Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hemmnisse der Wirkungsskalierung von Sozialunternehmen in Deutschland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sozialunternehmen in Deutschland

Zusammenfassung

Die Ausweitung und Verbreitung erfolgreicher Ansätze ist ein zentrales Thema in der Debatte um Sozialunternehmertum. Häufig wird diese sogenannte Wirkungsskalierung oder kurz Skalierung als normativer Anspruch von außen an Sozialunternehmen herangetragen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Alvord , S. H./ Brown, L. D./ Letts, C. W. (2004). Social Entrepreneurship and Societal Transformation: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 40(3):260–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin , J./ Stevenson, H./ Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30(1):1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom , P. N./ Chatterji, A. K . (2009). Scaling Social Entrepreneurial Impact. California Management Review 51(3):114–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom , P./ Smith, B. (2010). Identifying the Drivers of Social Entrepreneurial Impact: Theoretical Development and an Exploratory Empirical Test of SCALERS. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 1(1):126–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradach, J.L. (2003). Going to Scale: the challenge of replicating social programs. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring: 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesverband Deutscher Stiftungen (Hrsg.) (2008). Social Franchising. Eine Methode zur systematischen Vervielfältigung gemeinnütziger Projekte. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell , K./ Taft-Pearman, M./ Lee, M. (2008). Getting Replication Right: The Decisions That Matter Most for Nonprofit Organizations Looking to Expand. Boston [u.a.]: The Bridgespan Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, N.F. (2008). Replicating Success: A Funder’s Perspective on the "Why" and "How" of Supporting the Local Office of an Expanding Organization. New York: Blue Ridge Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, J. (2009). Broadening the Perspective on Scale. The Evaluation Exchange, 15(1),2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creech, H. (2008). Report for SEED Initiative Research Program: Scale up and Replication for social and environmental enterprises. Winnipeg [u.a.]: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dart, R. (2004). The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14(4),411–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees , G./ Anderson B. B./, J. (2004). Scaling Social Impact: Strategies for spreading social innovations. Stanford Social Innovation Review Spring: 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees , J. G./ Anderson, B.B. (2003). Scaling for Social Impact: Exploring Strategies for Spreading Social Innovations. Presentation at N.C. Center for Nonprofits. Duke University: The Fuqua School of Business, Download unter http://www.caseatduke.org/knowledge/scalingsocialimpact/articlespapers.html

  • Dees, J.G., (2008). Developing the field of social entrepreneurship. A report from the Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship (CASE). Duke University: The Fuqua School of Business, Download unter http://www.caseatduke.org/documents/CASE_Field-Building_Report_ June08.pdf

  • Defourny , J./ Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1),32–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friese, S. (2011). Using ATLAS.ti for analyzing the Financial Crisis Data. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum Qualitative Social Research 12(1),39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, S. (2004). Scaling up community-driven development: A Synthesis of experience. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division. Discussion Paper No. 181, Washington: International Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant , H.M./ Crutchfield, L. R . (2007). Creating High-Impact Nonprofits. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall: 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, L.E. (1998). Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow. In: Harvard Business Review, 76(3):55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackl, V. (2011). Social Entrepreneurship multiplizieren und skalieren – Wege und Beispiele von Social Franchising, in: Hackenberg , H./ Empter, S. (Hrsg.): Social Entrepreneurship – Social Business: Für die Gesellschaft unternehmen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, J. (2002). Why Entrepreneurs Don’t Scale. Harvard Business Review 80(12):110–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. (2010). Six Steps to Successfully Scale Impact in the Nonprofit Sector. The Evaluation Exchange 15: 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen , S.A./ Richter, S./Hahnke , E./Achleitner , A.K./ Spiess-Knafl, W./Volk , S./Then , V./ Mildenberger, G./ Scheuerle, T./ Schmitz, B. (2010). Eine Definition von Social Entrepreneurship. Working Paper Zeppelin Universität Friedrichshafen, CSI Universität Heidelberg, TU München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (2010). Perils and Possibilities Of Scaling Nonprofits. The Non-Profit Times, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehl , K./ Then, V./ Münscher, R. (2012). Social Return on Investment: Auf dem Weg zu einem integrativen Ansatz der Wirkungsforschung, in: Anheier , H.K./ Schröer, A./ Then, V. (Hrsg.): Soziale Investitionen – Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer. M. (2005). One Business Maxim to Avoid: Going to Scale. Chronicle of Philanthropy, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance , S./ Lee, M./ Green, R./ Kaveternik, J./ Robinson, A./ Alarcon, I. (2006). Scaling capacities: Supports for Growing Impact. Working Paper, San Francisco: LaFrance Associates, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon , F./ Fernandez, H. (2012). Strategies for scaling up social enterprise: lessons from early years providers. Social Enterprise Journal, 8(1),63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair , J./ Martí, F (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41: 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malek , M./ Ibach, P.K. (2004). Entrepreneurship – Prinzipien, Ideen und Geschäftsmodell zur Unternehmensgründung im Informationszeitalter. Heidelberg: dpunkt Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercator Forscherverbund (2012). Innovatives Soziales Handeln – Social Entrepreneurship: Handlungsempfehlungen für Politik, Wissenschaft, Wirtschaft und Sozialunternehmer. Essen: Stiftung Mercator.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin , R./ Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring: 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mildenberger , G./ Münscher, R./ Schmitz, B. (2012). Dimensionen der Bewertung gemeinnütziger Organisationen und Aktivitäten, in: Anheier , H.K./ Schröer, A./ Then, V. (Hrsg.): Soziale Investitionen – Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2010). The Legitimacy of Social Entrepreneurship: Reflexive Isomorphism in a Pre- Paradigmatic Field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4),611–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pümpin , C./ Prange, J. (1991). Management der Unternehmensentwicklung. Phasengerechte Führung und der Umgang mit Krisen. Frankfurt a. M./New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • REDF (2001). SROI Methodology Paper, Chapter 2: REDF’s SROI Approach. San Francisco: The Roberts Enterprise Development Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roob , N./ Bradach, J.L. (2009). Scaling What Works: Implications for Philanthropists, Policymakers, and Nonprofit Leaders. Boston [u.a.]: The Bridgespan Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz , B./ Then, V. (2011). Legitimation durch Narration – Bindungskräfte durch das Erzählen von Geschichten, in: Hackenberg , H./ Empter, S. (Hrsg.): Social Entrepreneurship – Social Business: Für die Gesellschaft unternehmen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey , P./ Jarvis, O. (2007). Toward a Theory of Social Venture Franchising. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(5):667–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uvin , P./ Jain, P. S./ Brown, L.D. (2000). Think Large and Act Small: Toward a New Paradigm for NGO Scaling Up. World Development, 28(8):1409–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uvin, P./Miller, (1996). Paths to Scaling up. Alternative Strategies for Local Nongovernmental Organizations. Human Organizations, 55(3):344–354.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Heidelberg, Deutschland

    Björn Schmitz & Thomas Scheuerle

Authors
  1. Björn Schmitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Scheuerle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Björn Schmitz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Friedrichshafen, Germany

    Stephan A Jansen

  2. Bochum, Germany

    Rolf G. Heinze

  3. , Lehrstuhl für Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement, Universität Erlangen, Findelgasse 7, Nürnberg, 90402, Germany

    Markus Beckmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmitz, B., Scheuerle, T. (2013). Hemmnisse der Wirkungsskalierung von Sozialunternehmen in Deutschland. In: Jansen, S., Heinze, R., Beckmann, M. (eds) Sozialunternehmen in Deutschland. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01074-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01074-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-01073-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-01074-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation