9: 297–312.
Ungar, S. (1992). The rise and (relative) decline of global warming as a social problem. The Sociological Quarterly 33(4): 483–501.
Weingart, P., A. Engels, et al. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science 9: 261–283.
Wilson, K. M. (1995). Mass media as sources of global warming knowledge. Mass Communications Review 22(1&2): 75–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this paper
Cite this paper
Boykoff, M.T. (2009). Media representational practices in the Anthropocene Era. In: Baveye, P.C., Laba, M., Mysiak, J. (eds) Uncertainties in Environmental Modelling and Consequences for Policy Making. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2636-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2636-1_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2635-4
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2636-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)