Skip to main content

Feature Assembly: A New Feature Modeling Technique

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Modeling – ER 2010 (ER 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6412))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we present a new feature modeling technique. This work was motivated by the fact that although for over two decades feature modeling techniques are used in software research for domain analysis and modeling of Software Product Lines, it has not found its way to the industry. Feature Assembly modeling overcomes some of the limitations of the current feature modeling techniques. We use a multi-perspective approach to deal with the complexity of large systems, we provide a simpler and easier to use modeling language, and last but not least we separated the variability specifications from the feature specifications which allow reusing features in different contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bosch, J.: Design and Use of Software Architectures: Adapting and Evolving a Product-Line Approach. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kang, K.C., Lee, J., Donohoe, P.: Feature-Oriented Product Line Engineering. IEEE Software 19(4), 58–65 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson, A.: Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-021, SEI (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kang, K., Kim, S., Lee, J., Kim, K., Shin, E., Huh, M.: FORM: A Feature-Oriented Reuse Method with Domain-Specific Reference Architectures. J. Annals of Software Engineering. 5, 143–168 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Griss, M., Favaro, J., d’Alessandro, M.: Integrating Feature Modeling with the RSEB. In: Fifth International Conference on Software Reuse, pp. 76–85 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Czarnecki, K., Kim, C.H.P.: Cardinality-Based Feature Modeling and Constraints: A Progress Report. In: OOPSLA 2005 International Workshop on Software Factories (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nestor, D., Thiel, S., Botterweck, G., Cawley, C., Healy, P.: Applying visualisation techniques in software product lines. In: SOFTVIS 2008, pp. 175–184 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bosch, J.: Software Product Families in Nokia. In: Obbink, H., Pohl, K. (eds.) SPLC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3714, pp. 2–6. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. MacGregor, J.: Bosch Experience Report, http://www.conipf.org/download/BoschExperienceReport.pdf

  10. Jaring, M., Krikhaar, R.L., Bosch, J.: Representing variability in a family of MRI scanners. Software—Practice & Experience 34(1), 69–100 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maccari, A., Heie, A.: Managing infinite variability in mobile terminal software. Softw., Pract. Exper. 35(6), 513–537 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eriksson, M., Börstler, J., Borg, K.: The PLUSS Approach - Domain Modeling with Features, Use Cases and Use Case Realizations. In: Obbink and Pohl [24], pp. 33–44

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clauss, M.: Generic Modeling using UML extensions for variability. In: Workshop on Workshop on Domain-Specific Visual Languages, OOPSLA 2001, pp. 11–18 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ziadi, T., Hélouët, L., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Towards a UML Profile for Software Product Lines. In: van der Linden, F.J. (ed.) PFE 2003. LNCS, vol. 3014, pp. 129–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Gomaa, H.: Designing Software Product Lines with UML: From Use Cases to Pattern-Based Software Architectures. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Asikainen, T., Männistö, T., Soininen, T.: Kumbang: A Domain Ontology for Modeling Variability in Software Product Families. Advanced Engineering Informatics 21(1), 23–40 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sinnema, M., Deelstra, S., Nijhuis, J., Bosch, J.: COVAMOF: A Framework for Modeling Variability in Software Product Families. In: Nord, R.L. (ed.) SPLC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3154, pp. 197–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Sinnema, M., Deelstra, S.: Classifying Variability Modeling Techniques. Elsevier Journal on Information and Software Technology 49(7), 717–739 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Djebbi, O., Salinesi, C.: Criteria for Comparing Requirements Variability Modeling Notations for Product Lines. In: CERE 2006, pp. 20–35 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hubaux, A., Classen, A., Mendonca, M., Heymans, P.: A Preliminary Review on the Application of Feature Diagrams in Practice. In: VaMoS 2010, pp. 53–59 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Batory, D.: Feature models, grammars, and propositional formulas. In: Obbink, H., Pohl, K. (eds.) SPLC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3714, pp. 7–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Finkelstein, A., Kramer, J., Nuseibeh, B., Finkelstein, L., Goedicke, M.: Viewpoints: A Framework for Integrating Multiple Perspectives in System Development. Intl. J. of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 2(1), 31–57 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nicholas Graham, T.C.: Viewpoints Supporting the Development of Interactive Software. In: Viewpoints 1996, pp. 263–267. ACM Press, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Woods, E.: Experiences Using Viewpoints for Information Systems Architecture: An Industrial Experience Report. In: Oquendo, F., Warboys, B.C., Morrison, R. (eds.) EWSA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3047, pp. 182–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Nuseibeh, B., Kramer, J., Finkelstein, A.: ViewPoints: Meaningful Relationships Are Difficult! In: ICSE 2003, pp. 676–683 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Abo Zaid, L., Kleinermann, F., De Troyer, O.: Applying Semantic Web Technology to Feature Modeling. In: Jacobson Jr., M.J., Rijmen, V., Safavi-Naini, R. (eds.) SAC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5867, pp. 1252–1256. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lopez-Herrejon, R.E., Batory, D.: A Standard Problem for Evaluating Product-Line Methodologies. In: Bosch, J. (ed.) GCSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2186, pp. 9–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Czarnecki, K., Eisenecker, U.W.: Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abo Zaid, L., Kleinermann, F., De Troyer, O. (2010). Feature Assembly: A New Feature Modeling Technique. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds) Conceptual Modeling – ER 2010. ER 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6412. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16373-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16373-9_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16372-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16373-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics