Skip to main content

Appendizitis (inkl. laparoskopischer Techniken)

  • Chapter
Praxis der Viszeralchirurgie
  • 57 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die akute Appendizitis ist die häufigste chirurgische Erkrankung des Gastrointestinaltraktes, die einer operativen Therapie bedarf. Männer haben öfters eine akute Appendizitis als Frauen. Die hohe Rate negativer Appendektomien bei Frauen im gebärfähigen Alter ist dafür verantwortlich, dass die Wahrscheinlichkeit, während seines Lebens appendektomiert zu werden, bei Frauen fast doppelt so hoch ist. Neueste Studien zeigen, dass die laparoskopische Appendektomie mit gleicher Sicherheit wie die offene Appendektomie durchgeführt werden kann. Die Wundinfektrate ist nach laparoskopischer Appendektomie geringer, es treten aber gehäuft intraabdominelle Abszesse auf. Der größte Vorteil ist die laparoskopische Exploration der Bauchhöhle. Bei unklaren rechtsseitigen Unterbauchschmerzen findet man in bis zu 98% der Fälle eine Ursache, die das Beschwerdebild erklärt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Adaila SA (1996) Appendiceal mass: interval appendicectomy should not be the rule. Br J Clin Pract 50:168–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson R, Hugander A, Thulin A, Nystrom PO, Olaison G (1994) Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. BMJ 308:107–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJ (1992) Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate. Eur J Surg 158:37–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bagi P, Dueholm S (1987) Nonoperative management of the ul-trasonically evaluated appendiceal mass. Surgery 101:602–605

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baigrie RJ, Dehn TC, Fowler SM, Dunn DC (1995) Analysis of 8651 appendicectomies in England and Wales during 1992 [see comments]. Br J Surg 82:933–933

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C (1994) Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 190:31–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Becker H, Neufang T (1997) Appendektomie 1997 — Offen oder geschlossen? Chirurg 68:17 – 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgstein PJ, Gordijn RV, Eijsbouts QA, Cuesta MA (1997) Acute appendicitis — a clear-cut case in men, a guessing game in young women. A prospective study on the role of laparoscopy Surg Endosc 11:923–927

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch HP, Schiedeck Th (1997) Der unklare Unterbauch-schmez — Stellenwert der Laparoskopie. Chirurg 68:12–16

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colson M, Skinner KA, Dunnington G (1997) High negative appendectomy rates are no longer acceptable. Am J Surg 174:723–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eldar S, Nash E, Sabo E, Matter I, Kunin J, Mogilner JG, Abra-hamson J (1997) Delay of surgery in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 173:194–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson S, Granstrom L (1995) Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis [see comments]. Br J Surg 82:166–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gamal R, Moore TC (1990) Appendicitis in children aged 13 years and younger. Am J Surg 159:589–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerharz CD, Gabbert HE (1997) Pathomorphological aspects of acute appendicitis. Chirurg 68:6–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 186:545–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gorbach SL (1991) Antimicrobial prophylaxis for appendectomy and colorectal surgery. Rev Infect Dis 13 [Suppl] 10:815–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale DA, Jaques DP, Molloy M et al. (1997) Appendectomy. Improving care through quality improvement. Arch Surg 132:153–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hecker WC, Ring-Mrozik E, Trammer A, Naegele S (1989) Appendektomie im Kindesalter. Chirurg 60:513–516

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horntrich J, Schneider W (1990) Die Appendizitis aus epidemiologischer Sicht. Zentralbl Chir 115:1521–1529

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jadallah FA, Abdul-Ghani AA, Tibblin S (1994) Diagnostic la-paroscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomy in fertile women. Eur J Surg 160:41–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Käufer C, Franz I, Löblich HJ (1989) Appendicitis — Wandel des Krankheitsbildes? Chirurg 60:501–507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST, Denholm S, Matheson NA (1988) Preventing wound infection after appendicectomy: a review [see comments]. Br J Surg 75:1023–1033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy — is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women. Surg Endosc 11:95–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lantsberg L, Mor I, Levy I, Khoda J (1997) Infected hydrocele following laparoscopic appendectomy: case report. Surg La-parosc Endosc 7:262–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lauwers GY (1992) Cytomegalovirus infection of the appendix in AIDS [letter; comment]. Gastroenterology 102:379–380

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luckmann R (1989) Incidence and case fatality rates for acute appendicitis in California. A population-based study of the effects of age. Am J Epidemiol 129:905–918

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCall JL, Sharpies K, Jadallah F (1997) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 84:1045–1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Memon MA (1997) Review. Laparoscopic appendicectomy: current status. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79:393–402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer LA, Makar R, Ampel NM, Zukoski CF (1993) Cytomegalovirus appendicitis in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Case report and review of the literature. Arch Surg 128:467–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson-Brown S (1993) Emergency laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 80:279–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson-Brown S, Thompson JN, Eckersley JR, Ponting GA, Dudley HA (1988) Which patients with suspected appendicitis should undergo laparoscopy? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 296:1363–1364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ (1994) Appendicectomy for acute appendicitis and for other conditions: an epidemiological study. Int J Epidemiol 23:155–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources [see comments]. N Engl J Med 338:141–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salky BA, Edye MB (1998) The role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal pain syndromes. Surg Endose 12:911–914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sisson RG, Ahlvin RC, Harlow MC (1971) Superficial mucosal ulceration and the pathogenesis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 122:378–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slim K, Pezet D, Chipponi J (1998) Laparoscopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 41:398–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzner F, Lierse W (1972) Über die Ursache der Appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Chir 330:273–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ (1995) The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study [see comments]. Ann Surg 221:278–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treutner KH, Schumpelick V (1997) Epidemiologie der Appendicitis. Chirurg 68:1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tytgat SHAJ, Bakker XR, Butzelaar RMJM (1998) Laparoscopic evaluation of patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Surg Endose 12:918–920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Velanovich V, Satava R (1992) Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. Am Surg 58:264–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wangensteen OH, Dennis C (1939) Experimental proof of the obstructive origin of appendicitis in man. Ann Surg 110:629–647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams NM, Jackson D, Everson NW, Johnstone JM (1998) Is the incidence of acute appendicitis really falling? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80:122–124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kocher, T., Wiesner, W., Harder, F. (2002). Appendizitis (inkl. laparoskopischer Techniken). In: Siewert, J.R., Harder, F., Rothmund, M. (eds) Praxis der Viszeralchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09418-1_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09418-1_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-09419-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-09418-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics