Skip to main content

Classification and Representation Using Conjoint Data

  • Conference paper
From Data to Knowledge

Summary

We present new approaches to the analysis of conjoint data. One part of this paper deals with classification, another with representation issues. Both parts start with an overview of available approaches and then introduce new approaches. A real-world application concerning the introduction of a new product in the European air freight market shows advantages of the presented approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BAIER, D. (1994): Konzipierung und Realisierung einer Unterstützung des kombinierten Einsatzes von Methoden bei der Positionierungsanalyse. Lang, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOCK, H.H. (1969): The Equivalence of Two Extremal Problems and its Application to the Iterative Classification of Multivariate Data. In Report on the Conference“Medizinische Statistik”, Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARROLL, J.D., GREEN, P.E., and KIM, J. (1989): Preference Mapping of Conjoint-Based Profiles: An INDSCAL Approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17, 273–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DESARBO, W.S., and CRON, W.L. (1988): A Maximum Likelihood Methodology for Clusterwise Regression.Journal of Classification, 5, 249–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DESARBO, W.S., OLIVER, R., and RANGASWAMY, A. (1989): A Simulated Annealing Methodology for Clusterwise Linear Regression. Psychometrika, 54, 707–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DESARBO, W.S., and RAO, V.R. (1986): A Constrained Unfolding Methodology for Product Positioning. Marketing Science, 5, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, P.E., and KRIEGER, A.M. (1991): Segmenting Markets With Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 55, 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, P.E., KRIEGER, A.M., and CARROLL, J.D. (1987): Conjoint Analysis and Multidimensional Scaling: A Complementary Approach. Journal of Advertising Research, 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, P.E., and RAO, V.R. (1971): Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgemental Data. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, P.E., and SRINIVASAN, V. (1978): Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, P.E., and SRINIVASAN, V. (1990): Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments With Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Marketing, 54, October, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAGERTY, M.R. (1985): Improving the Predictive Power of Conjoint Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis.Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KAMAKURA, W.A. (1988): A Least Squares Procedure for Benefit Segmentation with Conjoint Experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MENGEN, A. (1993): Konzeptgestaltung von Dienstleistungsprodukten. Schäf- fer-Poeschel, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOORE, W.L. (1980): Levels of Aggregation in Conjoint Analysis: An Experimental Comparison. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 516–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPÄTH, H. (1983): Cluster-Formation und -Analyse. Oldenbourg, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEDEL, M., and KISTEMAKER, C. (1989): Consumer Benefit Segmentation Using Clusterwise Linear Regression. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 6, 45–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WITTINK, D.R., and CATTIN, P. (1989): Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update. Journal of Marketing, 53, Summer, 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WITTINK, D.R., VRIENS, M., and BURHENNE, W. (1994): Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis in Europe: Results and Critical Reflections. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baier, D., Gaul, W. (1996). Classification and Representation Using Conjoint Data. In: Gaul, W., Pfeifer, D. (eds) From Data to Knowledge. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79999-0_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79999-0_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60354-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79999-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics