Skip to main content

Post-study migration behaviour: Differences between native, foreign and international university graduates in Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regionale Mobilität und Hochschulbildung

Part of the book series: Higher Education Research and Science Studies ((HERSS))

  • 479 Accesses

Abstract

We investigate differences in the mobility behaviour of graduates who completed secondary school in Germany (German, foreign) or abroad (international) and analyse factors that may cause disparities in mobility. Our analysis focuses on job-relevant networks and work experience as they seem to be associated with the area of job search and with migration decisions. Results of an event history analysis show that the proportion of long-term “stayers” in the university region is relatively low among international graduates. Regression results indicate that the probability to leave the region differs depending on individual, study-related and regional factors. Pre-study mobility and work experience in particular turn out to be important predictors. When controlling for these factors, the likelihood of staying in the university region does not significantly differ between German and international graduates. In contrast, foreign graduates who attended school in Germany show a higher propensity to leave the university region in order to enter the labour market than the other graduate groups, conditional on covariates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 2019, more than 10 percent of graduates in Germany had foreign citizenship. This proportion has doubled over the last two decades (Statistisches Bundesamt, 2020b).

  2. 2.

    We use the terms mobility and migration interchangeably. In the empirical analysis, we examine out-migration from the university region.

  3. 3.

    Scheller et al. (2013) note that more than 20 percent of all first-year students at German universities have completed an apprenticeship when enrolling for higher education.

  4. 4.

    In our data, 44 percent of the graduates obtained their higher education entrance certificate in the university region (see Sect. 3). Stöver und Sibbertsen (2018) show that in seven out of sixteen federal states more than 50 percent of the high school graduates moved to another state to start university.

  5. 5.

    Recent publications by Corcoran und Faggian (2017) and Buenstorf et al. (2016) provide excellent overviews.

  6. 6.

    We refrain from giving a detailed review of the literature on the international mobility of students and graduates because our analysis focuses on interregional mobility within Germany.

  7. 7.

    Furthermore, studies on international migration show that the probability of return migration decreases when migrants have resided in the host country for a longer period of time (e.g., van den Berg & Weynandt, 2013).

  8. 8.

    We cannot identify persons with dual nationality in our data. Furthermore, a potential fourth group of graduates, persons with German citizenship who obtained their university entry certificate abroad, is not represented in the data.

  9. 9.

    We assume that the mobility behaviour of this group differs significantly from that of the majority of graduates. These older graduates are likely to have entered the labour market already before starting university. Moreover, we assume that there are important differences with respect to family status, a characteristic we do not record.

  10. 10.

    We choose a Weibull distribution because the raw hazards derived from Kaplan–Meier estimates closely resemble hazards drawn from a Weibull distribution with p < 1 (see Figure 1 and the corresponding discussion in Andrews et al., 2011).

  11. 11.

    These results closely resemble the distribution across fields of study in official administrative university data, see Statistisches Bundesamt (2020a).

  12. 12.

    In contrast, the results of Busch und Weigert (2010) point to a decrease in migration probability as the age of graduates increases.

  13. 13.

    Applying the estimate of the full model (model 3 in Tab. 5), graduates who moved to the university region when starting university have a 94 percent [(exp(0.662) − 1) × 100] higher probability of taking up a full-time job outside the university region than immobile students, all other things being equal (including the frailty term).

  14. 14.

    As a robustness check, we also included interaction terms between exam grades and fields of study in the three models. The findings on differences between the graduate groups are not affected by this extension of the models.

  15. 15.

    We refer to a more detailed discussion of the corresponding effects in Teichert et al. (2020).

References

  • Agethen, C. (2019). Economic analyses in settings with different levels of data aggregation. Shaker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M., Clark, K., & Whittaker, W. (2011). The determinants of regional migration in Great Britain: A duration approach. Journal of the Royal Statistics Society, 174(1), 127–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buenstorf, G., Geissler, M., & Krabel, S. (2016). Locations of labor market entry by German university graduates: Is (regional) beauty in the eye of the beholder? Review of Regional Research, 36(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, O., & Weigert, B. (2010). Where have all the graduates gone? Internal cross-state migration of graduates in Germany 1984–2004. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(3), 559–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cleves, M., Gutierrez, R. G., Gould, W., & Marchenko, Y. V. (2010). An introduction to survival analysis using Stata. Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, J., & Faggian, A. (2017). Graduate migration and regional development: An international perspective. In J. Corcoran & A. Faggian (eds.), Graduate migration and regional development: An international perspective (pp. 1–10). Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Damelang, A. (2007). Räumliche Mobilität von türkischen Arbeitnehmern: eine Analyse mit der IAB-Beschäftigtenstichprobe 2001. (IAB Discussion Paper: Beiträge zum wissenschaftlichen Dialog aus dem Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung 21/2007). Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung der Bundesagentur für Arbeit.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaVanzo, J. (1983). Repeat migration in the U.S.: Who moves back and who moves on? Journal of Economic Statistics, 65(4), 552–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delisle, F., & Sheamur, R. (2010). Where does all the talent flow? Migration of young graduates and nongraduates, Canada 1996–2001. Canadian Geographer, 54(3), 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detang-Dessandre, C., & Molho, O. (2000). Residence spells and migration: A comparison for men and women. Urban Studies, 37(2), 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotti, N. F., Fratesi, U., Lenzi, C., & Percoco, M. (2013). Local labour markets and the interregional mobility of Italian university students. Spatial Economic Analysis, 8(4), 443–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faggian, A., & Franklin, R. S. (2014). Human capital redistribution in the USA: The migration of the college-bound. Spatial Economic Analysis, 9(4), 376–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faggian, A., & McCann, P. (2008). Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British regions. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(2), 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faggian, A., McCann, P., & Sheppard, S. (2006). An analysis of ethnic differences in UK graduate migration behaviour. Annals of Regional Science, 40(2), 461–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faggian, A., McCann, P., & Sheppard, S. (2007). Some evidence that women are more mobile than men: Gender differences in U.K. graduate migration behaviour. Journal of Regional Science, 47(3), 517–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennaioli, N., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2013). Human capital and regional development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 105–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glorius, B. (2016). Gekommen, um zu bleiben? Der Verbleib internationaler Studierender in Deutschland aus einer Lebenslaufperspektive. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 4, 361–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, P. D., & Joseph, G. (2006). College-to-work migration of technology graduates and holders of doctorates within the United States. Journal of Regional Science, 46(4), 627–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Harvard Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. J. (1972). The geographic mobility of college graduates. The Journal of Human Resources, 8(4), 506–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griesbeck, M., & Heß, B. (2016). „Study and stay”– Entwicklung und aktuelle Fragestellungen der rechtlichen Grundlegung der Zuwanderung und des Aufenthalts von Studenten und Absolventen. Recht der Jugend und des Bildungswesens, 64(1), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haapanen, M., & Tervo, H. (2012). Migration of the highly educated: Evidence from residence spells of university graduates. Journal of Regional Science, 52(4), 587–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., & Turok, I. (2017). Universities, knowledge and regional development. Regional Studies, 51(7), 977–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haussen, T., & Uebelmesser, S. (2018a). No place like home? Graduate migration in Germany. Growth and Change, 49(3), 442–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haussen, T., & Uebelmesser, S. (2018b). Job changes and interregional migration of graduates. Regional Studies, 52(10), 1346–1359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1381335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krabel, S., & Flöther, C. (2014). Here today, gone tomorrow? Regional labour mobility of German university graduates. Regional Studies, 48(10), 1609–1627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarz, F., & Nordström Skans, O. (2014). When strong ties are strong: Networks and youth labour market entry. Review of Economic Studies, 81(3), 1164–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu, N. (2016). Empirical analysis of the integrated employment biographies. Shaker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheller, P., Isleib, S., & Sommer, D. (2013). Studienanfängerinnen und Studienanfänger im Wintersemester 2011/2012: Tabellenband. (Forum Hochschule 6/2013). HIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2020a). Bildung und Kultur: Prüfungen an Hochschulen 2019. (Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.2.). Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2020b). Hochschulabsolventinnen und -absolventen insgesamt sowie ausländische Hochschulabsolventinnen und -absolventen nach Prüfungsgruppen, Ländern und Geschlecht. https://www.datenportal.bmbf.de/portal/de/K256.html. Retrieved: 14 January 2021.

  • Stöver, P., & Sibbertsen, B. (2018). Die räumliche Flexibilität von Studierenden – Gründe für das Wanderungsverhalten von Studienanfängerinnen und Studienanfängern zwischen den Bundesländern. Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, 40(3), 8–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichert, C., Niebuhr, A., Otto, A., & Rossen, A. (2020). Work experience and graduate migration: An event history analysis of German data. Regional Studies, 54(10), 1413–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, G. J., & Weynandt, M. A. (2013). Explaining differences between the expected and actual duration until return migration: Economic changes. Schmollers Jahrbuch: Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften/Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 133(2), 249–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, J. V. (2013). Human capital externalities and employment differences across metropolitan areas of the USA. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(5), 799–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annekatrin Niebuhr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Niebuhr, A., Otto, A., Rossen, A., Teichert, C. (2022). Post-study migration behaviour: Differences between native, foreign and international university graduates in Germany. In: Jungbauer-Gans, M., Gottburgsen, A. (eds) Regionale Mobilität und Hochschulbildung. Higher Education Research and Science Studies. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36156-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36156-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-36155-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-36156-3

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics