Petrogenetic Conditions
The chemical compositions of primary basaltic magmas beneath the CIR were back-calculated from basalt compositions using the olivine maximum fractionation model (e.g., Sato 2004, and references therein). This model calculates the chemical composition of olivine in equilibrium with the basalt using Fe-Mg and Ni-Mg partitioning between olivine and silicate melts. The calculated olivine composition was then added to the original whole-rock composition at a 1:99 weight ratio, with this calculation repeated until the equilibrium olivine had a NiO composition equivalent to that of mantle olivine. The olivine composition that was calculated in each step was fractionated from an original primary magma to yield the basalt compositions analyzed during this study. The whole-rock composition generated by the same number of calculation steps as the olivine composition in equilibrium with the mantle represents the melt composition that was also equilibrated with mantle olivine (i.e., primary magma); the calculations and assumptions involved in this analysis are as presented by Sato (2004).
This calculation assumes that only olivine was fractionated from magma prior to eruption. If plagioclase was fractionated from these magmas, then this calculation would overestimate the MgO concentration of the primary magma, whereas clinopyroxene fractionation would lead to an underestimation of the MgO concentration of the primary magma. This indicates that the starting composition chosen for this modeling should have only crystallized olivine. Therefore, the MgO concentration of the estimated primary magma would be overestimated for basalts containing olivine and plagioclase phenocrysts, The results of these calculations are listed in Table 13.2.
Table 13.2 Calculated compositions of primary melts and equilibrated olivine
The compositions of basalts from CIR-S1 (including off-ridge samples), CIR-S2, and CIR-S4 are equilibrated with mantle olivine without any significant fractionation. In comparison, the volcanic rocks from CIR-S3 and the Knorr Seamount equilibrated with mantle olivine after several steps of fractionation, suggesting that the MORB compositions at CIR-S1, CIR-S2, and CIR-S4 may represent the compositions of primary melts beneath these segments.
Estimated primary magma compositions are plotted in Fig. 13.5 on an olivine (Ol)-plagioclase (Pl)-quartz (Qz: silica) diagram (Walker et al. 1979) overlain with the isobaric liquid compositional trend of lherzolite determined by Hirose and Kushiro (Hirose and Kushiro 1993). The locations of these primary magmas in the figure represent the pressure (i.e., depth) where melt was fully equilibrated with mantle material or where melt was produced, indicating that off-ridge basalts from CIR-S1 are fully equilibrated with the mantle at slightly greater depths (>10 kbar, equivalent to a depth of 30 km), whereas basalts from other segments are fully equilibrated with the mantle at pressures of <10 kbar. As discussed above, due to possibility of the overestimation of MgO concentration, the estimated pressure might exhibit upper limit value.
Mantle Source Compositions
Differences in the normalized REE and trace element patterns and trace element ratios of basalts can be explained by either differences in the composition of the source mantle for the basalts or by differences in the degree of partial melting of mantle with a similar composition in all cases. The similarities between the REE and trace element compositions of basalts from CIR-S1 to CIR-S3 indicate that these basalts were most likely all derived from a N-MORB-type mantle source, and any variations in Na8, (La/Sm)N, and Zr/Y values for these basalts probably relate to differences in the degree of partial melting. In comparison, basalts from the CIR-S4 segment are more depleted than those from CIR-S1 to -S3. One explanation of this finding is that these depletions are related to higher degrees of partial melting beneath the CIR-S4. Because basalts from the CIR-S4 have similar Na8, (La/Sm)N, and Zr/Y values to basalts from the CIR-S2 segment, the explanation that these basalts formed at similar degrees of partial melting is dismissed. Rather, the more depleted compositions present in CIR-S4 indicate that these basalts were sourced from a mantle region that was slightly more depleted than the mantle beneath areas CIR-S1 to CIR-S3.
Basalts from the off-ridge section of CIR-S1 have more depleted compositions than basalts from the present-day spreading axis. Basalts from near the present-day axis have similar compositions to those at the present-day spreading axis, whereas basalts distal from the spreading axis are more depleted. This suggests that the source mantle beneath the CIR-S1 area was more depleted during formation of the off-ridge basalts in this area compared with the source mantle for more recent (and present-day) basalts.
Although basalts from the Knorr Seamount are significantly enriched when compared with those from the present-day spreading axis, the REE compositions of these seamount basalts provide no lines of evidence of a hotspot influence. Interaction between the Reunion hotspot and CIR segments to the south of 20°S has been proposed by Murton et al. (2005). However, plotting these data on the geochemical discrimination between plume-related and N-MORB/continental magmas of Fitton et al. (1997) indicates that basalts from the southern CIR, including basalts to the south of 20°S as reported by Murton et al. (2005), do not show any plume or hotspot influence (Fig. 13.6). Kumagai et al. (2007) reported He isotope ratios (3He/4He) of basaltic glasses sampled during the YK05-16 cruise by the Shinkai 6500, and these basalts have RA values well within global MORB variations (7.9 RA vs. 8 ± 1 RA for global MORB). In comparison, the majority of basalts around the RTJ, including a segment within the southeast Indian Ridge, have slightly higher He isotope ratios (~8.4 RA; Kumagai and Kaneoka 2005; Nishio et al. 1998). This indicates that basalts from the Knorr Seamount are not hotspot-related. Furthermore, Hirahara et al. (2007) reported Sr–Nd isotope compositions of basalts from the Knorr Seamount that were sampled during the YK05-16 cruise by the Shinkai 6500; these data indicated that the basalts of the Knorr Seamount were probably sourced from a region containing a mix of depleted MORB mantle (DMM) and recycled ancient oceanic crustal material.
Distribution of Depleted and Enriched Mantle
Calculated pressures (i.e., depth) at which melts were fully equilibrated with mantle material or where melts were produced do not change significantly between basalts from segments of the southern CIR (from CIR-S1 to CIR-S4, including the off-ridge area of CIR-S1 and the Knorr Seamount). However, these basalts have distinct trace element compositions, suggesting that the mantle beneath the southern CIR is laterally heterogeneous, with compositional variations present within mantle material at a given depth.
Price et al. (1986) used isotope systematics to determine that depleted components within Indian Ocean MORB are not isotopically homogeneous due to the effects of contamination with different amounts of an ancient (Dupal) component. Recent research into trace element variations in MORB samples from near the RTJ suggests that these variations can be explained by variable contamination of a depleted MORB source mantle by small amounts (up to ~1 %) of lower continental crust-derived melt (Nakamura et al. 2006).
This two-component model, consisting of a large volume of depleted source mantle and a small volume of ancient enriched component, indicates that MORB compositional variations along the southern CIR (from CIR-S1 to CIR-S4) may relate to changes in the degree of mixing between these components. The source mantle beneath the segments between CIR-S1 and CIR-S3 may be compositionally homogeneous, with this mantle representing the proposed mix of voluminous depleted and minor enriched components. In comparison, the off-ridge depleted MORB within the CIR-S1 segment may have been sourced from only the depleted portion of this heterogeneous mantle, whereas basalts from the Knorr Seamount may have been sourced from a region of the mantle that contained an increased amount of the enriched component.
Implications for Tectonic Development of the Southern CIR
An oceanic core complex (OCC), known as 25°S OCC, is exposed along a detachment fault to the west of the northern CIR-S1 (Morishita et al. 2009), with another OCC containing troctolites, olivine gabbros, and dunites reported to the east of the KHF (Kumagai et al. 2008). These OCCs are considered to represent massifs associated with non-transform offsets (NTOs). Observations during recent submersible dives, sample recovery by dredging, and geophysical investigations (Okino et al. Chap. 11) have identified another NTO massif that contains mantle peridotites. The location of this NTO along the segment boundary between CIR-S1 and CIR-S2 suggests that this area has undergone a significant temporal and spatial variation in melt supply, with small amounts of melt supplied during the formation of these NTO massifs.
The formation of the 25°S OCC was initiated at the southern inside corner of CIR-S2 during the Matuyama reversal polarity chron (Sato et al. 2009). A geophysical reconstruction indicates that the majority of the NTO massif, including the 25°S OCC, formed after either the Brunhes-Matuyama boundary or the Jaramillo event (Okino et al. Chap. 11). Therefore, the mantle between CIR-S1 and CIR-S2 may have changed to a more depleted composition, producing the off-ridge basalts in the CIR-S1 area, with present-day mantle beneath the spreading axis being more enriched, producing N-MORB-type basalts at that time.
It is known that the volcanism occur at off-ridge area, and recently large lava fields erupted two to several hundred kilometers off the fast-spreading East Pacific Rise are recognized (Geshi et al. 2007; Umino et al. 2008). The formation age of basaltic rocks from the off-ridge area of the CIR-S1 segment is not clear because no analyses of age determination were performed. The magnetization distribution along the CIR-S1 segment is mostly symmetry (Okino et al. Chap. 11). Therefore, it is plausible that basaltic rocks from the off-ridge area of the CIR-S1 segment might be formed at the ancient spreading center unlike the East Pacific Rise.