Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of Regulation on Cost Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis of Wisconsin Water Utilities

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of regulation of efforts to minimize costs has been widely discussed, but remains difficult to measure. The sophisticated regulation of water utilities in Wisconsin allows us to attempt such on assessment since different firms can be under different regulatory regimes (price cap or rate-of-return) in the same geographical area at the same time. To measure the impact of regulation on efficiency, we use a stochastic cost frontier approach defining the unobservable efficiency of a water utility as a function of exogeneous variables. Using a panel of 211 water utilities observed from 1998 to 2000, we show that their efficiency scores can be partly explained by the regulatory framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashton J. (1999). “Economies of Scale, Economies of Capital Utilisation and Capital Utilisation in the English and Welsh Water Industry”. School of Finance and Law Working Paper series, 17. Bournemouth University

  • J. Ashton (2000) ArticleTitle“Cost Efficiency in the UK Water and Sewerage Industry” Applied Economics Letters 7 455–458 Occurrence Handle10.1080/135048500351177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Battese T. Coelli (1992) ArticleTitle“Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data With Application to Paddy Farmers in India” Journal of Productivity Analysis 3 153–169 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00158774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese G., Coelli T. (1993). “A Stochastic Frontier Production Function Incorporating a Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects”. Working Paper in Econometrics and Applied Statistics, No. 69, Department of Economics, University of New England, Armindale, NSW, Australia

  • G. Battese T. Coelli (1995) ArticleTitle“A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data” Empirical Economics 20 325–332 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01205442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Bhattacharyya T. Harris R. Narayan K. Raffiee (1995) ArticleTitle“Specification and Estimation of the Effect of Ownership on the Economic Efficiency of the Water Utilities” Regional Science and Urban Economics 25 759–784 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0166-0462(95)02107-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Bhattacharyya E. Parker K. Raffiee (1994) ArticleTitle“An Examination of the Effect of Ownership on the Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Water Utilities” Land Economics 70 IssueID2 197–209

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Biclaiser M. Riordan (2000) ArticleTitle“Dynamics of Price Regulation” RAND Journal of Economics 31 IssueID4 744–767

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Caves L. Christensen M. Tretheway (1984) ArticleTitle‘Economies of Density versus Economies of Scale: Why Trunk and Local Service Airline Costs Differ Constraint” RAND Journal of Econmics 15 IssueID4 471–489

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Chambers (1988) Applied Production Analysis: a Dual Approach Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli T. (1996). “A Guide to Frontier Version 4.1. A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation”. CEPA Working paper 7/96, Australia

  • Dalen D., Gomen-lobo A. (1996). “Regulation and Incentive Contracts: An Empirical Investigation of the Norvegian Bus Transport Industry”. Institue for Fiscal Studies, Working paper W96/8

  • A. Estache M. Rossi (2002) ArticleTitle“How Different Is the Efficiency of Public and Private Water Companies in Asia” The World Bank Economic Review 16 IssueIDl 759–784 Occurrence Handle10.1093/wber/16.1.139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estache A., Rossi M. (2004). “Do Regulation and Ownership Drive the Efficiency of Electricity Distribution? Evidence from Latin America”. Working paper. Oxford University, UK

  • S. Feigenbaum R. Teeples (1983) ArticleTitle“Public Versus Private Water Delivery : A Hedonic Cost Approach” The Review of Economics and statistics 65 672–678

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Gagnepain M. Ivaldi (2002) ArticleTitle“Incentive Regulatory Policies: The Case of Public Transit Systems in France” Rand Journal of Economics 33 IssueID4 605–629

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Garcia A. Reynaud (2004) ArticleTitle“Estimating the Benefits of Efficient Water Pricing in France” Resource and Energy Economics 26 IssueIDl 1–25 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Garcia A. Thomas (2001) ArticleTitle“The Structure of Municipal Water Supply Costs: Application to a Panel French Local Communities” Journal of Productivity. Analysis 16 IssueIDl 5–31 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011142901799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Hunt E. Lynk (1995) ArticleTitle“Privatisation and Efficiency in the UK Water Industry: An Empirical Analysis” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 57 IssueID3 371–388

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Jondrow C. Lovell 1. Materov P. Schmidt (1982) ArticleTitle“On Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in the Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model” Journal of Econometrics 19 233–238 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-4076(82)90004-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Kim (1987) ArticleTitle“Economies of Scale in Multi-product Firms: an Empirical Analysis” Economica 54 185–206

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Kim (1995) ArticleTitle“Marginal Cost and Second-Best Pricing for Water” Review of Industrial Organization 10 323–338 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01027078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Kumbuakar S. Guosh J. McGuckin (1991) ArticleTitle“A Generalized Production Frontier Approach for Estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in U.S. Dairy Farms” Journal of Business and Economics Statistics 9 279–286

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Laffont J. Tirole (1993) A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation MIT Press MA

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Lynk (1993) ArticleTitle“Privatisation, Joint Production and the Comparative Efficiencies of Private Ownership: The UK Water Industry Case” Fiscal Studies 14 IssueID2 98–116 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1475-5890.1993.tb00482.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Newbery (1999) Privatization, Restructuring, and Regulation of Network Utilities MIT Press MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat. (2002). “Water and Sewerage Service Unit Costs and Relative Efficiency: 2001–2002 Report”. Annual report, Office of Water Service

  • S. Renzetti (1999) ArticleTitle“Municipal Water Supply and Sewage Treatment Costs, Prices, and Distortions” Canadian Journal of Economics 32 IssueID3 688–704

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Saal D. Parker (2000) ArticleTitle“The Impact of Privatization and Regulation on the Water and Sewerage Industry in England and Wales: A Translog Function Model” Managerial and Decision Economics 21 IssueID6 253–268 Occurrence Handle10.1002/mde.988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Saal D. Parker (2001) ArticleTitle“Productivity and Price Performance in the Privatised Water and Sewerage Companies of England and Wales” Journal of Regulatory Economics 20 IssueIDl 61–90 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011162214995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, M., C. Morrison-paul (2004). “Water Production and Distribution in the US: The Bigger the Better?”. article presented at the International Industrial Organization Conference in Chicago, Illinois, April 23–24

  • F. Wolak (1994) ArticleTitle“An Econometric Analysis of the Asymmetric Information Regulator-Utility Interaction” Annales d’Economie et de Statistiques 34 13–69

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cécile Aubert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aubert, C., Reynaud, A. The Impact of Regulation on Cost Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis of Wisconsin Water Utilities. J Prod Anal 23, 383–409 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-005-2216-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-005-2216-8

Keywords

Navigation