Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Weil sie nicht können, weil sie nicht wollen: Die Wahrnehmung von Arbeitslosen in Europa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Zivile Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie

  • 7027 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag wird der Frage nachgegangen, inwiefern Europäer der Ansicht sind, Arbeitslose bemühten sich nicht in ausreichendem Umfang um eine bezahlte Beschäftigung. Zudem wird analysiert, welche Faktoren diese Einstellung determinieren. Hierfür werden im Rahmen eines Mehrebenenmodells sowohl die Makro- als auch die Mikroebene berücksichtigt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Appelbaum, Lauren D. 2001. The Influence of Perceived Deservingess on Policy Decisions Regarding Aid to the Poor. Political Psychology Vol.22, No. 3: 419-442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, Lauren D. 2002. Who Deserves Help? Student´s Opinions About the Deservingness of Different Groups Living in Germany to Receive Aid. Social Justice Research Vol. 15, No. 3: 201-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus. 2003. Die politische Ökonomie der Arbeitslosigkeit. In Politische Ökonomie, Hrsg. Herbert Obinger und Uwe Wagschal und Bernhard Kittel, 151-174. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Anthony B., und John Micklewright. 1991. Unemployment Compensation and Labor Market Transitions: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature Vol. 29, No. 4, Dec. 1991: 1679-1727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccaro, Lucio, und Diego Rei. 2007. Institutional Determinants of Unemployment in OECD Countries: Does the Deregulatory View Hold Water?. International Organization 61, Summer 2007: 527-569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambra, Clare, und Terje Andreas Eikemo. 2009. Welfare state regimes, unemployment and health: a comparative study of the relationship between unemployment and self-reported health in 23 European countries. Journal of Epidemiol Community Health 2009, 63: 92-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassanini, Andrea, und Romain Duval. 2006. The Determinants of Unemployment Across OECD Countries: Reassessing the Role of Policies and Institutions. OECD Economic Studies No. 42, 2006/1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Peter T., und Basil S. Yamey. 1951. Economic Progress and Occupational Distribution. The Economic Journal, Vol. 61, No. 244: 741-755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, William J.. 1967. Macroeconomics and Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis. The American Economic Review Vol. 57, No.3: 415-426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadi, Adrian. 2010. How to Distinguish Voluntary from Involuntary Unemployment: On the Relationship between the Willingness to Work and Unemploymnt-Induced Unhappiness. KYKLOS Vol. 63, August 2010, No. 3: 317-329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Colin. 1940. The Conditions of Economic Progress. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Andrew, Andreas Knabe, und Steffen Rätzel. 2010. Boon or bane? Others´ unemployment, well-being and job insecurity. Labour Economics 17 (2010): 52-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corneo, Giacomo, und Hans-Peter Grüner. 2000. Social Limits to Redistribution. The American Economic Review Vol. 90, No. 5 (Dec. 2000): 1491-1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csoba, Judit. 2010. “Do the unemployed want to work?”. Employee ability and the willingness of the unemployed. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 1, No. 2: 89-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, Sheldon, Robert Haveman, und Robert Plotnick. 1981. How Income Transfer Programs Affect Work, Savings, and the Income Distribution: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 19, No. 3 (Sep., 1981): 975-1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Swaan, Abram. 1988. Health Care, Education and Welfare in Europe and the USA in the Modern Era. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Tocqueville, Alexis. 2006 [1835]. Memoir on pauperism. New York: Cosimo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, John. 2001. A global perspective on social security programs for the unemployed. International Social Work 44 (4): 405-422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, Andrew. 2010. The ‘Dole or Drudgery’ Dilemma: Education, the Work Ethic and Unemployment. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 44, No.1: 1-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ederveer, Sjef, und Ruud deMooij. 2003. Social Europe. ENEPRI Occasional Paper No. 5/November 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouarge, Didier, und Richard Layte. 2005. Welfare Regimes and Povery Dynamics: The Duration and Recurrence of Poverty Spells in Europe. Journal of Social Policy, 34,3: 407-426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, Adrian. 1982. Explanations for unemployment in Britain. European Journal of Social Psychology Vol. 12: 335-352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furåker, Bengt. 2002. Is high unemployment due to welfare state protection? Lessons from the Swedish experience. In Europe´s New State of Welfare. Unemployment, employment policies and citizenship. Hrsg. Jørgen Goul Andersen, und Jochen Clasen, und Wim van Oorschot, und Knut Halvorsen, 112-142. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, Duncan, und Serge Paugam. 2002. Social Precarity and Social Integration. Brüssel: Europäische Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellman, Andrew, und Jennifer Hill. 2009. Data-Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierachical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goul Andersen, Jørgen, und Jan Bendix Jensen. 2002. Employment and unemployment in Europe: overview and new trends. In Europe´s New State of Welfare. Unemployment, employment policies and citizenship. Hrsg. Jørgen Goul Andersen, und Jochen Clasen, und Wim van Oorschot, und Knut Halvorsen, 21-57. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosso, Jean-Luc, und Teresa Smith. 2012. Poverty and Unemployment: A Cultural Approach. Thunderbird International Business Review Vol. 54, No.1, January/February 2012: 79-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, Ross. 1981. Leaving school, facing unemployment, and making attributions about the causes of unemployment. Journal of Vocational Behavior Vol. 18. Issue 1, Feb. 1981: 79-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, Knut. 2002. Solidarity and the Legitimacy of the Welfare State: Attitudes to the Abuse of Welfare Benefits in Scandinavian Countries. Florence: COST13 Working Group II meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heston, Alan, Robert Summers und Bettina Aten. 2011. Penn World Table Version 7.0. Philadelphia: Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO – International Labour Organization. 2012. Key Indicators of the Labour Market (KILM), 7th Edition. http://kilm.ilo.org/kilmnet. Zugegriffen: 23.02.2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben, und Anne Wren. 1998. Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint. The Trilemma of the Service Economy. World Politics 50: 507-546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben, und David Soskice. 2001. An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences. The American Political Science Review Vol. 95, No. 4: 875-893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, Bob. 1993. Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare State? Preliminary Remarks on Post-Fordist Political Economy. Studies in Political Economy 40, Spring 1993: 7-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katouzian, M.A.. 1970. The Development of the Service Sector: A New Approach. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, Vol. 22, No. 3, Nov. 1970: 362-382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner, Claus Thustrup, und Torben Tranæs. 2005. Optimal Workfare with Voluntary and Involuntary Unemployment. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 107 (3): 459-474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnle, Stein. 2000. The Nordic welfare state in a European context: dealing with new economic and ideological challenges in the 1990s. In Welfare State Futures. Hrsg. Stephan Leibfried, 103-122. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumlin, Staffan. 2002. The Personal and the Political. How Personal Welfare State Experiences Affect Political Trust and Ideology. Göteborg Studies in Politics number 78. Hrsg. Bo Rothstein. Göteborg: Department of Political Science, Göteborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Christian Albrekt. 2008. The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes. How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support. Comparative Political Studies Vol. 41, No. 2: 145-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le, Sidney. 2010. Unemployment makes you sick, but high unemployment makes us healthy. Stanford: Department of Economics, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Eddy. 1997. Is Full Employment Still Desirable and Feasible?. Economic and Industrial Democracy 1997, 18: 35-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Alan. 1980. Attitudes to public expenditure and their relationship to voting preferences. Political Studies Vol. 28, Issue 2: 284-292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, Assar. 1995. Hazardous Welfare-State Dynamics. The American Economic Review, Vol. 85, No. 2: 9-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupu, Noam, und Jonas Pontusson. 2011 The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution. American Political Science Review Vol. 105, No. 2, May 2011: 316-336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, Cora M.J., und Joop J. Hox. 2005. Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling. Methodology Vol. 1, No. 3: 86-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miegel, Meinhard. 2002. Die deformierte Gesellschaft. Wie die Deutschen ihre Wirklichkeit verdrängen. Berlin: Ullstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1950. Human Action. A Treatise on Economics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Charles. 1984. Losing Ground. American Social Policy 1950-1980. Tenth-Anniversary Edition. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, Linda K.. 1999. Posting im Forum von Statmodel.com. www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/12/18.html. Zugegriffen: 30.03.2012.

  • Muthen, Bengt O., und Albert Satorra. 1995. Complex Sample Data in Structural Equation Modeling. Sociological Methodology Vol. 25: 267-316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Insurance Institut (Israel). 2012. Unemployment – Amounts of unemployment benefit based on the workers salary before the unemployment period. http://www.btl.gov.il/English%20Homepage/Benefits/Unemployment%20Insurance/Pages/Amountsof.aspx. Zugegriffen: 23.02.2012.

  • Nozick, Robert. 1974 Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 1996. Making work pay. Employment Outlook 1996, Chapter 2. http://www.oecd.org/employment/employmentpoliciesanddata/2080527.pdf. Zugegriffen: 31.07. 2012.

  • Oesch, Daniel. 2010. What explains high unemployment among low-skilled workers? Evidence from 21 OECD countries. European Journal of Industrial Relations 16 (1): 39-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oschmiansky, Frank, Günther Schmid, und Silke Kull. 2003. Faule Arbeitslose? Politische Konjunkturen und Strukturprobleme der Missbrauchsdebatte. Leviathan Vol. 31, No. 1: 3-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Samuel L.. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, Stephen W., und Anthony S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models. Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2. Auflage. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeskens, Tim, und Wim vanOorschot. 2011. Equity, Equality or Need? Explaining Preferences towards WelfareRedistribution Principles across 23 European Countries. Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle (WA), September 1-4, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmillen, Achim, und Joachim Möller. 2012. Distribution and determinants of lifetime unemployment. Labour Economics 19: 33-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, Doris. 2000. Work Incentives and Welfare Provision. The “Pathological” theory of Unemployment. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsiramos, Konstantinos. 2006. Unemployment Insurance in Europe: Unemployment Duration and Subsequent Employment Stability. Discussion Paper No. 2280. Bonn: Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzannatos, Zafiras, und Suzanne Roddis. 1998. Unemployment Benefits. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No. 9813. Washington: Social Protection Unit, Human Development Network, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oorschot, Wim. 2000. Who should get what, and why? On deservingenss criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics vol. 28: 33-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oorschot, Wim. 2010. Public Perceptions of the economic, moral, social and migration consequences of the welfare state: an empirical analysis of welfare state legitimacy. Journal of European Social Policy Vol. 20 (1): 19-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vliet, Olaf, und Koen Caminada. 2012. Unemployment replacement rates dataset among 34 welfare states 1971-2009: An update, extension and modification of Scruggs’ Welfare State Entitlements Data Set. NEUJOBS Special Report No. 2. Leiden: Leiden University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, Danielle. 2012. Eligibility Criteria for Unemployment Benefits: Quantitative Indicators for OECD and EU countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 131. OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Bernard, Danny Osborne, und Udo Rudolph. 2011. An Attributional Analysis of Reactions to Poverty: The Political Ideology of the Giver and the Perceived Morality of the Receiver. Personality and Social Psychology Review 15 (2): 199-213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, John B.. 1974. Beliefs about the Motivation of the Poor and Attitudes toward Poverty Policy. Social Problems Vol. 21, No. 5 (Jun., 1974): 634-648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stuttgart, Deutschland

    Jürgen Bauknecht & Uwe Remer-Bollow

Authors
  1. Jürgen Bauknecht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Uwe Remer-Bollow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen Bauknecht .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Breitscheidstr. 2, Stuttgart, 70174, Germany

    Silke I. Keil

  2. Breitscheidstr. 2, Stuttgart, 70174, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    S. Isabell Thaidigsmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bauknecht, J., Remer-Bollow, U. (2013). Weil sie nicht können, weil sie nicht wollen: Die Wahrnehmung von Arbeitslosen in Europa. In: Keil, S., Thaidigsmann, S. (eds) Zivile Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00875-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00875-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-00874-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-00875-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation