Der begriffliche Rahmen: 120 Thesen

Magyar, Bálint; Madlovics, Bálint

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-40729-2_1

Bálint Magyar⁶ &
Bálint Madlovics⁷

Part of the book series: Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft ((VGPO))

135 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die unerwartete und unaufgeforderte russische Aggression in der Ukraine im Februar 2022 hat deutlich gemacht, wie dringend notwendig es ist, die allgemeinen Annahmen über postkommunistische Länder zu aktualisieren. Der Krieg hat die Unzulänglichkeit der für westliche Demokratien verwendeten Begriffe und Konzepte zur Beschreibung, zum Verständnis und zur Vorhersage der Entwicklungen in den „hybriden“ Regimen Osteuropas und der ehemaligen UdSSR offenbart. Magyar und Madlovics plädieren nachdrücklich für ein Vokabular und eine Grammatik, die auf die Besonderheiten des postkommunistischen Blocks zugeschnitten sind. In diesem kompakten Begleitbuch zu dem 800 Seiten starken Werk The Anatomy of Post-Communist Regimes (CEU Press, 2020) entwickeln sie in 120 Thesen einen konzeptionellen Rahmen mit (1) einer Typologie postkommunistischer Regime und (2) einer detaillierten Darstellung idealtypischer Akteure und der politischen, wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Phänomene in diesen Regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Chapter: USD 29.95; Price excludes VAT (USA)

eBook: USD 59.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Softcover Book: USD 74.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

1.
Schmitter und Karl, „The Conceptual Travels of Transitologists and Consolidologists“.
2.
Kopecký und Mudde, „What Has Eastern Europe Taught Us about the Democratization Literature (and Vice Versa)?“
3.
Carothers, „The End of the Transition Paradigm“.
4.
Cassani, „Hybrid What?“
5.
Offe, „Political Corruption“.
6.
Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies.
7.
Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations.
8.
Katzenstein, Civilizations in World Politics.
9.
Szűcs, „The Three Historical Regions of Europe“.
10.
Hale, Patronal Politics.
11.
Ryabov, „The Institution of Power&Ownership in the Former U.S.S.R.“
12.
Kornai, The Socialist System.
13.
Bokros, Accidental Occidental.
14.
Magyar, Stubborn Structures.
15.
Levitsky und Way, Competitive Authoritarianism.
16.
Kornai, „The system paradigm revisited“.
17.
Eisenstadt und Roniger, „Patron – Client Relations as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange“.
18.
Klíma, Informal Politics in Post-Communist Europe.
19.
Fisun, „Neopatrimonialism in post-Soviet Eurasia“.
20.
Ledeneva, Can Russia Modernise?
21.
Holcombe, Political Capitalism.
22.
Szelényi und Szelényi, „Circulation or Reproduction of Elites during the Postcommunist Transformation of Eastern Europe“.
23.
Markus, „The Atlas That has Not Shrugged“.
24.
Weber, Economy and Society.
25.
Nureev, „Power-Property as a Path-Dependence Problem“.
26.
Minakov, „Republic of Clans“.
27.
Kryshtanovskaya und White, „Inside the Putin court“.
28.
Weber, Economy and Society.
29.
Szabó, A jó kommunista szilárdan együtt ingadozik a párttal.
30.
Baez-Camargo und Ledeneva, „Where Does Informality Stop and Corruption Begin?“, 63.
31.
Jancsics, „From Local Cliques to Mafia State“.
32.
Åslund, Russia’s Crony Capitalism.
33.
Fishman, „Rethinking State and Regime“.
34.
„The Rise of Kleptocracy [Special section]“.
35.
Bach und Gazibo, Neopatrimonialism in Africa and Beyond.
36.
Wedel, „Clans, cliques and captured states“.
37.
Chehabi und Linz, Sultanistic Regimes.
38.
Vahabi, „A Positive Theory of the Predatory State“.
39.
Friedrichs, Trusted Criminals.
40.
Hobsbawm, Primitive Rebels, 55.
41.
Wade, „The Developmental State“.
42.
Choi, „Industrial Policy as the Engine of Economic Growth in South Korea: Myth and Reality“.
43.
Volkov, Violent Entrepreneurs.
44.
Markus, Property, Predation, and Protection.
45.
Shlapentokh und Woods, Contemporary Russia as a Feudal Society.
46.
Vörös, „Hungary’s Constitutional Evolution During the Last 25 Years“.
47.
Wright, „Understanding Class“.
48.
Pakulski und Waters, „The Reshaping and Dissolution of Social Class in Advanced Society“.
49.
Collins, Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia.
50.
Collins.
51.
Minakov, „Republic of Clans“.
52.
Petrov, „Putin’s Neo-Nomenklatura System and its Evolution“.
53.
Magyar, Post-Communist Mafia State.
54.
Földi, „A római család jogi rendje [The legal order of the Roman family]“.
55.
Ledeneva, How Russia Really Works.
56.
Banfield, Moral Basis of a Backward Society.
57.
Graber, Levinson, und Tushnet, Constitutional Democracy in Crisis?
58.
Okara, „Sovereign Democracy“.
59.
Shilling, „‘People’s democracy’ in soviet theory‐I“.
60.
Murphy, „Constitutions, Constitutionalism, and Democracy“.
61.
Schmitter und Karl, „What Democracy Is.. and Is Not“.
62.
Przeworski, Democracy and the Market.
63.
Ryabov, „The Reasons for the Rise of Populism in Developed Countries and Its Absence in the Post-Soviet Space“.
64.
Müller, What is populism?
65.
Weber, Economy and Society.
66.
Dobson, The Dictator’s Learning Curve.
67.
Scheppele, „Autocratic Legalism“.
68.
Madlovics und Magyar, „Populism as a Challenge to Legal-Rational Legitimacy“.
69.
Haraszti, „Illiberal State Censorship“.
70.
Pomerantsev, This Is Not Propaganda.
71.
Ripp, „The Opposition of the Mafia State“.
72.
Naím, „Missing Links“.
73.
Minzarari, „Disarming Public Protests in Russia“.
74.
Hoffman, The Oligarchs.
75.
Hale, Patronal Politics, 66–76.
76.
Escribà-Folch, „Accountable for what?“
77.
White und Hill, „Russia, the Former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe“.
78.
Huskey, „A Framework for the Analysis of Soviet Law“.
79.
Magyar, Post-Communist Mafia State, 117–122.
80.
Frye, Property Rights and Property Wrongs.
81.
Ledeneva, Can Russia Modernise?
82.
Mizsei, „The New East European Patronal States and the Rule-of-Law“.
83.
Ledeneva, How Russia Really Works, 60.
84.
Szilágyi, „Kompromat and Corruption in Russia“.
85.
Gessen, Words Will Break Cement.
86.
Savage, „The Russian National Guard“.
87.
Politkovskaya, A Russian Diary.
88.
Kis, „Demokráciából autokráciába [From Democracy to Autocracy]“.
89.
Olson, Power And Prosperity.
90.
Scheppele, „Autocratic Legalism“.
91.
Karl, „The Hybrid Regimes of Central America“.
92.
Madison, „Federalist No. 51“.
93.
Vörös, „A ‚Constitutional‘ Coup in Hungary between 2010–2014“.
94.
Hale, Patronal Politics, 76–80.
95.
Gerlach, Color Revolutions in Eurasia.
96.
Pop-Eleches und Robertson, „After the Revolution“.
97.
Bunce und Wolchik, Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries.
98.
Hirschman, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty.
99.
Hale, Patronal Politics, 84–85, 178–306.
100.
Mearman, Berger, und Guizzo, What Is Heterodox Economics?
101.
Holcombe, „Make Economics Policy Relevant“.
102.
Holcombe, Political Capitalism.
103.
Jancsics, „“A Friend Gave Me a Phone Number”“.
104.
Hellman, Jones, und Kaufmann, „Seize the state, seize the day“.
105.
Kornai, „Hidden in an Envelope: Gratitude Payments to Medical Doctors in Hungary“.
106.
Polanyi, Ökonomie und Gesellschaft.
107.
Kornai, The Socialist System, 90–109.
108.
Szelényi und Mihályi, Rent-Seekers, Profits, Wages and Inequality.
109.
Stigler, „The Theory of Economic Regulation“.
110.
North, Wallis, und Weingast, Violence and Social Orders, 112.
111.
Rojansky, „Corporate Raiding in Ukraine“.
112.
Markus, Property, Predation, and Protection, 62.
113.
Madlovics und Magyar, „Post-Communist Predation“.
114.
Vahabi, The Political Economy of Predation.
Abb. 1.14
Idealtypische Dynamik des Wettbewerbs- und Beziehungsmarktwertes der Zielunternehmen
Full size image
115.
Ledeneva, How Russia Really Works, 142.
116.
Holcombe, Political Capitalism.
117.
Csanádi, Self-Consuming Evolutions.
Tab. 1.30 Idealtypische Muster der Machtverteilung nach dem interaktiven Parteienstaatsmodell (IPS) von Mária Csanádi
Full size table
118.
Heilmann, China’s Political System.
119.
Bauer, „Investment Cycles in Planned Economies“.
120.
Csanádi, „Systemic Background of Local Indebtedness and Investment Overheating during the Global Crisis in China“.
121.
Zhu, „Corruption Networks in China: An Institutional Analysis“.
122.
Heilmann, „4.8. ‚Cadre Capitalism‘ and Corruption“.
123.
Zhu, „The Rise and Fall of Ruling Oligarchs“.
124.
Heilmann, China’s Political System, 228–29.
125.
Mayfair, „Guanxi (China)“.
126.
Granovetter, „The Strength of Weak Ties“.
127.
Barabási, Linked.
128.
Müller und Strøm, Policy, Office, Or Votes?
129.
Csepeli, „The Ideological Patchwork of the Mafia State“.
130.
Norris und Inglehart, Cultural Backlash.
131.
Granville, „‚Dermokratizatsiya‘ and „Prikhvatizatsiya“ “.
132.
Laclau, On Populist Reason.
133.
Pappas, Populism and Liberal Democracy.
134.
Collins, Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia, 50.
135.
Anderson und Albini, „Ukraine’s SBU and the New Oligarchy“.
136.
Shlapentokh und Woods, Contemporary Russia as a Feudal Society, 128–30.
137.
„ГAйзepгEйт [Gaizergate]“.
138.
Csaba, Válság-gazdaság-világ [Crisis-Economy-World].
139.
Gros, „From Transition to Integration“.
140.
Antonova, „Ex-IKEA Boss Bares Russia’s ‚Chaotic Reality‘“.
141.
Scheiring, The Retreat of Liberal Democracy.
142.
Chayes, Thieves of State.
143.
Stephenson, „It Takes Two to Tango“.
144.
Cooley und Heathershaw, Dictators Without Borders.
145.
Gaddy und Ickes, „Russia’s Dependence on Resources“; Franke, Gawrich, und Alakbarov, „Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan as Post-Soviet Rentier States“.
146.
Karl, „Understanding the resource curse“.
147.
Vahabi, „The Resource Curse Literature as Seen through the Appropriability Lens“.
148.
Tóth und Hajdu, „Cronyism in the Orbán Regime“.
149.
Magyar, Post-Communist Mafia State; Magyar und Vásárhelyi, Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State.
150.
Petrov, Lipman, und Hale, „Three dilemmas of hybrid regime governance“.
151.
Levitsky und Way, Competitive Authoritarianism, 14.
152.
Magyar und Madlovics, The Anatomy of Post-Communist Regimes, 622–634.
153.
Hale, Patronal Politics, 87–88.

Literatur

„The Rise of Kleptocracy [Special section]“. Journal of Democracy 29, Nr. 1 (2018): 20–95.
Google Scholar
Anderson, Julie, und Joseph L. Albini. „Ukraine’s SBU and the New Oligarchy“. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 12, Nr. 3 (1999): 282–324.
Google Scholar
Antonova, Maria. „Ex-IKEA Boss Bares Russia’s ‚Chaotic Reality‘“. The Moscow Times, 25. März 2010. http://old.themoscowtimes.com/business/article/ex-ikea-boss-bares-russias-chaotic-reality/402494.html.
Åslund, Anders. Russia’s Crony Capitalism: The Path from Market Economy to Kleptocracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019.
Book Google Scholar
Bach, Daniel C., und Mamoudou Gazibo. Neopatrimonialism in Africa and Beyond. Routledge, 2011.
Google Scholar
Baez-Camargo, Claudia, und Alena V. Ledeneva. „Where Does Informality Stop and Corruption Begin? Informal Governance and the Public/Private Crossover in Mexico, Russia and Tanzania“. Slavonic & East European Review 95, Nr. 1 (2017): 49–75.
Article Google Scholar
Banfield, Edward C. Moral Basis of a Backward Society. Underlining edition. New York: Free Press, 1967.
Google Scholar
Barabási, Albert-László. Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus Publishing, 2002.
Google Scholar
Bauer, Tamás. „Investment Cycles in Planned Economies“. Acta Oeconomica 21, Nr. 3 (1978): 243–60.
Google Scholar
Bokros, Lajos. Accidental Occidental: Economics and Culture of Transition in Mitteleuropa, the Baltic and the Balkan Area. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2013.
Book Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie J., und Sharon L. Wolchik. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. 1 edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Book Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. „The End of the Transition Paradigm“. Journal of Democracy 13, Nr. 1 (2002): 5–21.
Article Google Scholar
Cassani, Andrea. „Hybrid What? Partial Consensus and Persistent Divergences in the Analysis of Hybrid Regimes“. International Political Science Review 35, Nr. 5 (1. 0 2014): 542–58.
Google Scholar
Chayes, Sarah. Thieves of State: Why Corruption Threatens Global Security. W. W. Norton & Company, 2015.
Google Scholar
Chehabi, Houchang E., und Juan J. Linz. Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.
Book Google Scholar
Choi, Young Back. „Industrial Policy as the Engine of Economic Growth in South Korea: Myth and Reality“. In The Collapse of Development Planning, herausgegeben von Peter J. Boettke, 231–55. New York; London: NYU Press, 1994.
Google Scholar
Collins, Kathleen. Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Google Scholar
Collins, Kathleen. Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander A., und John Heathershaw. Dictators Without Borders: Power and Money in Central Asia. Yale University Press, 2017.
Google Scholar
Csaba László. Válság-gazdaság-világ: Adalék Közép-Európa három évtizedes gazdaságtörténetéhez (1988–2018) [Crisis-economy-world: Additions to the economic history of the last three decades of Central Europe (1988–2018)]. Budapest: Éghajlat Könyvkiadó, 2018.
Google Scholar
Csanádi, Mária. „Systemic Background of Local Indebtedness and Investment Overheating during the Global Crisis in China“. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 13 (2015): 147–74.
Article Google Scholar
Csanádi, Mária. Self-Consuming Evolutions: A Model on the Structure, Self-Reproduction, Self-Destruction And Transformation of Party-State Systems Tested in Romania, Hungary, and China. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 2006.
Google Scholar
Csepeli, György. „The Ideological Patchwork of the Mafia State“. In Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State, herausgegeben von Bálint Magyar und Júlia Vásárhelyi, 27–40. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2017.
Google Scholar
Dobson, William J. The Dictator’s Learning Curve: Inside the Global Battle for Democracy. New York: Anchor, 2013.
Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N., und Louis Roniger. „Patron—Client Relations as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange“. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22, Nr. 1 (1980): 42–77.
Google Scholar
Escribà-Folch, Abel. „Accountable for what? Regime types, performance, and the fate of outgoing dictators, 1946–2004“. Democratization 20, Nr. 1 (2013): 160–85.
Google Scholar
Fishman, Robert M. „Rethinking State and Regime: Southern Europe’s Transition to Democracy“. World Politics 42, Nr. 3 (April 1990): 422–40.
Google Scholar
Fisun, Oleksandr. „Neopatrimonialism in post-Soviet Eurasia“. In Stubborn Structures: Reconceptualizing Post-Communist Regimes, herausgegeben von Bálint Magyar, 75–96. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2019.
Google Scholar
Földi, András. „A római család jogi rendje [The legal order of the Roman family]“. Rubicon, Nr. 3–4 (1997). http://www.rubicon.hu/magyar/oldalak/a_romai_csalad_jogi_rendje/.
Friedrichs, David O. Trusted Criminals: White Collar Crime In Contemporary Society. 4 edition. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning, 2009.
Google Scholar
Frye, Timothy. Property Rights and Property Wrongs: How Power, Institutions, and Norms Shape Economic Conflict in Russia. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Google Scholar
Gaddy, Clifford G., und Barry W. Ickes. „Russia’s Dependence on Resources“. In The Oxford Handbook of the Russian Economy, herausgegeben von Michael Alexeev und Shlomo Weber, 309–40. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Google Scholar
Gerlach, Julia. Color Revolutions in Eurasia. London: Springer, 2014.
Book Google Scholar
Gessen, Masha. Words Will Break Cement: The Passion of Pussy Riot. New York: Riverhead Books, 2014.
Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A., Sanford Levinson, und Mark V. Tushnet, Hrsg. Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. „The Strength of Weak Ties“. American Journal of Sociology 78, Nr. 6 (1. Mai 1973): 1360–80.
Google Scholar
Granville, Johanna. „‚Dermokratizatsiya‘ and Prikhvatizatsiya“: the Russian kleptocracy and rise of organized crime“. Demokratizatsiya 11, Nr. 3 (2003): 449–58.
Google Scholar
Gros, Daniel. „From Transition to Integration: The Role of Trade and Investment“. In The Great Rebirth: Lessons from the Victory of Capitalism over Communism, herausgegeben von Anders Åslund und Simeon Djankov, 233–50. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2014.
Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E. Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Google Scholar
Haraszti, Miklós. „Illiberal State Censorship: A Must-have Accessory for Any Mafia State“. In Stubborn Structures: Reconceptualizing Post-Communist Regimes, herausgegeben von Bálint Magyar, 371–84. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2019.
Google Scholar
Heilmann, Sebastian, Hrsg. China’s Political System. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.
Google Scholar
Heilmann, Sebastian. „4.8. ‚Cadre Capitalism‘ and Corruption“. In China’s Political System, herausgegeben von Sebastian Heilmann, 226–34. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.
Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel S, Geraint Jones, und Daniel Kaufmann. „Seize the state, seize the day: state capture and influence in transition economies“. Journal of Comparative Economics 31, Nr. 4 (1. 0 2003): 751–73.
Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Harvard University Press, 1970.
Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. Primitive Rebels. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1965.
Google Scholar
Hoffman, David E. The Oligarchs: Wealth And Power In The New Russia. Revised, Updated ed. edition. New York, NY: PublicAffairs, 2011.
Google Scholar
Holcombe, Randall G. „Make Economics Policy Relevant: Depose the Omniscient Benevolent Dictator“. The Independent Review 17, Nr. 2 (2012): 165–76.
Google Scholar
Holcombe, Randall G. Political Capitalism: How Economic and Political Power Is Made and Maintained. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1968.
Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996.
Google Scholar
Huskey, Eugene. „A Framework for the Analysis of Soviet Law“. The Russian Review 50, Nr. 1 (1991): 53–70.
Article Google Scholar
Jancsics, Dávid. „“A Friend Gave Me a Phone Number”: Brokerage in Low-Level Corruption“. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 1, Nr. 43 (2015): 68–87.
Article Google Scholar
Jancsics, Dávid. „From Local Cliques to Mafia State: The Evolution of Network Corruption“. In Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State, herausgegeben von Bálint Magyar und Júlia Vásárhelyi, 129–47. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2017.
Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. „The Hybrid Regimes of Central America“. Journal of Democracy 6, Nr. 3 (1. Juli 1995): 72–86.
Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. „Understanding the resource curse“. In Covering Oil: A Guide to Energy and Development, herausgegeben von Svetlana Tsalik und Anya Schiffrin, 21–27. New York: Open Society Institute, 2005.
Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Hrsg. Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives. London; New York: Routledge, 2010.
Google Scholar
Kis, János. „Demokráciából autokráciába: A rendszertipológia és az átmenet dinamikája [From Democracy to Autocracy: Regime Typology and the Dynamics of Transition]“. Politikatudományi Szemle 28, Nr. 1 (2019): 45–74.
Article Google Scholar
Klíma, Michal. Informal Politics in Post-Communist Europe: Political Parties, Clientelism and State Capture. 1 edition. Routledge, 2019.
Google Scholar
Kommersant. „Гaйзepгeйт [Gaizergate]“, 20. September 2015. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2814839.
Kopecký, Petr, und Cas Mudde. „What Has Eastern Europe Taught Us about the Democratization Literature (and Vice Versa)?“ European Journal of Political Research 37, Nr. 4 (1. Juni 2000): 517–39.
Google Scholar
Kornai, János. „Hidden in an Envelope: Gratitude Payments to Medical Doctors in Hungary“. In The Paradoxes of Unintended Consequences, herausgegeben von L. Dahrendorf und Y. Elkana. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2000.
Google Scholar
Kornai, János. „The system paradigm revisited“. Acta Oeconomica 66, Nr. 4 (1. 0 2016): 547–96.
Google Scholar
Kornai, János. The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.
Book Google Scholar
Kryshtanovskaya, Olga, und Stephen White. „Inside the Putin court: A research note“. Europe-Asia Studies 57, Nr. 7 (1. 0 2005): 1065–75.
Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. On Populist Reason. London ; New York: Verso, 2005.
Google Scholar
Ledeneva, Alena V. How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practices That Shaped Post-Soviet Politics and Business. New York: Cornell University Press, 2006.
Google Scholar
Ledeneva, Alena. Can Russia Modernise?: Sistema, Power Networks and Informal Governance. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Book Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, und Lucan Way. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Google Scholar
Madison, James. „Federalist No. 51: The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments“. In The Federalist Papers, von Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, und John Jay, 317–21. herausgegeben von Clinton Rossiter und Charles R. Kessler, 1 edition. New York, NY: Signet, 2003.
Google Scholar
Madlovics, Bálint, und Bálint Magyar. „Populism as a Challenge to Legal-Rational Legitimacy: The Cases of Orbán and Trump“. Social Research: An International Quarterly 88, Nr. 4 (2021): 827–55.
Article Google Scholar
Madlovics, Bálint, und Bálint Magyar. „Post-Communist Predation: Modeling Reiderstvo Practices in Contemporary Predatory States“. Public Choice 187 (2021): 247–73.
Article Google Scholar
Magyar, Bálint, Hrsg. Stubborn Structures: Reconceptualizing Post-Communist Regimes. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2019.
Google Scholar
Magyar, Bálint, und Bálint Madlovics. The Anatomy of Post-Communist Regimes: A Conceptual Framework. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2020.
Book Google Scholar
Magyar, Bálint, und Júlia Vásárhelyi, Hrsg. Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State. Budapest: CEU Press, 2017.
Google Scholar
Magyar, Bálint. Post-Communist Mafia State: The Case of Hungary. Budapest: CEU Press, 2016.
Book Google Scholar
Markus, Stanislav. „The Atlas That has Not Shrugged: Why Russia’s Oligarchs are an Unlikely Force for Change“. Dædalus – Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences 146, Nr. 2 (2017): 101–12.
Google Scholar
Markus, Stanislav. Property, Predation, and Protection: Piranha Capitalism in Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Google Scholar
Mayfair, Yang. „Guanxi (China)“. In The Global Encyclopaedia of Informality, herausgegeben von Alena Ledeneva, Volume 1:75–79. UCL Press, 2018.
Google Scholar
Mearman, Andrew, Sebastian Berger, und Danielle Guizzo, Hrsg. What Is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists. Routledge, 2019.
Google Scholar
Minakov, Mikhail. „Republic of Clans: The Evolution of the Ukrainian Political System“. In Stubborn Structures: Reconceptualizing Post-Communist Regimes, herausgegeben von Bálint Magyar, 217–45. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2019.
Google Scholar
Minzarari, Dumitru. „Disarming Public Protests in Russia: Transforming Public Goods into Private Goods“. In Stubborn Structures: Reconceptualizing Post-Communist Regimes, herausgegeben von Bálint Magyar, 385–411. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2019.
Google Scholar
Mizsei, Kálmán. „The New East European Patronal States and the Rule-of-Law“. In Stubborn Structures: Reconceptualizing Post-Communist Regimes, herausgegeben von Bálint Magyar, 531–610. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2019.
Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. „Constitutions, Constitutionalism, and Democracy“. In Constitutionalism and Democracy: Transitions in the Contemporary World, herausgegeben von Douglas Greenberg, Stanley N. Katz, Steven C. Wheatley, und Melanie Beth Oliviero, 3–25. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. What is populism? University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.
Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C., und Kaare Strøm, Hrsg. Policy, Office, Or Votes?: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Google Scholar
Naím, Moisés. „Missing Links: What Is a GONGO?“ Foreign Policy, Nr. 160 (2009): 95–96.
Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, und Ronald Inglehart. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Book Google Scholar
North, Douglass C., John Joseph Wallis, und Barry R. Weingast. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Google Scholar
Nureev, Rustem. „Power-Property as a Path-Dependence Problem: The Russian Experiance“. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Conference of the European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy (EAEPE). Krakow, 2012.
Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. „Political Corruption: Conceptual and Practical Issues“. In Building a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition, herausgegeben von János Kornai und Susan Rose-Ackerman, 77–99. Political Evolution and Institutional Change. Palgrave Macmillan US, 2004.
Google Scholar
Okara, Andrey. „Sovereign Democracy: A New Russian Idea or a PR Project?“ Russia in Global Affairs 5, Nr. 3 (2007): 8–20.
Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. Power And Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist And Capitalist Dictatorships. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2000.
Google Scholar
Pakulski, Jan, und Malcolm Waters. „The Reshaping and Dissolution of Social Class in Advanced Society“. Theory and Society 25, Nr. 5 (1996): 667–91.
Article Google Scholar
Pappas, Takis S. Populism and Liberal Democracy: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Book Google Scholar
Petrov, Nikolay, Maria Lipman, und Henry E. Hale. „Three dilemmas of hybrid regime governance: Russia from Putin to Putin“. Post-Soviet Affairs 30, Nr. 1 (2014): 1–26.
Article Google Scholar
Petrov, Nikolay. „Putin’s Neo-Nomenklatura System and its Evolution“. In Stubborn Structures: Reconceptualizing Post-Communist Regimes, herausgegeben von Bálint Magyar, 179–215. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2019.
Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. Ökonomie und Gesellschaft. 1. Aufl. Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch Wissenschaft. Frankfurt (am Main) : Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch-Verl., 1979.
Google Scholar
Politkovskaya, Anna. A Russian Diary: A Journalist’s Final Account of Life, Corruption, and Death in Putin’s Russia. London: Random House Publishing Group, 2009.
Google Scholar
Pomerantsev, Peter. This Is Not Propaganda: Adventures in the War Against Reality. New York, NY: PublicAffairs, 2019.
Google Scholar
Pop-Eleches, Grigore, und Graeme Robertson. „After the Revolution“. Problems of Post-Communism 61, Nr. 4 (2014): 3–22.
Article Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Book Google Scholar
Ripp, Zoltán. „The Opposition of the Mafia State“. In Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State, herausgegeben von Bálint Magyar und Júlia Vásárhelyi, 575–609. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2017.
Google Scholar
Rojansky, Matthew A. „Corporate Raiding in Ukraine: Causes, Methods and Consequences“. Demokratizatsiya; Washington 22, Nr. 3 (Summer 2014): 411–43.
Google Scholar
Ryabov, Andrey. „The Institution of Power&Ownership in the Former U.S.S.R.: Origin, Diversity of Forms, and Influence on Transformation Processes“. In Stubborn Structures: Reconceptualizing Post-Communist Regimes, herausgegeben von Bálint Magyar, 415–35. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2019.
Google Scholar
Ryabov, Andrey. „The Reasons for the Rise of Populism in Developed Countries and Its Absence in the Post-Soviet Space“. In Populism as a Common Challenge, herausgegeben von Claudia Crawford, Boris Makarenko, und Nikolay Petrov, 37–46. Moscow: Political encyclopedia, 2018.
Google Scholar
Savage, Patrick. „The Russian National Guard: An Asset for Putin at Home and Abroad“. American Security Project, 0 2017. https://www.americansecurityproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Ref-0208-Russian-National-Guard.pdf.
Scheiring, Gábor. The Retreat of Liberal Democracy: Authoritarian Capitalism and the Accumulative State in Hungary. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.
Book Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. „Autocratic Legalism“. University of Chicago Law Review 85, Nr. 2 (2018): 545–83.
Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C., und Terry Lynn Karl. „The Conceptual Travels of Transitologists and Consolidologists: How Far to the East Should They Attempt to Go?“ Slavic Review 53, Nr. 1 (1994): 173–85.
Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C., und Terry Lynn Karl. „What Democracy Is. . . and Is Not“. Journal of Democracy 2, Nr. 3 (1991): 3–16.
Google Scholar
Shilling, H. Gordon. „‘People’s democracy’ in soviet theory‐I“. Soviet Studies 3, Nr. 1 (Juli 1951): 16–33.
Google Scholar
Shlapentokh, Vladimir, und Joshau Woods. Contemporary Russia as a Feudal Society: A New Perspective on the Post-Soviet Era. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Book Google Scholar
Shlapentokh, Vladimir, und Joshau Woods. Contemporary Russia as a Feudal Society: A New Perspective on the Post-Soviet Era. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Book Google Scholar
Stephenson, Svetlana. „It Takes Two to Tango: The State and Organized Crime in Russia“. Current Sociology 65, Nr. 3 (1. Mai 2017): 411–26.
Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. „The Theory of Economic Regulation“. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2, Nr. 1 (1971): 3–21.
Article Google Scholar
Szabó Miklós. A jó kommunista szilárdan együtt ingadozik a párttal: Előadások a kommunista pártok történetéről és a fekete–piros-fehér-zöld színre festett sztálinizmusról [The Good Communist Firmly Fluctuates with the Party: Lectures on the History of Communist Parties and the Black–Red-White-Green Stalinism]. Herausgegeben von Jankó Attila. JATEPress Kiadó, 2013.
Google Scholar
Szelényi, Iván, und Péter Mihályi. Rent-Seekers, Profits, Wages and Inequality: The Top 20%. Pivot. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
Google Scholar
Szelényi, Iván, und Szonja Szelényi. „Circulation or Reproduction of Elites during the Postcommunist Transformation of Eastern Europe: Introduction“. Theory and Society 24, Nr. 5 (1995): 615–38.
Google Scholar
Szilágyi, Ákos. „Kompromat and Corruption in Russia“. In Political Corruption in Transition: A Sceptic’s Handbook, herausgegeben von Stephen Kotkin und András Sajó, 207–31. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2002.
Google Scholar
Szűcs, Jenő. „The Three Historical Regions of Europe: An outline“. Acta Historica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 29, Nr. 2/4 (1983): 131–84.
Google Scholar
Tóth, István János, und Miklós Hajdu. „Cronyism in the Orbán Regime: An Empirical Analysis of Public Tenders, 2005–2021“. In Dynamics of an Authoritarian System: Hungary, 2010–2021, von Mária Csanádi, Márton Gerő, Miklós Hajdu, Imre Kovách, István János Tóth, und Mihály Laki, 230–74. Budapest–Vienna–New York: CEU Press, 2022.
Google Scholar
Vahabi, Mehrdad. „A Positive Theory of the Predatory State“. Public Choice 168, Nr. 3 (1. September 2016): 153–75.
Google Scholar
Vahabi, Mehrdad. „The Resource Curse Literature as Seen through the Appropriability Lens: A Critical Survey“. Public Choice 175, Nr. 3 (1. Juni 2018): 393–428.
Google Scholar
Vahabi, Mehrdad. The Political Economy of Predation: Manhunting and the Economics of Escape. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Book Google Scholar
Volkov, Vadim. Violent Entrepreneurs: The Use of Force in the Making of Russian Capitalism. 1 edition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
Google Scholar
Vörös, Imre. „A ‚Constitutional‘ Coup in Hungary between 2010–2014“. In Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State, herausgegeben von Bálint Magyar und Júlia Vásárhelyi, 41–68. Budapest–New York: CEU Press, 2017.
Google Scholar
Vörös, Imre. „Hungary’s Constitutional Evolution During the Last 25 Years“. Südosteuropa 63, Nr. 2 (2015): 173–200.
Google Scholar
Wade, Robert H. „The Developmental State: Dead or Alive?“ Development and Change 49, Nr. 2 (2018): 518–46.
Article Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An outline of interpretative sociology. Herausgegeben von Guenther Roth und Claus Wittich. University of California Press, 1978.
Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An outline of interpretative sociology. Herausgegeben von Guenther Roth und Claus Wittich. University of California Press, 1978.
Google Scholar
Wedel, Janine R. „Clans, cliques and captured states: rethinking ‘transition’in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union“. Journal of International Development 15, Nr. 4 (2003): 427–40.
Article Google Scholar
White, Stephen, und Ronald J. Hill. „Russia, the Former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe: The Referendum as a Flexible Political Instrument“. In The Referendum Experience in Europe, herausgegeben von Michael Gallagher und Pier Vincenzo Uleri, 153–70. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1996.
Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin. „Understanding Class: Towards an Integrated Analytical Approach“. American Sociological Review 67, Nr. 6 (2009): 832–53.
Article Google Scholar
Zhu, Jiangnan. „Corruption Networks in China: An Institutional Analysis“. In Routledge Handbook of Corruption in Asia, herausgegeben von Ting Gong und Ian Scott, 27–41. Abingdon, Oxford, UK: Routledge, 2017.
Google Scholar
Zhu, Jiangnan. „The Rise and Fall of Ruling Oligarchs: Fighting “Political Corruption” in China“. China Review 22, Nr. 2 (2022): 49–79.
Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Democracy Institute, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary
Bálint Magyar
Democracy Institute, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary
Bálint Madlovics

Authors

Bálint Magyar
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Bálint Madlovics
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bálint Magyar .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Magyar, B., Madlovics, B. (2023). Der begriffliche Rahmen: 120 Thesen. In: Postkommunistische Regime. Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40729-2_1

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40729-2_1
Published: 01 July 2023
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-40728-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-40729-2
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics