Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Präselektion und definitive Selektion

  • Conference paper
Lokale Therapie des Rektumkarzinoms

  • 15 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Aufgrund bestimmter klinischer Kriterien wird zunächst entschieden, ob man den Tumor primär durch radikale Resektion oder aber durch lokale Maßnahmen entfernt. In letzterem Fall entscheidet die sich anschließende pathohistologische Untersuchung des lokal entfernten Tumors über das weitere Vorgehen, d.h. ob die lokale Therapie als definitiv und ausreichend angesehen werden kann oder ob eine radikale Resektion als definitiver Eingriff anzuschließen ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Brodsky JT, Richard GK, Cohen AM, Minsky BD (1992) Variables correlated with the risk of lymph node metastasis in early rectal cancer. Cancer 69:322–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown MT, Luna-Perez P, Petrelli NJ, Herrera L (1992) Factors associated with nodal involvement of rectal adenocarcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1:25–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dershaw DD, Enker WE, Cohen AM, Sigurdson ER (1990) Transrectal ultrasonography of rectal carcinoma. Cancer 66:2336–2340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dittler H-J, Siewert JR (1991) Bedeutung der Endosonographie in der Chirurgie. Endoskopie Heute 4:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dworak O (1989) Number and size of lymph nodes and node metastases in rectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 3:96–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fleshman JW, Myerson RJ, Fry RD, Kodner IJ (1992) Accuracy of transrectal ultrasound in predicting pathologic stage of rectal cancer before and after preoperative radiation therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 35:823–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Geraghty JM, Williams CB, Talbot IC (1991) Malignant colorectal polyps: venous invasion and successful treatment by endoscopic polypectomy. Gut 32:774–778

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Glaser F, Friedl P, Ditfurth B v, Schlag P, Herfarth Ch (1990) Influence of endorectal ultrasound on surgical treament of rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 16:304–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldman S, Arvidsson H, Norming U, Lagerstedt U, Magnusson I, Frisell J (1991) Transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography in preoperative staging of lower rectal adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Radiol 16:259–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heintz A, Junginger Th (1991) Bedeutung der endorektalen Sonographie bei der Therapie früher Stadien des Rektumkarzinoms. Coloproctology 13:261–264

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hermanek P (1990) Malignant polyps — Pathological factors governing clinical management. Curr Top Pathol 81:277–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hermanek P (1991) Onkologische Chirurgie/Pathologisch-anatomische Sicht. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl 277–281

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hermanek P (1992) Lymphknotendiagnostik aus der Sicht der klinischen Pathologie. Zentralbl Radiol 146:7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hermanek P, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Sobin LH (eds) (1993) UICC 1993. TNM Supplement 1993. A commentary on uniform use. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hildebrandt U, Klein T, Feidel G, Schwarz H-P, Koch B, Schmitt RM (1990) Endosonography of pararectal lymph nodes. Dis Colon Rectum 33:863–868

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hohenberger W, Hermanek P Jr, Hermanek P, Gall FP (1992) Decisionmaking in curative rectum carcinoma surgery. Onkologie 15:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jochem RJ, Reading CC, Dozois RR, Carpenter A, Wolff BG, Charbonean JW (1990) Endorectal ultrasonographic staging of rectal carcinoma. Mayo Clin Proc 65: 1571–1577

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Katsura Y, Yamada K, Ishizawa T, Yoshinaka H, Shimazu H (1992) Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of wall invasion and lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 35:362–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Konishi F, Ugajin H, Ito K, Kanazawa K (1990) Endorectal ultrasonography with a 7.5 MHz linear array scanner for the assessment of invasion of rectal carcinoma. Int J Colorect Dis 5:15–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindmark G, Elvin A, Pahlman I, Glimelius B (1992) The value of endosonography in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorect Dis 7:162–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Milsom JW, Lavery IC, Stolfi VM, Czyrko C, Church JM, Oakley JR, Fazic VW (1992) The expanding utility of endoluminal ultrasonography in the management of rectal cancer. Surgery 112:832–841

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Napoleon B, Pujol B, Berger F, Valette PJ, Gerard JP, Souquet JC (1991) Accuracy of endosonography in the staging of rectal cancer treated by radiotherapy. Br J Surg 78:785–788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Roubein LD, David C, DuBrow R, Faintuch J, Lynch P, Fornage B, Levin B (1990) Endoscopic ultrasonography in staging rectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 85:1391–1394

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Strittmatter B, Ruf G (1992) Stellenwert und Einsatz der endorektalen Sonographie beim Rektumkarzinom. Coloproctology 14:144–146

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tio TL, Coene PPLO, van Delden OM, Tytgat GNJ (1991) Colorectal carcinoma: Preoperative TNM classification with endosonography. Radiology 179:165–170

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wagner G, Hermanek P (1994) Organspezifische Tumordokumentation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo (in Druck)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. P. Hermanek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. P. Marzoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Chirurgische Klinik mit Poliklinik, der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Maximiliansplatz, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland

    Paul Hermanek

  2. II. Chirurgische Abteilung, Regionalkrankenhaus Bozen, Lorenz-Böhler-Str. 5, 39100, Bozen, Italien

    Gian P. Marzoli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hermanek, P., Marzoli, G.P. (1994). Präselektion und definitive Selektion. In: Hermanek, P., Marzoli, G.P. (eds) Lokale Therapie des Rektumkarzinoms. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78606-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78606-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57368-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78606-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation