Skip to main content

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Metastases

  • Conference paper
Tumor Response Monitoring and Treatment Planning
  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

In patients with malignant disease, the presence of skeletal metastases is very important for treatment and prognosis. Particularly the number and site of metastases influence the choice of field size in radiotherapy. Radionuclide scans carried out for screening or conventional radiographs depict alterations of the bone matrix but do not reflect tumor involvement of the bone marrow, which normally occurs first. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proven very sensitive in the detection of bone marrow changes [6] and may possibly depict bone metastases before they became apparant scintigraphically or roentgenologically [2–4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker LL, Goodman SB, Perkash I, Lane B, Enzmann DR (1990) Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical shift, and STIR MR imaging. Radiology 174: 495–502

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Decho T, Horstmann G, Randzio G (1990) Vergleichende Untersuchung zwischen Knochenmarkszintigraphie and Magnetresonanztomographie bei onkologischen Patienten. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr 154: 300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kattapuram SV, Khurana JS, Scott JA, el Khoury GY (1990) Negative scintigraphy with positive magnetic resonance imaging in bone metastases. Skeletal Radiol 19: 113–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stephan R, Lukas P, Kolb B, Breit A (1990) Die therapeutische Relevanz der Kernspintomographie für die strahlentherapeutische Behandlung von Skelettmetastasen. In: Lissner J, Doppman JL, Margulis AR (eds) MR ‘89. 3. Internationales Kernspintomograhie Symposium, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, 25–29. Januar 1989. Deutscher Ärzte, Köln, pp 52–56

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sze G (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine in oncology. In: Breit A (ed) Magnetic resonance in oncology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 41–54

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vogler JB, Murphy WA (1988) Bone marrow imaging. Radiology 168: 679–693

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Neumann, K., Hosten, N., Schörner, W., Steinkamp, H., Felix, R. (1992). Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Metastases. In: Breit, A., Heuck, A., Lukas, P., Kneschaurek, P., Mayr, M. (eds) Tumor Response Monitoring and Treatment Planning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48681-4_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48681-4_57

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54783-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-48681-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics