Zusammenfassung
Mit Hilfe einer feministisch-rechtlichen sowie kultursoziologischen Perspektive analysiert der Beitrag soziale Wahrnehmungen, politische Wurzeln sowie juristisch-rechtliche Entwicklungen im Prozess der Aufarbeitung von Unrecht in Ostasien. Ziel des Beitrages ist es, Normen und Mechanismen des Gerechtigkeits-Systems in Ostasien sowie ihre Interaktionen mit globalen Normen, sprich, Strafgerechtigkeit, Rechtsstaatlichkeit, Menschenrechte, und demokratischen Werte, zu identifizieren und zu beleuchten.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Ambos, Kai. 2006. Vergangenheitspolitik. Die Rolle des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofes. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APuZ) Nr. 42.
Asmal, Kadar. 2000. Truth reconciliation and justice: The South Africa experience in perspective. The Modern Law Review 63(1): 1–24.
Bartlett, Katharine T. 1990. Feminist legal methods. Harvard Law Review 103(4): 829–888.
Bayley, David H. 2001. Security and justice for all. In Restorative justice and civil society, Hrsg. Heather Strang und John Braithweite, 211–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kapitel 14.
Berlant, Lauren. 2000. The subject of true feeling. Pain, privacy and politics. In Transformations: Thinking through feminism, Hrsg. Sarah Ahmed, Jane Kilby und Lury Celia. London: Routledge Chapman & Hall.
Bingham, Lisa Blomgren. 2009. Designing justice: Legal institutions and other systems for managing conflict. JSP/Center for the Study of Law and Society Faculty Working Papers, Center for the Study of Law and Society Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program, UC Berkeley. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8ph0g1zz. Zugegriffen am 02.03.2011.
Bottigliero, Ilaria. 2005. Redress and international criminal justice in Asia and Europe. Asia Europe Journal 3(4): 453–461.
Braithwaite, John. 2002. Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Branigan, Tania. 2008. Elite Chinese think tank urges political reform and press freedoms. Guardian.co.uk, February 19.
Buckel, Sonja. 2008. Feministische Erfolge im transnationalen Recht. Die juridische Aufarbeitung des japanischen Systems sexueller Sklaverei. Leviathan 36(1): 54–75.
Chinkin, Christine. 1994. Symposium. The Yugoslav crisis: New international law issues. Rape and abuse of women in international law. European Journal of International Law (EJIL) 5:326–341.
Chiu, Fred Y. L. 1991. The specificity of the political on the Tiananmen Square, or the poetics of the popular resistance in Beijing. Dialectic Anthropology 16:331–347. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Chuh, Kandice. 2003. Discomforting knowledge: Or, Korean ‚Comfort Women‘ and Asian Americanist critical practice. Journal of Asian American Studies 6(1): 5–23.
Coleman, Jules. 1982. Corrective justice and wrongful gain. The Journal of Legal Studies 11(2): 421–440.
Confucius 1971/1893. The Analects, The Great Learning and The Doctrine of The Mean. Übers. James Legge. Dover Publications.
Dagan, Hanoch. 1999. The distributive foundation of corrective justice. Michigan Law Review 98:138–166.
Deng, Feng. 2006–07. Corrective justice in confucian legal traditions: A nonexistent concept. Paper presented at the Harvard-Yenching’s Confucianism Workshop, Cambridge, 40. http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/international/clarke_program/conferences/upload/DengFeng.pdf. Zugegriffen am 20.02.2011.
Diamant, Neil Jeffrey, Stanley B. Lubman, und Kevin J. O'Brien. 2005. Engaging the Law in China: State, society and possibilities for justice, 256 S. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.
Feldman, Eric A. 2006. The culture of legal change: A case study of tobacco control in twenty-first century Japan. Michigan Journal of International Law 27:743–821.
Fletcher, George P. 2000. The place of victims in the theory of retribution. Bufflo Criminal Law Review 3:51–64.
Forde-Mazrui, Kim. 2004. Corrective racial justice: The prima facie case for societal responsibility. Excerpt from „Taking Conservatives Seriously: A Moral Justification for Affirmative Action And Reparations.“ California Law Review 92:683–753 (Mai 2004). http://academic.udayton.edu/race/02rights/repara28a.htm. Zugegriffen am 02.03.2011.
Forsythe, David P. 2011. Human rights and mass atrocities: Revisiting transitional justice. International Studies Review 13:85–95.
Fraser, Nancy. 2009. Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world, 224 S. New York: Columbia University Press.
Fraser, Nancy. 2007. Abnormal justice. Critical Inquiry. http://criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu/issues/Fraser.pdf. Zugegriffen am 28.06.2007.
Freedman, Ann E. 1989–1990. Feminist legal method in action: Challenging racism, sexism and homophobia in law school. Ga. Law Review 24:849.
Futamura, Madoka. 2008. War crimes tribunals and transitional justice: The Tokyo trial and the Nuremburg legacy. London: Routledge.
Glasius, Marlies. 2002. Expertise in the cause of justice: Global civil society influence on the statute for an international criminal court. In Global civil society, Hrsg. Marlies Glasius, Mary Kaldor und Helmut Anheier, 137–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gray, David. 2005–2006. An excuse-centered approach to transitional justice. Fordham Law Review 74:2621–2694.
Gumz, Edward J. 2004. American social work, corrections and restorative justice: An appraisal. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 48(4): 449–460.
Halpin, Dennis P. 2006. Japanese views of their nation’s historic legacy from World War II. Institute for Korean-American Studies (ICAS) Special Contribution, 2006–1113-DPH, Nov. 13. http://www.icasinc.org. Zugegriffen am 20.02.2011.
Hanson, Sam. 2001. Public interest law, improving access to justice, the Chinese century: An American judge’s observations of the Chinese legal system. William Mitchell Law Review 28:243.
Hassemer, Winfried. 2011. Strafrechtliche Aufarbeitung von Diktaturvergangenheit. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APuZ) Nr. 35–36.
Henry, Nicola. 2011. War and rape. Law, memory and justice, 169 S. Oxon: Routledge.
Hicks, George. 1995. The comfort women regime: Japan’s brutal regime of enforced prostitution in the second World War, 303 S. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Hsing, You-tien, und Ching Kwan Lee. 2009. Reclaiming Chinese society. The new social activism, 272 S. London: Routledge.
James, Susan, und Stephanie Palmer, Hrsg. 2002. Visible women. Essays on feminist legal theory and political philosophy, 216 S. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Kang, Hyun Yi. 2003. Conjuring ‚Comfort Women‛: Mediated affiliations and disciplined subjects in Korean/American transnationality. Journal of Asian American Studies 6(1): 25–55.
Katz, Paul R. 2008. Divine justice: Religion and the development of Chinese legal culture, 240 S. London: Routledge.
Kim, Chin, und Stanley S. Kim. 1998. Delayed justice: The case of the Japanese imperial military sex slaves. UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal 16(2): 263–280.
Kim, Chin, und Craig M. Lawson. 1979. The law of the subtle mind: The traditional Japanese conception of law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 28:491–513.
Kim, Hyun Sook, Jyoti Puri, und H. J. Kim-Puri. 2005. Conceptualizing gender-sexuality-state-nation: An introduction. Gender and Society 19(2): 137–159. Gender-Sexuality-State-Nation: Transnational Feminist Analysis, Apr.
Labourne, Wendy. 2004. Post-conflict peacebuilding: Meeting human needs for justice and reconciliation. Peace, Conflict and Development, Issue 4, April, ISSN: 1742–0601.
Lee, Jae-young. 2010. Democratic alliance miscarrying justice. Foreign Policy Journal, 13.08.2010. http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/08/13/democratic-alliance-miscarrying-justice/. Zugegriffen am 17.02.2011.
Li, Weng. 1995–1996. Philosophical influences on contemporary Chinese law. Indiana International and Comparative Law Review. 6:327.
Lingen, Kerstin von. 2009. Review of Futamura, Madoka. „War crimes tribunals and transitional justice: The Tokyo trial and the Nuremburg legacy“ und Totani, Yuma „The Tokyo war crimes trial: The pursuit of justice in the wake of World War II“. H-Net Reviews, H-Soz-u-Kult, November.
Liu, Dongxiao. 2006. When do national movements adopt or reject international agendas? A comparative analysis of the Chinese and Indian women’s movements. American Sociological Review 71(6): 921–942.
Liu, Jianhong. 2007. Philosophical ideas of Confucius and the values of restorative justice. Restorative Justice Online. http://www.restorativejustice.org/10fulltext/liujianhong/view. Zugegriffen am 20.02.2011.
Liu, Jianhong, und George B. Palermo. 2009. Restorative justice in Chinese traditional legal culture in the context of contemporary Chinese criminal justice reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Police & Criminal Justice 7(1): 49–69. Asian Association of Police Studies (AAPS). http://www.aaps.or.kr/journal/attach/attach_1/liu_palermo_edited.pdf. Zugegriffen am 10.03.2011.
Mckay, Susan. 2000. Gender justice and reconciliation. Nursing and Women’s Studies 23(5): 561–570.
Miller, Edward Alan, und Jane Banaszak-Holl. 2005. Cognitive and normative determinants of state policymaking behavior: Lessons from the sociological institutionalism. Publius 35.
Na, Eun-Yeong, und Elisabeth F. Lofius. 1998. Attitudes toward law and prisoners, conservative authoritarianism, attribution, and internal-external locus of control: Korean and American law students and undergraduates. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29:595–615. doi:10.1177/0022022198295001.
Nagel, Thomas. 2005. The problem of global justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs 33(2): 113–148.
Nakamura, Hajime. 1959. Basic features of the legal, political, and economic thought of Japan. Philosophy East and West 9(1/2): 79–81. Preliminary Report on the Third East-West Philosophers’ Conference (Apr. – Jul., 1959).
Nesiah, Vasuki. 2006. Discussion lines on gender and transitional justice: An introductory essay reflecting on the ICTJ. Bellagio Workshop on gender and transitional justice. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 15:799.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2004. Beyond the social contract: Capabilities and global justice. An Olaf Palme Lecture, delivered in Oxford on June 19, 2003, Oxford Development Studies 32(1), March.
Palmer, David. 2008. Korean Hibakusha, Japan’s Supreme Court and the International Community: Can the U.S. and Japan confront forced labor and atomic bombing? Asia Pacific Journal Japan Focus, Feb. 20. http://www.japanfocus.org/-David-Palmer/2670. Zugegriffen am 02.03.2011.
Park, Shellie K. 2002. Broken silence: Redressing mass rape and sexual enslavement of Asian women by the Japanese government in an appropriate forum. Asia & Pacific Law and Policy Journal 3(1): 23–55.
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich. 2004. Theories of justice, human rights, and the constitution of international markets. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 74:407–460.
Pils, Eva. 2007. Le souvenir persistant des injustices historiques en Chine. Perspectives chinoises, 2007/4. http://perspectiveschinoises.revues.org/2523. Zugegriffen am 12.02.2011.
Posner, Richard A. 1983. The economics of justice, 432 pp. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Posner, Eric A. 2008. Erga Omnes Norms, institutionalization, and constitutionalism in international law. Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 224. The Law School, The University of Chicago.
Roht-Arriazza, Naomi, und Javier Mariezcurrena. 2006. Transitional justice in the twenty-first century: Beyond truth versus justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rojek, Dean G. 1989. Social control in the People’s Republic of China. Criminal Justice Review 14(2): 141–153.
Scales, Ann. 1992. Feminist legal method: Not so scary. UCLA Law Journal 2:1.
See, Harold. 1982–1983. Judiciary and dispute resolution in Japan: A survey. The Florida State University Law Review 10(3): 339.
Shao, Yangshiang. 2007. Who will compensate victims of the anti-rightist campaign? China Rights Forum. http://www.hrichina.org/public/PDFs/CRF.2.2007/CRF-2007-2_Victims.pdf. Zugegriffen am 02.03.2011.
Shaw, Bill, und William Martin. 1999. Aristotle and Posner on corrective justice: The tortoise and the hare. Business Ethics Quarterly 9(4): 651–657.
Skjelsbæk, Inger. 2001. Sexual violence and war. Mapping out a complex relationship. European Journal of International Relations 7(2): 2211–2237.
Stetz, Margaret, und Bonnie B. C. Oh., Hrsg. 2001. Legacies of the comfort women of World War II, 230 S. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
Tanaka, Yuki. 2002. Japan’s comfort women: Sexual slavery and prostitution during World War II and the US occupation, 212 S. London: Routledge.
Teiltel, Ruth G. 2009. Transitional justice. In The encyclopedia of human rights, Hrsg. David P. Forsythe, 81–86. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tepperman, Jonathan. 2013. Asian tensions and the problem of history. International Herald Tribune, May 25–26, 6.
Thoma, Pamela. 2000. Cultural autobiography, testimonial, and Asian American transnational feminist coalition in the ‚Comfort Women of World War II‘ Conference. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 21(1/2) Asian American Women: 29–54, published by University of Nebraska Press.
Tiananmen Mothers. 2009. Tiananmen mothers urge China’s leaders to investigate June 4. Feb. 26. http://www.hrichina.org/public/contents/press?revision_id=173377&item_id=135136. Zugegriffen am 12.02.2011.
Totani, Yuma. 2008. The Tokyo war crimes Trial: The pursuit of justice in the wake of World War II. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tushnet, Mark. 1991. Critical legal studies: A political history. Yale Law Journal 100(5): 1515–1544. Centennial Issue (Mar.).
Utter, Justice Rober F. 1990. Dispute resolution in China. Family Court Review 28(1): 65–70.
Vanderweert, Susan Jenkins. 2001. Comment: Seeking justice for ‚Comfort‘ women: Without an international criminal court, suits brought by World War II sex slaves of the Japanese army may find their best hope of success in U.S. Federal Courts. North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation 27:141.
Verity, Fiona, und Sue King. 2008. Responding to intercommunal conflict – What can restorative justice offer? Community Development Journal 43(4): 470–482.
Wakabayashi, Bob Tadashi. 2003. Book review: Comfort women: Beyond litigious feminism. Monumenta Nipponica 58(2): 223–258.
Wong, Bobby K.Y. 2000. Chinese law: Traditional philosophy and dispute resolution. Hong Kong Law Journal 30:304.
Xu, Xianglin. 2000. China’s incremental political reform on the base of political stability. Journal of Strategy and Management 5:16–26.
Yu, Ping. 1997. Transitional justice in East Asia and its impact on human rights. (Post-Deng China: Justice with Chinese Characteristics. Human Rights Dialogue. Spring.
Yun, Ilhong. 2008. Wengu Zhisxin: Review the old and know the new. Asia Pacific Journal of Police & Criminal Justice 6(1): 3–24.
Zatlin, Linda Gertner. 2001. ‚Comfort women‘ and the cultural tradition of prostitution in Japanese erotic art. In Legacies of the comfort women of World War II, Hrsg. Margaret Stetz und Bonnie B.C. Oh. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.
Zhang, Liang (compiler), Andrew Nathan, und Perry Link, Hrsg. 2001. The Tiananmen Papers. The Chinese leadership’s decision to use force against their own people – in their own words. New York: Public Affairs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hasenkamp, Ml.L. (2018). Transitional Justice in Ostasien: Die Suche nach Gerechtigkeit aus globaler und lokaler Perspektive. In: Mihr, A., Pickel, G., Pickel, S. (eds) Handbuch Transitional Justice. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02392-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02392-8_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02391-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02392-8
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)