Skip to main content

The Kyoto Protocol and European and Italian Regulations in Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils

Abstract

Climate change represents the most important challenge for the international scientific community, for the inherent and irreversible modification brought about in natural ecosystems. International institutions increasingly adopt measures to promote preservation of ecosystems and counteract the social and economical consequences of environmental decline. Here we review the actions undertaken by both the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), aimed to stabilize and reduce concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG) in atmosphere, including the Kyoto Protocol that obliges developed countries to provide the political and legal framework to meet the Protocol’s expectations. Moreover, it is mandatory for national policies to reduce the occurrence of main risky events, such as landslides, floods, and desertification processes, whose frequency have rapidly risen in the Mediterranean regions mostly susceptible to climatic changes. According to the Kyoto Protocol, each signed party should include, in its annual GHG inventory, information on GHG possibly removed by means of carbon sinks activities such as land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF). Italian laws encompass the National System for the Italian Greenhouse Gas Inventory and the National Registry for Carbon sinks. The latter estimates GHG emissions by sources and accounts for their net removal based on sinks of the LULUCF sector that includes forest land, cropland, grassland, wetlands, and settlements. These compartments in 2008 removed 87.3 Mt of CO2 from atmosphere while, from 1990 to 2008, the total removal as CO2 equivalent increased by 34.8%, CO2 accounting for more than 99% of both total emissions and removals of the sector. Within this frame, carbon sequestration in cultivated soils has become important to add new carbon sinks other than LULUCF. The relation of soil management practices to the increase in soil organic matter is a basic requirement to develop a solid methodology to assess carbon stock changes in soil pool and provide a useful database over the national territory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf

  2. 2.

    The review report for the Fifth National Communication will be available in: http://unfccc.int/national_reports/annex_i_natcom/idr_reports/items/2711.php

  3. 3.

    A comprehensive description of the methodologies used in compiling the inventory, the data sources, the institutional structures and quality assurance and control procedures.

  4. 4.

    A series of standardized data tables containing mainly numerical information and submitted electronically.

  5. 5.

    The last review report from Italy is available at the UNFCCC web site: http://unfccc.int/national_reports/annex_i_ghg_inventories/inventory_review_reports/items/5687.php

  6. 6.

    On 1st June 2002, Italy ratified the Kyoto Protocol with the law n.120 of 01/06/2002. The ratification law also prescribed the preparation of a National Action Plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, adopted by the Interministerial Committee for Economic Planning (CIPE) on 19th December 2002. The Kyoto Protocol entered into force on 16 February 2005.

  7. 7.

    ISPRA, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale.

  8. 8.

    APAT, Agenzia per la Protezione dell’Ambiente e per i Servizi Tecnici.

References

  • Bigano A, Pauli F (2007) Dimensioni socio-economiche, costi dell’inazione e strategie di adattamento per l’impatto del cambiamento climatico sul sistema idrogeologici italiano. Agenzia per la Protezione dell’Ambiente e per i Servizi Tecnici. http://www.apat.gov.it/site/_files/Doc_clima/Paper_idrogeologico_finale_new.pdf

  • Bojo J (1996) Costs of land degradation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Ecol Econom 16:161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cóndor RD, Vitullo M, Gaudioso D, Colaiezzi M (2010) The contribution of Rural Development Plans to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in Italy. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Climate change and the sustainable management of water resources. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini ECC, Urbano F, Bonati G, Nino P, Fais A (2007) Atlante nazionale delle aree a rischio di desertificazione. INEA, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Diao X, Sarpong DB (2007) Costs implication of agricultural land degradation in Ghana. An economy wide, multimarket model assessment. IFPRI Discussion paper 00698

    Google Scholar 

  • Drechsel P, Gliele LA (1999) The economics assessment of soil nutrient depletion. Analytical issue framework development. Issue in sustainable land management. IBSRAM, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Dregne HE, Chou NT (1992) Global desertification dimensions and costs. In: Dregne HE (ed) Degradation and restoration of arid lands. Texas Tech University, Lubbock. http://www.ciesin.org/docs/002-186/002-186.html

  • EM-DAT 2011. The International Disaster Database EM-DAT. http://www.emdat.be. Accessed Apr 2011

  • Fantappiè M, L’Abate G, Costantini EAC (2010) Factors influencing soil organic carbon stock variations in Italy during the last three decades. In: P Zdruli et al. (eds) Land degradation and desertification: assessment, mitigation 435 and remediation, doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8657-0_34 , ©Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambarelli G, Gipponi G, Goria A (2007) La desertificazione, i costi dell’inazione e la valutazione delle opzioni di adattamento al cambiamento climatico. Agenzia per la Protezione dell’Ambiente e per i Servizi Tecnici. Workshop Alghero 21–22 Giugno

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Bi XQ, Pal J (2004) Mean, interannual variability and trends in a regional climate change experiment over Europe. II Climate Change scenarios. Clim Dynam 23:839–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (1997) Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas emission inventories. Three volumes: Reference Manual, Reporting Manual, Reporting Guidelines and Workbook. IPCC/OECD/IEA. IPCC WG1 Technical Support Unit, Hadley Centre, Meteorological Centre, Meteorological Office, Bracknell, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2000) Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Technical Support Unit, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: the scientific basis. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Xiasou D (eds) Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. IPCC Technical Support Unit, Kanagawa, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007a) Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p 976

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007b) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Solomon SD, Qin M, Manning Z, Chen M, Marquis KB, Averyt M. Tignor, Miller HL (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p 996

    Google Scholar 

  • ISPRA (2008) Landslides in Italy. Special report 2008. ISPRA Technical Report 83/2008. Rome, Italy. http://www.apat.gov.it/site/_contentfiles/00153200/153292_RAPPORTO_83_08_Landslide.pdf

  • ISPRA (2011a) Italian Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2009. National Inventory Report 2011. ISPRA Technical report 139/2011. Rome, Italy. http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/site/_contentfiles/00009400/9475_NIR_ITALY_2011.pdf

  • ISPRA (2011b) National Greenhouse Gas Inventory System in Italy. ISPRA Technical report 136/2011. Rome, Italy. http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/site/_contentfiles/00009400/9473_rap136_2011_NS_ITALY_2011.pdf

  • ISPRA (2011c) Repertorio Nazionale degli interventi per la Difesa del Suolo. Statistiche. http://www.rendis.isprambiente.it/rendisweb/

  • ISSER/DFID/World Bank (2005) The economics assessment of the sustainable of growth dependent upon renewable natural resource, Ghana

    Google Scholar 

  • Jebuni CD, Oduro AD, Tutu KA (1994) Trade and payments regime and the balance of payments in Ghana. World Develop 22:1161–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestre FT, Cortina J (2004) Are Pinus halepensis plantations useful as a restoration tool in semiarid Mediterranean areas? For Ecol Manag 198:303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matallo H (2006) General approach to the costs of desertification United Nations Convention to Combat desertification. Latin America and Caribbean Unit, Rome 4–6 December 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare – MATTM (2009) Fifth National Communication under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Italy. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/ita_nc5.pdf

  • Ogaya R, Penuelas J (2003) Comparative field study of Quercus ilex and Phillyrea latifolia: photosynthetic response to experimental drought conditions. Environ Exp Bot 2:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira M, Trigo R, Dacamara C, Pereira J, Leite S (2005) Synoptic patterns associated with large summer forest fires in Portugal. Agr For Meteorol 127:11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Re M (1997) Flooding and insurance. Geo Risks Research Department, Munich Reinsurance Company, Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardans J, Peñuelas J (2005) Effects of water and a nutrient pulse supply on Rosmarinus officinalis growth, nutrient content and flowering in the field. Environ Exp Bot 53:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spizzichino D, Margottini C, Trigila A, Iadanza C, Linser S (2010) Landslides. In: Mapping the impacts of natural hazards and technological accidents in Europe. An overview of the last decade. European Environment Agency EEA Technical report 13/2010. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/mapping-the-impacts-of-natural

  • UNEP (1992) World atlas of desertification. UN, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2005a) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Decision 15/CMP.1. Land use, land use change and forestry. FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.2

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2005b) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Decision 16/CMP.1. Land use, land use change and forestry. FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.3

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) (1994) United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A (1999) Land degradation. In: Land resource: now and for the future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Savy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Savy, D., Nebbioso, A., Cóndor, R.D., Vitullo, M. (2012). The Kyoto Protocol and European and Italian Regulations in Agriculture. In: Piccolo, A. (eds) Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23385-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics