Advertisement

Managing Service Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis

  • Ali EmrouznejadEmail author
  • Emilyn Cabanda
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 215)

Abstract

This chapter provides the theoretical foundation and background on data envelopment analysis (DEA) method. We first introduce the basic DEA models. The balance of this chapter focuses on evidences showing DEA has been extensively applied for measuring efficiency and productivity of services including financial services (banking, insurance, securities, and fund management), professional services, health services, education services, environmental and public services, energy services, logistics, tourism, information technology, telecommunications, transport, distribution, audio-visual, media, entertainment, cultural and other business services. Finally, we provide information on the use of Performance Improvement Management Software (PIM-DEA). A free limited version of this software and downloading procedure is also included in this chapter.

Keywords

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Efficiency Productivity Service industry Managing service productivity DEA software 

References

  1. Adler, N., & Golany, B. (2001). Evaluation of the deregulated airlines network using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe. European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 260–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ariff, M., Cabanda, E., & Sathye, M. (2009). Privatization and performance: Evidence from telecommunications sector. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60, 1315–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aubert, C., & Reynaud, A. (2005). The impact of regulation on cost efficiency: An empirical analysis of Wisconsin water utilities. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23, 383–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banker, R. D., Chang, H., & Kao, Y. (2002). Impact of information technology on public accounting firm productivity. Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barr, R., Kiligo, K., Siems, F., & Zimmel, S. (2002). Evaluating the productive efficiency and performance of U.S. commercial banks. Managerial Finance, 28(8), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergendahl, G., & Lindblom, T. (2008). Evaluating the performance of Swedish savings banks according to service efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 185, 663–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berger, A., & Humphrey, D. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 175–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biorn, E., Hagen, T. P., Iversen, T., & Magnussen, J. (2003). The effect of activity based on hospital efficiency: A panel data analysis of data envelopment analysis scores 1992–2004. Health Care Management Science, 6(4), 271–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Botti, L., Briec, W., & Clique, G. (2009). Plural forms versus franchise and company-owned systems: A DEA approach of Hotel Chain Performance. Omega, 37, 566–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brockett, P. L., Cooper, W. W., Golden, L. L., Rousseau, J. J., & Wang, Y. (2005). Financial intermediary versus production approach to efficiency of marketing distribution systems and organizational structure of insurance companies. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 72(3), 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casu, B., Girardone, C., & Molyneux, P. (2004). Productivity change in European banking: A comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(10), 2521–2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9, 181–196. doi: 10.1002/nav.3800090303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making unit. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1981). Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: An application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science, 27, 668–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, W. D., & Green, R. (2003). Evaluating power plant efficiency: A hierarchical model. Computers and Operations Research, 32(4), 813–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cook, W. D., Kazakov, A., & Persaud, B. N. (2001). Prioritizing highway accident sites: A data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52, 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cook, W. D., Roll, Y., & Kazakov, A. (1990). A DEA model for measuring the relative efficiency of highway maintenance patrols. INFOR, 28, 113–124.Google Scholar
  19. Cummins, J. D., & Zi, H. (1998). Comparison of frontier efficiency methods and application to the US life insurance industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 10, 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dacosta-Claro, I., & Lapierre, S. (2003). Benchmarking as a tool for the improvement of health services’ supply departments. Health Services Management Research, 16, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dyson, R. G., Thanassoulis, E., & Boussofiane, A. (1990). Data envelopment analysis. In L. C. Hendry & R. Eglese (Eds.), Operational research tutorial papers (pp. 13–28). UK: The Operational Research Society.Google Scholar
  22. Eling, M., & Luhnen, M. (2010). Efficiency in the international insurance industry: A cross-country comparison. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 1497–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Emrouznejad, A., Cabanda, E., & Gholami, R. (2010). An alternative measure of the ICT-opportunity index. Information and Management, 47, 246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Emrouznejad, A., & De Writte, K. (2010). COOPER-framework: A unified process for non-parametric projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), 1573–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. R., & Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42(3), 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Emrouznejad, A., & Thanassoulis, E. (2011). Performance improvement management software: PIM-DEAsoft-V3.0 user guide. ISBN: 978-1-85449-412-2.Google Scholar
  27. Fecher, F., Keesler, D., Perelman, S., & Pesteieau, P. (1993). Productive performance of the French insurance industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 4, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Field, K., & Emrouznejad, A. (2003). Measuring the performance of neonatal care units in Scotland. Journal of Medical Systems, 27(4), 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fethi, M., & Pasiouras, F. (2010). Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 204(2), 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fukuyama, H. (1997). Investigating productive efficiency and productivity changes of Japanese life insurance companies. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 5, 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2002). Evaluating public school district performance via DEA gain functions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(9), 992–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goto, M. (2010). Financial performance analysis of US and world telecommunications companies: Importance of Information Technology in the telecommunications industry after the AT&T breakup and NTT divestiture. Decision Support Systems, 48, 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harrison, J., & Sexton, C. (2006). The improving efficiency Frontier of religious not-for-profit hospitals. Hospital Topics, 84(1), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haugland, S. A., Myrtveit, I., & Nygaard, A. (2007). Market orientation and performance in the service industry: A data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business Research, 60(11), 1191–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hirschhausen, C. V., Cullmann, A., & Kappeler, A. (2006). Efficiency analysis of German electricity distribution utilities-non-parametric and parametric tests. Applied Economics, 38, 2553–2566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hjalmarsson, L., & Veiderpass, A. (1992). Productivity in Swedish electricity retail distribution. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94(Supplement), 193–205.Google Scholar
  37. Ho, C.-T. B., Liao, C.-K., & Kim, H.-T. (2012). Valuing internet companies: A DEA-based multiple valuation approach. Journal of Operational Research Society, 62, 2097–2106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hofmarcher, M. M., Paterson, I., & Riedel, M. (2002). Measuring hospital efficiency in Austria – A DEA approach. Health Care Management Science, 5, 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hollingsworth, B. (2008). The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery. Health Economics, 17(10), 1107–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huang, C.-W. Y.-H., Chiu, C.-T. T., & Lin, C.-H. (2012). Applying a hybrid DEA model to evaluate the influence of marketing activities to operational efficiency on Taiwan’s international tourist hotels. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63, 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hung, S.-W., Lu, W.-M., & Wang, T.-P. (2010). Benchmarking the operating efficiency of Asia container ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 706–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185, 418–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kirigia, J. M., Emrouznejad, A., Vaz, R. G., Bastiene, H., & Padayachy, J. (2008). A comparative assessment of performance and productivity of health centres in Seychelles. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57(1), 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Korhonen, P. K., & Syrjanen, M. J. (2003). Evaluation of cost efficiency in Finnish electricity distribution. Annals of Operations Research, 121, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Luo, X., & Donthu, N. (2005). Assessing advertising media spending inefficiencies in generating sales. Journal of Business Research, 58(1), 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Madden, G., & Savage, S. (1999). Telecommunications productivity, catch-up and innovation. Telecommunications Policy, 23(1), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mayston, D. J. (2003). Measuring and managing educational performance. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(7), 679–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moreno, A. A., & Tadepalli, R. (2002). Assessing academic department efficiency at a public university. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23, 385–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nemoto, J., & Goto, M. (2003). Measurement of dynamic efficiency in production: An application of Data Envelopment analysis to Japanese electric utilities. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Noulas, A., Glaveli, N., & Kiriakopoulos, I. (2008). Investigating cost efficiency in the branch network of a Greek bank: An empirical study. Managerial Finance, 34(3), 160–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nunamaker, T. R. (1983). Measuring routine nursing service efficiency: A comparison of cost per patient day and data envelopment analysis models. Health Services Research, 18, 183–208.Google Scholar
  52. Odeck, J. (2000). Assessing the relative efficiency and productivity of vehicle inspection services: An application of DEA and Malmquist indices. European Journal of Operational Research, 126, 501–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Neill, L., & Dexter, F. (2005). Methods for understanding super-efficient data envelopment analysis results with an application to hospital inpatient surgery. Health Care Management Science, 8, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paradi, J. C., & Zhu, H. (2013). A survey on bank branch efficiency and performance research with data envelopment analysis. Omega, 41(1), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Park, J., Lee, S., & Kang, H. B. (2009). The insurance distribution systems and efficiency in the property casualty insurance industry. Managerial Finance, 35(8), 670–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pastor, J. T., Knox Lovell, C. A., & Tulkens, H. (2006). Evaluating the financial performance of bank branches. Annals of Operations Research, 145, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pille, P., & Paradi, J. C. (2002). Financial performance analysis of Ontario (Canada) credit unions: An application of DEA in the Regulatory environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(2), 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Portela, M. C. A. S., Thanassoulis, E., Horncastle, A., & Maugg, T. (2011). Productivity change in the water industry in England and Wales: Application of the meta-Malmquist index. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, 2173–2188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Prior, D. (2006). Efficiency and total quality management in health care organizations: A dynamic frontier approach. Annals of Operations Research, 145, 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ray, S. C. (2007). The directional distance function and measurement of super-efficiency: An application to airlines data. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–10.Google Scholar
  61. Sarrico, C. S., & Dyson, R. G. (2000). Using DEA for planning in UK universities-an institutional perspective. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(7), 789–800.Google Scholar
  62. Sathye, M. (2002). Measuring productivity changes in Australian banking: An application of Malmquist indices. Managerial Finance, 28(9), 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Segovia-Gonzalez, M. M., Contreras, I., & Mar-Molino, C. (2009). A DEA analysis of risk, cost, and revenues in insurance. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60, 1483–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shao, B. B. M., & Shu, W. S. (2004). Productivity breakdown of the information and computing technology industries across countries. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(1), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sherman, H. D. (1984). Hospital efficiency measurement and evaluation: Empirical-test of a new technique. Medical Care, 22, 922–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sherman, G., & Gold, F. (1985). Bank branch operating efficiency: Evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9, 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sherman, H. D., & Zhu, J. (2006). Service Productivity Management. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  68. Staat, M. (2006). Efficiency of Hospitals in Germany: a DEA-bootstrap Approach.Google Scholar
  69. Tone, K., & Sahoo, B. K. (2005). Evaluating cost efficiency and returns to scale in the Life Insurance Corporation of India using data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 39, 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aston Business SchoolAston UniversityBirminghamUK
  2. 2.School of Business and LeadershipRegent UniversityVirginia BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations