Abstract
The number of virtual teams is increasing in today's workplaces. In virtual teams, the members can have different cultural backgrounds, they often work in different countries and are professionals in their own fields. In addition, as such diverse and dispersed teams communicate mainly through communication technology this raises the challenge for the team leader of how to unify the team and get the members to identify themselves with the team. This qualitative study focuses on four virtual team leaders and their attempts to strengthen the team members' identification with the team through computer-mediated communication. The results show four different tactics employed in enhancing identification with the team: catering for the individual, giving positive feedback, bringing out common goals and workings and talking up the team activities and face-to-face meetings. The roles of organizational change and technology in identification with virtual teams are also discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ATLAS.ti©, version 4.1 [Computer Software]. Scientific Software Development, 1996–2000.
Ashforth, B. E. and F. Mael. (1989). “Social Identity Theory and the Organization,” Academy of Management Review 14, 20–39.
Barke, K. and D. W. Schlueter. (1988). “A Critical Evaluation of Organizational Commitment and Identification,” Managerial Communication Quarterly 2, 116–133.
Bell, B. S. and S. W. J. Kozlowski. (2002). “A Typology of Virtual Teams: Implications for Effective Leadership,” Group & Organization Management 27, 14–49.
Bryman, A. (1989). Research Methods and Organization Studies. London, Unwin Hyman.
Burke, K. (1950). A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Cheney, G. (1983). The Rhetoric of Identification and the Study of Organizational Communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech 69, 143–158.
Cheney, G. and P. K. Tompkins. (1987). “Coming to Terms with Organizational Identification and Commitment,” Central States Speech Journal 38, 1–15.
Chidambaram, L. and R. P. Bostrom. (1997). “Group Development (II): Implications for GSS Research and Practice,” Group Decision and Negotiation 6, 231–254.
Coffey, A. and P. Atkinson. (1996). Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
Connaughton, S. L., and J. A. Daly. (2004a). “Identification with Leader: A Comparison of Perceptions of Identification Among Geographically Dispersed and Co-Located Teams,” Corporate Communications 9, 89–103.
Connaughton, S. L. and J. A. Daly. (2004b). “Leading from Afar: Strategies for Effectively Leading Virtual Teams,” In: Godar, S. H. and Ferris, S. P. (eds.), Virtual & Collaborative Teams: Process, Technologies, & practice. Hershey, PA, Idea Group, Inc., pp. 49–75.
Denzin, N. K. and Y. S. Lincoln. (1994). “Introduction: Entering the Field of Qualitative Research,” In: Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, Sage, pp. 1–17.
Ellemers, N., D. de Gilder, and S. A. Haslam. (2004). “Motivating Individuals and Groups at Work: A Social Identity Perspective on Leadership and Group Performance,” Academy of Management Review 29, 459–478.
Epitropaki, O. and R. Martin. (2005). “The Moderating Role of Individual Differences in the Relation Between Transformational/Transactional Leadership Perceptions and Organizational Identification,” The Leadership Quarterly 16, 569–589.
Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, Aldine.
Godar, S. H. and S. P. Ferris. (2004). “Preface,” In: Godar, S. H. and Ferris, S. P. (eds.), Virtual and Collaborative Teams: Process, Technologies and Practice. Hershey, Idea Group, pp. vi–xii.
Hogg, M. A. and D. J. Terry (2000). “Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts,” Academy of Management Review 25, 121–140.
Jackson, P. J. (1999). “Organizational Change and Virtual Teams: Strategic and Operational Integration,” Information Systems Journal 9, 313–332.
Kark, R., B. Shamir, and G. Chen. (2003). “The Two Faces of Transformational Leadership: Empowerment and Dependency,” Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 246–255.
Kayworth, T. R. and D. E. Leidner. (2002). “Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams,” Journal of Management Information Systems 18, 7–40.
Lea, M. and R. Spears. (1992). “Paralanguage and Social Perception in Computer-Mediated Communication,” Journal of Organizational Computing 2, 321–341.
Lincoln, Y. S. and E. G. Guba. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, Sage.
Mael, F. and B. E. Ashforth. (1992). “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 13, 103–123.
Mael, F. A. and B. E. Ashforth. (1995). “Loyal from Day One: Biodata, Organizational Identification, and Turnover Among Newcomers,” Personnel Psychology 48, 309–333.
McColl-Kennedy, J. R. and R. D. Anderson. (2005). “Subordinate-Manager Gender Combination and Perceived Leadership Style Influence on Emotions, Self-Esteem and Organizational Commitment,” Journal of Business Research 58, 115–125.
Meyer, J. P. and L. Herscovitch. (2001). “Commitment in the Workplace: Toward a General Model,” Human Resource Management Review 11, 299–326.
Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills, Sage.
Mowday, R. T., R. M. Steers, and L. W. Porter. (1979). “The Measurement of Organizational Commitment,” Journal of Vocational Behavior 14, 224–247.
Scott, C. R., S. R. Corman, and G. Cheney. (1998). “Development of Structurational Model of Identification in the Organization,” Communication Theory 8, 298–336.
Tajfel, H. (1974). “Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour,” Social Science Information 13, 65–93.
Townsend, A. M., S. M. DeMarie, and A. R. Hendrickson. (1998). “Virtual Teams: Technology and the Workplace of the Future,” Academy of Management Executive 12, 17–29.
Van Maanen, J., J. M. Dabbs Jr., and R. R. Faulkner. (1982). Varieties of Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills, Sage.
Wiesenfeld, B. M., S. Raghuram, and R. Garud. (2001). “Organizational Identification Among Virtual Workers: The Role of Need for Affiliation and Perceived Work-Based Social Support,” Journal of Management 27, 213–229.
Wiesenfeld, B. M., S. Raghuram, and R. Garud. (1998). “Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(4). Retrieved May 2, 2005, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/wiesenfeld.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sivunen, A. Strengthening Identification with the Team in Virtual Teams: The Leaders' Perspective. Group Decis Negot 15, 345–366 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006-9046-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006-9046-6