Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mode-Effekte

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung

Zusammenfassung

Unter Mode-Effekten werden zufällige und/oder systematische Verzerrungen in den Antworten von Befragten verstanden, die auf die Form der Administration der Befragung zurückzuführen sind. Mit „Administration“ ist die Art und Weise der Präsentation der Fragen und die Aufzeichnung der Antworten der Befragten gemeint. Beispielsweise werden in Face-to-Face-Interviews (Stocké, Kapitel 51 in diesem Band) die Fragen in der Regel von Interviewern in einer mündlichen Situation vorgelesen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Biemer, Paul. P. (2001): Nonresponse bias and measurement bias in a comparison of face to face and telephone interviewing. In: Journal of Official Statistics 17 (2): 295-320

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse, Britta/Fuchs, Marek (2012): The components of landline telephone survey coverage bias. The relative importance of no-phone and mobile-only populations. In: Quality & Quantity 46 (4): 1209-1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busse, Britta/Fuchs, Marek (2015): Telephone surveys using mobile phones. In: Engel, Uwe/Jann, Ben/Lynn, Peter/Scherpenzeel, Annette C./Sturgis, Peter (Hg.): Improving Survey Methods. Lessons from Recent Research. New York: Routledge, 51-66

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Linchiat/Krosnick, Jon A. (2010): Comparing oral interviewing with self-administered computerized questionnaires: An experiment. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 74 (1): 154-167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Frederik G./Schober, Michael F. (2000): Clarifying question meaning in a household telephone survey. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (1): 1-28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruijne, Marika Annukka/Wijnant, Arnaud (2013): Comparing survey results obtained via mobile devices and computers: An experiment with a mobile web survey on a heterogeneous group of mobile devices versus a computer-assisted web survey. In: Social Science Computer Review 31 (4): 482-504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw, Edith D./Hox, Joop J. (2015): Survey mode and mode effects. In: Engel, Uwe/Jann, Ben/Lynn, Peter/Scherpenzeel, Annette C./Sturgis, Peter (Hg.): Improving Survey Methods. Lessons from Recent Research. New York: Routledge, 22-34

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, Don A./Smyth, Jolene D./Christian, Leah M. (2014): Internet, phone, mail and mixed-mode surveys. The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Marek/Couper, Mick P./Hansen, Sue-Ellen (2000): Technology effects: Do CAPI or PAPI interviews take longer. In: Journal of Official Statistics 16 (3): 273-286

    Google Scholar 

  • Heerwegh, Dirk (2009): Mode differences between face-to-face and web surveys: An experimental investigation of data quality and social desirability effects. In: International Journal of Public Opinion Research 21 (1): 111-121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heerwegh, Dirk/Loosveldt, Geert (2011): Assessing mode effects in a national crime victimization survey using structural equation models: Social desirability bias and acquiescence. In: Journal of Official Statistics 27 (1): 49-63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hox, Joop J./de Leeuw, Edith D./Klausch, Thomas (2017): Mixed-mode research. In: Biemer, Paul B./ de Leeuw, Edith D./Eckman, Stephanie/Edwards, Brad/Kreuter, Frauke/Lyberg, Lars E./Tucker, Clyde N./West, Brady T. (Hg.): Total Survey Error in Practice. Hoboken: Wiley, 511-530

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter, Frauke/Presser, Stanley/Tourangeau, Roger (2008): Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and Web surveys: The effects of mode and question sensitivity. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (5) 847-865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter, Frauke/Müller, Gerrit/Trappmann, Mark (2010): Nonresponse and measurement error in employment research. Making use of administrative data. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 74 (5): 880-906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Mingnan/Conrad, Frederick. G./Lee, Sunghee (2017): Comparing acquiescent and extreme response styles in face-to-face and web surveys. In: Quality & Quantity 51 (2): 941-958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariano, Luis T./Elliott, Mark N. (2017): An item response theory approach to estimating survey mode effects: Analysis of data from a randomized mode experiment. In: Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 5 (2): 233-253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, Joel M. (2004): Assessment of cigarette smoking and smoking susceptibility among youth: Telephone computer-assisted self-interviews versus computer-assisted telephone interviews. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 68 (4): 565-587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, Norbert/Strack, Fritz/Hippler, Hans-Jürgen/Bishop, Georg F. (1991): The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurement. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology 5 (3): 193-212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Tom/Bailey, Justin T./Link, Michael W. (2014): Comparison of Smartphone and online computer survey administration. In: Social Science Computer Review 32 (2): 238-255

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Soziologie, Fachbereich 2: Gesellschafts- und Geschichtswissenschaften, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Deutschland

    Marek Fuchs

Authors
  1. Marek Fuchs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marek Fuchs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Nina Baur

  2. Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany

    Jörg Blasius

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fuchs, M. (2019). Mode-Effekte. In: Baur, N., Blasius, J. (eds) Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-21307-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-21308-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation