Abstract
The rabbit has been often used as an experimental animal in atherosclerosis research [51]. Early, in 1908, Ignatowski [34] studied the “influence of animal food on the organism of rabbits” and found an increase of lipids in artery walls when the rabbit was fed with a diet rich in fat and cholesterol. The production of atheromas by cholesterol rich diets became a standard technique and is still used when the effects of cholesterol on the arterial walls is studied. It is the basis of the lipid theory of atherogenesis [1]. A second theory for atherogenesis, the response-to-injury theory [44], is based upon experiments reported by Baumgartner [2]. He induced a thrombogenic reaction with subsequent fibromuscular intimai proliferates in the aortas of rabbits. Using a balloon catheter the endothelial lining of the aorta was removed and the vessel was distended by inflating the balloon. In 1966, Baumgartner and Studer [3] found a relationship between the distension of the aorta and a subsequent proliferation of cells in the intima. The mechanical stimulus caused smooth muscle cells (SMCs) of the media to migrate into the intima and to proliferate there to form a local intimai fibromuscular cushion. In 1979, another model to generate atherosclerotic proliferations was described by Betz and Schlote [7]. Again the rabbit was used as an experimental animal for local weak electrical stimulation of the carotid artery. Both models showed that in the early stages of atherogenesis, SMCs migrate from the media into the subendothelial space where they proliferate to form a focal thickening of the vessel wall termed a “fibromuscular plaque”. In contrast, SMCs of the normal vessel wall reveal a low proliferation rate [18, 19]. In the normal vessel wall a balance exists between factors inhibiting and factors inducing proliferation of SMCs whereby the inhibitory factors dominate. These factors act in a complex manner in vivo and it is very difficult to study the mechanisms of inhibition or activation of SMC proliferation in detail. Since the rabbit was the first and most frequently used animal in experimental atherosclerosis research [51], in vitro systems consisting of cells from the rabbit may be helpful to analyze the interactions of factors affecting the proliferation of SMCs. This does not only save animal experiments [6] but also enables the study of therapeutic aspects which cannot be solved in in vivo experiments [5]. If, for example, a drug suppresses the development of a stenosing proliferate in an artery by inhibiting the migration or proliferation of SMCs in the intima, it cannot be concluded whether the drug causes this response because of its toxicity; it also cannot be concluded whether the drug inhibits the mitotic process directly or via an indirect mechanism, e.g., by inhibiting the permeability of the endothelium. Finally, the in vivo experiment does not allow the conclusion that the drug acts specifically on the SMCs in the artery walls. Therefore, cultures of various cell types are useful in order to study the action of antiatherogenic drugs. One of the most important cell type in this context is the arterial SMC. Cultures of SMCs enable migration and proliferation to be studied under controlled and standard conditions. In vitro it is even possible to observe either the migration or the proliferation as separate phenomena. It is useful to compare the responses of cultured SMCs of rabbits with the in vivo experiments. Thus, the effective doses of antiatherogenic drugs as well as their toxic concentration can be determined in vitro. Cultures of SMCs from the rabbit aorta can be easily established. The isolation of SMCs from the media can be achieved by enzymatic disaggregation [16] or using the primary expiant technique [44]. In culture, SMCs reveal a characteristic behavior of proliferation, migration, differentiation, and growth pattern. Furthermore, more complex culture systems can be established which represent the in vivo situation better than mass cell cultures or clone cultures of SMCs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Assmann G (1982) Zur Ätiologie der Atherosklerose. Hämostaseologie 4:162–168.
Baumgartner H-R (1963) Eine neue Methode zur Erzeugung von Thromben durch gezielte Überdehnung der Gefäßwand. Z Exp Med 137:227–247.
Baumgartner H-R, Studer A (1966) Folgen des Gefäßkatheterismus am normo-und hypercholesterinaemischen Kaninchen. Pathol Microbiol 29:393–405.
Bayreuther K, Rodemann HP, Hommel R, Dittmann K, Albiez M (1988) Human skin fibroblasts in vitro differentiate along a terminal cell lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:5112–5116.
Betz E, Hämmerle H (1984) Arterienwandproliferate und Zellkulturen als Indikatoren für Hemmstoffe der Atherogenese. Funkt Biol Med 3:46–55.
Betz E, Hämmerle H (1986) Die Wirkung von atherogenen Stoffen in Zellkulturen und Arterienwänden. In: Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie (ed) Ersatzmethoden zum Tierversuch. Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie, Bonn pp 253–266.
Betz E, Schlote W (1979) Responses of the vessel walls to chronically applied electrical stimuli. Basic Res Cardiol 74:10–20.
Björkerud S (1985) Cultivated human arterial smooth muscle displays heterogeneous pattern of growth and phenotypic variation. Lab Invest 53:303–310.
Björnheden T, Bylock A, Hansson GK, Bondjers G (1983) A system for a long-term perfusion of rabbit aorta in vitro. Arteriosclerosis 3:366–382.
Blank RS, Thompson MM, Owens GK (1988) Cell cycle versus density dependence of smooth muscle alpha actin expression in cultered rat aorta smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biol 107:299–306.
Bürk RR (1973) A factor from a transformed cell line that affects cell migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:369–372.
Campbell GR, Chamley-Campbell JH, Burnstock G (1981) Differentiation and phenotypic modulation of arterial smooth muscle cells. In: Schwartz CJ, Werhessen NT, Wolf S (eds) Structure and function of the circulation, vol 3. Plenum, New York, pp 357–399.
Cereijido M, Ehrenfeld J, Meza I, Martinez-Palomo A (1980) Structural and functional membrane polarity in cultured monolayers of MOCK cells. J Memb Biol 52:147–159.
Chamley JH, Campbell GR (1974) Mitosis of contractile smooth muscle cells in tissue culture. Exp Cell Res 84:105–110.
Chamley-Campbell JH, Campbell GR (1981) What controls smooth muscle phenotype? Atherosclerosis 40:347–357.
Chamley-Campbell J, Campbell GR, Ross R (1979) The smooth muscle cell in culture. Physiol Rev 59:1–61.
Chamley-Campbell JH, Campbell GR, Ross R (1981) Phenotype-dependent response of cultured aortic smooth muscle to serum mitogens. J Cell Biol 89:379–383.
Clowes AW, Reidy MA, Clowes MM (1983) Kinetics of cellular proliferation after arterial injury. I. Smooth muscle growth in the absence of endothelium. Lab Invest 49:327–333.
Clowes AW, Clowes MM, Reidy MA (1986) Kinetics of cellular proliferation after arterial injury. III. Endothelial and smooth muscle growth in chronically denuded vessels. Lab Invest 54:295–303.
Ehrlich HP (1980) Culture of aorta. Methods Cell Biol 21A: 117–134.
Fingerle JK (1986) Organkultur der thorakalen Kaninchenaorta. Thesis, University of Tübingen.
Fingerle J, Kraft T (1987) The induction of smooth muscle cell proliferation in vitro using an organ culture system. Int Angiol 6:65–72.
Freshney RI (1983) Culture of animal cells. In: Freshney RI (ed) A manual of basic technique. Liss, New York.
Fuchs JCA, Dixon SH Jr, Hagen P (1979) Lipid metabolism and accumulation in perfused rabbit aorta. J Surg Res 26:611–617.
Gabbiani G (1987) The cytoskeleton of rat aortic smooth muscle cells: normal conditions, experimental intimai thickening and tissue culture. Acta histochem Suppl XXXIV:33–35.
Grobstein C (1956) Trans-filter induction of tubules in mouse metanephrogenic mesenchym. Exp Cell Res 10:424–440.
Gröschel-Stewart U, Drenkhahn D (1982) Muscular and cytoplasmic contractile proteins. Coll Relat Res 2:381–463.
Gröschel-Stewart U, Chamley JH, McConnell JD, Burnstock G (1975) Comparison of the reaction of cultured smooth and cardiac muscle cells and fibroblasts to specific antibodies to myosin. Histochemistry 43:215–224.
Gröschel-Stewart U, Schreiber J, Mahlmeister C, Weber K (1976) Production of specific antibodies to contractile proteins and their use in immunofluorescence microscopy. I. Antibodies to smooth and striated chicken muscle myosin.Histochemistry 46:229–236.
Grünwald J, Haudenschild CC (1984) Intimai injury in vivo activates vascular smooth muscle cell migration and expiant outgrowth in vitro. Arteriosclerosis 4:183–188.
Hämmerle H (1987) Wachstum und Differenzierung von arteriellen glatten Muskelzellen bei der Atherombildung und in Zellkulturen. Thesis, University of Tübingen.
Hämmerle H, Fingerle J, Rupp J, Grünwald J, Betz E, Haudenschild CC (1988) Expression of smooth muscle myosin in relation to growth kinetics of cultured aortic smooth muscle cells. Exp Cell Res 178:390–400.
Hollander W, Colombo M, Faris B, Franzblau C, Schmid K, Wernli M, Bernasconi U (1984) Changes in the connective tissue proteins, glycosaminoglycans and calcium in the arteries of the cynomolgus monkey during atherosclerotic induction and regression. Atherosclerosis 51:89–108.
Ignatowski AC (1908) Influence of animal food on the organism of rabbits. S Peterb Izviest Imp Voyenno Med Akad 16:154–173.
Kagan HM, Milbury PE Jr, Kramsch DM (1979) A possible role for elastic ligands in the proteolytic degradation of arterial elastic lamellae in the rabbit. Circ Res 44:95–103.
Labarca C, Paigen K (1980) A simple, rapid, and sensitive DNA assay procedure. Anal Biochem 102:344–352.
Lindl T, Bauer J (1987) Zell und Gewebekultur. Einführung in die Grundlagen sowie ausgewählte Methoden und Anwendungen. Fischer, Stuttgart.
Mauger JP, Worcel M, Tassin J, Courtois Y (1975) Contractility of smooth muscle cells of rabbit aorta in tissue culture. Nature 225:337–338.
Mayer HD, Hampton JC, Rosario B (1961) A simple method for removing the resin from epoxy-embedding tissue. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 9:909–910.
Osborne M, Weber K (1982) Immunofluorescence and immunocytochemical procedures with affinity purified antibodies: tubulin-containing structures. Methods Cell Biol 24:97–132.
Pederson DC, Bowyer DE (1985) Endothelial injury and healing in vitro. Studies using an organ culture system. AJP 119:264–272.
Raff MC, Fields KL, Hakomori SL, Minsky R, Pruss RM, Winter J (1979) Cell-typespecific markers for distinguishing and studying neurons and the major classes of glial cells in culture. Brain Res 174:283–309.
Rhodin JAG (1980) Architecture of the vessel wall. In: Bohr DF, Somlyo AP, Sparks HV (eds) Handbook of Physiology, vol 2, sect 2. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 1–31.
Ross R (1971) The smooth muscle cell. II. Growth of smooth muscle in culture and formation of elastic fibers. J Cell Biol 50:172–186.
Ross R, Glomset JA (1973) Atherosclerosis and the arterial smooth muscle cell. Proliferation of smooth muscle is a key event in the genesis of the lesions of atherosclerosis. Science 180:1332–1339.
Rovner AS, Murphy RA, Owens GK (1986) Expression of smooth muscle and nonmuscle myosin heavy chains in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 261:14740–14745.
Santillan GG, Schuh J, Chan SI, Bing RJ (1980) Binding and internalization of low density lipoproteins by perfused arteries. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 95:1410–1416.
Spaet TH, Stemerman MB, Veith FJ, Lejnieks I (1975) Intimai injury and regrowth in the rabbit aorta. Medial smooth muscle cells as a source of neointima. Circ Res 36:58–70.
Skalli O, Bloom WS Ropraz P, Azzarone B, Gabbiani G (1986) Cytoskeletal remodeling of rat aortic smooth muscle cells in vitro: relationships to culture conditions and analogies to in vivo situations. J Submicrosc Cytol 18:481–493.
Skalli O, Ropraz P, Trzeciak A, Benzonana G, Gillessen D, Gabbiani G (1986) A monoclonal antibody against alpha-smooth muscle actin: a new probe for smooth muscle differentiation. J Cell Biol 103:2787–2796.
Vesselinovitch D (1988) Animal models and the study of atherosclerosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 112:1011–1016.
Weber E, Hämmerle H, Vatti R, Berti G, Betz E (1986) Co-cultivation of endothelial and smooth muscle cells on opposite sides of a porous membrane. Appl Pathol 4:246–252.
Worton RG, Duff C (1979) Karyotyping. Methods Enzymol 62:322–344.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fallier-Becker, P., Rupp, J., Fingerle, J., Betz, E. (1990). Smooth Muscle Cells from Rabbit Aorta. In: Piper, H.M. (eds) Cell Culture Techniques in Heart and Vessel Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75262-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75262-9_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75264-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75262-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive