Telecommunication Economics pp 67-77

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7216)

Social Communication Behaviors of Virtual Leaders

  • Daphna Shwarts-Asher
Open Access
Chapter

Abstract

More and more organizations are adapting the solution of e-teams - teams that can span distances and times to take on challenges that most local and global organizations must address. This experimental study examined leadership in the context of traditional teams using face-to-face communication and virtual teams using computer-mediated communication. The research question is which leadership functions are necessary to promote virtual team performance. A model, suggesting that leader communication behaviors mediate the relationship between “virtuality” and “team’s outputs” will be presented, and a methodology to examine this model will be illustrated. The findings show that face-to-face team’s output is partially superior to a virtual team’s output, and that social communication behaviors of face-to-face leaders are positive than social communication behaviors of virtual leaders. Virtual team is a common way of working, and will expand in the future. Thus, the importance of the theoretical and practical implementation of the virtual leadership will be discussed.

Keywords

Virtual teams leadership communication behaviors team performance 

References

  1. 1.
    Ammeter, A.P., Dukerich, J.M.: Leadership, team building, and team member characteristics in high performance project teams. Engineering Management Journal 14(4), 3–11 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andres, H.P.: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Virtual Software Development Teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal 8(1/2), 39–48 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker, G.: The Effects of Synchronous Collaborative Technologies on Decision Making: A Study of Virtual Teams. Information Resources Management Journal 15(4), 79–93 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bales, R.F.: A set of factors for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociological Review 15, 257–263 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bouas, K.S., Arrow, H.: The Development of Group Identity in Computer and Face-to-face Groups with Membership Change. CSCW 4, 153–178 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burke, C.S., Stagl, K.C., Klein, C., et al.: What types of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. Leadership Quarterly 17(3), 288–307 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burke, K., Aytes, K., Chidambaram, L.: Media Effects on the Development of Cohesion and Process Satisfaction in Computer-Supported Workgroups. Information Technology & People 14(2), 122–141 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burke, K., Chidambaram, L.: Do Mediated Contexts Differ in Information Richness? A Comparison of Collocated and Dispersed Meetings. In: 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, pp. 92–101 (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carte, T.A., Chidambaram, L., Becker, A.: Emergent Leadership in Self-Managed Virtual Teams; A Longitudinal Study of Concentrated and Shared Leadership Behaviors. Group Decision and Negotiation 15(4), 323–343 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cascio, W.F., Shurygailo, S.: E-leadership and virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics 31(4), 362–376 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cordery, J.L., Soo, C.: Overcoming impediments to virtual team effectiveness. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 18(5), 487–500 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cramton, C.D., Webber, S.S.: Modeling the Impact of Geographic Dispersion on Work Teams. In: Working Paper, George Mason University, Washington, DC, USA (1999).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eom, M.: Cross-Cultural Virtual Team and Its Key Antecedents to Success. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics 10(1), 1–15 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gruenfeld, D.H., Mannix, E.A., Williams, K.Y., Neale, M.A.: Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67(1), 1–16 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gürerk, Ö., Irlenbusch, B., Rockenbach, B.: Motivating teammates: The leader’s choice between positive and negative incentives. Journal of Economic Psychology 30(4), 591–607 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horwitz, F.M., Bravington, D., Silvis, U.: The promise of virtual teams: identifying key factors in effectiveness and failure. Journal of European Industrial Training 30(6), 472–494 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang, W.W., Wei, K.K., Watson, R.T., Tan, B.C.Y.: Supporting Virtual Team-Building with a GSS: An Empirical Investigation. Decision Support Systems 34(4), 359–367 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hultman, K., Hultman, J.: Deep Teams: Leveraging the Implicit Organization. Organization Development Journal 26(3), 11–23 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kanaga, K., Browning, H.: Keeping watch: How to monitor and maintain a team. Leadership in Action 23(2), 3–8 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kayworth, T.R., Leidner, D.E.: Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(3), 7–41 (2001/2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kearney, E., Gebert, D.: Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology 94(1), 77–89 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Konradt, U., Hoch, J.E.: A Work Roles and Leadership Functions of Managers in Virtual Teams. International Journal of E-Collaboration 3(2), 16–25 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kossler, M.E., Prestridge, S.: Going the distance: The challenges of leading a dispersed team. Leadership in Action 23(5), 3–6 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martins, L.L., Gilson, L.L., Maynard, M.T.: Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management 30(6), 805–835 (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maruping, L.M., Agarwal, R.: Managing Team Interpersonal Processes through Technology: A Task-Technology Fit Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 89(6), 975–990 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morgeson, F.P., DeRue, D.S., Karam, E.P.: Leadership in Teams: A Functional Approach to Understanding Leadership Structures and Processes. Journal of Management 36(1), 5–39 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nemanich, L.A., Vera, D.: Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. Leadership Quarterly 20(1), 19–33 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nicholson, D.B., Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Valacich, J.S.: Determinants of effective leadership in information systems development teams: An exploratory study of face-to-face and virtual context. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 8(4), 39–56 (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Olson, J., Olson, G., Meader, D.: Face-to-face Group Work Compared to Remote Group Work With and Without Video. In: Finn, K., Sellen, A., Wilbur, S. (eds.) Video-mediated Communication, pp. 157–172. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1997)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Olson, J., Teasley, S.: Groupware in the Wild: Lessons Learned from a Year of Virtual Collocation. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference, Denver, CO, USA, pp. 419–427 (1996)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Purvanova, R.K., Bono, J.E.: Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams. Leadership Quarterly 20(3), 343–357 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rego, A., Sousa, F., Pina e Cunha, M., Correia, A., Saur-Amaral, I.: Leader Self-Reported Emotional Intelligence and Perceived Employee Creativity: An Exploratory Study. Creativity and Innovation Management 16(3), 250–264 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sarin, S., O’Connor, G.C.: First among Equals: The Effect of Team Leader Characteristics on the Internal Dynamics of Cross-Functional Product Development Teams. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 26(2), 188–205 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S.S.K., Cha, S.E.: Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 92(4), 1020–1030 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shin, S.J., Zhou, J.: When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology 92(6), 1709–1721 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sivunen, A.: Strengthening Identification with the Team in Virtual Teams: The Leaders’ Perspective. Group Decision and Negotiation 15(4), 345–366 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Srivastava, A., Bartol, K.M., Locke, E.A.: Empowering leadership in management teams: effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy and performance. Academy of Management Journal 49(6), 1239–1251 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stewart, G.L.: A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships between Team Design Features and Team Performance. Journal of Management 32(1), 29–55 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Straus, S.G., McGrath, J.E.: Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology 79(1), 87–98 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tansley, C., Newell, S.: Project social capital, leadership and trust; A study of human resource information systems development. Journal of Managerial Psychology 22(4), 350–368 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Thamhain, H.J.: Team leadership effectiveness in technology-based project environment. Project Management Journal 35(4), 35–47 (2004)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thompson, L.F., Coovert, M.D.: Teamwork Online: The Effects of Computer Conferencing on Perceived Confusion, Satisfaction, and Post-discussion Accuracy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 7(2), 135–151 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Warkentin, M., Sayeed, L., Hightower, R.: Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-Based Conference System. Decision Sciences 28(4), 975–996 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Weisband, S., Atwater, L.: Evaluating Self and Others in Electronic and Face-to-Face Groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 84(4), 632–639 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wolff, S.B., Pescosolido, A.T., Druskat, V.U.: Emotional intelligence as the basis of leadership emergence in self-managing teams. Leadership Qtly. 13(5), 505–522 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zaccaro, S.J., Bader, P.: E-leadership and the challenges of leading e-teams: Minimizing the bad and maximizing the good. Organizational Dynamics 31(4), 377–387 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zigurs, I.: Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity? Organizational Dynamics 31(4), 339–351 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daphna Shwarts-Asher
    • 1
  1. 1.“Sarnat” School of ManagementThe College for Academic StudiesIsrael

Personalised recommendations