Zusammenfassung
In diesem Kapitel beschäftigen wir uns mit den Prozessen, die der menschlichen Sprachverarbeitung jenseits der Wortebene zugrunde liegen. Zunächst werden die unterschiedlichen Aspekte der menschlichen Sprachverarbeitung vornehmlich aus der Perspektive der Sprachverstehensforschung behandelt. Hier geht es um die syntaktische, semantische und pragmatische Analyse von Sätzen sowie die Forschung zum Textverstehen. Die Sprachproduktion wird in einem gesonderten Abschnitt behandelt. An Ende des Kapitels werden die neurobiologischen Grundlagen der menschlichen Sprachverarbeitung diskutiert, einige Anwendungsbeispiele aufgeführt und ein Ausblick auf zukünftige Forschung im Bereich der Sprachpsychologie gegeben.
Schlüsselwörter: Ambiguität; Bedeutung; Bedeutungskomposition; Kohärenz; Parsing; Pragmatik; Satzverstehen; Semantik; Sprachproduktion; Sprachwissen; Syntax; Textlinguistik, Textverstehen; Versprecher
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Adams, B. C., Clifton, C., & Mitchell, D. C. (1998). Lexical guidance in sentence processing? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 265–270.
Akinnaso, F. N. (1982). On the differences between spoken and written language. Language and Speech, 25, 97–125.
Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1061–1070.
Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. J. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 593–613.
Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106, 748–765.
Altmann, G., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247–264.
Altmann, G., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191–238.
Altmann, G., Garnham, A., & Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 685–712.
Anderson, A., Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1983). The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 427–440.
Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 76, B13–B26.
Asher, N. (1993). Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). Philosophical Papers. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382–391.
Badecker, W., & Straub, K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 748–769.
Baker, L., & Wagner, J. L. (1987). Evaluating information for truthfulness: The effects of logical subordination. Memory & Cognition, 15, 247–255.
Baroni, M., Bernardi, R., & Zamparelli, R. (2014). Frege in space: A program for compositional distributional semantics. Linguistic Issues in Language Technologies, 9, 5–110.
Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2006). Perspective taking and the coordination of meaning in language use. In M. Traxler, & M. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2. Aufl. S. 901–938). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and brain sciences, 22, 637–660.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher, & R. A. Zwaan (Hrsg.), Grounding Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barsalou, L. W. (2014). Cognitive Psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. New York: Psychology Press.
Barton, S. B., & Sanford, A. J. (1993). A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory & Cognition, 21, 477–487.
Bates, E., Masling, M., & Kintsch, W. (1978). Recognition memory for aspects of dialogue. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 187–197.
Beck, S., & Gergel, R. (2014). Contrasting English and German Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112, 150–158.
Berkum, J. J. A. van, Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2003). Event related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40, 235–248.
Berkum, J. J. van, Van Den Brink, D., Tesink, C. M., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 580–591.
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Hrsg.), Cognition and the development of language (S. 279–362). New York: Wiley.
Bierwisch, M. (1982). Formal and lexical semantics. Linguistische Berichte, 80/82, 3–17.
Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 527–536.
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2767–2796.
Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1–47.
Bock, J. K. (1986a). Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 575–586.
Bock, J. K. (1986b). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.
Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177–192.
Bock, K. J., & Irwin, D. E. (1980). Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 467–484.
Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (S. 945–984). San Diego: Academic Press.
Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. H. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104, 437–458.
Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1990). Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 413–432.
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2009). Processing syntax and morphology: A neurocognitive perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185–189.
Bott, O. (in press). The processing domain of aspectual interpretation. In B. Arsenijevic, B. Gehrke & R. Marín (Eds.): Subatomic Semantics of Event Predicates. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Springer: Dordrecht.
Bott, O., & Schlotterbeck, F. (2015). The processing domain of scope interaction. Journal of Semantics, 39, 39–92.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Liversedge, S. P., Stewart, A. J., & Urbach, T. P. (1995). Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 489–506.
Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331–350.
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11, 717–726.
Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193–209.
Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In G. Miller, J. Bresnan, & M. Halle (Hrsg.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality (S. 1–59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bresnan, J., & Kaplan, R. M. (1982). Introduction: Grammars as mental representations of language. In J. Bresnan (Hrsg.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Broca, P. (1861). Perte de la parole, ramollissement chronique et destruction partielle du lobe antérieur gauche du cerveau. Bulletin de la Société Anthropologique, 2, 235–238.
Bröder, A., & Bredenkamp, J. (1996). SLIP-Technik, Prozeßdissoziationsmodell und multinomiale Modellierung: neue Werkzeuge zum experimentellen Nachweis „Freudscher Versprecher?“. Zeitschrift für experimentelle Psychologie, 43, 175–202.
Broek, P. van den, Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316.
Brysbaert, M., & Mitchell, D. C. (1996). Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 49, 664–695.
Burkhardt, P. (2006). Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 98, 159–168.
Burton, M., Small, S., & Blumstein, S. (2000). The role of segmentation in phonological processing: an fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 679–690.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 671–681.
Carlson, K. (2009). How prosody influences sentence comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 1188–1200.
Carroll, D. (1994). Psychology of language. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Chafe, W., & Tannen, D. (1987). The relation between written and spoken language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 16, 383–407.
Cherubim, D. (Hrsg.). (1980). Fehlerlinguistik. Beiträge zum Problem der sprachlichen Abweichung. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 1–15.
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (1999). Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance. Cognitive Science, 23, 157–205.
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489–509.
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368–407.
Cirilo, R. K., & Foss, D. J. (1980). Text structure and reading time for sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 96–109.
Clark, H. H. (1975). Bridging. Proceedings of the 1975 workshop on Theoretical issues in natural language processing. (S. 169–174). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 430–477.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in Communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Hrsg.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (S. 127–149). Washington: APA Books.
Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the given – new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Hrsg.), DiscourseProduction and Comprehension (S. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294.
Clark, H. H., & Sengul, C. M. J. (1979). In search of referents for nouns and pronouns. Memory & Cognition, 7, 35–41.
Claus, B. (2015). Verb gapping: an action-gap compatibility study. Acta Psychologica, 156, 104–113.
Claus, B., & Kelter, S. (2006). Comprehending narratives containing flashbacks: evidence for temporally organized representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1031–1044.
Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. (2006). Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations? Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 185–198.
Clifton Jr, C., & Odom, P. (1966). Similarity relations among certain English sentence constructions. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–35.
Corbett, A. T., & Chang, F. R. (1983). Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents. Memory & Cognition, 11, 283–294.
Crain, S., & Steedman, M. (1985). On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser. Natural Language Parsing, 320–358.
Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. C. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73–105.
Davidson, D. (1967). The logical form of action sentences. In N. Resher (Hrsg.), The logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391–407.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.
Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611–629.
Dijk, T. A. van, & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Dove, G. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110, 412–431.
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547–619.
Drieman, G. H. (1962). Differences between written and spoken language: An exploratory study. Acta Psychologica, 20, 78–100.
Dudschig, C., Maienborn, C., & Kaup, B. (2016). Is there a difference between stripy journeys and stripy ladybirds? The N400 response to semantic and world-knowledge violations during sentence comprehension. Brain and Cognition, 103, 38–49.
Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179–211.
Elman, J. L. (1991). Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7, 195–225.
Elman, J. L. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33, 547–582.
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813.
Erickson, T. D., & Mattson, M. E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 540–551.
Farmer, T. A., Misyak, J. B., & Christinsen, M. H. (2012). In M. Spivey, M. Joanisse, & K. McRae (Hrsg.), In (S. 353–364). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferreira, F. (1993). Creation of prosody during sentence production. Psychological Review, 100, 233–253.
Ferreira, F. (1994). Choice of passive voice is affected by verb type and animacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 715–736.
Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203.
Ferreira, F., & Clifton Jr, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348–368.
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 555–568.
Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 57–84.
Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11–15.
Ferreira, V. S. (1996). Is it better to give than to donate? Syntactic flexibility in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 724–755.
Ferreira, V. S., & Dell, G. S. (2000). Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 296–340.
Filik, R., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Processing local pragmatic anomalies in fictional contexts: Evidence from the N400. Psychophysiology, 45, 554–558.
Filik, R., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). Processing doubly quantified sentences: Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 953–959.
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach, & R. T. Harms (Hrsg.), Universals in linguistic theory (S. 1–88). New York: Holt, Rinehart und Winston.
Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. Studies in Linguistic Analysis, Philological Society (Great Britain), 1–32.
Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Grounding Cognition in Perception and Action. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825–850.
Flores d’Arcais, G. B. (1987). Syntactic processing during reading for comprehension. Attention and Performance, Bd. XII, S. 619–633). The Psychology of Reading
Fodor, J. D. (1998). Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 285–319.
Fodor, J. A., & Bever, T. G. (1965). The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 414–420.
Fodor, J. A., & Garrett, M. (1967). Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 289–296.
Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G., & Garrett, M. F. (1974). The psychology of langauge. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Foltz, P. W., Gilliam, S., & Kendall, S. (2000). Supporting content-based feedback in on-line writing evaluation with LSA. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 111–127.
Forrest, L. B. (1996). Discourse goals and attentional processes in sentence production: The dynamic construal of events. In A. E. Goldberg (Hrsg.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (S. 149–162). Stanford, CA: The Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.
Frazier, L. (1999). On sentence interpretation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291–325.
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178–210.
Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik, N.F, 100, 25–50.. Neuabdruck in Frege (1962)
Freud, S. (1901). Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens. Über Vergessen, Versprechen, Vergreifen, Aberglaube und Irrtum. In: Project Gutenberg eBook.
Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91, 1357–1392.
Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27–52.
Gamut, L. T. F. (1991). Intensional Logic and Logical Grammar. Logic, Language, and Meaning, Bd. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garnham, A., Shillcock, R. C., Brown, G. D., Mill, A. I., & Cutler, A. (1981). Slips of the tongue in the London-Lund corpus of spontaneous conversation. Linguistics, 19, 805–818.
Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower (Hrsg.), The psychology of learning and motivation Bd. 9 New York: Academic Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1992). Disorder of lexical selection. Cognition, 42, 143–180.
Garrett, M. F., Bever, T., & Fodor, J. (1966). The active use of grammar in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 30–32.
Garrod, S., & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27, 181–218.
Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 8–11.
Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 292–304.
Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1994). Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (S. 675–698). San Diego: Academic Press.
Garvey, C., & Caramazza, A. (1974). Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 459–464.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 265–304.
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1988). Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 699–717.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2006). Figurative language. In M. Traxler, & M. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2. Aufl. S. 835–862). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76.
Giora, R. (2002). Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 487–506.
Gleitman, H., Gross, J., & Reisberg, D. (2010). Psychology. New York, NJ: Norton.
Glenberg, A. M. (2011). How reading comprehension is embodied and why that matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 5–18.
Glenberg, A. M. (2014). How acting out in school boosts learning. Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-acting-out-in-school-boosts-learning/
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565.
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and language, 26, 69–83.
Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children’s Reading Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 424–436.
Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., & Cattaneo, L. (2008). Use-induced motor plasticity affects the processing of abstract and concrete language. Current Biology, 18, R290–R291.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 419–429.
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Gesture’s role in speaking, learning, and creating language. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 257–283.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12, 516–522.
Gompel, R. P. van, & Pickering, M. J. (2001). Lexical guidance in sentence processing: A note on Adams, Clifton, and Mitchell (1998). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 851–857.
Gompel, R. P. van, & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Syntactic parsing. The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, Gareth Gaskell. Oxford University Press, NY, 289–307.
Gompel, R. P. van, Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2001). Reanalysis in sentence processing: Evidence against current constraint-based and two-stage models. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 225–258.
Gompel, R. P. van, Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 284–307.
Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 311–347.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
Grewendorf, G. (2006). Noam Chomsky. München: CH Beck.
Grewendorf, G., Hamm, F., & Sternefeld, W. (1989). Sprachliches Wissen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Hrsg.), Speech acts Syntax and semantics, (Bd. 3, S. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Griffin, Z. M. (2001). Gaze duration during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82, B1–B14.
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274–279.
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grober, E. H., Beardsley, W., & Caramazza, A. (1978). Parallel function strategy in pronoun assignment. Cognition, 6, 117–133.
Grodner, D. J., Klein, N. M., Carbary, K. M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2010). „Some,“ and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment. Cognition, 116, 42–55.
Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12, 175–204.
Grosz, B. J., Weinstein, S., & Joshi, A. K. (1995). Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21, 203–225.
Gullberg, M., De Bot, K., & Volterra, V. (2008). Gestures and some key issues in the study of language development. Gesture, 8, 149–179.
Habel, C. (1986). Prinzipien der Referentialität. Untersuchungen zur propositionalen Repräsentation von Wissen. Berlin: Springer.
Hagoort, P., & Berkum, J. van (2007). Beyond the sentence given. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 801–811.
Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438–441.
Hakes, D. T. (1972). Effects of reducing complement constructions on sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 278–286.
Hare, M., Jones, M., Thomson, C., Kelly, S., & McRae, K. (2009). Activating event knowledge. Cognition, 111, 151–167.
Harley, T. A. (1984). A Critique of Top-down Independent Levels Models of Speech Production: Evidence from Non-plan-Internal Speech Errors. Cognitive Science, 8, 191–219.
Harley, T. A. (2013). The psychology of language: From data to theory. New York: Psychology Press.
Hartshorne, J. K. (2013). What is implicit causality? Language and Cognitive Processes, 29, 1–21.
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Westenberg, C. (2000). Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition, 75, B27–B39.
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15, 409–414.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.
Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512–521.
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts).
Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Bd. 13. Oxford: Blackwell.
Herbert, C., Deutsch, R., Sütterlin, S., Kübler, A., & Pauli, P. (2011). Negation as a means for emotion regulation? Startle reflex modulation during processing of negated emotional words. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 199–206.
Herrmann, T. (2003). Theorien und Modelle der Sprachproduktion. In G. Rickheit, T. Herrmann, & W. Deutsch (Hrsg.), Psycholinguistik. Ein internationals Handbuch (S. 213–228). Berlin, New York: DeGruyter.
Hess, D. J., Foss, D. J., & Carroll, P. (1995). Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 62–82.
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2000). Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 131–138.
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2004). Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition, 92, 67–99.
Holmes, V. M., & Forster, K. I. (1970). Detection of extraneous signals during sentence recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 7, 297–301.
Holsinger, E. (2013). Representing Idioms: Syntactic and contextual effects on idiom processing. Language and Speech, 56, 373–394.
Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500.
Hörnig, R., Oberauer, K., & Weidenfeld, A. (2005). Two principles of premise integration in spatial reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 33, 131–139.
Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 495–514.
Huang, Y. T., & Gordon, P. C. (2011). Distinguishing the time course of lexical and discourse processes through context, coreference, and quantified expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 966–978.
Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2011). Logic and conversation revisited: Evidence for a division between semantic and pragmatic content in real-time language comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1161–1172.
Hughes, D. C., Keeling, B., & Tuck, B. F. (1983). The effects of instructions to scorers intended to reduce context effects in essay scoring. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 1047–1050.
Isberner, M. B., & Richter, T. (2014). Does validation during language comprehension depend on an evaluative mindset? Discourse Processes, 51, 7–25.
Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). What’s communication got to do with it? Gesture in children blind from birth. Developmental Psychology, 33, 453–467.
Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science, 16, 367–371.
Jacobson, P. (2014). Compositional semantics: An introduction to the syntax/semantics interface. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Bd. 6. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jones, M. N., Willits, J. A. & Dennis, S. (im Druck). Models of semantic memory. In J. R. Busemeyer & J. T. Townsend (Eds.) Oxford Handbook of Mathematical and Computational Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
Kamide, Y., & Mitchell, D. C. (1999). Incremental pre-head attachment in Japanese parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 631–662.
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133–156.
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Katz, A. N., & Ferretti, T. R. (2001). Moment-by-moment reading of proverbs in literal and nonliteral contexts. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 193–221.
Katz, J. J., & Postal, P. M. (1964). An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kaup, B. (2001). Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information. Memory & Cognition, 20, 960–967.
Kaup, B. & Ulrich, R. (im Druck). Die Beziehung zwischen sprachlicher und nicht-sprachlicher Kognition: Die Bedeutung von Repräsentationsformaten. Psychologische Rundschau.
Kaup, B., de la Vega, I., Strozyk, J., & Dudschig, C. (im Druck). The role of sensorimotor processes in meaning composition. In M. H. Fischer & Y. Coello (Eds.), Foundations of Embodied Cognition: Conceptual and Interactive Embodiment. London: Psychology Press.
Kellogg, R. T. (1999). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kelly, M. H., Bock, J. K., & Keil, F. C. (1986). Prototypicality in a linguistic context: Effects on sentence structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 59–74.
Kelter, S. (2003). Mentale Modelle. In G. Rickheit, T. Herrmann, & W. Deutsch (Hrsg.), Psycholinguistik-Psycholinguistics (S. 505–517). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
Kelter, S., Kaup, B., & Claus, B. (2004). Representing a described sequence of events: a dynamic view of narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 451–464.
Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258.
Kendon, A. (1997). Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 109–128.
Kennedy, A., Murray, W. S., Jennings, F., & Reid, C. (1989). Parsing complements: Comments on the generality of the principle of minimal attachment. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, SI51–SI76.
Kimball, J. (1973). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition, 2, 15–47.
Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological review, 95, 163.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive Science, 25, 173–202.
Kintsch, W., & Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257–274.
Kintsch, W., & Dijk, T. A. van (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Hrsg.), Language and Gesture (S. 162–185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32.
Knoeferle, P., Crocker, M. W., Scheepers, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition, 95, 95–127.
Konieczny, L. (2000). Locality and parsing complexity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 627–645.
Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B., & Strube, G. (1991). Psychologisch fundierte Prinzipien der Satzverarbeitung jenseits von Minimal Attachment. Kognitionswissenschaft, 1, 58–70.
Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B., Scheepers, C., & Strube, G. (1997). The role of lexical heads in parsing: Evidence from German. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 307–348.
Konopka, A. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2014). Priming sentence planning. Cognitive Psychology, 73, 1–40.
Krauss, R. M., Dushay, R. A., Chen, Y., & Rauscher, F. (1995). The communicative value of conversational hand gesture. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 533–552.
Krifka, M. (1989). Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Bd. 10. Paderborn: W. Fink.
Krifka, M. (2004). Argumentstruktur und Verbsemantik. Skript zum Grundkurs C WS 2004/5. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Lakoff, G. (1970). Global rules. Language, 46(3), 627–639.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.
Lang, E., & Maienborn, C. (2011). Two-level semantics: Semantic form and conceptual structure. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Hrsg.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (Bd. I, S. 709–740). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lee, E. K., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Watson, D. G. (2013). Ways of looking ahead: Hierarchical planning in language production. Cognition, 129, 544–562.
Lenhard, W., Baier, H., Hoffmann, J., & Schneider, W. (2007). Automatische Bewertung offener Antworten mittels Latenter Semantischer Analyse. Diagnostica, 53, 155–165.
Leuninger, H. (1999). Reden ist Schweigen, Silber ist Gold: gesammelte Versprecher. München: DTV.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41–104.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126–1177.
Lichtheim, L. (1885). On aphasia. Brain, 7, 433–484.
MacDonald, M. C. (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 157–201.
MacDonald, M. C., & Just, M. A. (1989). Changes in activation levels with negation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 633.
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676.
Macedonia, M. (2014). Bringing back the body into the mind: gestures enhance word learning in foreign language. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1467.
Maienborn, C. (2003). Die logische Form von Kopula-Sätzen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Maienborn, C. (2011). Event semantics. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Hrsg.), Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning (Bd. 1, S. 802–829). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.. HSK 33.1
Mani, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions. Memory & Cognition, 10, 181–187.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1–71.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Warren, P., Grenier, P., & Lee, C. S. (1992). Prosodic effects in minimal attachment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 73–87.
Marx, E. (2000). Versprecher und Genusverarbeitung. Analyse spontaner und experimentell erzeugter Sprechfehler. Wiesbaden: DUV.
McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287–330.
McCelland, J., & Rumelhart, D. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
McDonald, J. L., Bock, K., & Kelly, M. H. (1993). Word and world order: Semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 188–230.
McElree, B., Traxler, M. J., Pickering, M. J., Seely, R. E., & Jackendoff, R. (2001). Reading time evidence for enriched composition. Cognition, 78, B17–B25.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1998). Memory-based language processing: Psycholinguistic research in the 1990s. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 25–42.
McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 283–312.
Meringer, R., & Mayer, C. (1895). Versprechen und Verlesen: eine philologisch-linguistische Studie. Stuttgart: Göschen.
Meyer, A. S. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 477–496.
Miller, G. A., & McKean, K. O. (1964). A chronometric study of some relations between sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 297–308.
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action, 27, Oxford Psychology Series 27. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, K. A. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 414–417.
Mitchell, D. C. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In M. Coltheart (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XII (S. 601–618). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mitchell, D. C., Cuetos, F., Corley, M. M., & Brysbaert, M. (1995). Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 469–488.
Mitchell, D. C., & Holmes, V. M. (1985). The role of specific information about the verb in parsing sentences with local structural ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 542–559.
Mitchell, J., & Lapata, M. (2010). Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cognitive Science, 34, 1388–1429.
Montague, R. (1973). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In K. J. J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik, & P. Suppes (Hrsg.), Approaches to Natural Language (S. 221–242). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Morgan, J. L., Meier, R. P., & Newport, E. L. (1987). Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 498–550.
Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 165–187.
Murray, J. D., Klin, C. M., & Myers, J. L. (1993). Forward inferences in narrative text. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 464–473.
Ni, W., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1996). Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 283–334.
Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How we know – and sometimes misjudge – what others know: Imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 737–759.
Nieuwland, M. S., & Berkum, J. J. van (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1098–1111.
O’Brien, E. J. (1987). Antecedent search processes and the structure of text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 278–290.
O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing víew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learníng, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1200–1210.
O’Donnell, R. C. (1974). Syntactic differences between speech and writing. American Speech, 49, 102–110.
Özyürek, A., Willems, R., Kita, S., & Hagoort, P. (2007). On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: Insights from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 605–616.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Partee, B. (1984). Compositionality. Varieties of Formal Semantics, 3, 281–311.
Pfau, R., Steinbach, M., & Woll, B. (Hrsg.). (2012). Sign language: An international handbook. Bd. 37. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–190.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 105–110.
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73–193.
Poeppel, D., & Hickok, G. (2004). Towards a new functional anatomy of language. Cognition, 92, 1–12.
Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97–132.
Price, C. J. (2010). The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 62–88.
Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582.
Pylkkänen, L., & McElree, B. (2006). The syntax-semantics interface: On-line composition of sentence meaning. In M. Traxler, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (S. 537–577). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Raaijmakers, J. G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93–134.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1978). Priming in item recognition: Evidence for the propositional structure of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 403–417.
Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7, 226–231.
Rayner, K., & Frazier, L. (1987). Parsing temporarily ambiguous complements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 657–673.
Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358–374.
Rayner, K., Kambe, G., & Duffy, S. A. (2000). The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 53, 1061–1080.
Reber, A. S., & Anderson, J. R. (1970). The perception of clicks in linguistic and nonlinguistic messages. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 81–89.
Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445–476.
Richter, T., Schroeder, S., & Wöhrmann, B. (2009). You don’t have to believe everything you read: background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 538–558.
Rinck, M., & Bower, G. H. (1995). Anaphora resolution and the focus of attention in situation models. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 110–131.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. G. Bobrow, & M. A. Collins (Hrsg.), Representation and understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science (S. 211–236). New York: Academic Press.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland, & D. E. Rumelhart (Hrsg.), Parallel Distributed Processing (Bd. II, S. 216–271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533–536.
Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14, 479–493.
Sachs, J. S. (1967). Recopition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 437–442.
Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1981). Understanding written language: Explorations of comprehension beyond the sentence. New York: Wiley.
Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1998). The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 26, 159–190.
Sanford, A. J., Moar, K., & Garrod, S. C. (1988). Proper names as controllers of discourse focus. Language and Speech, 31, 43–56.
Sanford, A. J., & Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 382–386.
Sauerland, U. (2011). Traces. In P. C. Hogan (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences (S. 866–867). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Savin, H. B., & Perchonock, E. (1965). Grammatical structure and the immediate recall of English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 348–353.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schlotterbeck, F., & Bott, O. (2013). Easy Solutions for a Hard Problem? The Computational Complexity of Reciprocals with Quantificational Antecedents. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 22, 363–390.
Schwarz, F. (2007). Processing presupposed content. Journal of Semantics, 24, 373–416.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, K. M., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71, 109–147.
Shapiro, A., & Murphy, G. (1993). Can you answer a question for me? Evidence for a salience-based theory of indirect speech act. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 211–229.
Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 272–281.
Slevc, L. R. (2011). Saying what’s on your mind: Working memory effects on sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1503–1514.
Slobin, D. I. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 5, 219–227.
Singer, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (S. 479–515). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. (1999). High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition, 73, 205–246.
Smyth, R. (1994). Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 197–229.
Speer, S., & Blodgett, A. (2006). Prosody. In M. Traxler, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (S. 505–537). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
Sperber, & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Backwell.
Spivey, M. J., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 447–481.
Sprenger, S. A., Levelt, W. J. M., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 161–184.
Stallings, L. M., MacDonald, M. C., & O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1998). Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: Phrase length and verb disposition in heavy-NP shift. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 392–417.
Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: The closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 267–295.
Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and progressing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 18, 523–534.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G., & Trueswell, J. C. (1989). The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, SI211–SI234.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.
Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of content-based expectations. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 597–632.
Taylor, L., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Motor resonance and linguistic focus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 896–904.
Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77–110.
Tiemann, S. (2014). The Processing of ’wieder’ (’again’) and Other Presupposition Triggers (Doctoral dissertation, Universität Tübingen).
Till, R. E., Mross, E. F., & Kintsch, W. (1988). Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context. Memory & Cognition, 16, 283–298.
Tomasello, M. (1995). Language is not an instinct. Cognitive Development, 10, 131–156.
Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Hrsg.), Perspectives in Sentence Processing (S. 155–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 528–553.
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285–318.
Tunstall, S. L. (1998). The interpretation of quantifiers: semantics & processing (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst).
Ulrich, R., & Maienborn, C. (2010). Left-right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition, 117, 126–138.
Von Stutterheim, C., & Nüse, R. (2003). Processes of conceptualization in language production: language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics, 41, 851–882.
Velde, F. van der, Van der Voort van der Kleij, G. T., & Kamps, M. de (2004). Lack of combinatorial productivity in language processing with simple recurrent networks. Connection Science, 16, 21–46.
Velde, M. van de, Meyer, A. S., & Konopka, A. E. (2014). Message formulation and structural assembly: Describing „easy“ and „hard“ events with preferred and dispreferred syntactic structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 71, 124–144.
Vosse, T., & Kempen, G. (2000). Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar. Cognition, 75, 105–143.
Vosse, T., & Kempen, G. (2009). The Unification Space implemented as a localist neural net: predictions and error-tolerance in a constraint-based parser. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 3, 331–346.
Wagner, V., Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2010). On the flexibility of grammatical advance planning during sentence production: Effects of cognitive load on multiple lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 423–440.
Wason, P. C. (1965). The contexts of plausible denial. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 4, 7–11.
Wason, P. C., & Reich, S. S. (1979). A verbal illusion. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 591–597.
Weber, A., Grice, M., & Crocker, M. W. (2006). The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: A study of anticipatory eye movements. Cognition, 99, B63–B72.
Welke, K. (1988). Einführung in die Valenz- und Kasustheorie. Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut.
Wernicke, C. (1874/1974). Der aphasische Symptomenkomplex (pp. 1–70). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Wheeldon, L. (2000). Generating prosodic structures. In L. R. Wheeldon (Hrsg.), Aspects of language production (S. 249–274). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Wheeldon, L. (2012). Producing spoken sentences: The scope of incremental planning. In S. Fuchs, M. Weirich, D. Pape, & P. Perrier (Hrsg.), Speech planning and dynamics Speech production and perception, (Bd. 1, S. 97–118). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Land.
Wheeldon, L., & Lahiri, A. (1997). Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 356–381.
Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt, W. J. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 311–334.
William, M., & Thompson, S. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8, 243–281.
Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460–473.
Yamamoto, Y. (2014). Multidimensional vocabulary acquisition through deliberate vocabulary list learning. System, 42, 232–243.
Yeari, M., & Broek, P. W. van den (2011). A cognitive account of discourse understanding and discourse interpretation: The landscape model of reading. Discourse Studies, 13, 635–643.
Yekovich, F. R., Walker, C. H., & Blackman, H. S. (1979). The role of presupposed and focal information in integrating sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 535–548.
Zagar, D., Pynte, J., & Rativeau, S. (1997). Evidence for early closure attachment on first pass reading times in French. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 50, 421–438.
Zimmermann, T. E., & Sternefeld, W. (2013). Introduction to semantics: an essential guide to the composition of meaning. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Hrsg.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Bd. 43, S. 35–62). New York: Academic Press.
Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 229–234.
Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In D. Pecher, & R. A. Zwaan (Hrsg.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (S. 224–245). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.
Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Discourse comprehension. In M. Traxler, & M. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2. Aufl. S. 725–764). Oxford, U.K: Elsevier.
Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1–11.
Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2015). Psycholinguistik 1: Worterkennung und Wortproduktion. In J. M. Müsseler, & M. Rieger (Hrsg.), Allgemeine Psychologie. Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaup, B., Dudschig, C. (2017). Sätze und Texte verstehen und produzieren. In: Müsseler, J., Rieger, M. (eds) Allgemeine Psychologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53898-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53898-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53897-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53898-8
eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)