Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Zur Funktion und Bedeutung politischer Institutionen in Systemwechselprozessen. Eine vergleichende Betrachtung

  • Chapter
Systemwechsel 2

Zusammenfassung

Die “dritte Welle” der Demokratisierungen, die in den Systemwechseln in den mittel- und osteuropäischen Staaten seit 1989 ihren Höhepunkt fand, hat die Demokratietheorie vor neue Herausforderungen gestellt. Ihr einflußreicher modernisierungstheoretischer Strang geht von der These aus, daß die Bedingung einer erfolgreichen Demokratisierung im sozioökonomischen Entwicklungsstand der entsprechenden Länder liege. Der sozioökonomische Entwicklungsstand wurde hierbei mit einem breiten Spektrum von Variablen vergleichend untersucht, das die politische Kultur, die Klassenstruktur, das Pro-Kopf-Einkommen, ökonomische Produktivität, den Grad an “civic culture” und den Entwicklungsstand der staatlichen Bürokratie umfaßte.

Wolfgang Merkel verdanke ich wichtige Hinweise zu einer ersten Fassung des Manuskripts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Ackerman, Bruce, 1992: Von der Revolution zur Verfassung, Transit 4: 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arato, Andrew, 1994: Elections, Coalitions, and Constitutionalism in Hungary, East European Constitutional Review (3) 34: 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyme, Klaus von, 1988: The Genesis of Constitutional Review in Parliamentary Systems, in: Landfried, Christine (Eds.): Constitutional Review and Legislation. An International Comparison, Baden-Baden: 21–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyme, Klaus von, 1994: Systemwechsel in Osteuropa, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brünneck, Alexander von, 1988: Constitutional Review and Legislation in Western Democracies, in: Landfried, Christine (Eds.): Constitutional Review and Legislation. An International Review, Baden-Baden: 219–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, Valerie, 1991: Democracy, Stalinism, and the management of Uncertainty, in: Szoboszlai, György (Eds.): Democracy and Political Transformation. Theories and East-European Realities, Yearbook of the Hungarian Political Science Association, Budapest: 138–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, Valerie, Csanadi, Maria, 1992: A Systematic Analysis of a Non-System: Post-Commmunism in Eastern Europe, in: Szoboszlai, György (Eds.): Flying Blind. Emerging Democracies in Eastern-Europe, Yearbook of the Hungarian Political Science Association, Budapest: 204–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelletti, Mauro, 1989: The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, David, 1991: Can Civil Wars be Avoided? Electoral and Constitutional Models for Ethnically Divided Countries, Chippenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Palma, Giuseppe, 1991: To Craft Democracies. An Essay on Democratic Transitions, Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry, 1992: Economic Development and Democracy Reconsidered, in: Marks, Garry, Diamond, Larry (Eds.): Reexamining Democracy. Essays in Honor of Seymour Martin Lipset, Newbury Park, London, New Dehli: 93–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, Maurice, 1980: A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government, European Journal of Political Research (8) 2: 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, Daniel J., 1980: The Political Theory of Covenant: Biblical Origins and Modern Developments, Publius (19) 4: 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, Daniel J., 1985: Constitution-Making: The Pre-eminently Political Act, in: Banting, Keith, G., Simeon Richard (Eds.): Redesigning the State. The Politics of Constitutional Change, Toronto: 232–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon, 1992: Arguing and Bargaining in two Constituent Assemblies, unveröffentl. Ms., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon, 1993: Constitution-Making in Eastern Europe: Rebuilding the Boat in the Open Sea, Public Administration (71) 1, 2: 167–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon, 1994: Transition, Constitution-Making, and Separation in Czechoslovakia, unveröffentl. Ms., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon, Slagstad, Rune (Eds.), 1988: Constitutionalism and Democracy, Cambridge. Evers, Adalbert, Nowotny, Helga, 1987: Über den Umgang mit Unsicherheit. Die Entdeckung der Gestaltbarkeit von Gesellschaft, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fix-Zamudio, Felix, 1989: Die Verfassungskontrolle in Lateinamerika, in: Horn, Hans Rudolf, Weber, Albrecht (Eds.): Richterliche Verfassungskontrolle in Lateinamerika, Spanien und Portugal, Baden-Baden: 129–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, Carl J. (1974): Limited Government: A Comparison, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götting, Ulrike, 1994: Welfare State Development in Post-Communist Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, and Hungary, Discussion-Paper 6, Zentrum für Sozialpolitik, Bremen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Douglas et. al. (Eds.), 1993: Constitutionalism and Democracy. Transitions in the Contemporary World, New York, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häberle, Peter, 1992: Theorielemente eines allgemeinen juristischen Rezeptionsmodells, Juristen Zeitung 74: 1033–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Stephen, 1988: Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy, in: Elster, Jon, Slagstad, Rune (Eds.): 195–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Stephen, 1993: Back to the Drawing Board, East European Constitutional Review (2) 1: 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1991: The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P., 1968: Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juberias, Carlos Flores, 1994: Electoral Systems in Eastern Europe: How are they Changing? Why are they Changing?, Paper presented at the XVI. International Political Science Association World Congress, Berlin, August 21–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltefleiter, Werner, 1971: Die Funktionen des Staatsoberhauptes in der parlamentarischen Demokratie, Köln, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingsberg, Ethan, 1992: Judical Review and Hungary’s Transition from Communism to Democracy: The Constitutional Court, the Continuity of Law, and the Redefinition of Property Rights, Brigham Young University Law Review (42) 1: 41–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Jack, 1992: Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landfried, Christine (Eds.), 1988: Constitutional Review and Legislation. An International Comparism, Baden Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, Gerhard, 1967: Proporzdemokratie. Politisches System und politische Kultur in der Schweiz und in Österreich, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepsius, Rainer M., 1990: Interessen, Ideen und Institutionen, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend (Eds.), 1992: Parliamentary versus Presidential Government, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend, 1989: Democratic Political Systems. Types, Cases, Causes, and Consequences, Journal of Theoretical Politics (1) 1: 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend, 1992: Introduction, in: ders. (Eds.): Parliamentary versus Presidential Government, Oxford: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J., 1992: Change and Continuity in the Nature of Contemporary Democracy, in: Marks, Garry, Diamond, Larry (Eds.): Reexamining Democracy. Essays in Honor of Seymour Martin Lipset, Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: 182–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J., 1994a: Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does it Make a Difference?, in: Linz, Juan J., Valenzuela, Arturo (Eds.): The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Vol. 1: Comparative Perspectives, Baltimore: 3–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan, J., 1994b: Multinationalism, Pluralism and Democracy. Individuals and Collectivities, Paper presented at the XV World Congress of the International Political Science Association, 21.-25. August 1994, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J., Valenzuela, Arturo (Eds.), 1994: The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Vol.]: Comparative Perspectives, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymor Martin, 1960: Political Man. The Social Basis of Politics, Garden City, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, Karl, 1959: Verfassungslehre, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, Karl, 1961: Über das Verhältnis von politischen Ideologien und politischen Institutionen, in: ders.: Beiträge zur Staatssoziologie, Tübingen: 245–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott, 1992: Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination, in: Szoboszlai, György (Eds.), Flying Blind. Emerging Democracies in East-Central Europe, Budapest: 59–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott, O’Donnell, Guillermo, Valenzuela, Samuel J. (Eds.) 1992: Issues in Democratic Consolidation. The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G., Olsen, Johan P., 1989: Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Garry, Diamond, Larry (Eds.), 1992: Reexamining Democracy. Essays in Honor of Seymor Martin Lipset, Newbury Park, London, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang, 1993: Systemwechsel: Probleme der demokratischen Konsolidierung in Ostmitteleuropa, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B 18–19 (6): 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Walter F., 1993: Constitutions, Constitutionalism, and Democracy, in: Greenberg, Douglas et. al. (Eds.): Constitutionalism and Democracy. Transitions in the Contemporary World, New York, Oxford: 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nino, Carlos Santiago, 1993: Transitions to Democracy, Corporatism, and Presidentialism with Special Reference to Latin America, in: Greenberg, Douglas et. al. (Eds.): Constitutionalism and Democracy. Transitions in the Contemporary World, New York, Oxford: 46–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohlen, Dieter, 1992: Präsidentialismus versus Parlamentarismus in Lateinamerika, in: Lateinamerika Jahrbuch 1992, Frankfurt a.M.: 86–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nullmeier, Frank, Rüb, Friedbert W., 1993: Vom Sozialstaat zum Sicherungsstaat. Die Transformation der Sozialpolitik, Frankfurt a.M., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe C., 1986: Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies, Baltimore, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, Claus, 1992: Designing Institutions for East European Transitions, Paper prepared for the Institutional Design Conference, The Australian National University, Research School for Social Sciene, Dec. 7–8, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, Claus, 1994: Der Tunnel am Ende des Lichts. Erkundungen der politischen Transformation im Neuen Osten, Frankfurt a.M., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Johan, P., 1991: Political Science and Organization Theory. Parallel Agenda but Mutual Disregard, in: Czada, Roland M., Windhoff-Héritier, Adrienne (Eds.): Political Choice. Institutions, Rules, and the Limits of Rationality, Frankfurt a.M., Boulder: 87–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuß, Ulrich, K., 1993: Constitutional Aspects of the Making of Democracy in the Post-Communist Societies of East Europe, ZERP-Discussion Paper 2, 1993, Bremen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuß, Ulrich K. (Eds.), 1994: Zum Begriff der Verfassung. Die Ordnung des Politischen, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuß, Ulrich K., 1994: Der Begriff der Verfassung und ihre Beziehung zur Politik, in: ders. (Eds.): Zum Begriff der Verfassung. Die Ordnung des Politischen, Frankfurt a.M.: 7–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam, 1991: Democracy and the Market. Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabushka, Alvin, Shepsle, Kenneth A., 1972: Politics in Plural Societies. A Theory of Democratic Instability, Colombo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rub, Friedbert W., 1994: Schach dem Parlament!-Ober semi-präsidentielle Regierungssysteme in einigen post-kommunistischen Gesellschaften, Leviathan (22) 2: 260–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni, 1976: Party and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis, Cambridge u. a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni, 1992: Demokratietheorie, Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni, 1994: Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives, and Outcomes, Houndmills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl, 1932: Legalität und Legitimität, München, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe C., 1992: Interest Systems and the Consolidation of Democracy, in: Marks, Garry, Diamond, Larry (Eds.): Reexamining Democracy. Essays in Honor of Seymour Martin Lipset, Newbury Park, London, New Dehli: 156–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Hermann, 1992: The New East European Constitutional Courts, Michigan Journal of International Law (13) 4: 741–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, Matthew S., Carey John M., 1992: Presidents and Assemblies. Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisk, Timothy D., 1994a: Electoral Choice in South Africa: Implications for Intergroup Moderation, Paper prepared for the IPSA XVI World Congress, August 21–24, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skouris, Wassilios, 1988: Constitutional Disputes and Judicial Review in Greece, in: Landfried, Christine (Eds.): Constitutional Review and Legislation. An International Comparison, Baden-Baden: 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Brian C., 1985: Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepan, Alfred, 1994: When Democracy and the Nation State are Competing Logics: Reflections on Estonia, Archives Européennes de Sociologie (25) 1: 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepan, Alfred, Skach, Sindy, 1994: Presidentialism and Parliamentarism in Comparative Perspective, in: Linz, Juan J., Valenzuela, Arturo (Eds.): The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Vol. 1: Comparative Perspectives, Baltimore: 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tâborsky, Edward, 1945: Czechoslovak Democracy at Work, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, George, 1990: Nested Games. Rational Choice in Comparative Politics, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, Samuel J., 1992: Democratic Consolidation in Post-Transitional Settings: Notion, Process, and Facilitating Conditions, in: Mainwaring, Scott, O’Donnell, Guillermo, Valenzuela, Samuel J. (Eds.): Issues in Democratic Consolidation. The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, Notre Dame: 57–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawik, Paul, 1981: Bausteine “ideologischer” Wirklichkeiten, in: ders (Eds.): Die erfundene Wirklichkeit, München: 192–228.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Friedbert W. Rüb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland

    Wolfgang Merkel (Professor) & Eberhard Sandschneider (Privatdozent, vertritt gegenwärtig eine Professsur) (Professor) &  (Privatdozent, vertritt gegenwärtig eine Professsur)

  2. Universität Saarbrücken, Deutschland

    Eberhard Sandschneider (Privatdozent, vertritt gegenwärtig eine Professsur) (Privatdozent, vertritt gegenwärtig eine Professsur)

  3. Berlin, Deutschland

    Dieter Segert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rüb, F.W. (1996). Zur Funktion und Bedeutung politischer Institutionen in Systemwechselprozessen. Eine vergleichende Betrachtung. In: Merkel, W., Sandschneider, E., Segert, D. (eds) Systemwechsel 2. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11585-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11585-4_2

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-663-11586-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-11585-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation