Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Antifouling Self-Cleaning Surfaces

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Antifouling Surfaces and Materials

Abstract

Wettability is closely related to self-cleaning surfaces, which provides many important hints for antifouling. In nature, there exist many self-cleaning surfaces from land to the ocean after hundreds of millions of years’ evolution. These surfaces possess the properties of self-cleaning by minimizing the water and contaminant adhesion, or pinning spherical water droplets, collecting water droplets by integrating water vapor collection and droplet transportation, which have increasingly attracted attention of material scientists. In this chapter, we review many typical self-cleaning surfaces not only on land but also in the sea. We also conclude the principle of the self-cleaning mechanism and the hints for antifouling. On land, many self-cleaning surfaces are due to the superhydrophobicity which is related to the surface microstructures and the chemical constitution. The contamination and dust on the superhydrophobic surfaces can be readily washed away only with the flowing water. However, the superhydrophobic surfaces have a less self-cleaning effect under water, especially in the field of marine antifouling. While, the aquatic organisms also have the underwater self-cleaning capability. But different from the terrestrial organisms, they provide another self-cleaning approach to overcome the problems of fouling underwater, and also afford many hints in the anti-fouling field. The study and mimicking of the self-cleaning surfaces in nature should inspire the development of intelligent antifouling materials for applications in relative fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nosonovsky M (2007) Multiscale roughness and stability of superhydrophobic biomimetic interfaces. Langmuir 23:3157–3161

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chu ZL, Seeger S (2014) Superamphiphobic surfaces. Chem Soc Rev 43:2784–2798

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu XJ, Liang YM, Zhou F, Liu WM (2012) Extreme wettability and tunable adhesion: biomimicking beyond nature? Soft Matter 8:2070–2086

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feng L, Li SH, Li YS, Li HJ, Zhang LJ, Zhai J, Song YL, Liu BQ, Jiang L, Zhu DB (2002) Super-hydrophobic surfaces: from natural to artificial. Adv Mater 14(24):1857–1860

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gao XF, Jiang L (2004) Water-repellent legs of water striders. Nature 432(7013):36

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ueda E, Levkin PAL (2013) Emerging applications of superhydrophilic-superhydrophobic micropatterns. Adv Mater 25(9):1234–1247

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parker AR, Lawrence CR (2001) Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature 414:33–34

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barthlott W, Neinhuis C (1997) Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  9. Neinhuis C, Barthlott W (1997) Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Ann Bot 79(6):667–677

    Google Scholar 

  10. Onda T, Shibuichi S, Satoh N, Tsujii K (1996) Super-water-repellent fractal surfaces. Langmuir 12(9):2125–2127

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li XM, Reinhoudt D, Crego-Calama M (2007) What do we need for a superhydrophobic surface? A review on the recent progress in the preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces. Chem Soc Rev 36:1350–1368

    Google Scholar 

  12. Callies M, Quere D (2005) On water repellency. Soft Matter 1:55–61

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quere D (2008) Wetting and roughness. Annu Rev Mater Res 38:71–99

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roach P, Shirtcliffe NJ, Newton MI (2008) Progress in superhydrophobic surface development. Soft Matter 4:224–240

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sun TL, Feng L, Gao XF, Jiang L (2005) Bioinspired surfaces with special wettability. Acc Chem Res 38(8):644–652

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shirtcliffe NJ, McHale G, Newton MI (2011) The superhydrophobicity of polymer surfaces: recent developments. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 49(17):1203–1217

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gao LC, McCarthy TJ (2006) The “Lotus Effect” explained: two reasons why two length scales of topography are important. Langmuir 22(7):2966–2967

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu KS, Jiang L (2011) Bio-inspired design of multiscale structures for function integration. Nano Today 6:155–175

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang L, Zhao Y, Zhai J (2004) A lotus-leaf-like superhydrophobic surface: a porous microsphere/nanofiber composite film prepared by electrohydrodynamics. Angew Chem Int Ed 116(33):4338–4341

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ichimura K, Oh SK, Nakagawa M (2000) Light-driven motion of liquids on a photoresponsive surface. Science 288(5471):1624–1626

    Google Scholar 

  21. Erbil HY, Demirel AL, Avci Y, Mert O (2003) Transformation of a simple plastic into a superhydrophobic surface. Science 299(5611):1377–1380

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guo ZG, Zhou F, Hao JC, Liu WM (2005) Stable biomimetic super-hydrophobic engineering materials. J Am Chem Soc 127(45):15670–15671

    Google Scholar 

  23. Teare DOH, Spanos CG, Ridley P, Kinmond EJ, Roucoules V, Badyal JPS, Brewer SA, Coulson S, Willis C (2002) Pulsed plasma deposition of super-hydrophobic nanospheres. Chem Mater 14(11):4566–4571

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yan H, Kurogi K, Mayama H, Tsujii K (2005) Environmentally stable super water-repellent poly(alkylpyrrole) films. Angew Chem Int Ed 44(22):3453–3456. doi:10.1002/anie.200500266

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shirtcliffe NJ, McHale G, Newton MI, Chabrol G, Perry CC (2004) Dual-scale roughness produces unusually water-repellent surfaces. Adv Mater 16(21):1929–1932

    Google Scholar 

  26. Koch K, Bhushan B, Jung YC, Barthlott W (2009) Fabrication of artificial lotus leaves and significance of hierarchical structure for superhydrophobicity and low adhesion. Soft Matter 5:1386–1393

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu XJ, Wu WC, Wang XL, Luo ZZ, Liang YM, Zhou F (2009) A replication strategy for complex micro/nanostructures with superhydrophobicity and superoleophobicity and high contrast adhesion. Soft Matter 5:3097–3105

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liu M, Zheng Y, Zhai J, Jiang L (2010) Bioinspired super-antiwetting interfaces with special liquid-solid adhesion. Acc Chem Res 43(3):368–377

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2012) Green Tribology. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 25–40

    Google Scholar 

  30. Adamson AV (1990) Physical chemistry of surfaces. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bormashenko E, Stein T, Pogreb R, Aurbach D (2009) ‘‘Petal effect’’ on surfaces based on lycopodium: high-stick surfaces demonstrating high apparent contact angles. J Phys Chem C 113 (14):5568–5572

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2007) Biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces: multiscale approach. Nano Lett 7(9):2633–2637

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2007) Hierarchical roughness makes superhydrophobic surfaces stable. Microelectron Eng 84(3):382–386

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lai YK, Gao XF, Zhuang HF, Lin CJ, Jiang L (2009) Designing superhydrophobic porous nanostructures with tunable water adhesion. Adv Mater 21(37):3799–3803

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jin MH, Feng XJ, Feng L, Sun TL, Zhai J, Li TJ, Jiang L (2005) Super-hydrophobic aligned polystyrene nanotubes film with high adhesive force. Adv Mater 17(16):1977–1981

    Google Scholar 

  36. Guo ZG, Liu WM (2007) Why so strong for the lotus leaf? Appl Phys Lett 90:193108–193110

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lai YK, Lin CJ, Huang JY, Zhuang HF, Sun L, Nguyen T (2008) Markedly controllable adhesion of superhydrophobic spongelike nanostructure TiO2 films. Langmuir 24(8):3867–3873

    Google Scholar 

  38. Feng L, Zhang YN, Xi JM, Zhu Y, Wang N, Xia F, Jiang L (2008) Petal effect: a superhydrophobic state with high adhesive force. Langmuir 24(8):4114–4119

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ishii D, Yabu H, Shimomura M (2009) Novel biomimetic surface based on a self-organized metal–polymer hybrid structure. Chem Mater 21(9):1799–1801

    Google Scholar 

  40. Liu XJ, Ye Q, Song XW, Zhu YW, Liang YM, Zhou F (2011) Responsive wetting transition on superhydrophobic surfaces with sparsely grafted polymer brushes. Soft Matter 7:515–523

    Google Scholar 

  41. Liu XJ, Cai MR, Liang YM, Zhou F (2011) Photo-regulated stick-slip switch of water droplet mobility. Soft Matter 7:3331–3336

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gao X, Yan X, Yao X, Xu L, Zhang K, Zhang J, Yang B, Jiang L (2007) The dry-style antifogging properties of mosquito compound eyes and artificial analogues prepared by soft lithography. Adv Mater 19(17):2213–2217

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dupuis A, Yeomans JM (2006) Droplets on patterned substrates: water off a beetle’s back. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 50(2):255–261

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kier WM, Smith AM (2002) The structure and adhesive mechanism of octopus suckers. Integr Comp Biol 42(6):1146–1153

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zi J, Yu X, Li Y, Hu X, Xu C, Wang X, Liu X, Fu R (2003) Coloration strategies in peacock feathers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(22):12576–12578

    Google Scholar 

  46. Parker AR, Welch VL, Driver D (2003) Structural colour-opal ana-logue discovered in a weevil. Nature 426(6968):786–787

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhai L, Berg MC, Cebeci FC, Kim Y, Milwid JM, Rubner MF, Cohen RE (2006) Patterned superhydrophobic surfaces: toward a synthetic mimic of the namib desert beetle. Nano Lett 6(6):1213–1217

    Google Scholar 

  48. Garrod RP, Harris LG, Schofield WCE, McGettrick J, Ward LJ, Teare DOH, Badyal JPS (2007) Mimicking a Stenocara beetle’s back for microcondensation using plasmachemical patterned superhydrophobic-superhydrophilic surfaces. Langmuir 23(2):689–693

    Google Scholar 

  49. Liu KS, Yao X, Jiang L (2010) Recent developments in bio-inspired special wettability. Chem Soc Rev 39:3240–3255

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hu HM, Watson JA, Cribb BW, Watson GS (2011) Fouling of nanostructured insect cuticle: adhesion of natural and artificial contaminants. Biofouling 27(10):1125–1137

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nishimoto S, Bhushan B (2013) Bioinspired self-cleaning surfaces with superhydrophobicity, superoleophobicity, and superhydrophilicity. RSC Adv 3:671–690

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lee Y, Yoo Y, Kim J, Widhiarini S, Park B, Park HC, Yoon KJ, Byun D (2009) Mimicking a superhydrophobic insect wing by argon and oxygen ion beam treatment on polytetrafluoroethylene film. J Bionic Eng 6(4):365–370

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lee W, Jin MK, Yoo WC, Lee JK (2004) Nanostructuring of a polymeric substrate with well-defined nanometer-scale topography and tailored surface wettability. Langmuir 20(18):7665–7669

    Google Scholar 

  54. Parker AR (2009) Natural photonics for industrial applications. Philos Trans R Soc A 367:1759–1782

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ingram AL, Parker AR (2008) A review of the diversity and evolution of photonic structures in butterflies, incorporating the work of John Huxley (The Natural History Museum, London from 1961–1990). Philos Trans R Soc B 363(1502):2465–2480

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sato O, Kubo S, Gu ZZ (2009) Structural color films with lotus effects, superhydrophilicity, and tunable stop-bands. Acc Chem Res 42(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  57. Vukusic P, Sambles JR (2003) Photonic structures in biology. Nature 424:852–855

    Google Scholar 

  58. Dorrer C, Rühe J (2009) Some thoughts on superhydrophobic wetting. Soft Matter 5:51–61

    Google Scholar 

  59. Zheng YM, Gao XF, Jiang L (2007) Directional adhesion of superhydrophobic butterfly wings. Soft Matter 3:178–182

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang JH, Cheng ZJ, Zheng YM, Jiang L (2009) Ratchet-Induced anisotropic behavior of superparamagnetic microdroplet. Appl Phys Lett 94:144104–144107

    Google Scholar 

  61. Huang JY, Wang XD, Wang ZL (2006) In vivo molecular probing of cellular compartments with gold nanoparticles and nanoaggregates. Nano Lett 6(10):2325–2331

    Google Scholar 

  62. Jiang L, Yao X, Li HX, Fu YY, Chen L, Meng Q, Hu WP, Jiang L (2010) “Water Strider” legs with a self-assembled coating of single-crystalline nanowires of an organic semiconductor. Adv Mater 22(3):376–379

    Google Scholar 

  63. Shi F, Niu J, Liu JL, Liu F, Wang ZQ, Feng XQ, Zhang X (2007) Towards understanding why a superhydrophobic coating is needed by water striders. Adv Mater 19(17):2257–2261

    Google Scholar 

  64. Andersen NM (1976) A comparative study of locomotion on the water surface in semiaquatic bugs. (Insecta, Hemiptera, Gerromorpha). Vidensk Meddr Dansk Naturh Foren 139:337–396

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hu DL, Chan B, Bush JWM (2003) The hydrodynamics of water strider locomotion. Nature 424:663–666

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hu DL, Bush JWM (2005) Meniscus-climbing insects. Nature 437:733–736

    Google Scholar 

  67. Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M, Georgiadis JG, Marinas BJ, Mayes AM (2008) Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452:301–310

    Google Scholar 

  68. Lejars M, Margaillan A, Bressy C (2012) Fouling release coatings: a nontoxic alternative to biocidal antifouling coatings. Chem Rev 112(8):4347–4390

    Google Scholar 

  69. Maki A W (1991) The Exxon Valdez oil spill: initial environmental impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol 25(1):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  70. Alzieu C (2000) Impact of tributyltin on marine invertebrates. Ecotoxicology 9(1):71–76

    Google Scholar 

  71. Nys R, Steinberg PD (2002) Linking marine biology and biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 13(3):244–248

    Google Scholar 

  72. Bechert DW, Bruse M, Hage W (2000) Experiments with three-dimensional riblets as an idealizedmodel of shark skin. Exp Fluids 28(5):403–412

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ball P (1999) Engineering shark skin and other solutions. Nature 400:507–509

    Google Scholar 

  74. Han X, Zhang DY (2008) Study on the micro-replication of shark skin. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci 51(7):890–896

    Google Scholar 

  75. Baum C, Meyer W, Stelzer R, Fleischer LG, Siebers D (2002) Average nanorough skin surface of the pilot whale (Globicephala melas, Delphinidae): considerations on the self-cleaning abilities based on nanoroughness. Marine Biol 140:653–657

    Google Scholar 

  76. Liu MJ, Wang ST, Wei ZX, Song YL, Jiang L (2009) Bioinspired design of a superoleophobic and low adhesive water/solid interface. Adv Mater 21(6):665–669

    Google Scholar 

  77. Bhushan B (2009) Biomimetics: lessons from nature–an overview. Philos Trans R Soc A 367(1893):1445–1486

    Google Scholar 

  78. Bixler GD., Bhushan B (2012) Bioinspired rice leaf and butterfly wing surface structures combining shark skin and lotus effects. Soft Matter 8:11271–11284. doi:10.1039/c2sm26655e

    Google Scholar 

  79. Magin CM, Cooper SP, Brennan AB (2010) Non-toxic antifouling strategies. Mater Today 13(4):36–44

    Google Scholar 

  80. Wainwright SA, Vosburgh F, Hebrank JH (1978) Shark skin: function in locomotion. Science 202(4369):747–749

    Google Scholar 

  81. Scardino AJ, Nys R (2011) Mini review: biomimetic models and bioinspired surfaces for fouling control. Biofouling 27(1):73–86

    Google Scholar 

  82. Jung YC, Bhushan B (2009) Wetting behavior of water and oil droplets in three-phase interfaces for hydrophobicity/philicity and oleophobicity/philicity. Langmuir 25(24):14165–14173

    Google Scholar 

  83. Scholz SG, Griffiths CA, Dimov SS, Brousseau EB, Lalev G, Petkov P (2011) Manufacturing routes for replicating micro and nano surface structures with biomimetic applications. CIRP Ann-Manuf Techn 4(4):347–356

    Google Scholar 

  84. Schumacher JF, Carman ML, Estes TG, Feinberg AW, Wilson LH, Callow ME, Callow JA, Finlay JA, Brennan AB (2007) Engineered Antifouling microtopographies–effect of feature size, geometry, and roughness on settlement of zoospores of the Green Alga Ulva. Biofouling 23(1):55–62

    Google Scholar 

  85. Schumacher JF, Aldred N, Callow ME, Finlay JA, Callow JA, Clare AS, Brennan AB (2007) Species-specific engineered antifouling topographies: correlations between the settlement of algal zoospores and barnacle cyprids. Biofouling 23(5):307–317

    Google Scholar 

  86. Baum C, Simon F, Meyer W, Fleischer L, Siebers GD (2003) Surface properties of the skin of the pilot whale Globicephala melas. Biofouling 19:181–186

    Google Scholar 

  87. Liu KS, Jiang L (2012) Bio-inspired self-cleaning surfaces. Annu Rev Mater Res 42:231–263

    Google Scholar 

  88. Cao XY, Pettitt ME, Wode F, Sancet MPA, Fu JH (2010) Interaction of zoospores of the green alga ulva with bioinspiredmicro- and nanostructured surfaces prepared by polyelectrolyte layer-by-layer self-assembly. Adv Funct Mater 20(12):1984–1993

    Google Scholar 

  89. Lin L, Liu MJ, Chen L, Chen PP, Ma J (2010) Bio-inspired hierarchical macromolecule-nanoclay hydrogels for robust underwater superoleophobicity. Adv Mater 22(43):4826–4830

    Google Scholar 

  90. Fratzl P, Weinkamer R (2007) Nature’s hierarchical materials. Prog Mater Sci 52(8):1263–1334

    Google Scholar 

  91. Meyers MA, Chen PY, Lin AYM, Seki Y (2008) Biological materials: structure and mechanical properties. Prog Mater Sci 53(1):1–206

    Google Scholar 

  92. Cusack M, Freer A (2008) Biomineralization: elemental and organic influence in carbonate systems. Chem Rev 108(11):4433–4454

    Google Scholar 

  93. Mayer G (2005) Rigid biological systems as models for synthetic composites. Science 310(5751):1144–1147

    Google Scholar 

  94. Chec AG, Cartwright JHE, Willinger MG (2009) The key role of the surface membrane in why gastropod nacre grows in towers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(1):38–43

    Google Scholar 

  95. Kroger N (2009) The molecular basis of nacre formation. Science 325(5946):1351–1352

    Google Scholar 

  96. Gilbert PUPA, Metzler RA, Zhou D, Scholl A, Doran A, Young A, Kunz M, Tamura N, Coppersmith SN (2008) Gradual ordering in red abalone nacre. J Am Chem Soc 130 (51):17519–17527

    Google Scholar 

  97. Sellinger A, Weiss PM, Nguyen A, Lu YF, Assink RA, Gong WL, Brinker JC (1998) Continuous self-assembly of organic–inorganic nanocomposite coatings that mimic nacre. Nature 394:256–260

    Google Scholar 

  98. Tang Z, Kotov N, Magonov AS, Ozturk B (2003) Nanostructured artificial nacre. Nat Mater 2:413–418

    Google Scholar 

  99. Podsiadlo P, Paternel S, Rouillard JM, Zhang ZF, Lee J, Lee JW, Gulari L, Kotov NA (2005) Layer-by-layer assembly of nacre-like nanostructured composites with antimicrobial properties. Langmuir 21(25):11915–11921

    Google Scholar 

  100. Finnemore A, Cunha P, Shean T, Vignolini S, Guldin S, Oyen M, Steiner U (2012) Biomimetic layer-by-layer assembly of artificial nacre. Nat Commun 3:966

    Google Scholar 

  101. Yao HB, Fang HY, Tan ZH, Wu LH, Yu SH (2010) Biologically inspired, strong, transparent, and functional layered organic–inorganic hybrid films. Angew Chem Int Ed 49(12):2140–2145

    Google Scholar 

  102. Xu LP, Peng JT, Liu YB, Wen YQ, Zhang XJ, Jiang L, Wang ST (2013) Nacre-inspired design of mechanical stable coating with underwater superoleophobicity. ACS Nano 7(6):5077–5083

    Google Scholar 

  103. Liu XL, Zhou J, Xue ZX, Gao J, Meng JX, Wang ST, Jiang L (2012) Clam’s shell inspired high-energy inorganic coatings with underwater low adhesive superoleophobicity. Adv Mater 24(25):3401–3405

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Solid Lubrication, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics Chinese Academy of Science, 730000, Lanzhou, China

    Xiangyu Yin & Bo Yu

Authors
  1. Xiangyu Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bo Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Yu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Solid Lubrication, Chinese Academy of Science Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Lanzhou, China

    Feng Zhou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yin, X., Yu, B. (2015). Antifouling Self-Cleaning Surfaces. In: Zhou, F. (eds) Antifouling Surfaces and Materials. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45204-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation