Advertisement

The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models

  • Christian Sonnenberg
  • Christian Huemer
  • Birgit Hofreiter
  • Dieter Mayrhofer
  • Alessio Braccini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6741)

Abstract

In the discipline of accounting, the resource-event-agent (REA) ontology is a well accepted conceptual accounting framework to analyze the economic phenomena within and across enterprises. Accordingly, it seems to be appropriate to use REA in the requirements elicitation to develop an information architecture of accounting and enterprise information systems. However, REA has received comparatively less attention in the field of business informatics and computer science. Some of the reasons may be that the REA ontology despite of its well grounded core concepts is (1) sometimes vague in the definition of the relationships between these core concepts, (2) misses a precise language to describe the models, and (3) does not come with an easy to understand graphical notation. Accordingly, we have started developing a domain specific modeling language specifically dedicated to REA models and corresponding tool support to overcome these limitations. In this paper we present our REA DSL which supports the basic set of REA concepts.

Keywords

Domain Specific Languages Conceptual Modeling Business Models Accounting Information Systems 

References

  1. 1.
    Andersson, B., Bergholtz, M., Edirisuriya, A., Ilayperuma, T., Johannesson, P., Gordijn, J., Grégoire, B., Schmitt, M., Martinez, F.H., Abels, S., Hahn, A., Wangler, B., Weigand, H.: Towards a reference ontology for business models. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds.) ER 2006. LNCS, vol. 4215, pp. 482–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Tucci, C.L.: Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present and Future of the Concept. Communications of the Association for Information Science (CAIS) 15, 751–775 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: E3-value: Designing and evaluating e-business models. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(4), 11–17 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McCarthy, W.E.: The REA Accounting Model: A Generalized Framework for Accounting Systems in a Shared Data Environment. The Accounting Review 57(3) (1982)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geerts, G.L., McCarthy, W.E.: An ontological analysis of the economic primitives of the extended-rea enterprise information architecture. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 3(1), 1–16 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Deursen, A., Klint, P., Visser, J.: Domain-specific languages: an annotated bibliography. SIGPLAN Not. 35(6), 26–36 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kelly, S., Tolvanen, J.P.: Domain-Specific Modeling. Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Press (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greenfield, J., Short, K., Cook, S., Kent, S.: Software Factories. John Wiley, Chichester (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strembeck, M., Zdun, U.: An approach for the systematic development of domain-specific languages. Softw., Pract. Exper. 39(15), 1253–1292 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geerts, G.L., McCarthy, W.E.: An Accounting Object Infrastructure for Knowledge-Based Enterprise Models. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(4), 89–94 (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Geerts, G.L., McCarthy, W.E.: The Ontological Foundations of REA Enterprise Systems (August 2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Motal, T., Schuster, R.: From e3-value to REA: Modeling multi-party eBusiness Collaborations. In: Proc. of the 11th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, pp. 202–208. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geerts, G.L., McCarthy, W.E.: Modeling business enterprises as value-added process hierarchies with resource-event-agent object templates. In: Business Object Design and Implementation, pp. 94–113. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    OMG: Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification, Version 2.0 (January 2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ijiri, Y.: Theory of accounting measurement. American Accounting Association, Sarasota (1975)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yu, S.C.: The Structure of Accounting Theory. The University Presses of Florida (1976)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gailly, F., Poels, G.: Ontology-driven business modelling: Improving the conceptual representation of the REA ontology. In: Parent, C., Schewe, K.-D., Storey, V.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2007. LNCS, vol. 4801, pp. 407–422. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Geerts, G.L., McCarthy, W.E.: Policy-level specification in rea enterprise information systems. Journal of Information Systems 20(2), 37–63 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Sonnenberg
    • 2
  • Christian Huemer
    • 1
  • Birgit Hofreiter
    • 2
  • Dieter Mayrhofer
    • 1
  • Alessio Braccini
    • 3
  1. 1.TUViennaAustria
  2. 2.University of LiechtensteinLiechtenstein
  3. 3.LUISS UniversityItaly

Personalised recommendations