Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Entwicklung der Knieendoprothetik, Indikation und sozioökonomische Gesichtspunkte

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
AE-Manual der Endoprothetik

  • 5580 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die ersten operativen Behandlungsversuche bei Gonarthrose gehen auf Verneuil 1860 (Steinberg u. Steinberg 2000) zurück. Er versuchte, nach Resektion der femoralen und tibialen Gelenkflächen durch Interposition verschiedener Materialien wie z. B. Nylon, Fascia lata u. a. eine Verbesserung der Mobilität bei arthrotischen Kniegelenken zu erreichen (Verneuil 1860). Ein ähnlicher Ansatz mit Resektion der Gelenkflächen wurde von Ferguson verfolgt. Er konnte bei einem Teil der Patienten eine mobile Pseudarthrosenbildung erreichen. Das Ausmaß der Beweglichkeit ging allerdings mit einer zunehmenden Instabilität des Gelenks einher (Riley 1976).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (2004) Annual Report. AOA, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Blauth W, Donner K (1979) Notes on the history of arthroplasty (author’s transl). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 117:997–1006

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm P (2003) The hinged knee prosthesis: outdated design or valuable implant for difficult cases? Zentralbl Chir 128:64–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne RB, Masonis J, Anthony M (2003) An analysis of rotating-platform total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:173–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BQS Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung (2005) Qualitätsindikatoren Knie-Totalendoprothesen- Erstimplantation. In: BQS-Bundesauswertung 2004. BQS Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung gGmbH, S 4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckwalter JA, Saltzman C, Brown T (2004) The impact of osteoarthritis: Implications for research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 427 (Suppl): S6–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buechel FF (2004) Mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty: rotation is our salvation! J Arthroplasty 19 (Suppl 1):27–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buechel FF, Pappas MJ (1986) The New Jersey low-contact-stress knee replacement system: biomechanical rationale and review of the first 123 cemented cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 105:197–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buechel FF, Pappas MJ (1989) New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings. Orthop Clin North Am 20:147–177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buechel FF Sr. et al. (2001) Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:41–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC (2006) Prevalence of doctordiagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation – United States, 2003–2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, S 1089–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A (1999) What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ 319:780–782

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charnley J (2005) The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. 1970. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430:3–11; discussion 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Christen B et al. (2007) Posterior cruciate ligament balancing in total knee replacement: the quantitative relationship between tightness of the flexion gap and tibial translation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1046–1050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crossett L (2006) Evolution of the low contact stress (LCS) complete knee system. Orthopedics 29 (Suppl): S17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Deber RB (1994) Physicians in health care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information. CMAJ 151:171–176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Degner LF, Sloan JA (1992) Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 45:941–950

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dieppe P et al. (1999) Knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis: effectiveness, practice variations, indications and possible determinants of utilization. Rheumatology (Oxford) 38:73–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht E (1971) Sliding prosthesis, a partial prosthesis in destructive processes of the knee joint. Chirurg 42:510–514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht E et al. (1976) Statistics of total knee replacement: partial and total knee replacement, design St. Georg: a review of a 4-year observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 120:54–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falatyn S, Lachiewicz PF, Wilson FC (1995) Survivorship analysis of cemented total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 317:178–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faller H, Kirschner S, Konig A (2003) Psychological distress predicts functional outcomes at three and twelve months after total knee arthroplasty. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 25:372–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felson DT (1990a) Osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 16:499–512

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felson DT (1990b) The epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis: results from the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 20 (Suppl 1):42–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman MA, Swanson SA, Todd RC (1973) Total replacement of the knee using the Freeman-Swanson knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 94:153–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdesmeyer L et al. (2006) The modular MML revision system in knee revision and tumor arthroplasty. Orthopäde 35:975–981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gluck T (1890) Die Invaginationsmethode der Osteo- und Arthroplastik. Berl Klin Wschr 27:752

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluck T (1891) IX. Verhandlungen ärztlicher Gesellschaften. Berl Klin Wschr 28:623

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow J, O’Connor J (1978) The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 60-B:358–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosheger G, Winkelmann W (2000) Mutars – ein modulares Tumor- und Revisionssystem Erfahrungen am Tumorzentrum Münster. Orthopäde 29(Suppl 1):S54–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Gschwend N, Loehr J (1981) The Gschwend-Scheier-Bahler (GSB) replacement of the rheumatoid knee joint. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 18:174–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gschwend N, Ivosevic-Radovanovic D (1988) Proven and nonproven facts in knee arthroplasty. Results with the semiconstrained GSB-prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 107:140–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunston FH (1971) Polycentric knee arthroplasty. Prosthetic simulation of normal knee movement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 53:272–277

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gunston FH, MacKenzie RI (1976) Complications of polycentric knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 120:11–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Günther KP et al. (1998) Prevalence of generalised osteoarthritis in patients with advanced hip and knee osteoarthritis: the Ulm Osteoarthritis Study. Ann Rheum Dis 57:717–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Günther KP et al. (1999) Incidence of joint-specific risk factors in patients with advanced cox- and gonarthroses in the Ulm Osteoarthrosis Study. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 137:468–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Günther KP et al. (2002) Clinical epidemiology of hip and knee joint arthroses: an overview of the results of the „Ulm Osteoarthrosis Study“. Z Rheumatol 61:244–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadorn DC, Holmes AC (1997) The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview. BMJ 314:131–134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagena FW, Hofmann GO (1984) Long and medium-term results following implantation of the GSB-knee-joint endoprosthesis. I. Clinical results. Unfallheilkunde 87:133–143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawk A (1993) Recreating the knee: the history of knee arthroplasty. Caduceus 9:75–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Canada Arthritis in Canada (2003) An ongoing challenge. Health Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernigou P, Goutallier D (1988) GUEPAR unicompartmental Lotus prosthesis for single-compartment femorotibial arthrosis. A five- to nine-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 230:186–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoikka V et al. (1989) Results and complications after arthroplasty with a totally constrained total knee prosthesis (GUEPAR). Ann Chir Gynaecol 78:94–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Insall JN, Kelly M (1986) The total condylar prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:43–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Insall J, Scott WN, Ranawat CS (1979) The total condylar knee prosthesis. A report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:173–180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH (1982) The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:1317–1323

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Insall JN et al. (1983) The total condylar knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis. A five to nine-year follow-up of the first one hundred consecutive replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:619–628

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones EC et al. (1979) GUEPAR knee arthroplasty results and late complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 140:145–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judet R, Judet J, Crepin G, Rigault A (1947) Essais des prothèses osteoarticulaires. Presse Méd 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy LG et al. (2003) When should we do knee replacements? Knee 10:161–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotz R (1993) Tumorprothesen bei malignen Knochentumoren. Orthopäde 22:160–166

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz S et al. (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence RC et al. (2008) Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum 58:26–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leitlinien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie und des Berufsverbandes der Ärzte für Orthopädie (2002) AWMF-Leitlinien-Register 2002: BV d. Ärzte für Orthopädie, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüring C, Tingart M, Perlick L, Grifka J (2005) Die navigationsgestützte Knieendoprothetik. Eine Standortbestimmung unter evidenzbasierten Kriterien. Dtsch Ärztebl 102A:2320–2325

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntosh DL (1958) Hemiarthroplasty of the knee using a space occupying prosthesis for painful varus and valgus deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40:1431

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancuso CA et al. (1996) Indications for total hip and total knee arthroplasties. Results of orthopaedic surveys. J Arthroplasty 11:34–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marmor L (1988a) Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee with a minimum ten-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res 228:171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmor L (1988b) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Ten- to 13-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazas FB (1973) Guepar total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 94:211–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merx H, Dreinhofer KE, Günther KP (2007) Socioeconomic relevance of osteoarthritis in Germany. Z Orthop Unfall 145:421–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:983–989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor CD, Williams JI (1996) Primary hip and knee replacement surgery: Ontario criteria for case selection and surgical priority. Qual Health Care 5:20–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NIH (2003) NHI Consensus Statement on total knee replacement December 8–10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1328–1335

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak EJ, Silverstein MD, Bozic KJ (2007) The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2389–2397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plutat J, Friesecke C, Kluber D (2000) Endo-Model hinged prosthesis – a model with a future? Experiences and outcome after 20 years use. Orthopäde 29 (Suppl 1): S 56–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy DL et al. (2000) Results of all-polyethylene tibial components as a cost-saving technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:140–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Deshmukh RG (1994) Impact of modern technique on long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:131–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riley LH Jr. (1976) The evolution of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 120:7–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter MA et al. (1994) Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:136–145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sathappan SS et al. (2006) Midterm results of primary total knee arthroplasty using a dished polyethylene insert with a recessed or resected posterior cruciate ligament. J Arthroplasty 21:1012–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2002) Fachserie 12, Reihe 6.2. Diagnosedaten der Krankenhauspatientinnen und -patienten (einschl. Sterbe-, ohne Stundenfälle)

    Google Scholar 

  • Steckel H et al. (2005) Long-term results of the Blauth knee prosthesis – current status of hinged knee prostheses. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:30–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg DR, Steinberg ME (2000) The early history of arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 374:55–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y et al. (1997) Incidence and prevalence of cox- and gonarthrosis in the general population. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 135:184–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verneuil A (1860) De la creation d’une fausse articulation par section ou resection partielle de l’os maxillaire inserieur comme moyen de remedier a l’ankylose vrai ou fausse de la machoire inferieure. Arc Gen Med 15:174

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertullo CJ et al. (2001) Mobile bearings in primary knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 9:355–364

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walldius B (1957) Arthroplasty of the knee using an endoprosthesis. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl) 24:1–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walldius B (1960) Arthroplasty of the knee using an endoprosthesis. 8 years’ experience. Acta Orthop Scand 30:37–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland

    J. Mettelsiefen, S. Kirschner, J. Lützner & K.-P. Günther

Authors
  1. J. Mettelsiefen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Kirschner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Lützner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K.-P. Günther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kirschner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Klinik für Orthopädie u. Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, 53105, Germany

    Dieter C. Wirtz

Copyright information

© 2011 Arbeitsgemeinschaft Endoprothetik

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mettelsiefen, J., Kirschner, S., Lützner, J., Günther, KP. (2011). Entwicklung der Knieendoprothetik, Indikation und sozioökonomische Gesichtspunkte. In: Wirtz, D. (eds) AE-Manual der Endoprothetik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12889-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12889-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12888-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12889-9

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation