Abstract
We argue that psycholinguistics should be concerned with both the representation and the processing of language. Recent experimental work on syntax in language comprehension has largely concentrated on the way in which language is processed, and has assumed that theoretical linguistics serves to determine the representation of language. In contrast, we advocate experimental work on the mental representation of grammatical knowledge, and argue that sybtactic priming is a promising way to do this. Syntactic priming is the phenomenon whereby exposure to a sentence with a particular syntactic construction can affect the subsequent processing of an otherwise unrelated sentence with the same (or, perhaps, related) structure, for reasons of that structure. We assess evidence for syntactic priming in corpora, and then consider experimental evidence for priming in production and comprehension, and for bidirectional priming between comprehension and production. This in particular strongly suggests that priming is tapping into linguistic knowledge itself, and is not just facilitating particular processes. The final section discusses the importance of priming evidence for any account of language construed as the mental representation of human linguistic capacities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barss, A. (1993). Transparency and visibility: Sentence processing and the grammar of anaphora. In G. T. M. Altmann & R. C. Shillcock (Eds.),Cognitive models of speech processing: The second Sperlonga meeting (pp. 401–451). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.),Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.
Bever, T. G., & McElree, B. (1988). Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension.Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 35–43.
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production.Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.
Bock, J. K. (1989). Closed class immanence in sentence production.Cognition, 31, 163–186.
Bock, J. K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences.Cognition, 35, 1–39.
Bock, J. K., Loebell, H., & Morey, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft.Psychological Review, 99, 150–171.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Stewart, A. J. (1995).Syntactic priming in language comprehension. Unpublished manuscript.
Chomsky, N. (1980).Rules and representations. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
Chomsky, N. (1981).Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1986).Knowledge of language: Its nature, origins, and use. New York: Praeger.
Clifton, C., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (Eds.) (1994).Perspectives on sentence processing. London: Erlbaum.
Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D. C., & Corley, M. M. B. (in press) Parsing in different languages. In M. Carreras & J. Garcia-Albea (Eds.),Language Processing in Spanish. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dooling, D. J. (1974). Rhythm and syntax in sentence perception.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 255–264.
Estival, D. (1985). Syntactic priming of the passive in English.Text, 5, 7–21.
Fodor, J. D. (1989). Empty categories in sentence processing.Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, SI155–209.
Fodor, J. D. (1993). Processing empty categories: A question of visibility. In G. T. M. Altmann & R. C. Shillcock (Eds.),Cognitive models of speech processing: The second Sperlonga meeting (pp. 351–400). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Frazier, L., Taft, L., Clifton, C., Roeper, T., & Ehrlich, K. (1984). Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension.Memory & Cognition, 12, 421–430.
Garnham, A. (1985).Psycholinguistics: Central topics. London: Methuen.
Garrett, M. (1980). Levels of processing in speech production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.),Language production (Vol. 1, pp. 177–220). London: Academic Press.
Gibson, E. J., & Hickok, G. (1993). Sentence processing with empty categories.Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 147–161.
Giles, H., & Powesland, P. (1975).Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic Press.
Katz, J. J. (1981).Language and other abstract objects. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Levelt, W., & Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering.Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78–106.
MacDonald, M. C. (1989). Priming effects from gaps to antecedents.Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 35–56.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon.Psychological Review, 101, 3–33.
McElree, B., & Bever, T. G. (1989). The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 21–35.
Mehler, J., & Carey, P. W. (1967). Role of surface and base structure in the perception of sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 335–338.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234.
Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure of coreference assignment during sentence comprehension.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–19.
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly.Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785–806.
Pickering, M. J., & Barry, G. D. (1991). Sentence processing without empty categories.Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 229–259.
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1995).Syntactic persistence in written language production: Priming from written production and reading. Unpublished manuscript.
Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1987).Information-based syntax and semantics. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1994)Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford, CA, and Chicago, IL: CSLI and University of Chicago Press.
Schenkein, J. (1980). A taxonomy for repeating action sequences in natural conversation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.),Language production (Vol. 1, pp. 21–47). London: Academic Press.
Tannen, D. (1984).Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Tannen, D. (1989).Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Traxler, M. J., & Pickering, M. J. (in press). Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study.Journal of Memory and Language.
Urbach, T. P., & Pickering, M. J. (1995).Event-related potentials and the processing of subordinate clause and reduced complement ambiguities. Unpublished manuscript.
Urbach, T. P., Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P., & Myler, A. (1995, March).Eventrelated potential effects and parsing. Poster presented at the Eighth CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, Tucson.
Weiner, E. J., & Labov, W. (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive.Journal of Linguistics, 19, 29–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The order of the first two authors is arbitrary. H.B. is supported by an EPSRC Postgraduate Studentship. M.P. is supported by a British Academy Postdoctoral Felowship. S.L. is supported by a University of Nottingham Postdoctoral Fellowship. A.S. was supported by British Academy Research Grant awarded to M.P. T.U. is in part supported by a Mellon Science Development Grant. We would like to thank Dave Elmes, Tyler Lorig, Matt Traxler, an anonymous reviewer, and members of the Sentence Processing Group, Human Communication Research Centre, Universities of Edinburgh and Glasgow.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., Liversedge, S.P. et al. Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. J Psycholinguist Res 24, 489–506 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143163
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143163