Skip to main content

Transitional Justice in Ostasien: Die Suche nach Gerechtigkeit aus globaler und lokaler Perspektive

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Transitional Justice

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften ((SRS))

  • 2580 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Mit Hilfe einer feministisch-rechtlichen sowie kultursoziologischen Perspektive analysiert der Beitrag soziale Wahrnehmungen, politische Wurzeln sowie juristisch-rechtliche Entwicklungen im Prozess der Aufarbeitung von Unrecht in Ostasien. Ziel des Beitrages ist es, Normen und Mechanismen des Gerechtigkeits-Systems in Ostasien sowie ihre Interaktionen mit globalen Normen, sprich, Strafgerechtigkeit, Rechtsstaatlichkeit, Menschenrechte, und demokratischen Werte, zu identifizieren und zu beleuchten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Ambos, Kai. 2006. Vergangenheitspolitik. Die Rolle des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofes. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APuZ) Nr. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmal, Kadar. 2000. Truth reconciliation and justice: The South Africa experience in perspective. The Modern Law Review 63(1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, Katharine T. 1990. Feminist legal methods. Harvard Law Review 103(4): 829–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, David H. 2001. Security and justice for all. In Restorative justice and civil society, Hrsg. Heather Strang und John Braithweite, 211–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kapitel 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, Lauren. 2000. The subject of true feeling. Pain, privacy and politics. In Transformations: Thinking through feminism, Hrsg. Sarah Ahmed, Jane Kilby und Lury Celia. London: Routledge Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, Lisa Blomgren. 2009. Designing justice: Legal institutions and other systems for managing conflict. JSP/Center for the Study of Law and Society Faculty Working Papers, Center for the Study of Law and Society Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program, UC Berkeley. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8ph0g1zz. Zugegriffen am 02.03.2011.

  • Bottigliero, Ilaria. 2005. Redress and international criminal justice in Asia and Europe. Asia Europe Journal 3(4): 453–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, John. 2002. Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branigan, Tania. 2008. Elite Chinese think tank urges political reform and press freedoms. Guardian.co.uk, February 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckel, Sonja. 2008. Feministische Erfolge im transnationalen Recht. Die juridische Aufarbeitung des japanischen Systems sexueller Sklaverei. Leviathan 36(1): 54–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinkin, Christine. 1994. Symposium. The Yugoslav crisis: New international law issues. Rape and abuse of women in international law. European Journal of International Law (EJIL) 5:326–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, Fred Y. L. 1991. The specificity of the political on the Tiananmen Square, or the poetics of the popular resistance in Beijing. Dialectic Anthropology 16:331–347. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuh, Kandice. 2003. Discomforting knowledge: Or, Korean ‚Comfort Women‘ and Asian Americanist critical practice. Journal of Asian American Studies 6(1): 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Jules. 1982. Corrective justice and wrongful gain. The Journal of Legal Studies 11(2): 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Confucius 1971/1893. The Analects, The Great Learning and The Doctrine of The Mean. Übers. James Legge. Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagan, Hanoch. 1999. The distributive foundation of corrective justice. Michigan Law Review 98:138–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Feng. 2006–07. Corrective justice in confucian legal traditions: A nonexistent concept. Paper presented at the Harvard-Yenching’s Confucianism Workshop, Cambridge, 40. http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/international/clarke_program/conferences/upload/DengFeng.pdf. Zugegriffen am 20.02.2011.

  • Diamant, Neil Jeffrey, Stanley B. Lubman, und Kevin J. O'Brien. 2005. Engaging the Law in China: State, society and possibilities for justice, 256 S. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Eric A. 2006. The culture of legal change: A case study of tobacco control in twenty-first century Japan. Michigan Journal of International Law 27:743–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, George P. 2000. The place of victims in the theory of retribution. Bufflo Criminal Law Review 3:51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forde-Mazrui, Kim. 2004. Corrective racial justice: The prima facie case for societal responsibility. Excerpt from „Taking Conservatives Seriously: A Moral Justification for Affirmative Action And Reparations.“ California Law Review 92:683–753 (Mai 2004). http://academic.udayton.edu/race/02rights/repara28a.htm. Zugegriffen am 02.03.2011.

  • Forsythe, David P. 2011. Human rights and mass atrocities: Revisiting transitional justice. International Studies Review 13:85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. 2009. Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world, 224 S. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. 2007. Abnormal justice. Critical Inquiry. http://criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu/issues/Fraser.pdf. Zugegriffen am 28.06.2007.

  • Freedman, Ann E. 1989–1990. Feminist legal method in action: Challenging racism, sexism and homophobia in law school. Ga. Law Review 24:849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futamura, Madoka. 2008. War crimes tribunals and transitional justice: The Tokyo trial and the Nuremburg legacy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasius, Marlies. 2002. Expertise in the cause of justice: Global civil society influence on the statute for an international criminal court. In Global civil society, Hrsg. Marlies Glasius, Mary Kaldor und Helmut Anheier, 137–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, David. 2005–2006. An excuse-centered approach to transitional justice. Fordham Law Review 74:2621–2694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumz, Edward J. 2004. American social work, corrections and restorative justice: An appraisal. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 48(4): 449–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, Dennis P. 2006. Japanese views of their nation’s historic legacy from World War II. Institute for Korean-American Studies (ICAS) Special Contribution, 2006–1113-DPH, Nov. 13. http://www.icasinc.org. Zugegriffen am 20.02.2011.

  • Hanson, Sam. 2001. Public interest law, improving access to justice, the Chinese century: An American judge’s observations of the Chinese legal system. William Mitchell Law Review 28:243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassemer, Winfried. 2011. Strafrechtliche Aufarbeitung von Diktaturvergangenheit. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APuZ) Nr. 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Nicola. 2011. War and rape. Law, memory and justice, 169 S. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, George. 1995. The comfort women regime: Japan’s brutal regime of enforced prostitution in the second World War, 303 S. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsing, You-tien, und Ching Kwan Lee. 2009. Reclaiming Chinese society. The new social activism, 272 S. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Susan, und Stephanie Palmer, Hrsg. 2002. Visible women. Essays on feminist legal theory and political philosophy, 216 S. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Hyun Yi. 2003. Conjuring ‚Comfort Women‛: Mediated affiliations and disciplined subjects in Korean/American transnationality. Journal of Asian American Studies 6(1): 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Paul R. 2008. Divine justice: Religion and the development of Chinese legal culture, 240 S. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Chin, und Stanley S. Kim. 1998. Delayed justice: The case of the Japanese imperial military sex slaves. UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal 16(2): 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Chin, und Craig M. Lawson. 1979. The law of the subtle mind: The traditional Japanese conception of law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 28:491–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Hyun Sook, Jyoti Puri, und H. J. Kim-Puri. 2005. Conceptualizing gender-sexuality-state-nation: An introduction. Gender and Society 19(2): 137–159. Gender-Sexuality-State-Nation: Transnational Feminist Analysis, Apr.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labourne, Wendy. 2004. Post-conflict peacebuilding: Meeting human needs for justice and reconciliation. Peace, Conflict and Development, Issue 4, April, ISSN: 1742–0601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Jae-young. 2010. Democratic alliance miscarrying justice. Foreign Policy Journal, 13.08.2010. http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/08/13/democratic-alliance-miscarrying-justice/. Zugegriffen am 17.02.2011.

  • Li, Weng. 1995–1996. Philosophical influences on contemporary Chinese law. Indiana International and Comparative Law Review. 6:327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingen, Kerstin von. 2009. Review of Futamura, Madoka. „War crimes tribunals and transitional justice: The Tokyo trial and the Nuremburg legacy“ und Totani, Yuma „The Tokyo war crimes trial: The pursuit of justice in the wake of World War II“. H-Net Reviews, H-Soz-u-Kult, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Dongxiao. 2006. When do national movements adopt or reject international agendas? A comparative analysis of the Chinese and Indian women’s movements. American Sociological Review 71(6): 921–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Jianhong. 2007. Philosophical ideas of Confucius and the values of restorative justice. Restorative Justice Online. http://www.restorativejustice.org/10fulltext/liujianhong/view. Zugegriffen am 20.02.2011.

  • Liu, Jianhong, und George B. Palermo. 2009. Restorative justice in Chinese traditional legal culture in the context of contemporary Chinese criminal justice reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Police & Criminal Justice 7(1): 49–69. Asian Association of Police Studies (AAPS). http://www.aaps.or.kr/journal/attach/attach_1/liu_palermo_edited.pdf. Zugegriffen am 10.03.2011.

  • Mckay, Susan. 2000. Gender justice and reconciliation. Nursing and Women’s Studies 23(5): 561–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Edward Alan, und Jane Banaszak-Holl. 2005. Cognitive and normative determinants of state policymaking behavior: Lessons from the sociological institutionalism. Publius 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Na, Eun-Yeong, und Elisabeth F. Lofius. 1998. Attitudes toward law and prisoners, conservative authoritarianism, attribution, and internal-external locus of control: Korean and American law students and undergraduates. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29:595–615. doi:10.1177/0022022198295001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Thomas. 2005. The problem of global justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs 33(2): 113–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Hajime. 1959. Basic features of the legal, political, and economic thought of Japan. Philosophy East and West 9(1/2): 79–81. Preliminary Report on the Third East-West Philosophers’ Conference (Apr. – Jul., 1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesiah, Vasuki. 2006. Discussion lines on gender and transitional justice: An introductory essay reflecting on the ICTJ. Bellagio Workshop on gender and transitional justice. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 15:799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. 2004. Beyond the social contract: Capabilities and global justice. An Olaf Palme Lecture, delivered in Oxford on June 19, 2003, Oxford Development Studies 32(1), March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, David. 2008. Korean Hibakusha, Japan’s Supreme Court and the International Community: Can the U.S. and Japan confront forced labor and atomic bombing? Asia Pacific Journal Japan Focus, Feb. 20. http://www.japanfocus.org/-David-Palmer/2670. Zugegriffen am 02.03.2011.

  • Park, Shellie K. 2002. Broken silence: Redressing mass rape and sexual enslavement of Asian women by the Japanese government in an appropriate forum. Asia & Pacific Law and Policy Journal 3(1): 23–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich. 2004. Theories of justice, human rights, and the constitution of international markets. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 74:407–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pils, Eva. 2007. Le souvenir persistant des injustices historiques en Chine. Perspectives chinoises, 2007/4. http://perspectiveschinoises.revues.org/2523. Zugegriffen am 12.02.2011.

  • Posner, Richard A. 1983. The economics of justice, 432 pp. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Eric A. 2008. Erga Omnes Norms, institutionalization, and constitutionalism in international law. Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 224. The Law School, The University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roht-Arriazza, Naomi, und Javier Mariezcurrena. 2006. Transitional justice in the twenty-first century: Beyond truth versus justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rojek, Dean G. 1989. Social control in the People’s Republic of China. Criminal Justice Review 14(2): 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scales, Ann. 1992. Feminist legal method: Not so scary. UCLA Law Journal 2:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • See, Harold. 1982–1983. Judiciary and dispute resolution in Japan: A survey. The Florida State University Law Review 10(3): 339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao, Yangshiang. 2007. Who will compensate victims of the anti-rightist campaign? China Rights Forum. http://www.hrichina.org/public/PDFs/CRF.2.2007/CRF-2007-2_Victims.pdf. Zugegriffen am 02.03.2011.

  • Shaw, Bill, und William Martin. 1999. Aristotle and Posner on corrective justice: The tortoise and the hare. Business Ethics Quarterly 9(4): 651–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skjelsbæk, Inger. 2001. Sexual violence and war. Mapping out a complex relationship. European Journal of International Relations 7(2): 2211–2237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetz, Margaret, und Bonnie B. C. Oh., Hrsg. 2001. Legacies of the comfort women of World War II, 230 S. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Yuki. 2002. Japan’s comfort women: Sexual slavery and prostitution during World War II and the US occupation, 212 S. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teiltel, Ruth G. 2009. Transitional justice. In The encyclopedia of human rights, Hrsg. David P. Forsythe, 81–86. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepperman, Jonathan. 2013. Asian tensions and the problem of history. International Herald Tribune, May 25–26, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, Pamela. 2000. Cultural autobiography, testimonial, and Asian American transnational feminist coalition in the ‚Comfort Women of World War II‘ Conference. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 21(1/2) Asian American Women: 29–54, published by University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiananmen Mothers. 2009. Tiananmen mothers urge China’s leaders to investigate June 4. Feb. 26. http://www.hrichina.org/public/contents/press?revision_id=173377&item_id=135136. Zugegriffen am 12.02.2011.

  • Totani, Yuma. 2008. The Tokyo war crimes Trial: The pursuit of justice in the wake of World War II. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tushnet, Mark. 1991. Critical legal studies: A political history. Yale Law Journal 100(5): 1515–1544. Centennial Issue (Mar.).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utter, Justice Rober F. 1990. Dispute resolution in China. Family Court Review 28(1): 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderweert, Susan Jenkins. 2001. Comment: Seeking justice for ‚Comfort‘ women: Without an international criminal court, suits brought by World War II sex slaves of the Japanese army may find their best hope of success in U.S. Federal Courts. North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation 27:141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verity, Fiona, und Sue King. 2008. Responding to intercommunal conflict – What can restorative justice offer? Community Development Journal 43(4): 470–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakabayashi, Bob Tadashi. 2003. Book review: Comfort women: Beyond litigious feminism. Monumenta Nipponica 58(2): 223–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Bobby K.Y. 2000. Chinese law: Traditional philosophy and dispute resolution. Hong Kong Law Journal 30:304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Xianglin. 2000. China’s incremental political reform on the base of political stability. Journal of Strategy and Management 5:16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Ping. 1997. Transitional justice in East Asia and its impact on human rights. (Post-Deng China: Justice with Chinese Characteristics. Human Rights Dialogue. Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun, Ilhong. 2008. Wengu Zhisxin: Review the old and know the new. Asia Pacific Journal of Police & Criminal Justice 6(1): 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zatlin, Linda Gertner. 2001. ‚Comfort women‘ and the cultural tradition of prostitution in Japanese erotic art. In Legacies of the comfort women of World War II, Hrsg. Margaret Stetz und Bonnie B.C. Oh. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Liang (compiler), Andrew Nathan, und Perry Link, Hrsg. 2001. The Tiananmen Papers. The Chinese leadership’s decision to use force against their own people – in their own words. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miao-ling Lin Hasenkamp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hasenkamp, Ml.L. (2018). Transitional Justice in Ostasien: Die Suche nach Gerechtigkeit aus globaler und lokaler Perspektive. In: Mihr, A., Pickel, G., Pickel, S. (eds) Handbuch Transitional Justice. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02392-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02392-8_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02391-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02392-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics