Abstract
Fldelity to a former breeding area is strong in many bird species, and in particular in males, since previous experience may help in the competition for essential breeding resources, like a good territory and a good nest site. Because of such fidelity, return rates have repeatedly been used in analysing annual survival rates of adult male Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca, e.g. when studying relationships with male plumage colour, and effects of brood size manipulation (Askenmo 1979, Järvi et al. 1987, Slagsvold and Lifjeld 1988, Alatalo and Lundberg 1989). A problem is that return rate is a mixture of survival and capture rate. Capture rate is not only dependent on the efficiency of observation within a study area, but on breeding dispersal. Thus, it has been questioned whether return rate can be used to estimate survival rate (Högstedt 1981; but see Curio and Regelmann 1982, p.242, for a reply). Here we present data for return rates of male Pied Flycatchers to study sites near Oslo, in southern Norway. Studies of other bird species have shown that an increase in dispersal rate may occur after a breeding failure (e.g. Harvey et al. 1979, Newton and Marquiss 1982, Pärt and Gustafsson 1989). We therefore asked if previous breeding success affects male return rate in our population. To answer this question, we compare male return rates for two study plots; in the first plot we experimentally reduced breeding success by removing all females; in the second plot we increased breeding success by releasing these additional females. Such experiments are necessary to ascertain whether an increased dispersal after a breeding failure is related to the failure itself, or to a qualitative difference between the birds involved and/or of their breeding territories. We therefore also analysed return rate in relation to various male characteristics such as age, body size, and plumage colour, to see if there was any relationship with male quality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alatalo RV and Lundberg A (1989) Clutch size of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca — an experiment. Ornis Fenn 66: 15–23
Alatalo RV, Lundberg A and Ulfstrand S (1985) Habitat selection in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. in: Cody ML (ed) Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, London, p. 59–83
Askenmo C (1979) Reproductive effort and return rate of male Pied Flycatchers. Am Nat 114: 748–753
Berndt R and Winkel W (1975) Gibt es beim Trauerschnäpper Ficedula hypoleuca eine Prägung auf den Biotop des Geburtsortes? J Orn 116: 195–201
Campbell B (1955) A population of Pied Flycatchers (Muscicapa hypoleuca). Proc Int orn Congr 11 (1954): 428–434
Creutz G (1955) Der Trauerschnäpper (Muscicapa hypoleuca (Pallas)). Eine Populationsstudie. J Orn 96: 241–326
Curio E (1959) Beiträge zur Populationsökologie des Trauerschnäppers (Ficedula hypoleuca Pallas). Zool Jahrb 87: 185–230
Curio E and Regelmann K (1982) Forpflanzungswert und “Brutwert” der Kohlmeise (Parus major). J Orn. 123: 237–257
Dale S and Slagsvold T (1990) Random settlement of female Pied Flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 39, in press
Drilling NE and Thompson CF (1988) Natal and breeding dispersal in House Wrens (Troglodytes aedon). Auk 105: 480–491
Drost R (1936) Uber das Brutkleid männlicher Trauerfliegenfanger, Muscicapa hypoleuca. Vogelzug 6: 179–186
Haartman L von (1949) Der Trauerfliegenschnäpper. I. Ortstreue und Rassenbildung. Acta Zool Fenn 56: 1–105
Haartman L von (1951) Der Trauerfliegenschnäpper. II. Populationsprobleme. Acta Zool Fenn 67: 1–57
Haartman L von (1960) The Ortstreue of the Pied Flycatcher. Proc Int orn Congr 12 (1958): 226–273
Harvey PH, Greenwood PJ and Perrins CM (1979) Breeding area fidelity of the Great Tit (Parus major). J Anim Ecol 48: 305–313
Harvey PH, Greenwood PJ, Campbell B and Stenning MJ (1984) Breeding dispersal of the Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) J Anim Ecol 53: 727–736
Högstedt G (1981) Should there be a positive or negative correlation between survival of adults in a bird population and their clutch size? Am Nat 118: 568–571
Järvi T, Røskaft E, Bakken M and Zumsteg B (1987) Evolution of variation in male secondary sexual characteristics: a test of eight hypotheses applied to Pied Flycatchers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20: 161–169
Lifjeld JT and Slagsvold T (1988) Mate fidelity of renesting Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in relation to characteristics of the pair mates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22: 117–123
Newton I and Marquiss M (1982) Fidelity to breeding area and mate in Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus. J Anim Ecol 51: 327–341
Nyholm NEI and Myhrberg HE (1983) Breeding area fidelity of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca at Ammarnäs, Swedish Lapland. Ornis Fenn 60: 22–27
Ojanen M and Orell M (1982) Onset of moult among breeding Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) in Northern Finland. Vogelwarte 31: 445–451
Pärt T and Gustafsson L (1989) Breeding dispersal in the Collared Flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis): possible causes and reproductive consequences. J Anim Ecol 58: 305–320
Røskaft E, Järvi T, Nyholm NEI, Virolainen M, Winkel W and Zang H (1986) Geographic variation in secondary sexual plumage colour characteristics of the male Pied Flycatcher. Ornis Scand 17: 293–298
Slagsvold T and Lifjeld JT (1986) Mate retention and male polyterritoriality in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19: 25–30
Slagsvold T and Lifjeld JT (1988). Plumage colour and sexual selection in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 36: 395–407
Slagsvold T and Lifjeld JT, Stenmark G and Breiehagen T (1988) On the cost of searching for a mate in female Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 36: 433–442
Stenmark G, Slagsvold T and Lifjeld JT (1988) Polygyny in the Pied Flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca: a test of the deception hypothesis. Anim Behav 36: 1646–1657
Trettau W (1952) Planberingung des Trauerfliegenschnäppers (Muscicapa hypoleuca) in Hessen. Vogelwarte 16: 89–95
Trettau W and Merkel F (1943) Ergebnisse einer Planberingung des Trauerfliengenfangers (Muscicapa hypoleuca Pallas) in Schlesien. Vogelzug 14: 77–90
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Slagsvold, T., Lifjeld, J.T. (1990). Return Rates of Male Pied Flycatchers: An Experimental Study Manipulating Breeding Success. In: Blondel, J., Gosler, A., Lebreton, JD., McCleery, R. (eds) Population Biology of Passerine Birds. NATO ASI Series, vol 24. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75110-3_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75110-3_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51759-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75110-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive