Skip to main content

Tricks and Traps of NIV

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Non Invasive Artificial Ventilation

Abstract

The subtitle of this chapter could be “How details can influence the success of NIV,” because sometimes minor changes or precautions can determine whether the attempted ventilation is successful or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Reading

  • Borel JC, Sabil A, Janssens JP et al (2009) Intentional leaks in industrial masks have a significant impact on efficacy of bilevel noninvasive ventilation: a bench test study. Chest 135(3):669–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Branconnier MP, Hess D (2005) Albuterol delivery during noninvasive ventilation. Respir Care 50(12):1649–1653

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlucci A, Schreiber A, Mattei A, Malovini A, Bellinati J, Ceriana P, Gregoretti C (2013) The configuration of bi-level ventilator circuits may affect compensation for non-intentional leaks during volume-targeted ventilation. Intensive Care Med 39(1):59–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ceriana P, Navalesi P, Rampulla C et al (2003) Use of bronchodilators during non-invasive mechanical ventilation. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 59(2):123–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chatmongkolchart S, Schettino GP, Dillman C et al (2002) In vitro evaluation of aerosol bronchodilator delivery during non-invasive positive pressure ventilation: effect of ventilator settings and nebulizer position. Crit Care Med 30(11):2515–2519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craven DE, Goularte TA, Make BJ (1984) Contaminated condensate in mechanical ventilator circuit. A risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia? Am Rev Respir Dis 129(4):625–628

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dhand R, Tobin MJ (1997) Inhaled bronchodilator therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156(1):3–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson GT, Gilmartin M (1995) CO2 rebreathing during BiPAP ventilatory asssitance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151(4):1126–1135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill NS, Carlisle C, Kramer NR (2002) Effect of a nonrebreathing exhalation valve on long-term nasal ventilation using a bilevel device. Chest 122(1):84–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaber S, Chanques G, Matecki S et al (2002) Comparison of the effects of heat and moisture exchangers and heated humidifiers on ventilation and gas exchange during non-invasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med 28(11):1590–1594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lellouche F, Maggiore SM, Deye N et al (2002) Effect of the humidification device on the work of breathing during noninvasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med 28(11):1582–1589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lofaso F, Brochard L, Touchard D et al (1995) Evaluation of carbon dioxide rebreathing during pressure support ventilation with airway management system (BiPAP) devices. Chest 108(3):772–778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lofaso F, Aslanian P, Richard JC, Isabey D, Hang T, Corriger E, Harf A, Brochard L (1998) Expiratory valves used for home devices: experimental and clinical comparison. Eur Respir J 11(6):1382–1388

    Google Scholar 

  • Massie CA, Hart RW, Peralez K, Richards GN (1999) Effects of humidification on nasal symptoms and compliance in sleep apnea patients using continuous positive airway pressure. Chest 116(2):403–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nava S, Karakurt S, Rampulla C et al (2001) Salbutamol delivery during non-invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized, controlled study. Intensive Care Med 27(10):1627–1635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nava S, Cirio S, Fanfulla F (2008) Comparison of two humidification systems for long-term noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J 32(2):460–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rakotonanahary D, Pelletier-Fleury N, Gagnadoux F, Fleury B (2001) Predictive factors for the need for additional humidification during nasal continuous positive airways pressure therapy. Chest 119(2):460–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber A, Nava S, Ceriana P, Carlucci A (2012) Lack of humidification may harm the patient during continuous positive airway pressure. Br J Anaesth 108(5):884–885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thys F, Liistro G, Dozin O et al (2002) Determinants of FiO2 with oxygen supplementation during noninvasive two-level positive pressure ventilation. Eur Respir J 19(4):653–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Nava .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nava, S., Fanfulla, F. (2014). Tricks and Traps of NIV. In: Non Invasive Artificial Ventilation. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5526-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5526-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5525-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5526-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics