Advertisement

Pädophilie und Hebephilie

  • Gerold SchernerEmail author
  • Till Amelung
  • Miriam Schuler
  • Dorit Grundmann
  • Klaus Michael Beier
Chapter
Part of the Psychotherapie: Manuale book series (PSMA)

Zusammenfassung

Dargestellt wird der aktuelle Wissensstand zur Häufigkeit und den klinischen Erscheinungsformen der sexuellen Ansprechbarkeit für das vorpubertäre Körperschema (i. e. Pädophilie) bzw. das frühpubertäre körperliche Entwicklungsstadium (i. e. Hebephilie), die als sexuelle Präferenzbesonderheiten im Spektrum der menschlichen Sexualität zu verstehen sind. Nach einer ausführlichen Besprechung gegenwärtiger Modelle zur Ätiologie wird zudem der Kenntnisstand über neurobiologische Aspekte und Komorbiditäten der pädophilen und hebephilen Sexualpräferenz referiert. Abschließend wird auf die kulturell unterschiedlichen gesellschaftlichen Bewertungen der Pädophilie eingegangen, was für die unterschiedlichen Prävalenzen sexuellen Missbrauchs von Kindern genauso von Bedeutung ist wie für die Möglichkeiten einer Etablierung verursacherbezogener Präventionsangebote.

Literatur

  1. Ahlers, C .J., Schaefer, G. A., Mundt, I. A., Roll, S., Englert, H., Willich, S., & Beier, K. M. (2011). How unusual are the contents of paraphilias – Prevalence of Paraphilia-Associated Sexual Arousal Patterns (PASAPs) in a community-based sample of men. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(5),1362–1370. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17436109.2009.01597.x.
  2. Alanko, K., Salo, B., Mokros, A., & Santtila, P. (2013). Evidence for heritability of adult men’s sexual interest in youth under age 16 from a population-based extended twin design. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10(4),1090–1099.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12067
  3. Alby, B., & Schmidt-Bucher, K. J. (2007). Modelllernen. In M. Borg-Laufs (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Verhaltenstherapie mit Kindern und Jugendlichen. Band II: Diagnostik und Intervention (2. Aufl.) (S. 453–486). Tübingen: dgvt.Google Scholar
  4. Banse, R. (2013). Sexueller Missbrauch von Kindern. Was sind die Ursachen? Vortrag im Symposium: 5. Internationales Symposium für Forensische Psychiatrie, Zürich. Abgerufen Januar 2018, von http://docplayer.org/45631469-Sexueller-missbrauch-vonkindern-was-sind-die-ursachen.html.
  5. Banse, R., Schmidt, A. F., & Clarbour, J. (2010). Indirect measures of sexual interest in child sex offenders: a multimethod approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3),319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beier, K .M. (1998). Differential typology and prognosis for dissexual behavior – a follow-up study of previously expert-appraised child molesters. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 111(3),133–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Beier, K. M., Bosinski, H. A. G., & Loewit, K. (2005). Sexualmedizin: Grundlagen und Praxis (2. Aufl.). München: Elsevier, Urban und Fischer.Google Scholar
  8. Beier, K. M., Schaefer, G. A., Goecker, D., Neutze, J., & Ahlers, C .J. (2007). Prevention Project Dunkelfeld – treating pedophiles in the community to improve child protection in Germany. Presentation at the IASR-Meeting 2007, Vancouver, Canada, abstracts on http://www.iasr.org.
  9. Beier, K. M., Neutze, J., Mundt, I. A., Ahlers, C .J., Goecker, D., Konrad, A., & Schaefer, G. A. (2009). Encouraging self-identified pedophiles and hebephiles to seek professional help: First results of the Berlin Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD). Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 545–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beier, K. M., Amelung, T., Grundmann, D., & Kuhle, L. F. (2015). Pädophilie und Hebephilie im Kontext sexuellen Kindesmissbrauchs. Sexuologie, 22(3-4), 127–136.Google Scholar
  11. Beier, K. M., Scherner, G., Gieseler, H., Siegel, S., Wagner, J. Kossow, S., Amelung, T., Grundmann, D., & Kuhle, L. F. (2015). Primärpräventive Therapieangebote bei Pädophilie und Hebephilie – Teil der Prävention sexuellen Kindesmissbrauchs im Dunkelfeld. Interdisziplinäre Fachzeitschrift, 18(2),140–159.Google Scholar
  12. Bem, B., Daryl J. (1996). Exotic becomes erotic: a developmental theory of sexual orientation. Psychological Review, 103(2),320–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bischof, G. P., Stith, S. M., & Wilson, S. M. (1992). A comparison of the family systems of adolescent sexual offenders and nonsexual offending delinquents. Family Relations, 41(3)318–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blanchard, R., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment 13(1),118–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.13.1.118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P., & Dickey, R. (2006). Phallometric comparison of pedophilic interest in nonadmitting sexual offenders against stepdaughters, biological daughters, other biologically related girls, and unrelated girls. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blanchard, R., Cantor, J. M., & Robichaud, L. K. (2008). Biological factors in the development of sexual deviance and aggression in males. In H. E. Barbaree & W. L. Marshall (Hrsg.), The juvenile sex offender (2. Aufl.) (S. 77–105). New York, NY US: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., & Klassen, P. E. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(3),335–350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bode, H., & Heßling, A. (2015). Jugendsexualität 2015. Die Perspektive der 14- bis 25-Jährigen. Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Repräsentativen Wiederholungsbefragung. Köln: Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung.Google Scholar
  19. Bundschuh, C. (2001). Pädosexualität: Entstehungsbedingungen und Erscheinungsformen (1. Aufl.). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cantor, J. M., Kabani, N., Christensen, B. K., Zipursky, R. B., Barbaree, H. E., Dickey, R., & Blanchard, R. (2008). Cerebral white matter deficiencies in pedophilic men. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 42(3),167–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.10.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Carson, D. K., Foster, M. J., Tripathi, N. (2013) Child sexual abuse in India: current issues and research. Psychological Studies, 58(3):318–325, DOI  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-013-0198-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cohen, L. J., & Galynker, I. (2002). Clinical features of pedophilia and implications for treatment. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 8(5),276–289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dombert, B., Schmidt, A. F., Banse, R., Briken, P., Hoyer, J., Neutze, J., & Osterheider, M. (2015). How common is men’s selfreported sexual interest in prepubescent children? The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 214–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499. 2015.1020108.
  24. Dunsieth, N. W., Nelson, E. B., Brusman-Lovins, L. A., Holcomb, J. L., Beckman, D., Welge, J. A., & McElroy, S. L. (2004). Psychiatric and legal features of 113 men convicted of sexual offenses. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 65(3),293–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dyshniku, F., Murray, M. E., Fazio, R. L., Lykins, A. D., & Cantor, J. M. (2015). Minor physical anomalies as a window into the prenatal origins of pedophilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(8),2151–2159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0564-7.
  26. Eke, A. W., Seto, M. C., & Williams, J. (2011). Examining the criminal history and future offending of child pornography offenders: an extended prospective follow-up study. Law and Human Behavior, 35(6),466–478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9252-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Engelhardt, L., Willers, B., & Pelz L. (1995). Sexual maturation in East German girls. Acta Paediatrica, 84, 1362–1365.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fernandez, Y. M., Marshall, W. L., Lightbody, S., & O’Sullivan, C. (1999). The child molester empathy measure: description and examination of its reliability and validity. Sexual Abuse, 11(1),17–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Franke, G. H. (2000). BSI: Brief symptom inventory von LR Derogati; (Kurzform der SCL-90-R). Göttingen: Beltz Test.Google Scholar
  30. Freund, K., McKnight, C. K., Langevin, R., & Cibiri, S. (1972). The female child as a surrogate object. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2(2),119–133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gerwinn, H., Pohl, A., Granert, O., van Eimeren, T., Wolff, S., Jansen, O., & Ponseti, J. (2015). The (in)consistency of changes in brain macrostructure in male paedophiles: a combined T1-weighted and diffusion tensor imaging study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 68, 246–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.07.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hames, R., & Blanchard, R. (2012). Anthropological data regarding the adaptiveness of hebephilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior 41, 745–747. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9972-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, E. M. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Häuser, W., Schmutzer, G., Brähler, E., & Glaesmer, H. (2011). Maltreament in childhood and adolescence – results from a survey of a representative sample of the German population. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 108(17),287–294. doi: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2011.0287.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Herdt, G. (1982). Rituals of manhood: male initiation in Papua New Guinea. Berkeley: University of California Press, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Jahnke, S., Philipp, K., & Hoyer. J. (2015). Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with pedophilia and their malleability among psychotherapists in training. Child Abuse and Neglect, 40, 93–102. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.07.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Jespersen, A. F., Lalumière, M. L., & Seto, M. C. (2009). Sexual abuse history among adult sex offenders and non-sex offenders: a meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33(3),179–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Joyal, C. C., Cossette, A., & Lapierre, V. (2015). What exactly is an unusual sexual fantasy? Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 328–340. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12734.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kafka, M. P., & Hennen, J. (2002). A DSM-IV Axis I comorbidity study of males (n = 120) with paraphilias and paraphiliarelated disorders. Sexual Abuse, 14(4),349–366.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Klüver, H., & Bucy, P. (1939). Preliminary analysis of functions of the temporal lobes in monkeys. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 42(6),979–1000.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurpsyc.1939.02270240017001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuhle, L., Grundmann, D., & Beier, K. M. (2015). Missbrauchstäter und -täterinnen. Sexueller Missbrauch von Kindern: Ursachen und Verursacher. In J. M. Fegert, U. Hoffmann, E. König, J. Niehues & H. Liebhardt (Hrsg.), Sexueller Missbrauch von Kindern und Jugendlichen (S. 109–129). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Laws, D. R., & Marshall, W. L. (1990). A conditioning theory of the etiology and maintenance of deviant sexual preference and behavior. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws & H. E. Barbaree (Hrsg.), Handbook of sexual assault (S. 209–230). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191–217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210366039.
  44. Marshall, W. L. (1997). The relationship between self-esteem and deviant sexual arousal in nonfamilial child molesters. Behavior Modification, 21(1),86–96.  https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455970211005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. McGuire, R. J., Carlisle, J. M., & Young, B. G. (1964). Sexual deviations as conditioned behaviour: a hypothesis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2(2–4), 185–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(64)90014-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Mohnke, S., Müller, S., Amelung, T., Krüger, T. H. C., Ponseti, J., Schiffer, B., & Walter, H. (2014). Brain alterations in paedophilia: a critical review. Progress in Neurobiology, 122, 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.07.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Neutze, J., Seto, M. C., Schaefer, G. A., Mundt, I. A., & Beier K. M. (2011). Predictors of child pornography offenses and child sexual abuse in a community sample of pedophiles and hebephiles. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23(2),212–242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210382043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Polisois-Keating, A., & Joyal, C. C. (2013). Functional neuroimaging of sexual arousal: a preliminary meta-analysis comparing pedophilic to non-pedophilic men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(7),1111–1113.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0198-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Ponseti, J., Granert, O., Jansen, O., Wolff, S., Beier, K. M., Neutze, J., & Bosinski, H. A. G. (2012). Assessment of pedophilia using hemodynamic brain response to sexual stimuli. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(2),187–194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Quayle, E., & Taylor, M. (2002). Pedophiles, pornography and the Internet: assessment issues. British Journal of Social Work, 32, 863–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Raymond, N. C., Coleman, E., Ohlerking, F., Christenson, G. A., & Miner, M. (1999). Psychiatric comorbidity in pedophilic sex offenders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 786–788.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Riegel, D. L. (2004). Effects on boy-attracted pedosexual males of viewing boy erotica [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 321–323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000029071.89455.53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Salter, D., McMillan, D., Richards, M., Talbot, T., Hodges, J., Bentovim, A., & Skuse, D. (2003). Development of sexually abusive behaviour in sexually victimised males: a longitudinal study. The Lancet, 361(9356),471–476.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12466-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schaefer, G. A., Mundt, I. A., Feelgood, S., Hupp, E., Neutze, J., Ahlers, C. J., & Beier, K. M. (2010). Potential and Dunkelfeld offenders: two neglected target groups for prevention of child sexual abuse. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 33(3),154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scherner, G., Konrad, A., & Grundmann, D. (2015). Therapie im Präventionsprojekt Dunkelfeld. Sexuologie, 22(3–4),Google Scholar
  56. Schiffer, B., Amelung, T., Pohl, A., Kaergel, C., Tenbergen, G., Gerwinn, H., & Walter, H. (2017). Gray matter anomalies in pedophiles with and without a history of child sexual offending. Translational Psychiatry, 7(5), e1129.  https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2017.96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmidt, A. F., Banse, R., & Imhoff, R. (2015). Indirect measures in forensic contexts. Behavior-Based Assessment in Psychology: Going beyond Self-Report in the Personality, Affective, Motivation, and Social Domains, 1, 173–194.Google Scholar
  58. Seligman, M. E. P. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 77, 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Seto, M. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: theory, assessment, and intervention (2. Aufl.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seto, M. C. (2009). Pedophilia. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 391–407. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153618.
  61. Seto, M., Cantor, J., & Blanchard, R. (2006). Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(3),610–615.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Ward, T., Polaschek, D., & Beech, A. R. (2006). Theories of sexual offending. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  63. Willers, B., Engelhardt, L., & Pelz, L. (1996). Sexual maturation in East German boys. Acta Paediatrica, 85, 785–788.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Beier, K. M., & Loewit, K. (2013).Sexual medicine in clinical practice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  65. O’Donohue, W., & Plaud, J. J. (1994). The conditioning of human sexual arousal.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23(3), 321–344.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541567.
  66. Pfaus, J. G., Kippin, T. E., & Centeno, S. (2001). Conditioning and sexual behavior: A review. Hormones and Behavior, 40(2), 291–321.  https://doi.org/10.1006/hbeh.2001.1686.
  67. Gaffney, G., & Berlin, F. (1984). Is there hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal dysfunction in paedophilia? A pilot study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 657–660.Google Scholar
  68. Grubin, D. (2008). Medical models and interventions in sexual deviance. In D. R. Laws, W. T. O’Donohue (Hrsg.), Sexual deviancy: Theory, assessment and treatment (2. Aufl.) (S. 595–610). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  69. Stiels-Glenn, M. (2010). The availability of outpatient psychotherapy for paedophiles in Germany. Recht & Psychiatrie, 28(2), 74–80.Google Scholar
  70. Kramer, R., (2011). The DSM and the stigmatization of people who are attracted to minors. In Pedophilia, minor-attracted persons, and the DSM: Issues and controversies. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the B4U-ACT, Inc., Westminster, MD. http://www.b4uact.org/science/symp/2011/Proceedings.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerold Scherner
    • 1
    Email author
  • Till Amelung
    • 2
  • Miriam Schuler
    • 3
  • Dorit Grundmann
    • 4
  • Klaus Michael Beier
    • 5
  1. 1.Institut für Sexualwissenschaft und Sexualmedizin, Centrum für Human- und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Charité Campus MitteCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinDeutschland
  2. 2.Institut für Sexualwissenschaft und Sexualmedizin, Centrum für Human- und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Charité Campus MitteCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinDeutschland
  3. 3.Institut für Sexualwissenschaft und Sexualmedizin, Centrum für Human- und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Charité Campus MitteCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinDeutschland
  4. 4.Institut für Sexualwissenschaft und Sexualmedizin, Centrum für Human- und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Charité Campus MitteCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinDeutschland
  5. 5.Institut für Sexualwissenschaft und Sexualmedizin, Centrum für Human- und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Charité Campus Mitte Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations