Progress in Physical and Chemical Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass



Lignocelluloses are abundant and nonfood-based materials that are considered as the most suitable feedstocks for the future energy production. However, these materials have naturally evolved to resist against physical and biological attacks. Thus, the conversion yield of lignocellulosic materials without a preprocessing step, called pretreatment, is not typically high enough for a process to be commercially viable. However, in the last decade or so, continued worldwide research efforts resulted in a significant improvement in the understanding of the biomass characteristics that influence subsequent biological conversions. The cell wall composition, characteristics, components distribution, and linkage between different parts are some of the factors that have been shown to have significant effects on biological conversion of lignocelluloses. In this chapter, different aspects of the parameters affecting the pretreatment and progress in the characteristic modification of lignocelluloses are reviewed. Furthermore, the challenges and conflicts in the related researches are discussed and some suggestions with concluding remarks are presented. Moreover, the most important processes, including pretreatment with acid, alkali, and cellulosic solvents are presented. The fundamental reactions and biomass structural changes in the processes imparted by these leading pretreatments, as well as recent progresses, are also reviewed.


Biogas Production Alkali Treatment Accessible Surface Area Chemical Pretreatment Dilute Acid Pretreatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aad G, Abbott B, Abdallah J, Abdelalim AA, Abdesselam A, Abdinov O, Abi B, Abolins M et al (2010) Search for new particles in two-jet final states in 7 TeV proton–proton collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys Rev Lett 105:161801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ago M, Endo T, Hirotsu T (2004) Crystalline transformation of native cellulose from cellulose I to cellulose ID polymorph by a ball-milling method with a specific amount of water. Cellulose 11:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvira P, Tomas-Pejo E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol 101:4851–4861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aravamuthan RG (2004) Pulping: chemical pulping. In: Jeffery B (ed) Encyclopedia of forest sciences. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 904–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bak JS, Ko JK, Han YH, Lee BC, Choi IG, Kim KH (2009) Improved enzymatic hydrolysis yield of rice straw using electron beam irradiation pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 100:1285–1290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bak JS, Kim MD, Choi IG, Kim KH (2010) Biological pretreatment of rice straw by fermenting with Dichomitus squalens. N Biotechnol 27:424–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballesteros I, Oliva JM, Navarro AA, Gonzalez A, Carrasco J, Ballesteros M (2000) Effect of chip size on steam explosion pretreatment of softwood. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–6:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Behrendt CJ, Blanchette RA (1997) Biological processing of pine logs for pulp and paper production with phlebiopsis gigantea. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:1995–2000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertaud F, Sundberg A, Holmbom B (2002) Evaluation of acid methanolysis for analysis of wood hemicelluloses and pectins. Carbohydr Polym 48:319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertran MS, Dale BE (1985) Enzymatic hydrolysis and recrystallization behavior of initially amorphous cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 27:177–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Besombes S, Mazeau K (2005) The cellulose/lignin assembly assessed by molecular modeling. Part 1: adsorption of a threo guaiacyl beta-O-4 dimer onto a Ibeta cellulose whisker. Plant Physiol Biochem 43:299–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Biermann CJ (1996) Pulping fundamentals. In: Handbook of pulping and papermaking, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 55–100Google Scholar
  13. Biganska O, Navard P (2003) Phase diagram of a cellulose solvent: N-methylmorpholine–N-oxide–water mixtures. Polymer 44:1035–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Billa E, Monties B (1991) Occurrence of silicon associated with lignin-polysaccharide complexes isolated from gramineae (wheat straw) cell walls. Food Hydrocolloids 5:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Binder JB, Raines RT (2010) Fermentable sugars by chemical hydrolysis of biomass. PNAS 107:4516–4521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Binod P, Sindhu R, Singhania RR, Vikram S, Devi L, Nagalakshmi S, Kurien N, Sukumaran RK et al (2010) Bioethanol production from rice straw: an overview. Bioresour Technol 101:4767–4774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Biswas D, Misbahuddin M, Roy U, Francis RC, Bose SK (2011) Effect of additives on fiber yield improvement for kraft pulping of kadam (Anthocephalus chinensis). Bioresour Technol 102:1284–1288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bose S, Barnes CA, Petrich JW (2012) Enhanced stability and activity of cellulase in an ionic liquid and the effect of pretreatment on cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:434–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brownell HH, Yu EK, Saddler JN (1986) Steam-explosion pretreatment of wood: effect of chip size, acid, moisture content and pressure drop. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:792–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cameron MG, Fahey GC Jr, Clark JH, Merchen NR, Berger LL (1990) Effects of feeding alkaline hydrogen peroxide-treated wheat straw-based diets on digestion and production by dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 73:3544–3554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cameron MG, Fahey GC Jr, Clark JH, Merchen NR, Berger LL (1991) Effects of feeding alkaline hydrogen peroxide-treated wheat straw-based diets on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and production responses by mid-lactation dairy cows. J Anim Sci 69:1775–1787PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Canilha L, Santos VT, Rocha GJ, Almeida e Silva JB, Giulietti M, Silva SS, Felipe MG, Ferraz A et al (2011) A study on the pretreatment of a sugarcane bagasse sample with dilute sulfuric acid. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38:1467–1475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Castro FB, Hotten PM, Orskov ER (1993) Effects of dilute-acid hydrolysis treatment on the physico-chemical features and bio-utilization of wheat straw. Anim Feed Sci Technol 42:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chandra R, Ewanick S, Hsieh C, Saddler JN (2008) The characterization of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates prior to enzymatic hydrolysis, part 1: a modified Simons’ staining technique. Biotechnol Prog 24:1178–1185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chandra R, Ewanick S, Chung P, Au-Yeung K, Rio L, Mabee W, Saddler J (2009) Comparison of methods to assess the enzyme accessibility and hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Lett 31:1217–1222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chang VS, Holtzapple MT (2000) Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–86:5–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chang M, Chou T, Tsao G (1981) Structure, pretreatment and hydrolysis of cellulose. In: Bioenergy 15–42Google Scholar
  28. Chen C, Boldor D, Aita G, Walker M (2012) Ethanol production from sorghum by a microwave-assisted dilute ammonia pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 110:190–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cheng KK, Zhang JA, Ping WX, Ge JP, Zhou YJ, Ling HZ, Xu JM (2008) Sugarcane bagasse mild alkaline/oxidative pretreatment for ethanol production by alkaline recycle process. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 151:43–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chesson A (1988) Lignin-polysaccharide complexes of the plant cell wall and their effect on microbial degradation in the rumen. Anim Feed Sci Technol 21:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chundawat SP, Beckham GT, Himmel ME, Dale BE (2011a) Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 2:121–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Chundawat SP, Bellesia G, Uppugundla N, da Costa Sousa L, Gao D, Cheh AM, Agarwal UP, Bianchetti CM et al (2011b) Restructuring the crystalline cellulose hydrogen bond network enhances its depolymerization rate. J Am Chem Soc 133:11163–11174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ciolacu D, Ciolacu F, Popa VI (2011) Amorphous cellulose—structure and characterization cellulose chem. Technol 45:13–21Google Scholar
  34. Cochard H, Tyree MT (1990) Xylem dysfunction in quercus: vessel sizes, tyloses, cavitation and seasonal changes in embolism. Tree Physiol 6:393–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cuissinat C, Navard P (2006) Swelling and dissolution of cellulose. Part 1: free floating cotton and wood fibres in N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide-water mixtures. Macromol Symp 244:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Curreli N, Fadda MB, Rescigno A, Rinaldi AC, Soddu G, Sollai F, Vaccargiu S, Sanjust E et al (1997) Mild alkaline/oxidative pretreatment of wheat straw. Process Biochem 32:665–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Czirnich W, Patt R (1976) Untersuchungen uber die stabilisierung von hemicellulosen beim sulfitverfahren auf magnesium-basis. Holzforschung 30:124–132Google Scholar
  38. da Costa Sousa L, Chundawat SP, Balan V, Dale BE (2009) ‘Cradle-to-grave’ assessment of existing lignocellulose pretreatment technologies. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dadi AP, Varanasi S, Schall CA (2006) Enhancement of cellulose saccharification kinetics using an ionic liquid pretreatment step. Biotechnol Bioeng 95:904–910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Deschamps FC, Ramos LP, Fontana JD (1996) Pretreatment of sugar cane bagasse for enhanced ruminal digestion. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 57–58:171–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Deshpande MD, Scheicher RH, Ahuja R, Pandey R (2008) Binding strength of sodium ions in cellulose for different water contents. J Phys Chem B 112:8985–8989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ding SY, Himmel ME (2006) The maize primary cell wall microfibril: a new model derived from direct visualization. J Agric Food Chem 54:597–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dogan H, Hilmioglu ND (2009) Dissolution of cellulose with NMMO by microwave heating. Carbohydr Polym 75:90–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Donohoe BS, Decker SR, Tucker MP, Himmel ME, Vinzant TB (2008) Visualizing lignin coalescence and migration through maize cell walls following thermochemical pretreatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 101:913–925PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Elbeshbishy E, Aldin S, Hafez H, Nakhla G, Ray M (2011) Impact of ultrasonication of hog manure on anaerobic digestability. Ultrason Sonochem 18:164–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Esteghlalian AR, Bilodeau M, Mansfield SD, Saddler JN (2001) Do enzymatic hydrolyzability and Simons’ stain reflect the changes in the accessibility of lignocellulosic substrates to cellulase enzymes? Biotechnol Prog 17:1049–1054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ewanick SM, Bura R, Saddler JN (2007) Acid-catalyzed steam pretreatment of lodgepole pine and subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation to ethanol. Biotechnol Bioeng 98:737–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fan LT, Lee Y, Beardmore DH (1980) Mechanism of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: effects of major structural features of cellulose on enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 22:177–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fan L, Lee Y, Gharpuray M (1982) The nature of lignocellulosics and their pretreatments for enzymatic hydrolysis. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 23:158–183Google Scholar
  50. Fengel D, Wegener G (1979) Hydrolysis of polysaccharides with trifluoroacetic acid and its application to rapid wood and pulp analysis. In: Jurasek L, Brown RD (eds) Hydrolysis of cellulose: mechanisms of enzymatic and acid catalysis, vol 181. American Chemical Society, pp 145–158Google Scholar
  51. Fengel D, Wegener G (1984) Wood: chemistry, ultrastructure reactions. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  52. Fengel D, Wegener G, Heizmann A, Przyklenk M (1978) Analysis of wood and cellulose by total hydrolysis with trifluoroacetic acid. Cellul Chem Technol 12:31–37Google Scholar
  53. Fernandez-Cegri V, de la Rubia MA, Raposo F, Borja R (2012) Impact of ultrasonic pretreatment under different operational conditions on the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode. Ultrason Sonochem 19:1003–1010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Festucci-Buselli RA, Otoni WC, Joshi CP (2007) Structure, organization, and functions of cellulose synthase complexes in higher plants. Braz J Plant Physiol 19:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Fink HP, Weigel P, Purz HJ, Ganster J (2001) Structure formation of regenerated cellulose materials from NMMO-solutions. Adv Polym Sci 26:1473–1524Google Scholar
  56. Forsskahl I, Popoff T, Theander O (1976) Reactions of -xylose and -glucose in alkaline, aqueous solutions. Carbohydr Res 48:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Foston M, Ragauskas AJ (2010) Changes in lignocellulosic supramolecular and ultrastructure during dilute acid pretreatment of populus and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1885–1895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Fry SC (1989) The structure and functions of xyloglucan. J Exp Bot 40:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Fu D, Mazza G (2011) Aqueous ionic liquid pretreatment of straw. Bioresour Technol 102:7008–7011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Galbe M, Zacchi G (2007) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials for efficient bioethanol production. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108:41–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Geng X, Henderson WA (2012) Pretreatment of corn stover by combining ionic liquid dissolution with alkali extraction. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:84–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Girio FM, Fonseca C, Carvalheiro F, Duarte LC, Marques S, Bogel-Lukasik R (2010) Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol: a review. Bioresour Technol 101:4775–4800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Glaus MA, Van Loon LR (2008) Degradation of cellulose under alkaline conditions: new insights from a 12 years degradation study. Environ Sci Technol 42:2906–2911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Grethelin HE (1985) The effect of pore size distribution on the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates. Nat Biotechnol 3:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Grohmann K, Torget R, Himmel M (1986a) Optimization of dilute acid pretreatment of biomass. Biotechnol Bioeng SympWiley 15:59–80Google Scholar
  66. Grohmann K, Torget R, Himmel M (1986b) Dilute acid pretreatment research. Biochemical conversion program review meeting, Solar Energy Research Inst., Golden, CO, pp 121–138Google Scholar
  67. Grohmann K, Mitchell D, Himmel M, Dale B, Schroeder H (1989) The role of ester groups in resistance of plant cell wall polysaccharides to enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 20–21:45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Gümüskaya E, Usta M (2006) Dependence of chemical and crystalline structure of alkali sulfite pulp on cooking temperature and time. Carbohydr Polym 65:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ha SH, Mai NL, An G, Koo YM (2011) Microwave-assisted pretreatment of cellulose in ionic liquid for accelerated enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 102:1214–1219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hallac BB, Ragauskas AJ (2011) Analyzing cellulose degree of polymerization and its relevancy to cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 5:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hallac BB, Ray M, Murphy RJ, Ragauskas AJ (2010) Correlation between anatomical characteristics of ethanol organosolv pretreated Buddleja davidii and its enzymatic conversion to glucose. Biotechnol Bioeng 107:795–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Harris J, Baker A, Zerbe J (1984) Two-stage, dilute sulfuric acid hydrolysis of hardwood for ethanol production. Energy Biomass Wastes 8:1151–1170Google Scholar
  73. Harun MY, Dayang Radiah AB, Zainal Abidin Z, Yunus R (2011) Effect of physical pretreatment on dilute acid hydrolysis of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Bioresour Technol 102:5193–5199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Haverty D, Dussan K, Piterina AV, Leahy JJ, Hayes MH (2012) Autothermal, single-stage, performic acid pretreatment of miscanthus x giganteus for the rapid fractionation of its biomass components into a lignin/hemicellulose-rich liquor and a cellulase-digestible pulp. Bioresour Technol 109:173–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hayashi J, Sufoka A, Ohkita J, Watanabe S (1975) The confirmation of existences of cellulose IIII, IIIII, IVI, and IVII by the X-ray method. J Polym Sci: Polym Lett ed 13:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. He X, Miao Y, Jiang X, Xu Z, Ouyang P (2010) Enhancing the enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover by an integrated wet-milling and alkali pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160:2449–2457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Heiss-Blanquet S, Zheng D, Lopes Ferreira N, Lapierre C, Baumberger S (2011) Effect of pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw on cell wall composition, hydrophobicity and cellulase adsorption. Bioresour Technol 102:5938–5946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Henderson R (1970) Structure of crystalline alpha-chymotrypsin. IV. The structure of indoleacryloyl-alpha-chyotrypsin and its relevance to the hydrolytic mechanism of the enzyme. J Mol Biol 54:341–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Hendriks AT, Zeeman G (2009) Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 100:10–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Hepworth DG, Vincent JF, Stringer G, Jeronimidis G (2002) Variations in the morphology of wood structure can explain why hardwood species of similar density have very different resistances to impact and compressive loading. Philos Trans Math Phys Eng Sci 360:255–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Higgins FJ, Ho GE (1982) Hydrolysis of cellulose using HCl: a comparison between liquid phase and gaseous phase processes. Agric Waste 4:97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Hong J, Ye X, Zhang YH (2007) Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a nonhydrolytic fusion protein containing CBM and GFP with its applications. Langmuir 23:12535–12540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Hong F, Guo X, Zhang S, Han SF, Yang G, Jonsson LJ (2012) Bacterial cellulose production from cotton-based waste textiles: enzymatic saccharification enhanced by ionic liquid pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 104:503–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Isogai A, Atalla RH (1991) Amorphous celluloses stable in aqueous media: regeneration from SO2–amine solvent systems. J Polym Sci, Part A: Polym Chem 29:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Jacobsen SE, Wyman CE (2000) Cellulose and hemicellulose hydrolysis models for application to current and novel pretreatment processes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–86:81–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Jeihanipour A (2011) Waste textile bioprocessing to ethanol and biogas. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Ph.D thesisGoogle Scholar
  87. Jeihanipour A, Karimi K, Niklasson C, Taherzadeh MJ (2010a) A novel process for ethanol or biogas production from cellulose in blended-fibers waste textiles. Waste Manag 30:2504–2509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Jeihanipour A, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ (2010b) Enhancement of ethanol and biogas production from high-crystalline cellulose by different modes of NMO pretreatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 105:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Jiang ZH, Fei BH, Yang Z (2007) Effects of spectral pretreatment on the prediction of crystallinity of wood cellulose using near infrared spectroscopy. Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi 27:435–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Karlsson J, Medve J, Tjerneld F (1999) Hydrolysis of steam-pretreated lignocellulose: synergism and adsorption for cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase II of Trichoderma reesei. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 82:243–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Keshwani DR, Cheng JJ (2010) Modeling changes in biomass composition during microwave-based alkali pretreatment of switchgrass. Biotechnol Bioeng 105:88–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Keys JE Jr, DeBarthe JV (1974) Cellulose and hemicellulose digestibility in the stomach, small intestine and large intestine of swine. J Anim Sci 39:53–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Keys JE Jr, Van Soest PJ, Young EP (1969) Comparative study of the digestibility of forage cellulose and hemicellulose in ruminants and nonruminants. J Anim Sci 29:11–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Khodaverdi M, Jeihanipour A, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ (2012) Kinetic modeling of rapid enzymatic hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose after pretreatment by NMMO. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39:429–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Kim S, Holtzapple MT (2005) Lime pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 96:1994–2006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Kim S, Holtzapple MT (2006) Effect of structural features on enzyme digestibility of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 97:583–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Kim BS, Lee YY (2002) Diffusion of sulfuric acid within lignocellulosic biomass particles and its impact on dilut-acid pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 83:165–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Kim TH, Lee YY (2006) Fractionation of corn stover by hot-water and aqueous ammonia treatment. Bioresour Technol 97:224–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Kim BS, Um BH, Park SC (2001) Effect of pretreatment reagent and hydrogen peroxide on enzymatic hydrolysis of oak in percolation process. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 91–93:81–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Kim TH, Kim JS, Sunwoo C, Lee YY (2003) Pretreatment of corn stover by aqueous ammonia. Bioresour Technol 90:39–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Kim JS, Sandquist D, Sundberg B, Daniel G (2011) Spatial and temporal variability of xylan distribution in differentiating secondary xylem of hybrid aspen. Planta. doi: 10.1007/s00425-011-1576-8 Google Scholar
  102. Kim S, Park JM, Seo JW, Kim CH (2012) Sequential acid-/alkali-pretreatment of empty palm fruit bunch fiber. Bioresour Technol 109:229–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Knappert D, Grethlein H, Converse A (1980) Partial acid hydrolysis of cellulosic materials as a pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 22:1449–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Ko JK, Bak JS, Jung MW, Lee HJ, Choi IG, Kim TH, Kim KH (2009) Ethanol production from rice straw using optimized aqueous-ammonia soaking pretreatment and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation processes. Bioresour Technol 100:4374–4380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Kobayashi T, Sakai Y (1956) Hydrolysis rate of pentosan of hardwood in dilute sulfuric acid. Bull Agr Chem Soc Jpn 20:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Kuhad RC, Gupta R, Khasa YP, Singh A (2010) Bioethanol production from lantanacamara (red sage): pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation. Bioresour Technol 101:8348–8354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Kumar R, Wyman CE (2008) An improved method to directly estimate cellulase adsorption on biomass solids. Enzyme Microb Technol 42:426–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Kumar R, Wyman CE (2009a) Cellulase adsorption and relationship to features of corn stover solids produced by leading pretreatments. Biotechnol Bioeng 103:252–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Kumar R, Wyman CE (2009b) Access of cellulase to cellulose and lignin for poplar solids produced by leading pretreatment technologies. Biotechnol Prog 25:807–819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Kumar R, Mago G, Balan V, Wyman CE (2009) Physical and chemical characterizations of corn stover and poplar solids resulting from leading pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 100:3948–3962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Kuo C-H, Lee C-K (2009a) Enhancement of enzymatic saccharification of cellulose by cellulose dissolution pretreatments. Carbohydr Polym 77:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Kuo C-H, Lee C-K (2009b) Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse by N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 100:866–871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Lamed R, Kenig R, Setter E, Bayer EA (1985) Major characteristics of the cellulolytic system of Clostridium thermocellum coincide with those of the purified cellulosome. Enzyme Microb Technol 7:37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Lee J (1997) Biological conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol. J Biotechnol 56:1–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Lee JH, Brown RM Jr, Kuga S, Shoda S, Kobayashi S (1994) Assembly of synthetic cellulose I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:7425–7429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Lee SH, Doherty TV, Linhardt RJ, Dordick JS (2009) Ionic liquid-mediated selective extraction of lignin from wood leading to enhanced enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:1368–1376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Lennartsson PR, Niklasson C, Taherzadeh MJ (2011) A pilot study on lignocelluloses to ethanol and fish feed using NMMO pretreatment and cultivation with zygomycetes in an air-lift reactor. Bioresour Technol 102:4425–4432Google Scholar
  118. Lewis NG, Yamamoto E (1990) Lignin: occurrence, biogenesis and biodegradation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 41:455–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Li C, Cheng G, Balan V, Kent MS, Ong M, Chundawat SP, Sousa L, Melnichenko YB, Dale BE, Simmons BA, Singh S (2011) Influence of physico-chemical changes on enzymatic digestibility of ionic liquid and AFEX pretreated corn stover. Bioresour Technol 102:6928–6936Google Scholar
  120. Li C, Zhao ZK (2007) Efficient acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of cellulose in ionic liquid. Adv Synth Catal 349:1847–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Li C, Wang Q, Zhao ZK (2008) Acid in ionic liquid: an efficient system for hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Green Chem 10:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Li Q, He YC, Xian M, Jun G, Xu X, Yang JM, Li LZ (2009) Improving enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw using ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium diethyl phosphate pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 100:3570–3575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Li C, Knierim B, Manisseri C, Arora R, Scheller HV, Auer M, Vogel KP, Simmons BA et al (2010a) Comparison of dilute acid and ionic liquid pretreatment of switchgrass: biomass recalcitrance, delignification and enzymatic saccharification. Bioresour Technol 101:4900–4906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Li Q, Jiang X, He Y, Li L, Xian M, Yang J (2010b) Evaluation of the biocompatible ionic liquid 1-methyl-3-methylimidazolium dimethylphosphite pretreatment of corn cob for improved saccharification. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:117–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Li B, Asikkala J, Filpponen I, Argyropoulos DS (2010c) Factors affecting wood dissolution and regeneration of ionic liquids. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:2477–2484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Liebert T (2010) Cellulose solvents-remarkable history, bright future, cellulose solvents: for analysis, shaping and chemical modification. American Chemical Society, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Lin KW, Ladisch MR, Voloch M, Patterson JA, Noller CH (1985) Effect of pretreatments and fermentation on pore size in cellulosic materials. Biotechnol Bioeng 27:1427–1433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Lis MJ, Carrillo F, Colom X, Martinez D, Nogues F (2000) Acid hydrolysis of straw before its enzymic treatment. Determination of a kinetic model. Ing Quim (Madrid) 32:181–186Google Scholar
  129. Liu L, Chen H (2006) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose materials treated with ionic liquid [BMIM] Cl. Chin Sci Bull 51:2432–2436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Liu H, Sale KL, Holmes BM, Simmons BA, Singh S (2010) Understanding the interactions of cellulose with ionic liquids: a molecular dynamics study. J Phys Chem B 114:4293–4301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Liu C-Z, Wang F, Stiles AR, Guo C (2012) Ionic liquids for biofuel production: opportunities and challenges. Appl Energy 92:406–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Lucas M, Macdonald BA, Wagner GL, Joyce SA, Rector KD (2010) Ionic liquid pretreatment of poplar wood at room temperature: swelling and incorporation of nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:2198–2205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Lynam JG, Toufiq Reza M, Vasquez VR, Coronella CJ (2012) Pretreatment of rice hulls by ionic liquid dissolution. Bioresour Technol. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.004 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:506–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Mäki-Arvela P, Anugwom I, Virtanen P, Sjöholm R, Mikkola JP (2010) Dissolution of lignocellulosic materials and its constituents using ionic liquids-a review. Ind Crop Prod 32:175–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Mansour OY, Saady M, Mottaleb FA (1972) On structure of cellulose, Part I, study of changes due to alkali treatment by infrared spectroscopy. Indian Pulp Pap 26:72–84Google Scholar
  137. Martin C, Rocha G, Perez M, Lopez Y, Hernandez E, Plasencia Y (2008) Acid prehydrolysis, alkaline delignification and enzymatic hydrolysis of rice hulls. Cellul Chem Technol 41:129–135Google Scholar
  138. McCarter SL, Adney WS, Vinzant TB, Jennings E, Eddy FP, Decker SR, Baker JO, Sakon J et al (2002) Exploration of cellulose surface-binding properties of acidothermus cellulolyticus Cel5A by site-specific mutagenesis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 98–100:273–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. McMillan JD (1992) Process for pretreating lignocellulosic biomass: a review. National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, COReport No. NREL/TP 4214978Google Scholar
  140. McMillan JD (1994) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Himmel ME, Baker JO, Overend RP (eds) ACS symposium series (enzymatic conversion of biomass for fuels production), vol 566, pp 292–324Google Scholar
  141. Meister G, Wechsler M (1998) Biodegradation of N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide. Biodegrad 9:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Millett MA, Baker AJ, Satter LD (1976) Physical and chemical pretreatments for enhancing cellulose saccharification. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 125–153Google Scholar
  143. Mirahmadi K, Kabir MM, Jeihanipour J, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ (2010) Alkaline pretreatment of spruce and birch to improve bioethanol and biogas production. BioResources 5:928–938Google Scholar
  144. Mittal A, Katahira R, Himmel ME, Johnson DK (2011) Effects of alkaline or liquid-ammonia treatment on crystalline cellulose: changes in crystalline structure and effects on enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Morag E, Bayer EA, Lamed R (1990) Relationship of cellulosomal and noncellulosomal xylanases of Clostridium thermocellum to cellulose-degrading enzymes. J Bacteriol 172:6098–6105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Mora-Pale M, Meli L, Doherty TV, Linhardt RJ, Dordick JS (2011) Room temperature ionic liquids as emerging solvents for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:1229–1245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Morjanoff PJ, Gray PP (1987) Optimization of steam explosion as a method for increasing susceptibility of sugarcane bagasse to enzymatic saccharification. Biotechnol Bioeng 29:733–741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96:673–686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Moulthrop JS, Swatloski RP, Moyna G, Rogers RD (2005) High-resolution 13C NMR studies of cellulose and cellulose oligomers in ionic liquid solutions. Chem Commun (Camb), pp 1557–1559Google Scholar
  150. Mugnolo AMJ, Macchi EM, Marx-Flglnl M (1988) Dilute acid-hydrolized cotton cellulose: an electron diffraction study. Polym Bull 19:187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Nguyen QA, Tucker MP, Keller FA, Eddy FP (2000) Two-stage dilute-acid pretreatment of softwoods. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–86:561–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Nguyen TA, Kim KR, Han SJ, Cho HY, Kim JW, Park SM, Park JC, Sim SJ (2010) Pretreatment of rice straw with ammonia and ionic liquid for lignocellulose conversion to fermentable sugars. Bioresour Technol 101:7432–7438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Ninomiya K, Kamide K, Takahashi K, Shimizu N (2012) Enhanced enzymatic saccharification of kenaf powder after ultrasonic pretreatment in ionic liquids at room temperature. Bioresour Technol 103:259–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Norman AG (1934) The biological decomposition of plant materials: part IX. The anaerobic decopmsition of hemicelluloses. Ann Appl Biol 21:454–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Ogiwara Y, Arai K (1968) Swelling degree of cellulose materials and hydrolysis rate with cellulase. Text Res J 38:885–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Pan X, Xie D, Gilkes N, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN (2005) Strategies to enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated softwood with high residual lignin content. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 121–124:1069–1079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Pan X, Gilkes N, Kadla J, Pye K, Saka S, Gregg D, Ehara K, Xie D et al (2006a) Bioconversion of hybrid poplar to ethanol and co-products using an organosolv fractionation process: optimization of process yields. Biotechnol Bioeng 94:851–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Pan X, Gilkes N, Saddler J (2006b) Effect of acetyl groups on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates. Holzforschung 60:398–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Pan X, Kadla JF, Ehara K, Gilkes N, Saddler JN (2006c) Organosolv ethanol lignin from hybrid poplar as a radical scavenger: relationship between lignin structure, extraction conditions, and antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem 54:5806–5813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Pan X, Fan Z, Chen W, Ding Y, Luo H, Bao X (2007a) Enhanced ethanol production inside carbon-nanotube reactors containing catalytic particles. Nat Mater 6:507–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Pan X, Xie D, Kang KY, Yoon SL, Saddler JN (2007b) Effect of organosolv ethanol pretreatment variables on physical characteristics of hybrid poplar substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 137–140:367–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Pang C, Xie T, Lin L, Zhuang J, Liu Y, Shi J, Yang Q (2012) Changes of the surface structure of corn stalk in the cooking process with active oxygen and MgO-based solid alkali as a pretreatment of its biomass conversion. Bioresour Technol 103:432–439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Patt R, Kordsachia O, Süttinger R (2011) Pulp. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaAGoogle Scholar
  164. Pei H, Liu L, Zhang X, Sun J (2012) Flow-through pretreatment with strongly acidic electrolyzed water for hemicellulose removal and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 110:292–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Peng F, Peng P, Xu F, Sun RC (2012) Fractional purification and bioconversion of hemicelluloses. Biotechnol Adv. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.01.018 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Pérez S, Samain D (2010) Structure and engineering of celluloses. In: Derek H (ed) Advances in carbohydrate chemistry and biochemistry, vol 64. Academic Press, New York, pp 25–116Google Scholar
  167. Pham TT, Brar SK, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY (2009) Ultrasonication of wastewater sludge-consequences on biodegradability and flowability. J Hazard Mater 163:891–898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Pingali SV, Urban VS, Heller WT, McGaughey J, O’Neill H, Foston M, Myles DA, Ragauskas A et al (2010) Breakdown of cell wall nanostructure in dilute acid pretreated biomass. Biomacromolecules 11:2329–2335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Poornejad N, Karimi K, Behzad T (2012) Improvement of saccharification and ethanol production from rice straw by NMMO and [BMIM][OAc] pretreatments. Ind Crop ProdGoogle Scholar
  170. Procter AR, Wiekenkamp RH (1969) The stabilization of cellulose to alkaline degradation by novel end unit modifications. J Polym Sci, Part C: Polym Symp 28:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Pu YQ, Jiang N, Ragauskas AJJ (2007) Ionic liquid as a green solvent for lignin. Wood Chem Technol 27:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Puri VP (1984) Effect of crystallinity and degree of polymerization of cellulose on enzymatic saccharification. Biotechnol Bioeng 26:1219–1222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Puri VP, Pearce GR (1986) Alkali-explosion pretreatment of straw and bagasse for enzymic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:480–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Qi B, Chen X, Wan Y (2010) Pretreatment of wheat straw by nonionic surfactant-assisted dilute acid for enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 101:4875–4883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Qing Q, Yang B, Wyman CE (2010) Impact of surfactants on pretreatment of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 101:5941–5951PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Ramos LP, Breuil C, Saddler JN (1992) Comparison of steam pretreatment of eucalyptus, aspen, and spruce wood chips and their enzymic hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 34–35:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Remsing RC, Swatloski RP, Rogers RD, Moyna G (2006) Mechanism of cellulose dissolution in the ionic liquid 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride: a 13C and 35/37Cl NMR relaxation study on model systems. Chem Commun 1271–1273Google Scholar
  178. Rocha GJ, Martin C, da Silva VF, Gomez EO, Goncalves AR (2012) Mass balance of pilot-scale pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse by steam explosion followed by alkaline delignification. Bioresour Technol 111:447–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Rodrigues TH, Rocha MV, de Macedo GR, Goncalves LR (2011) Ethanol production from cashew apple bagasse: improvement of enzymatic hydrolysis by microwave-assisted alkali pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 164:929–943PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Rollin JA, Zhu Z, Sathitsuksanoh N, Zhang YH (2011) Increasing cellulose accessibility is more important than removing lignin: a comparison of cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation and soaking in aqueous ammonia. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:22–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Rosenau T, Potthast A, Sixta H, Kosma P (2001) The chemistry of side reactions and byproduct formation in the system NMMO/cellulose (lyocell process). Prog Polym Sci 26:1763–1837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Saeman JF (1945) Kinetics of wood saccharification: Hydrolysis of cellulose and decomposition of sugars in dilute acid at high temperature. Ind Eng Chem 37:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Saeman JF (1949) Kinetics of wood hydrolysis and the decomposition of sugars in dilute acids at high temperatures. Holzforschung 4:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Saha BC, Iten LB, Cotta MA, Wu YV (2005) Dilute acid pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification, and fermentation of rice hulls to ethanol. Biotechnol Prog 21:816–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Sassner P, Martensson CG, Galbe M, Zacchi G (2008) Steam pretreatment of H2SO4-impregnated Salix for the production of bioethanol. Bioresour Technol 99:137–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Shafiei M, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ (2010) Pretreatment of spruce and oak by N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO) for efficient conversion of their cellulose to ethanol. Bioresour Technol 101:4914–4918PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Shafiei M, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ (2011) Techno-economical study of ethanol and biogas from spruce wood by NMMO-pretreatment and rapid fermentation and digestion. Bioresour Technol 102:7879–7886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Shafiei M, Ziluoei H, Zamani A, Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2012) Enhancement of ethanol production from spruce wood chips by ionic liquid pretreatment. Appl EnergyGoogle Scholar
  189. Shafizadeh F (1963) Acidic hydrolysis of glucosidic bonds. Tappi J 46:381–383Google Scholar
  190. Shah MM, Song SK, Lee YY, Torget R (1991) Effect of pretreatment on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of hardwood into acetone/butanol. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 28–29:99–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Shen J, Wyman CE (2011) A novel mechanism and kinetic model to explain enhanced xylose yields from dilute sulfuric acid compared to hydrothermal pretreatment of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 102:9111–9120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Shill K, Padmanabhan S, Xin Q, Prausnitz JM, Clark DS, Blanch HW (2011) Ionic liquid pretreatment of cellulosic biomass: enzymatic hydrolysis and ionic liquid recycle. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:511–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Shimizu K (1988) Steam-explosion treatment of wood. Kami Pa Gikyoshi 42:1114–1130Google Scholar
  194. Sievers C, Valenzuela-Olarte MB, Marzialetti T, Musin I, Agrawal PK, Jones CW (2009) Ionic-liquid-phase hydrolysis of pine wood. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:1277–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Silva ASA, Lee SH, Endo T, Bon EP (2011) Major improvement in the rate and yield of enzymatic saccharification of sugarcane bagasse via pretreatment with the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([Emim][Ac]). Bioresour Technol 102:10505–10509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Singh A, Tuteja S, Singh N, Bishnoi NR (2011) Enhanced saccharification of rice straw and hull by microwave-alkali pretreatment and lignocellulolytic enzyme production. Bioresour Technol 102:1773–1782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Sjostrom E (1977) The behavior of wood polysaccharides during alkaline pulping process. Tappi J 60:151–154Google Scholar
  198. Soderstrom J, Pilcher L, Galbe M, Zacchi G (2003) Combined use of H2SO4 and SO2 impregnation for steam pretreatment of spruce in ethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 105–108:127–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Stone J E, Scallan A M, Donefer E, Ahlgren E (1969) Digestibility as a simple function of a molecule of similar size to a cellulase enzyme. In: Hajny GJ, Reese ET (eds) Cellulases and their applications, vol 95, American Chemical Society, pp 219–241Google Scholar
  200. Sun Y, Cheng J (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol 83:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Sun Y, Cheng JJ (2005) Dilute acid pretreatment of rye straw and bermudagrass for ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 96:1599–1606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Swatloski RP, Visser AE, Reichert WM, Broker GA, Farina LM, Holbrey JD, Rogers RD (2001) Solvation of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate in aqueous ethanol-a green solution for dissolving ‘hydrophobic’ ionic liquids. Chem Commun (Camb) 2070–2071Google Scholar
  203. Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2007) Acid-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: a review. BioResources 2:472–499Google Scholar
  204. Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mol Sci 9:1621–1651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Takai M, Colvin R (1978) Mechanism of transition between cellulose I and cellulose II during mercerization. J Polym Sci: Polym Chem Ed 16:1335–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Tao F, Song H, Chou L (2010) Hydrolysis of cellulose by using catalytic amounts of FeCl2 in ionic liquids. Chem Sus Chem 3:1298–1303Google Scholar
  207. Tarkow H, Feist W (1969) A mechanism for improving the digestibility of lignocellulosic materials with dilute alkali and liquid ammonia. Adv Chem Ser 95:197–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Teghammar A, Yngvesson J, Lundin M, Taherzadeh MJ, Horvath IS (2010) Pretreatment of paper tube residuals for improved biogas production. Bioresour Technol 101:1206–1212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Teghammar A, Karimi K, Sárvári Horváth I, Taherzadeh MJ (2012) Enhanced biogas production from rice straw, triticale straw and softwood spruce by NMMO pretreatment. Biomass Bioenergy 36:116–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Teixeira LC, Linden JC, Schroeder HA (2000) Simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation of peracetic acid-pretreated biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–86:111–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Teleman A, Harjunpaa V, Tenkanen M, Buchert J, Hausalo T, Drakenberg T, Vuorinen T (1995) Characterisation of 4-deoxy-beta-L-threo-hex-4-enopyranosyluronic acid attached to xylan in pine kraft pulp and pulping liquor by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 272:55–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. Teleman A, Tenkanen M, Jacobs A, Dahlman O (2002) Characterization of O-acetyl-(4-O-methylglucurono)xylan isolated from birch and beech. Carbohydr Res 337:373–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. Titchener AL, Guha BK (1981) Acid hydrolysis of wood. Report—new zealand energy research and development committee, vol 56, p 63Google Scholar
  214. Torget R, Himmel ME, Grohmann K (1991) Dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of hardwood bark. Bioresour Technol 35:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. Tosun A (1995) Dilute acid hydrolysis of sunflower residue (cellulosic wastes) prior to enzymatic hydrolysis. 8th international symposium on environmental pollution and its impact on life in the mediterranean region, Rhodes, Greece, pp 296–301Google Scholar
  216. Uju Y, Nakamoto A, Goto M, Tokuhara W, Noritake Y, Katahira S, Ishida N, Nakashima K, Ogino C, Kamiya N (2012) Short time ionic liquids pretreatment on lignocellulosic biomass to enhance enzymatic saccharification. Bioresour Technol 103:446–452Google Scholar
  217. Um BH, Karim M, Henk L (2003) Effect of sulfuric and phosphoric acid pretreatments on enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 105–108:115–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Vazana Y, Morais S, Barak Y, Lamed R, Bayer EA (2010) Interplay between Clostridium thermocellum family 48 and family 9 cellulases in cellulosomal versus noncellulosomal states. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:3236–3243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. Wald S, Wilke CR, Blanch HW (1984) Kinetics of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 26:221–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Wang Y, Spratling BM, ZoBell DR, Wiedmeier RD, McAllister TA (2004) Effect of alkali pretreatment of wheat straw on the efficacy of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes. J Anim Sci 82:198–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  221. Wang K, Yang HY, Xu F, Sun RC (2011) Structural comparison and enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of the cellulosic preparation from Populus tomentosa Carr., by different cellulose-soluble solvent systems. Bioresour Technol 102:4524–4529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Wu L, Arakane M, Ike M, Wada M, Takai T, Gau M, Tokuyasu K (2011a) Low temperature alkali pretreatment for improving enzymatic digestibility of sweet sorghum bagasse for ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 102:4793–4799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. Wu L, Li Y, Arakane M, Ike M, Wada M, Terajima Y, Ishikawa S, Tokuyasu K (2011b) Efficient conversion of sugarcane stalks into ethanol employing low temperature alkali pretreatment method. Bioresour Technol 102:11183–11188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Wyman CE (1996) Handbook on bioethanol: production and utilization. Taylor and Francis, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  225. Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY (2005) Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 96:1959–1966PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Xiang Q, Kim JS, Lee YY (2003) A comprehensive kinetic model for dilute-acid hydrolysis of cellulose. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 105–108:337–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. Xu F, Sun JX, Liu CF, Sun RC (2006) Comparative study of alkali- and acidic organic solvent-soluble hemicellulosic polysaccharides from sugarcane bagasse. Carbohydr Res 341:253–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. Yang B, Wyman CE (2004) Effect of xylan and lignin removal by batch and flow through pretreatment on the enzymatic digestibility of corn stover cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 86:88–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. Yang B, Wyman CE (2006) BSA treatment to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in lignin containing substrates. Biotechnol Bioeng 94:611–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. Yang B, Wyman CE (2008) Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuel Bioprod Bior 2:26–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. Yang B, Dai Z, Ding SY, Wyman C (2011) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass. Biofuels 2:421–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. Yoneda Y, Krainz K, Liebner F, Potthast A, Rosenau T, Karakawa M, Nakatsubo F (2008) Furan endwise peeling of celluloses: mechanistic studies and application perspectives of a novel reaction. Eur J Org Chem 2008:475–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. Yu J, Zhang J, He J, Liu Z, Yu Z (2009) Combinations of mild physical or chemical pretreatment with biological pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of rice hull. Bioresour Technol 100:903–908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. Zavrel M, Bross D, Funke M, Buchs J, Spiess AC (2009) High-throughput screening for ionic liquids dissolving (ligno)-cellulose. Bioresour Technol 100:2580–2587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. Zhang YH, Lynd LR (2005) Determination of the number-average degree of polymerization of cellodextrins and cellulose with application to enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules 6:1510–1515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  236. Zhang Y, Du H, Qian X, Chen EYX (2010) Ionic liquid—water mixtures: enhanced Kw for efficient cellulosic biomass conversion. Energy Fuel 24:2410–2417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. Zhao X, Liu D (2011) Fractionating pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse for increasing the enzymatic digestibility of cellulose. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 27:384–392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  238. Zhao H, Baker GA, Song Z, Olubajo O, Crittle T, Peters D (2008a) Designing enzyme-compatible ionic liquids that can dissolve carbohydrates. Green Chem 10:696–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  239. Zhao Y, Wang Y, Zhu JY, Ragauskas A, Deng Y (2008b) Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of spruce by alkaline pretreatment at low temperature. Biotechnol Bioeng 99:13201328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. Zhao H, Jones CL, Baker GA, Xia S, Olubajo O, Person VN (2009) Regenerating cellulose from ionic liquids for an accelerated enzymatic hydrolysis. J Biotechnol 139:47–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  241. Zhao H, Baker GA, Cowins JV (2010) Fast enzymatic saccharification of switchgrass after pretreatment with ionic liquids. Biotechnol Progress 26:127–133Google Scholar
  242. Zheng Y, Pan Z, Zhang R (2009) Overview of biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production. Int J Agric Biol Eng 2:51–68Google Scholar
  243. Zhu JY, Pan XJ (2010) Woody biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production: technology and energy consumption evaluation. Bioresour Technol 101:4992–5002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  244. Zhu Y, Lee YY, Elander RT (2005) Optimization of dilute-acid pretreatment of corn stover using a high-solids percolation reactor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 121–124:1045–1054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  245. Zhu JY, Pan X, Zalesny RS Jr (2010) Pretreatment of woody biomass for biofuel production: energy efficiency, technologies, and recalcitrance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:847–857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT)Bourns College of Engineering University of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations