Skip to main content

Lagrangian E-Voting: Verifiability on Demand and Strong Privacy

  • Conference paper
Trust and Trustworthy Computing (Trust 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 6101))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2365 Accesses

Abstract

We propose a new approach to verifiability of Internet e-voting procedures: correct counting of each single ballot can be checked, but verification is a zero-knowledge court procedure. After verification period is over, certain keys are destroyed and breaking vote privacy becomes substantially harder.

Our main goal is to provide a framework for the political situation in which the voters are more concerned about disclosure of their preferences than about the correctness of the results. Our approach also responds to threats of coercion exercised by a physically present coercer.

Our approach can be used on top of most previous schemes to improve their privacy features. It is limited to the cases when the voters hold electronic ID cards.

Partially supported by Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, grant N N206 2701 33. The second author has been also supported by Foundation for Polish Science within the MISTRZ Programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dagstuhl Accord (2007), http://www.dagstuhlaccord.org/

  2. The E-vote 2011-project Electronic Voting. 2011, http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/krd/kampanjer/election_portal/electronic-voting.html?id=437385

  3. Top-to-bottom Review. Top-to-bottom Report Conducted by Secretary of State Debra Bowen of Many of the Voting Systems Certified for Use in California (2007), http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_vsr.htm

  4. Adida, B.: Helios: Web-based Open-Audit Voting. In: USENIX Security Symposium 2008, USENIX Association, pp. 335–348 (2008), ISBN 978-1-931971-60-7

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baer, W.S., Borisov, N., Danezis, G., Guerses, S.F., Klonowski, M., Kutyłowski, M., Maier-Rabler, U., Moran, T., Pfitzmann, A., Preneel, B., Sadeghi, A.-R., Vedel, T., Westen, T., Zagórski, F., Dutton, W.H.: Machiavelli Confronts 21st Century Digital Technology: Democracy in a Network Society. In: Social Science Research Network, 1521222 (2009), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1521222

  6. Chaum, D.: Punchscan (2005), http://www.punchscan.org

  7. Chaum, D., Antwerpen, H.V.: Undeniable Signatures. In: Brassard, G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1989. LNCS, vol. 435, pp. 212–216. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chaum, D., Essex, A., Carback, R., Clark, J., Popoveniuc, S., Rivest, R.L., Ryan, P.Y.A., Shen, E., Sherman, A.: Scantegrity II: End-to-End Voter-Verifiable Optical Scan Election Systems Using Invisible Ink Confirmation Codes. In: USENIX/ACCURATE EVT 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chaum, D., Ryan, P.Y.A., Schneider, S.: A Practical Voter-Verifiable Election Scheme. In: di Vimercati, S.d.C., Syverson, P.F., Gollmann, D. (eds.) ESORICS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3679, pp. 118–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Desmedt, Y., Estehghari, S.: Hacking Helios and its Impact. CRYPTO 2009 rump session (2009), http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/Y.Desmedt/IACR/

  11. Desmedt, Y., Kurosawa, K.: Electronic Voting: Starting Over? In: Zhou, J., López, J., Deng, R.H., Bao, F. (eds.) ISC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3650, pp. 329–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Garrido, J.M., Schlesinger, R.: Principles of Modern Operating Systems. Jones and Barlett Publishers (2008), ISBN 0-7637-3574-4

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gjøsteen, K.: Analysis of an Internet Voting Protocol. http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/krd/kampanjer/election_portal/electronic-voting/news-about-the-e-vote-2011-project/year/2010/Description-of-cryptografhic-protocol-.html?id=594906

  14. Gogolewski, M., Klonowski, M., Kutyłowski, M., Kubiak, P., Lauks, A., Zagórski, F.: Kleptographic Attacks on E-voting Schemes. In: Müller, G. (ed.) ETRICS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3995, pp. 494–508. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Gołȩbiewski, Z., Kutyłowski, M., Zagórski, F.: Stealing Secrets with SSL/TLS and SSH – Kleptographic Attacks. In: Pointcheval, D., Mu, Y., Chen, K. (eds.) CANS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4301, pp. 191–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Juels, A., Catalano, D., Jakobsson, M.: Coercion-Resistant Electronic Elections. In: ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, pp. 61–70. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kutyłowski, M., Zagórski, F.: Coercion-free Internet Voting with Receipts. In: Miyaji, A., Kikuchi, H., Rannenberg, K. (eds.) IWSEC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4752, pp. 199–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Kutyłowski, M., Zagórski, F.: Scratch, Click & Vote: E2E Voting over the Internet’. Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2008/314. In: Towards Trustworthy Election Systems, in State-of-the-Art Survey Series. Springer, Heidelberg (2008) (to appear), http://eprint.iacr.org/2008/314

    Google Scholar 

  19. Popoveniuc, S., Lundin, D.: A Simple Technique for Safely Using Punchscan and Pret a Voter in Mail-in Elections. In: Alkassar, A., Volkamer, M. (eds.) VOTE-ID 2007. LNCS, vol. 4896, pp. 150–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Rivest, R.L., Smith, W.D.: Three Voting Protocols: Threeballot, Vav, and Twin. In: EVT 2007: Proceedings of the USENIX/Accurate Electronic Voting Technology on USENIX/Accurate Electronic Voting Technology Workshop. USENIX Association (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tarnovsky, C.: Hacking the Smartcard Chip. A presentation at Black Hat DC (2010), http://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-dc-10/bh-dc-10-briefings.html

  22. Weber, S., Araujo, R., Buchmann, J.: On Coercion-Resistant Electronic Elections with Linear Work. In: ARES, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, pp. 908–916. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Krzywiecki, Ł., Kutyłowski, M. (2010). Lagrangian E-Voting: Verifiability on Demand and Strong Privacy. In: Acquisti, A., Smith, S.W., Sadeghi, AR. (eds) Trust and Trustworthy Computing. Trust 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6101. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13869-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13869-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13868-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13869-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics