Advertisement

Weil sie nicht können, weil sie nicht wollen: Die Wahrnehmung von Arbeitslosen in Europa

  • Jürgen Bauknecht
  • Uwe Remer-Bollow
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag wird der Frage nachgegangen, inwiefern Europäer der Ansicht sind, Arbeitslose bemühten sich nicht in ausreichendem Umfang um eine bezahlte Beschäftigung. Zudem wird analysiert, welche Faktoren diese Einstellung determinieren. Hierfür werden im Rahmen eines Mehrebenenmodells sowohl die Makro- als auch die Mikroebene berücksichtigt.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Appelbaum, Lauren D. 2001. The Influence of Perceived Deservingess on Policy Decisions Regarding Aid to the Poor. Political Psychology Vol.22, No. 3: 419-442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appelbaum, Lauren D. 2002. Who Deserves Help? Student´s Opinions About the Deservingness of Different Groups Living in Germany to Receive Aid. Social Justice Research Vol. 15, No. 3: 201-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armingeon, Klaus. 2003. Die politische Ökonomie der Arbeitslosigkeit. In Politische Ökonomie, Hrsg. Herbert Obinger und Uwe Wagschal und Bernhard Kittel, 151-174. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, Anthony B., und John Micklewright. 1991. Unemployment Compensation and Labor Market Transitions: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature Vol. 29, No. 4, Dec. 1991: 1679-1727.Google Scholar
  5. Baccaro, Lucio, und Diego Rei. 2007. Institutional Determinants of Unemployment in OECD Countries: Does the Deregulatory View Hold Water?. International Organization 61, Summer 2007: 527-569.Google Scholar
  6. Bambra, Clare, und Terje Andreas Eikemo. 2009. Welfare state regimes, unemployment and health: a comparative study of the relationship between unemployment and self-reported health in 23 European countries. Journal of Epidemiol Community Health 2009, 63: 92-98.Google Scholar
  7. Bassanini, Andrea, und Romain Duval. 2006. The Determinants of Unemployment Across OECD Countries: Reassessing the Role of Policies and Institutions. OECD Economic Studies No. 42, 2006/1.Google Scholar
  8. Bauer, Peter T., und Basil S. Yamey. 1951. Economic Progress and Occupational Distribution. The Economic Journal, Vol. 61, No. 244: 741-755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baumol, William J.. 1967. Macroeconomics and Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis. The American Economic Review Vol. 57, No.3: 415-426.Google Scholar
  10. Chadi, Adrian. 2010. How to Distinguish Voluntary from Involuntary Unemployment: On the Relationship between the Willingness to Work and Unemploymnt-Induced Unhappiness. KYKLOS Vol. 63, August 2010, No. 3: 317-329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, Colin. 1940. The Conditions of Economic Progress. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, Andrew, Andreas Knabe, und Steffen Rätzel. 2010. Boon or bane? Others´ unemployment, well-being and job insecurity. Labour Economics 17 (2010): 52-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corneo, Giacomo, und Hans-Peter Grüner. 2000. Social Limits to Redistribution. The American Economic Review Vol. 90, No. 5 (Dec. 2000): 1491-1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Csoba, Judit. 2010. “Do the unemployed want to work?”. Employee ability and the willingness of the unemployed. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 1, No. 2: 89-107.Google Scholar
  15. Danziger, Sheldon, Robert Haveman, und Robert Plotnick. 1981. How Income Transfer Programs Affect Work, Savings, and the Income Distribution: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 19, No. 3 (Sep., 1981): 975-1028.Google Scholar
  16. De Swaan, Abram. 1988. Health Care, Education and Welfare in Europe and the USA in the Modern Era. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  17. De Tocqueville, Alexis. 2006 [1835]. Memoir on pauperism. New York: Cosimo.Google Scholar
  18. Dixon, John. 2001. A global perspective on social security programs for the unemployed. International Social Work 44 (4): 405-422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunn, Andrew. 2010. The ‘Dole or Drudgery’ Dilemma: Education, the Work Ethic and Unemployment. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 44, No.1: 1-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ederveer, Sjef, und Ruud deMooij. 2003. Social Europe. ENEPRI Occasional Paper No. 5/November 2003.Google Scholar
  21. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fouarge, Didier, und Richard Layte. 2005. Welfare Regimes and Povery Dynamics: The Duration and Recurrence of Poverty Spells in Europe. Journal of Social Policy, 34,3: 407-426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Furnham, Adrian. 1982. Explanations for unemployment in Britain. European Journal of Social Psychology Vol. 12: 335-352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Furåker, Bengt. 2002. Is high unemployment due to welfare state protection? Lessons from the Swedish experience. In Europe´s New State of Welfare. Unemployment, employment policies and citizenship. Hrsg. Jørgen Goul Andersen, und Jochen Clasen, und Wim van Oorschot, und Knut Halvorsen, 112-142. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gallie, Duncan, und Serge Paugam. 2002. Social Precarity and Social Integration. Brüssel: Europäische Kommission.Google Scholar
  26. Gellman, Andrew, und Jennifer Hill. 2009. Data-Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierachical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Goul Andersen, Jørgen, und Jan Bendix Jensen. 2002. Employment and unemployment in Europe: overview and new trends. In Europe´s New State of Welfare. Unemployment, employment policies and citizenship. Hrsg. Jørgen Goul Andersen, und Jochen Clasen, und Wim van Oorschot, und Knut Halvorsen, 21-57. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  28. Grosso, Jean-Luc, und Teresa Smith. 2012. Poverty and Unemployment: A Cultural Approach. Thunderbird International Business Review Vol. 54, No.1, January/February 2012: 79-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gurney, Ross. 1981. Leaving school, facing unemployment, and making attributions about the causes of unemployment. Journal of Vocational Behavior Vol. 18. Issue 1, Feb. 1981: 79-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Halvorsen, Knut. 2002. Solidarity and the Legitimacy of the Welfare State: Attitudes to the Abuse of Welfare Benefits in Scandinavian Countries. Florence: COST13 Working Group II meeting.Google Scholar
  31. Heston, Alan, Robert Summers und Bettina Aten. 2011. Penn World Table Version 7.0. Philadelphia: Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  32. ILO – International Labour Organization. 2012. Key Indicators of the Labour Market (KILM), 7th Edition. http://kilm.ilo.org/kilmnet. Zugegriffen: 23.02.2012.Google Scholar
  33. Iversen, Torben, und Anne Wren. 1998. Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint. The Trilemma of the Service Economy. World Politics 50: 507-546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Iversen, Torben, und David Soskice. 2001. An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences. The American Political Science Review Vol. 95, No. 4: 875-893.Google Scholar
  35. Jessop, Bob. 1993. Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare State? Preliminary Remarks on Post-Fordist Political Economy. Studies in Political Economy 40, Spring 1993: 7-39.Google Scholar
  36. Katouzian, M.A.. 1970. The Development of the Service Sector: A New Approach. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, Vol. 22, No. 3, Nov. 1970: 362-382.Google Scholar
  37. Kreiner, Claus Thustrup, und Torben Tranæs. 2005. Optimal Workfare with Voluntary and Involuntary Unemployment. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 107 (3): 459-474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuhnle, Stein. 2000. The Nordic welfare state in a European context: dealing with new economic and ideological challenges in the 1990s. In Welfare State Futures. Hrsg. Stephan Leibfried, 103-122. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kumlin, Staffan. 2002. The Personal and the Political. How Personal Welfare State Experiences Affect Political Trust and Ideology. Göteborg Studies in Politics number 78. Hrsg. Bo Rothstein. Göteborg: Department of Political Science, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
  40. Larsen, Christian Albrekt. 2008. The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes. How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support. Comparative Political Studies Vol. 41, No. 2: 145-168.Google Scholar
  41. Le, Sidney. 2010. Unemployment makes you sick, but high unemployment makes us healthy. Stanford: Department of Economics, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  42. Lee, Eddy. 1997. Is Full Employment Still Desirable and Feasible?. Economic and Industrial Democracy 1997, 18: 35-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewis, Alan. 1980. Attitudes to public expenditure and their relationship to voting preferences. Political Studies Vol. 28, Issue 2: 284-292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lindbeck, Assar. 1995. Hazardous Welfare-State Dynamics. The American Economic Review, Vol. 85, No. 2: 9-15.Google Scholar
  45. Lupu, Noam, und Jonas Pontusson. 2011 The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution. American Political Science Review Vol. 105, No. 2, May 2011: 316-336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maas, Cora M.J., und Joop J. Hox. 2005. Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling. Methodology Vol. 1, No. 3: 86-92.Google Scholar
  47. Miegel, Meinhard. 2002. Die deformierte Gesellschaft. Wie die Deutschen ihre Wirklichkeit verdrängen. Berlin: Ullstein.Google Scholar
  48. Mises, Ludwig von. 1950. Human Action. A Treatise on Economics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Murray, Charles. 1984. Losing Ground. American Social Policy 1950-1980. Tenth-Anniversary Edition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  50. Muthen, Linda K.. 1999. Posting im Forum von Statmodel.com. www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/12/18.html. Zugegriffen: 30.03.2012.
  51. Muthen, Bengt O., und Albert Satorra. 1995. Complex Sample Data in Structural Equation Modeling. Sociological Methodology Vol. 25: 267-316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. National Insurance Institut (Israel). 2012. Unemployment – Amounts of unemployment benefit based on the workers salary before the unemployment period. http://www.btl.gov.il/English%20Homepage/Benefits/Unemployment%20Insurance/Pages/Amountsof.aspx. Zugegriffen: 23.02.2012.
  53. Nozick, Robert. 1974 Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  54. OECD. 1996. Making work pay. Employment Outlook 1996, Chapter 2. http://www.oecd.org/employment/employmentpoliciesanddata/2080527.pdf. Zugegriffen: 31.07. 2012.
  55. Oesch, Daniel. 2010. What explains high unemployment among low-skilled workers? Evidence from 21 OECD countries. European Journal of Industrial Relations 16 (1): 39-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Oschmiansky, Frank, Günther Schmid, und Silke Kull. 2003. Faule Arbeitslose? Politische Konjunkturen und Strukturprobleme der Missbrauchsdebatte. Leviathan Vol. 31, No. 1: 3-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Popkin, Samuel L.. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Raudenbush, Stephen W., und Anthony S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models. Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2. Auflage. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Reeskens, Tim, und Wim vanOorschot. 2011. Equity, Equality or Need? Explaining Preferences towards WelfareRedistribution Principles across 23 European Countries. Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle (WA), September 1-4, 2011.Google Scholar
  60. Schmillen, Achim, und Joachim Möller. 2012. Distribution and determinants of lifetime unemployment. Labour Economics 19: 33-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schroeder, Doris. 2000. Work Incentives and Welfare Provision. The “Pathological” theory of Unemployment. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  62. Tatsiramos, Konstantinos. 2006. Unemployment Insurance in Europe: Unemployment Duration and Subsequent Employment Stability. Discussion Paper No. 2280. Bonn: Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit.Google Scholar
  63. Tzannatos, Zafiras, und Suzanne Roddis. 1998. Unemployment Benefits. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No. 9813. Washington: Social Protection Unit, Human Development Network, The World Bank.Google Scholar
  64. Van Oorschot, Wim. 2000. Who should get what, and why? On deservingenss criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics vol. 28: 33-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Oorschot, Wim. 2010. Public Perceptions of the economic, moral, social and migration consequences of the welfare state: an empirical analysis of welfare state legitimacy. Journal of European Social Policy Vol. 20 (1): 19-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Van Vliet, Olaf, und Koen Caminada. 2012. Unemployment replacement rates dataset among 34 welfare states 1971-2009: An update, extension and modification of Scruggs’ Welfare State Entitlements Data Set. NEUJOBS Special Report No. 2. Leiden: Leiden University.Google Scholar
  67. Venn, Danielle. 2012. Eligibility Criteria for Unemployment Benefits: Quantitative Indicators for OECD and EU countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 131. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  68. Weiner, Bernard, Danny Osborne, und Udo Rudolph. 2011. An Attributional Analysis of Reactions to Poverty: The Political Ideology of the Giver and the Perceived Morality of the Receiver. Personality and Social Psychology Review 15 (2): 199-213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Williamson, John B.. 1974. Beliefs about the Motivation of the Poor and Attitudes toward Poverty Policy. Social Problems Vol. 21, No. 5 (Jun., 1974): 634-648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.StuttgartDeutschland

Personalised recommendations