Skip to main content
Log in

Functional comparison between double and triple ileal loop pouches

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Ileal pouch function in 35 patients operated upon by the same surgeon were compared. Seventeen of the patients had a double loop (J) ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and 18 a triple loop (S) pouch. The patients were examined a mean of 27.9 months and 5.1 months, respectively, after ileostomy closure. Ten of the S-pouch patients were evaluated more than 6 months (S>6 months), mean 9.1 after ileostomy closure. There were no differences in the mean maximum resting pressures or maximum squeeze pressures between the groups. The incidence of daytime and nocturnal leakage was lower in the S-pouch group, 22 and 29 percent, than in the J group 29, and 53 percent. Though the mean maximum tolerated volume (MTV) of the S-pouch group was greater than the J group, the difference was not statistically significant. The difference in the mean compliance between the J- and S-pouch groups and the J and S>6 months group was statistically significant (P<0.01) and (P<0.008). All the patients could evacuate spontaneously. The difference in the 24-hour frequency of defecation between the S>6 months and J group was significant (P<0.05), but not between the S and J groups. The median frequency of nocturnal defecation between the S>6 months and J pouch groups was significant (P<0.005), but not between the S and J groups. The triple loop S-pouches were more compliant than the J-pouches and had a better functional result as shown by a lower incidence of nocturnal leakage, and a lower frequency of defecation during the day and night.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fazio VW. Inflammatory bowel disease: surgical aspects. In: Farmer RG, Achkar E, Fleshier B, eds. Clinical gastroenterology. New York: Raven Press, 1983:361–73.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McHugh SM, Diamant NE, McLeod R, Cohen Z. S pouchesvs. J pouches: a comparison of functional outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:671–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O'Connell PR, Pemberton JH, Kelly KA. Motor function of the ileal J pouch and its relation to clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg 1987;11:735–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nicholls RJ. Restorative proctocolectomy with various types of reservoir. World J Surg 1987;11:751–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholls RJ, Pezim ME. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg 1985;72:470–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor BM, Cranley B, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Beart RW, Dozois RR. A clinico-physiological comparison of ileal pouch-anal and straight ileoanal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1983;198:462–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pescatori M, Manhire A, Bartram CI. Evacuation pouchography in the evaluation of ileoanal reservoir function. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:365–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindquist K, Liljeqvist L, Sellberg B. The topography of ileoanal reservoirs in relation to evacuation patterns and clinical functions. Acta Chir Scand 1984;150:573–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vasilevsky CA, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. The S ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg 1987;11:742–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rabau MY, Percy JP, Parks AG. Ileal pelvic reservoir: a correlation between motor patterns and clinical behavior. Br J Surg 1982;69:391–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nasmyth DG, Johnston D, Godwin PG, Dixon MF, Smith A, Williams NS. Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1986;73:469–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stryker SJ, Phillips SF, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Beart RW. Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1986;203:55–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O'Connell PR, Pemberton JH, Brown ML, Kelly KA. Determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Surg 1987;153:157–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Toronto, Canada, June 11 to 16, 1989.

About this article

Cite this article

Tuckson, W.B., Fazio, V.W. Functional comparison between double and triple ileal loop pouches. Dis Colon Rectum 34, 17–21 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050201

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050201

Key words

Navigation