Skip to main content

A Standard Problem for Evaluating Product-Line Methodologies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Generative and Component-Based Software Engineering (GCSE 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2186))

Abstract

We propose a standard problem to evaluate product-line methodologies. It relies on common knowledge from Computer Science, so that domainknowledge can be easily acquired, and it is complex enough to expose the fundamental concepts of product-line methodologies. As a reference point, we present a solution to this problem using the GenVoca design methodology. We explain a series of modeling, implementation, and benchmarking issues that we encountered, so that others can understand and compare our solution with theirs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J-R Abrial, E. Boerger, and H. Langmaack, Formal Methods for Industrial Applications: Specifying and Programming the Steam Boiler Control, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1165, Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. America, et. al. “CoPAM: A Component-Oriented Platform Architecting Method Family for Product Family Engineering”, Software Product Lines: Experience and Research Directions, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Batory and B. Geraci. Composition Validation and Subjectivity in GenVoca Generators. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, February 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Batory, B. Lofaso, and Y. Smaragdakis. “JTS: Tools for implementing Domain-Specific Languages”, Int. Conf. on Software Reuse, Victoria, Canada, June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Batory, R. Cardone, and Y. Smaragdakis. “Object-Oriented Frameworks and Product Lines”, 1st Software Product-Line Conference, Denver, Colorado, August 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Batory, G. Chen, E. Robertson, and T. Wang, “Design Wizards and Visual Programming Environments for GenVoca Generators”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, May 2000, 441–452.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Bosch, “Evolution and Composition of Reusable Assets in Product-Line Architectures: A Case Study”, Software Architecture, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.R. Chidamber and C.F. Kemerer, “Towards a Metrics Suite for Object Oriented Design”, OOPSLA 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Cohen and L. Northrop, “Object-Oriented Technology and Domain Analysis”, Int. Conf. on Software Reuse, Victoria, Canada, June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T.H. Cormen, C.E. Leiserson, and R.L. Rivest. Introduction to Algorithms, MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Czarnecki and U.W. Eisenecker, “Components and Generative Programming”, SIGSOFT 1999, LNCS 1687, Springer-Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Czarnecki and U.W. Eisenecker, Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications, Addison-Wesley, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J-M. DeBaud and K. Schmid, “A Systematic Approach to Derive the Scope of Software Product Lines”, Int. Conference on Software Engineering 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Gomaa et al., “A Prototype Domain Modeling Environment for Reusable Software Architectures”, Int. Conf. on Software Reuse, Rio de Janeiro, November 1994, 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Griss, “Implementing Product-Line Features by Composing Component Aspects”, First International Software Product-Line Conference, Denver, Colorado., August 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. Holland. “Specifying Reusable Components Using Contracts”, ECOOP 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.L. Parnas, “On the Design and Development of Program Families”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, March 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Smaragdakis and D. Batory, “Implementing Layered Designs with Mixin Layers”, ECOOP 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. VanHilst and D. Notkin, “Using C++ Templates to Implement Role-Based Designs”, JSSST International Symposium on Object Technologies for Advanced Software, Springer-Verlag, 1996, 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D.M. Weiss and C.T.R. Lai, Software Product-Line Engineering, Addison-Wesley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lopez-Herrejon, R.E., Batory, D. (2001). A Standard Problem for Evaluating Product-Line Methodologies. In: Bosch, J. (eds) Generative and Component-Based Software Engineering. GCSE 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2186. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44800-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44800-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42546-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44800-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics