Skip to main content
Log in

Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of wall invasion and lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) with a flexible-type radial scanner (Aloka Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; 7.5 MHz) was applied to 120 patients with rectal cancer for the assessment of wall invasion and pararectal lymph node metastasis. Normal rectal wall was described as a five- or seven-layer structure excluding the lowest part within 3 cm from the anal verge. Loss of normal layers basically indicated the existence of cancer invasion. According to UICC classification, we divided the depth of wall invasion into four ultrasonographic levels (uT1–uT4), and results were correlated with histopathologic findings. Overall accuracy of the assessment was 92.0 percent (103/112). Overestimation occurred in 5 of 60 cases with T3 cancer (8.3 percent), and underestimation occurred in 1 of 19 cases with T2 cancer (5.3 percent) and 3 of 60 cases with T3 cancer (5 percent). Inflammatory cell infiltration was found around the cancer in a considerable number of cases. However, the assessment of wall invasion was hardly affected in our hands. Because the muscularis propria of the rectal wall was often recognized as a three-layer structure, uT2 cancer was subdivided into three subgroups of uPM1, uPM2, and uPM3. The assessment of invasion of sublayers in muscularis propria was possible in 14 of 19 cases (73.7 percent), and correct assessment was achieved in 57 percent of the cases. The ultrasonographic demonstration of pararectal lymph nodes was studied on 98 patients. No swollen lymph nodes were detected ultrasonographically in 35 of 98 cases (35.7 percent), but cancer metastasis was found histopathologically in 5 of these 35 cases (14.3 percent). The metastasis was observed more frequently in lymph nodes with a diameter of more than 5 mm (53.8 percent) and in those with a well-defined boundary and with an uneven and markedly hypoechoic pattern (72.3 percent). Although unable to detect minimal cancer foci, ERUS was considered a very useful tool for the assessment of the depth of cancer invasion in the rectal wall and pararectal lymph node metastasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clark J, Bankoff M, Carter B, Smith TJ. The use of computerized tomography scan in the staging and follow up study of carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1984;159:335–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hori M, Watanabe S, Matsubara T, Ikeda T, Kajitani T. Staging of colorectal cancer with computed tomography. Stomach Intest 1984;19:1321–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freency PC, Marks WM, Ryan JA. Colorectal carcinoma evaluation with CT. Radiology 1986;158:347–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hodgman CG, MacCarty RL, Wolff BG,et al. Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by computed tomography and 0.15T magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:446–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hildebrant U, Feifel G. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by intrarectal ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:42–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saitoh N, Okui K, Sarashina H, Suzuki M, Arai T, Nunomura M. Evaluation of echographic diagnosis of rectal cancer using intrarectal ultrasonic examination. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:234–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamashita Y, Machi J, Shirouzu K, Morotomi T, Isomoto H, Karegawa T. Evaluation of endorectal ultrasound for the assessment of wall invasion of rectal cancer: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:617–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ogiso M. A study of preoperative ultrasonographic evaluation of the depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. Tokyo Med Coll 1987;45:191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  9. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. In: Hermanek P, Sobin LH, eds. International Union Against Cancer. Springer-Verlag, 1987.

  10. Katsura Y, Ishizawa T, Yoshinaka H, Yamada K, Shimazu H. Diagnosis of mural invasion and lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer by endorectal ultrasonography. J Jpn Soc Colo-proctol 1990;43:388–95.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hildebrandt U, Klein T, Feifel G, Schwarz H-P, Koch B, Schmitt RM. Endosonography of pararectal lymph nodes:in vitro andin vivo evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:863–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Katsura, Y., Yamada, K., Ishizawa, T. et al. Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of wall invasion and lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 35, 362–368 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048115

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048115

Key words

Navigation