Skip to main content

Prominence, Competition, Learning, and the Generation of Offers in Computer-Aided Experimental Spatial Games

  • Chapter
Game Equilibrium Models III

Abstract

Collective decision making by people who, as humans, are merely quasirational is subject to influences of substantively irrelevant features of the decision environment. This paper analyzes data from a computer-aided laboratory study of decision making in spatially represented, majority rule games to identify influences of prominent features of the problem environment on the processes and outcomes of decision, and the way in which these influences change through competition and learning.*

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albers, W. (1987). Aspirations and aspiration adjustment in location games. Working Paper 159, Institute for Mathematical Economics Research, Univ. of Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albers, W., and Laing, J.D. (1988). A noncooperative mechanism for negotiations in two classes of cooperative games. Working note, Dept. of Decision Sciences, the Wharton School, Univ. of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormendi, R.C., and Plott, C.R. (1980). Committee decisions under procedural rules: an experimental study applying a new nonmonetary method of preference inducements. Social Sciences Working Paper 345. California Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, J.D. (1988). A noncooperative model of bargaining in simple spatial games. Working Paper 88–11–03, Dept. of Decision Science, the Wharton School, Univ. of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, J. D., and Olmsted, S. M. (1978). An experimental and game-theoretic study of committees. In P. C. Ordeshook (ed.), Game Theory and Political Science: 215281. New York NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordeshook, P.C. (1986). Game Theory and Political Theory: An Introduction. Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1981). A noncooperative model of characteristic-function bargaining. In V. Boehm and H. Nachthanp, eds., Essays in Game Theory and Mathematical Economics in Honor of Oskar Norgenstern. Wissenschaftsverlag Bibliographisches Institut Mannheim, Wien — Zürich, 131–151.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Albers, W., Laing, J.D. (1991). Prominence, Competition, Learning, and the Generation of Offers in Computer-Aided Experimental Spatial Games. In: Selten, R. (eds) Game Equilibrium Models III. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07367-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07367-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08110-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07367-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics