Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Demokratisierung und Demokratiemodelle

Ein dynamischer Ansatz für Lateinamerika nach der Transition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Demokratie, Diktatur, Gerechtigkeit

  • 7161 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Politik in Lateinamerika konzentriert sich im Zuge des demokratischen Wandels in den 1980er und 1990er Jahren weiterhin auf die Demokratie. Eine alte Sorge – die Sicherung demokratischer Mindeststandards, die als Ziel der Prozesse des demokratischen Übergangs gedient hat – bleibt relevant. Aber eine neue Sorge – das Erreichen von mehr als einer Minimaldemokratie – verändert die Politik über die Demokratie. Akteure, die entweder für oder gegen den Neoliberalismus – die Schlüsselachse des idelogischen Konflikts – waren, haben Veränderungen im Namen unterschiedlicher Demokratiemodelle befürwortet oder abgelehnt. Welches Demokratiemodell beherrschte und formte nun die Verläufe nach der Transition in Lateinamerika und bestimmte dadurch, wie sich die Demokratie entwickelte und ob die Demokratie Bestand hatte?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Acemoglu, Daron und James A. Robinson. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrueto, Felipe und Patricio Navia. 2013. Tipologías de democracia representativa en América Latina. Política y Gobierno 20 (2): 265-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, Norberto. 1996. Right and Left. The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresser Pereira, Luiz Carlos, José María Maravall und Adam Przeworski. 1993. Economic Reform in New Democracies: A Social-Democratic Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Maxwell A. 2014. The Myth of Competitive Authoritarianism in the Andes, unveröffentlichtes Manuskript, University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, Dante. 2011. El desarrollo democrático en América Latina: Entre la crisis de legitimidad y la crisis de sustentabilidad. Revista SAAP 5 (2): 437-452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavarozzi, Marcelo. 1992. Beyond Transitions to Democracy in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies 24 (3): 665-684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Ruth Berins und David Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and the Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consejo para la Consolidación de la Democracia. 1988. Presidencialismo vs. parlamentarismo: Materiales para el estudio de la reforma constitucional. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Torre, Carlos. 2013. In the Name of the People: Democratization, Popular Organizations, and Populism in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 95: 27-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Sebastian. 2010. Left Behind: Latin America and the False Promise of Populism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escaith, Hubert und Igor Paunovic. 2004. Reformas estructurales en América Latina y el Caribe en el período 1970–2000: Indices y notas metodológicas. Santiago, Chile: ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Macías, Gustavo A. 2012. After Neoliberalism? The Left and Economic Reforms in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargarella, Roberto. 2010. The Legal Foundations of Inequality. Constitutionalism in the Americas 1776-1860. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargarella, Roberto. 2013. Latin American Constitutionalism (1810-2010): The Engine Room of the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 2007. Del post-pinochetismo a la sociedad democrática. Globalización y Política en el bicentenario. Santiago, Chile: Random House Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 2012. Neoliberalismo corregido y progresismo limitado: Los gobiernos de la concertación en Chile, 1990-2010. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Arcis and CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garretón, Manuel Antonio, Marcelo Cavarozzi, Peter S. Cleaves, Gary Gereffi und Jonathan Hartlyn. 2003. Latin America in the Twenty-First Century: Toward a New Sociopolitical Matrix. Boulder, MA: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy Arcaya, Oscar. Hrsg. 1990. Hacia una democracia moderna: La opción parlamentaria. Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnecker, Marta. 2007. Rebuilding the Left. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Evelyne und John D. Stephens. 2012. Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insulza, José Miguel. 2014. Sólo el diálogo puede cambiar la dinámica de confrontación. El País, 26. Februar 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauze, Enrique. 1984. Por una democracia sin adjetivos. Vuelta 9 (86): 4-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto. 2006. La deriva populista y la centroizquierda latinoamericana. Nueva sociedad 205: 56-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Crisis, Breakdown, and Reequilibriation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzuca, Sebastián L. 2013. The Rise of Rentier Populism. Journal of Democracy 24 (4): 108-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2014a. Is There a Crisis of Democracy? Democratic Theory 1 (2): 11-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2014b. Is Capitalism Compatible with Democracy? Comparative Governance and Politics 8 (2): 109-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang. Hrsg. 2015. Demokratie und Krise. Zum schwierigen Verhältnis von Theorie und Empirie. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, Samuel A., Roberto Machado und Stefano Pettinato. 1999. Indexes of Structural Reform in Latin America. Santiago, Chile: ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, Gerardo L. 2009. Measuring Democracy: A Bridge Between Scholarship and Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, Gerardo L. 2016. What is Democracy? A Reconceptualization of the Quality of Democracy. Democratization 23 (1): 1-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, María Victoria, Virginia Oliveros und Milan Vaishnav. 2010. Dataset on Political Ideology of Presidents and Parties in Latin America. Columbia University. Online unter http://mariavictoriamurillo.com/data/ or http://www.virginiaoliveros.com, Zugriff am 13.04.2016.

  • Nun, José. 2003. Democracy: Government of the People or Government of the Politicians? Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy 5 (1): 55-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo. 2007. Dissonances: Democratic Critiques of Democracy. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo und Philippe Schmitter. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo, Jorge Vargas Cullell und Osvaldo Iazzetta. Hrsg. 2004. The Quality of Democracy. Theory and Applications. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisarello, Gerardo. 2012. Un largo Termidor: Historia y crítica del constitucionalismo antidemocrático. Quito: Corte Constitucional para el Período de Transición.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam. 1985. Capitalism and Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, Alain. 1989. América Latina: Política y sociedad. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1987. False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1990. A Alternative Transformadora. Como Democratizar o Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Guanabara Koogan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1998. Democracy Realized. The Progressive Alternative. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas Llosa, Mario. 2009. Sables y Utopías: Visiones de América Latina. Madrid: Aguilar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Ignacio. 2013. Democracy in Latin America: Between Hope and Despair. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weffort, Francisco C. 1992. New Democracies, Which Democracies? Working Paper No. 198. Washington: Latin American Program, Woodrow Wilson Center.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of International Relations, University of Southern California, Trousdale Parkway, VKC 330 3518, 90089-0043, Los Angeles, USA

    Prof. Dr. Gerardo L Munck

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Gerardo L Munck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerardo L Munck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst.f. Polit. Wissenschaft, Ruprecht-Karls- Univ Inst.f. Polit. Wissenschaft, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Aurel Croissant

  2. Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Sascha Kneip

  3. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin , Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Alexander Petring

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Munck, G.L. (2017). Demokratisierung und Demokratiemodelle. In: Croissant, A., Kneip, S., Petring, A. (eds) Demokratie, Diktatur, Gerechtigkeit. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16090-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16090-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-16089-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-16090-6

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation