A Safe Process: Protecting Core Values



 Chapter 5 addressed the open nature of decision making. Open decision making has major advantages, but it may also be quite threatening to the parties involved. They have particular interests and are not always sure whether their participation in an open decision-making process will actually serve their interests. They might get ‘trapped’, or perhaps open decision making will produce a result that they are not satisfied with.


Core Values Open Decision-making Process Maasvlakte Process Should Public Transport Companies 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Andersson M, Mol APJ (2002) The Netherlands in the UNFCCC process. Leadership between ambition and reality. Int Environ Agreem 2(1):49–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burger J et al (2001) Science, Policy Stakeholders, and Fish Consumption Authorities: developing a fish fact sheet for the Savannah River. Environ Manage 4:501–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dinan D (1994) Ever Closer Union: an introduction to European Integration. MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jackson JH (2000) The role and effectiveness of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. In: Collins SM, Rodrik D (eds) Brookings Trade Forum, pp 179–212, 220–231. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Senge P (1992) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyBX DelftNetherlands
  2. 2.JH LeiderdorpNetherlands

Personalised recommendations