Abstract
Chapter 5 addressed the open nature of decision making. Open decision making has major advantages, but it may also be quite threatening to the parties involved. They have particular interests and are not always sure whether their participation in an open decision-making process will actually serve their interests. They might get ‘trapped’, or perhaps open decision making will produce a result that they are not satisfied with.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersson M, Mol APJ (2002) The Netherlands in the UNFCCC process. Leadership between ambition and reality. Int Environ Agreem 2(1):49–68
Burger J et al (2001) Science, Policy Stakeholders, and Fish Consumption Authorities: developing a fish fact sheet for the Savannah River. Environ Manage 4:501–514
Dinan D (1994) Ever Closer Union: an introduction to European Integration. MacMillan, London
Jackson JH (2000) The role and effectiveness of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. In: Collins SM, Rodrik D (eds) Brookings Trade Forum, pp 179–212, 220–231. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Senge P (1992) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Bruijn, H., ten Heuvelhof, E.F., in ‘t Veld, R. (2010). A Safe Process: Protecting Core Values. In: Process Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13941-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13941-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13940-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13941-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)