Skip to main content

Biological and Biotechnological Evaluation of Carbon Dynamics in Field Experiments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils

Abstract

Bacteria and fungi play a key role in promoting soil organic matter (SOM) turn over and consequent nutrient availability to plants uptake. During SOM degradation, they contribute to transform highly complex biomolecules to smaller compounds, which are either immobilized by soil microflora or self-associated in humified and microbially stable superstructures. These processes rapidly occur in the rhizosphere where soil adheres to plant roots and microbial populations are more abundant and active than in bulk soil. Despite the difficulties in determining the composition of soil microbial communities, their genetic and functional diversities are fundamental to maintain soil quality and productivity, even under environmental stress or alteration. Within the national MESCOSAGR project, we provided indications on the composition and diversity of bacterial communities in soils subjected to carbon sequestration treatments. Nucleic acids were extracted from rhizosphere and bulk soils, purified and amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), targeting a conserved region of 16S rRNA gene. Amplicons were separated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and cluster analysis of relative electrophoretic profiles was used to evaluate the diversity of bacteria communities in soils under different soil management practices. The PCR products have also been cloned and sequenced in order to identify and characterize the microbial groups and species which populated the experimental soils. Our results, relative to field trials of the first 2 years and three experimental sites, indicate that the application of different molecular approaches contribute to reach an advanced characterization of structure and diversity of soil bacteria, as well as an appraisal of their variation, as a consequence of specific soil management practices. In particular, it appears that only the amendments with mature compost had a significant effect on the soil microbial communities, while other soil treatments such as that with the iron–porphyrin biomimetic catalyst did not have any effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acosta-Martínez V, Dowd S, Sun Y, Allen V (2008) Tag-encoded pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in a single soil type as affected by management and land use. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2762–2770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boon N, De Windt V, Verstraete W, Top EM (2002) Evaluation of nested PCR-DGGE (denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis) with group-specific 16S rRNA primers for the analysis of bacterial communities from different wastewater treatment plants. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 39:101–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Britschgi TB, Giovannoni SJ (1991) Phylogenetic analysis of a natural marine bacterioplankton population by rRNA gene cloning and sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:1707–1713

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brosius J, Palmer ML, Kennedy PJ, Noller HF (1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:4801–4805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curl EA, Truelove B (1986) The rhizosphere. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis TP, Sloan W, Scannell J (2002) Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:10494–10499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis M, Di Cagno R, Gallo G, Curci M, Siragusa S, Crecchio C, Parente E, Gobbetti M (2007) Molecular and functional characterization of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis strains isolated from sourdoughs. Int J Food Microbiol 114:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar J, Takala S, Barns SM, Davis JA, Kuske CR (1999) Levels of bacterial community diversity in four arid soils compared by cultivation and 16rRNA gene cloning. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1662–1669

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felske A, Weller R (2004) Cloning 16S rRNA genes and utilization to type bacterial communities. In: Kowalchuk GA, de Bruijn FJ, Head IM, Akkermans ADL, van Elsas JD (eds) Molecular microbial ecology manual, vol 3. Kluwer Academic, Netherlands, pp 523–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Foereid B, Yearsley JM (2004) Modelling the impact of microbial grazers on soluble rhizodeposit turnover. Plant Soil 267:329–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine S, Mariotti A, Abbadie L (2003) The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biol Biochem 35:837–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frackman S, Kephart D (1999) Rapid Ligation for the pGEM®-T and pGEM®-T Easy Vector Systems. Promega Notes 71:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Frothingham R, Allen RL, Wilson KH (1991) Rapid 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing from a single colony without DNA extraction or purification. Biotechniques 11:40–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RI, Whiteley AS, O’Donnell AG, Bailey MJ (2000) Rapid method for coextraction of DNA and RNA from natural environments for analysis of ribosomal DNA and rRNA-based microbial community composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5488–5491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall TA (1999) BIOEDIT: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp 41:95–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassink J, Bouwman LA, Zwart KB, Brussard L (1993) Relationships between habitable pore space, soil biota and mineralisation rates in grassland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 25:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer H, Smalla K (1997) Application of denaturing gradient gel electophoresis and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis for studying soil microbial communities. In: van Elsas JD, Wellington EMH, Trevors JT (eds) Modern soil microbiology. Dekker, New York, pp 353–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GT, Mitkowski NA, Aldrich-Wolfe L, Emele LR, Jurkonie DD, Ficke A, Maldonado-Ramirez S, Lynch ST, Nelson EB (2000) Methods for assessing the composition and diversity of soil microbial communities. Appl Soil Ecol 15:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A, Robinson D, Fitter AH (2000) An arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculum enhances root proliferation in, but not nitrogen capture from, nutrient-rich patches in soil. New Phytol 145:575–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic, New York, pp 21–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiem R, Kögel-Knabner I (2003) Contribution of lignin and polysaccharides to the refractory carbon pool in C-depleted arable soils. Soil Biol Biochem 35:101–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kindler R, Miltnera A, Richnowb HH, Matthias Kästner M (2006) Fate of gram-negative bacterial biomass in soil-mineralization and contribution to SOM. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2860–2870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krave AS, Lin B, Braster M, Laverman AM, van Straalen NM, Röling WFM, van Verseveld HW (2002) Stratification and seasonal stability of diverse bacterial communities in a Pinus merkusii (pine) forest soil in central Java, Indonesia. Environ Microbiol 4:361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuikman PJ, Jansen AG, van Veen JA, Zehnder AJB (1990a) Protozoan predation and the turnover of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in the presence of plants. Biol Fertil Soils 10:22–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuikman PJ, van Elsas JD, Jansen AG, Burgers SLGE, van Veen JA (1990b) Population dynamics and activity of bacteria and protozoa in relation to their spatial distribution in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 22:1063–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd JN, Forster RC, Nannipieri P, Oades JM (1996) Soil structure and biological activity. In: Stotzky G, Bollag JM (eds) Soil biochemistry. Dekker, New York, pp 23–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino A, Moscatelli MC, De Angelis P, Greco S (2006) Labile substrates quality as the main driving force of microbial mineralization activity in a poplar plantation soil under elevated CO2 and nitrogen fertilization. Sci Total Environ 372:256–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maidak BL, Larsen N, McCaughey MJ, Overbeek R, Olsen GJ, Fogel K, Blandy J, Woese CR (1994) The ribosomal database project. Nucleic Acids Res 22:3485–3487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maidak BL, Olsen GJ, Larsen N, Overbeck R, McCaughey MJ, Woese CR (1997) The ribosomal database project (RDP). Nucleic Acids Res 25:109–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muyzer G, de-Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Profiling of complex microbial population by denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:695–700

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G (2003) Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur J Soil Sci 54:655–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolardot B, Recous S, Mary B (2001) Simulation of C and N mineralisation during crop residue decomposition: a simple dynamic model based on the C:N ratio of the residues. Plant Soil 228:83–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogram AV (2000) Soil molecular ecology at age 20: methodological challenges for the future. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1499–1504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogram A, Sayler GS, Barkay T (1987) The extraction and purification of microbial DNA from sediments. J Microbiol Methods 7:57–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paustian K, Elliott ET, Killian K (1998) Modeling soil carbon in relation to management and climate change in some agroecosystems in central North America. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, Stewart BA (eds) Soil processes and the carbon cycle. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 459–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser JI (2002) Molecular and functional diversity in soil micro-organisms. Plant Soil 244:9–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rademaker JL, De Bruijn WFJ (2004) Computer-assisted analysis of molecular fingerprint profiles and database construction. In: Kowalchuk GA, de Bruijn FJ, Head IM, Akkermans ADL, van Elsas JD (eds) Molecular microbial ecology manual, vol 7, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic, Netherlands, pp 1397–1446

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronaghi M (2001) Pyrosequencing sheds light on DNA sequencing. Genome 11:3–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, Scharf SJ, Higuchi R, Horn GT, Mullis KB, Erlin HA (1988) Primed-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239:487–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson A, Simpson M, Smith E, Kelleher B (2007) Microbially derived inputs to soil organic matter: are current estimates too low? Environ Sci Technol 41:8070–8076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smit E, Leeflang P, Wernars K (1997) Detection of shifts in microbial community structure and diversity in soil caused by copper contamination using amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 23:249–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JL, Papendick RI, Bezdicek DF, Lynch JM (1993) Soil organic matter dynamics and crop residue management. In: Meetting JFB (ed) Soil microbial ecology. Dekker, New York, pp 65–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torsvik VL (1980) Isolation of bacterial DNA from soil. Soil Biol Biochem 12:15–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torsvik V, Ovreas L, Thingstad TF (2002) Prokaryotic diversity: magnitude, dynamics, and controlling factors. Science 296:1064–1066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toyota K, Kuninaga S (2006) Comparison of soil microbial community between soils amended with or without farmyard manure. Appl Soil Ecol 33:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevors JT (1998) Molecular evolution in bacteria: cell division. Microbiol Rev 29:237–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Peer YR, De Wachter H (1997) Construction of evolutionary distance trees with TREECON for Windows: accounting for variation in nucleotide substitution rate among sites. Comput Appl Biosci 13:227–230

    Google Scholar 

  • von Lützow M, Kögel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, Matzner E, Guggenberger G, Marschner B, Flessa H (2006) Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions. Eur J Soil Sci 57:426–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang GCY, Wang Y (1997) Frequency of formation of chimeric molecules as a consequence of PCR coamplification of 16S rRNA genes from mixed bacterial genomes. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4645–4650

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward DM, Bateson MM, Weller R, Ruff Roberts AL (1992) Ribosomal RNA analysis of microorganisms as they occur in nature. In: Marshall KC (ed) Advances in microbial ecology. Plenum, New York, pp 219–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz S, Czarnes S, Batoli F, Renault P, Commeaux C, Guillaumaud N, Clays-Josserand A (2007) Early-stage bacterial colonization between a sterilized remoulded soil clod and natural soil aggregates of the same soil. Soil Biol Biochem 39:3127–3137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zoetendal EG, Akkermans ADL, de Vos WM (1998) Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis of 16rRNA from human fecal samples reveals stable and host-specific communities of active bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 4:3854–3859

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmine Crecchio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crecchio, C., Pascazio, S., Ruggiero, P. (2012). Biological and Biotechnological Evaluation of Carbon Dynamics in Field Experiments. In: Piccolo, A. (eds) Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23385-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics