Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Results and Quality of Life after Surgical Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

  • Chapter
Ulcerative Colitis

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

  • 1266 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hueting WE, Buskens E, van der Tweel I et al (2005) Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9,317 patients. Dig Surg 22(1–2):69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fazio VW, Kiran RP, Remzi FH et al (2013) Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg 257(4):679–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grucela AL, Bauer JJ, Gorfine SR, Chessin DB (2011) Outcome and long-term function of restorative proctocolectomy for Crohn’s disease: comparison to patients with ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis 13(4):426–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen B, Patel S, Lian L (2010) Natural history of Crohn’s disease in patients who underwent intentional restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 31(7):745–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heikens JT, de Vries J, van Laarhoven CJ (2012) Quality of life, health-related quality of life and health status in patients having restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 14(5):536–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tekkis PP, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS et al (2010) Long-term failure and function after restorative proctocolectomy — a multi-centre study of patients from the UK National Ileal Pouch Registry. Colorectal Dis 12(5):433–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zmora O, Natanson M, Dotan I et al (2013) Long-term functional and quality-of-life outcomes after IPAA in children. Dis Colon Rectum 56(2):198–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shannon A, Eng K, Kay M et al (2016) Long-term follow up of ileal pouch anal anastomosis in a large cohort of pediatric and young adult patients with ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Surg 51(7):1181–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Seetharamaiah R, West BT, Ignash SJ et al (2009) Outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing straight vs J pouch ileoanal anastomosis: a multicenter analysis. J Pediatr Surg 44(7):1410–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Michelassi F, Lee J, Rubin M et al (2003) Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study. Ann Surg 238(3):433–441; discussion 442–445

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagar H, Rabau M (2000) The importance of early surgery in children with ulcerative colitis. Isr Med Assoc J 2(8):592–594

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Candilio G et al (2013) Complications and functional outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in the elderly. BMC Surg 13(Suppl 2):S9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohan JN, Bacchetti P, Varma MG, Finlayson E (2015) Outcomes after ileoanal pouch surgery in frail and older adults. J Surg Res 198(2):327–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramage L, Qiu S, Georgiou P et al (2016) Functional outcomes following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in older patients: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(3):481–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Delaney CP, Dadvand B, Remzi FH et al (2002) Functional outcome, quality of life, and complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in selected septuagenarians. Dis Colon Rectum 45(7):890–894; discussion 894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Candilio G et al (2014) Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is safe and effective in selected very elderly patients suffering from ulcerative colitis. Int J Surg 12(Suppl 2):S56–S59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen JL, Strong SA, Hyman NH et al; Standards Practice Task Force American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (2005) Practice parameters for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 48(11):1997–2009

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Magro F, Gionchetti P, Eliakim R et al; European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] (2017) Third European evidence-based consensus on diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 1: definitions, diagnosis, extra-intestinal manifestations, pregnancy, cancer surveillance, surgery, and ileo-anal pouch disorders. J Crohns Colitis 11(6):649–670

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Karlbom U, Lindfors A, Påhlman L (2012) Long-term functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis 14(8):977–984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rickard MJFX, Young CJ, Bissett IP et al; Research Committee of the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australasia (2007) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: the Australasian experience. Colorectal Dis 9(2):139–145

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gentilini L, Coscia M, Lombardi PM et al (2016) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis 20 years later: is it still a good surgical option for patients with ulcerative colitis? Int J Colorectal Dis 31(12):1835–1843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kiran RP, El-Gazzaz G, Remzi FH et al (2011) Influence of age at ileoanal pouch creation on long-term changes in functional outcomes. Colorectal Dis 13(2):184–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McLaughlin SD, Clark SK, Bell AJ et al (2009) Incidence and short-term implications of prepouch ileitis following restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 52(5):879–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Berndtsson I, Lindholm E, Øresland T, Börjesson L (2007) Long-term outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: function and health-related quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 50(10):1545–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Braveman JM, Schoetz DJ Jr, Marcello PW et al (2004) The fate of the ileal pouch in patients developing Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 47(10):1613–1619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Heuschen UA, Allemeyer EH, Hinz U et al (2002) Outcome after septic complications in J pouch procedures. Br J Surg 89(2):194–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferrante M, Declerck S, De Hertogh G et al (2008) Outcome after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 14(1):20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tulchinsky H, Hawley PR, Nicholls J (2003) Long-term failure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 238(2):229–234

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hahnloser D, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG et al (2007) Results at up to 20 years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 94(3):333–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bengtsson J, Börjesson L, Lundstam U, Øresland T (2007) Long-term function and manovolumetric characteristics after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 94(3):327–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chessin DB, Gorfine SR, Bub DS et al (2008) Septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy do not impair functional outcome: long-term follow-up from a specialty center. Dis Colon Rectum 51(9):1312–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hallberg H, Ståhlberg D, Akerlund JE (2005) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): functional outcome after postoperative pelvic sepsis. A prospective study of 100 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 20(6):529–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Farouk R, Dozois RR, Pemberton JH, Larson D (1998) Incidence and subsequent impact of pelvic abscess after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 41(10):1239–1243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Breen EM, Schoetz DJ Jr, Marcello PW et al (1998) Functional results after perineal complications of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 41(6):691–695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kiely JM, Fazio VW, Remzi FH et al (2012) Pelvic sepsis after IPAA adversely affects function of the pouch and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 55(4):387–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. McCombie A, Lee Y, Vanamala R et al (2016) Early postoperative complications have long-term impact on quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(27):e3966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Forbes SS, O’Connor BI, Victor JC et al (2009) Sepsis is a major predictor of failure after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 52(12):1975–1981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Scott NA, Dozois RR, Beart RW et al (1988) Postoperative intra-abdominal and pelvic sepsis complicating ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Int J Colorect Dis 3(3):149–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Utsunomiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M et al (1980) Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 23(7):459–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ (1978) Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J 2(6130):85–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Nicholls RJ, Pezim ME (1985) Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg 72(6):470–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hallgren T, Fasth S, Nordgren S et al (1989) Manovolumetric characteristics and functional results in three different pelvic pouch designs. Int J Colorectal Dis 4(3):156–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lovegrove RE, Heriot AG, Constantinides V et al (2007) Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes of J, W and S ileal reservoirs for restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis 9(4):310–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. McHugh SM, Diamant NE, McLeod R, Cohen Z (1987) S-pouches vs. J-pouches. A comparison of functional outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 30(9):671–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tuckson WB, Fazio VW (1991) Functional comparison between double and triple ileal loop pouches. Dis Colon Rectum 34(1):17–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wu XR, Kirat HT, Kalady MF, Church JM (2015) Restorative proctocolectomy with a handsewn IPAA: S-pouch or J-pouch? Dis Colon Rectum 58(2):205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Johnston D, Williamson ME, Lewis WG et al (1996) Prospective controlled trial of duplicated (J) versus quadruplicated (W) pelvic ileal reservoirs in restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Gut 39(2):242–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Keighley MR, Yoshioka K, Kmiot W (1988) Prospective randomized trial to compare the stapled double lumen pouch and the sutured quadruple pouch for restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 75(10):1008–1011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Selvaggi F, Giuliani A, Gallo C et al (2000) Randomized, controlled trial to compare the J-pouch and W-pouch configurations for ulcerative colitis in the maturation period. Dis Colon Rectum 43(5):615–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lumley J, Stevenson A, Stitz R (2002) Prospective randomized study of J vs. W pouches in ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 45:A5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. McCormick PH, Guest GD, Clark AJ et al (2012) The ideal ileal-pouch design: a long-term randomized control trial of J- vs W-pouch construction. Dis Colon Rectum 55(12):1251–1257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sunde ML, Øresland T, Faerden AE (2017) Restorative proctocolectomy with two different pouch designs: few complications with good function. Colorectal Dis 19(4):363–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Øresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S et al (1990) A prospective randomized comparison of two different pelvic pouch designs. Scand J Gastroenterol 25(10):986–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Block M, Börjesson L, Lindholm E, Øresland T et al (2009) Pouch design and long-term functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 96(5):527–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Schluender SJ, Mei L, Yang H, Fleshner PR (2006) Can a meta-analysis answer the question: is mucosectomy and handsewn or double-stapled anastomosis better in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis? Am Surg 72(10):912–916

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA , Heriot AG et al (2006) A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann Surg 244(1):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kirat HT, Remzi FH, Kiran RP, Fazio VW (2009) Comparison of outcomes after hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 3,109 patients. Surgery 146(4):723–729; discussion 729–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Panis Y, Poupard B, Nemeth J et al (1996) Ileal pouch/anal anastomosis for Crohn’s disease. Lancet 347(9005):854–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Melton GB, Fazio VW, Kiran RP et al (2008) Long-term outcomes with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and Crohn’s disease: pouch retention and implications of delayed diagnosis. Ann Surg 248(4):608–616

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Davies RJ, O’Connor BI, Victor C et al (2008) A prospective evaluation of sexual function and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 51(7):1032–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Berndtsson I, Øresland T, Hultén L (2004) Sexuality in patients with ulcerative colitis before and after restorative proctocolectomy: a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol 39(4):374–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Farouk R, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG et al (2000) Functional outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 231(6):919–926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Hueting WE, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2004) Sexual function and continence after ileo pouch anal anastomosis: a comparison between a meta-analysis and a questionnaire survey. Int J Colorectal Dis 19(3):215–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Larson DW, Davies MM, Dozois EJ et al (2008) Sexual function, body image, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 51(4):392–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Sunde ML, Øresland T, Færden AE (2016) Correlation between pouch function and sexual function in patients with IPAA. Scand J Gastroenterol 51(3):295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. General Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy

    Lorenzo Gentilini

Authors
  1. Gilberto Poggioli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lorenzo Gentilini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maurizio Coscia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Federica Ugolini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Gentilini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Gilberto Poggioli

  2. General Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy

    Gilberto Poggioli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poggioli, G., Gentilini, L., Coscia, M., Ugolini, F. (2019). Results and Quality of Life after Surgical Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. In: Poggioli, G. (eds) Ulcerative Colitis. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-3977-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-3977-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-3976-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-3977-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation