Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vor- und Nachteile der autologen Spongiosaplastik

  • Chapter
Fortbildung Osteologie

Part of the book series: Fortbildung Osteologie ((FORTOSTEO,volume 3))

Zusammenfassung

Knöcherne Defekte, wie sie z. B. bei Knochenzysten, Knochentumoren, periprothetisch bei Prothesenlockerungen oder aber im Rahmen osteoporotisch bedingter Frakturen auftreten können, stellen für den orthopädischen Chirurgen regelmäßig eine Herausforderung dar. Mit zunehmender Lebenserwartung steigt die Zahl knöcherner Defekte. Gleichzeitig nimmt die Qualität des Knochenlagers wegen allgemeiner osteoporotischer Veränderungen ab und die Regenerationspotenz des Knochens verschlechtert sich im Rahmen der Gewebeseneszenz [28], [36].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Ahlmann E, Patzakis M, Roidis N, Shepherd L, Holtom P (2002) Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84: 716–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, Bucknel AL, Davino NA (1996) Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Rel Res 329: 300–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS (1995) Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine 20: 1055–1060

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapman MW, Buchholz R, Cornall C (1997) Treatment of acute fractures with a collagen-calcium phosphate graft material: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79: 495–502

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cockin J (1971) Autologous bone grafting — complications at the donor site. J Bone Joint Surg Br 53: 153

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colterjohn NR Bednar DA (1997) Procurement of bone graft from the iliac crest. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79: 756–759

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coventry MB, Tapper EM (1972) Pelvic Instability. A consequence of removing iliac bone for grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54: 83–101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deijkers RL, Bloem RM, Petit PL, Brand R, Vehmeyer SB, Veen MR (1997) Contamination of bone allografts: analysis of incidence and predisposing factors. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79: 161–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Delawi D, Dhert WJ, Castelein RM, Verbout AJ, Oner FC (2007) The incidence of donor site pain after bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest may be overestimated: a study on spine fracture patients. Spine 32: 1865–1866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Doppelt SH, Tomford WW, Lucas AD, Mankin HJ (1981) Operational and financial aspects of a hospital bone bank. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63: 1472–1481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernyhough JC, Schimandle JJ, Weigel MC, Edwards CC, Levine AM (1992) Chronic donor site pain complicating bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest for spinal fusion. Spine 17: 1474–1480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedlaender GE (1987) Current concepts review: Bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69: 786–790

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Galea G, Kopman D, Graham BJ (1998) Supply and demand of bone allograft for revision hip surgery in Scotland. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80: 595–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goodman SB, Bauer TW, Carter D et al. (1998) Norian SRS cement augmentation in hip fracture treatment. Clin Orthop Rel Res 348: 42–50

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goulet A, Senunas LE, DeSilva GL, Greenfield MLVH (1997) Autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Complications and functional assessment. Clin Orthop Rel Res 339: 76–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grillon GL, Gunther SF, Connole PW (1984) A new technique for obtaining iliac bone grafts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42: 172–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson EE, Urist MR, Finerman GAM (1988) Bone morphogenetic protein augmentation grafting of resistant femoral nonunions. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Rel Res 230: 257–265

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keller EE, Triplett WW (1987) Iliac bone grafting: review of 160 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45: 11–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Laurie SW, Kaban LB, Mulliken JB, Murray JE (1984) Donor site morbidity after harvesting rib and iliac bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 73: 933–938

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lichtblau S (1962) Dislocation of the sacro-iliac joint. A complication of bone grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 44: 193–198

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marx RE, Morales MJ (1988) Morbidity from bone harvest in major jaw reconstruction: A randomized trial comparing the lateral anterior and posterior aproaches to the ilium. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48: 196–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Neidel J, Kunz R (1999) Evidenz-basierte Orthopädie. Z Orthop 137: Oa 1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Niedhart C, Maus U, Redmann E, Siebert CH, Niethard FU (2001) In vivo testing of a new in situ setting ß-tricalcium phosphate cement for osseous reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res 55: 530–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Niedhart C, Niethard FU (1998) Klinische Anforderungen an Knochenersatzstoffe. In: Puhl W (ed). Bioceramics in Orthopaedics — New Applications. Enke, Stuttgart, pp 46–50

    Google Scholar 

  25. Niedhart C, Pingsmann A, Jürgens C, Marr A, Merck, Niethard FU (2003) Komplikationen nach Entnahme autologen Knochens aus dem ventralen und dorsalen Beckenkamm — eine prospektive, kontrollierte Studie. Z Orthop 141: 481–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Perry CR (1999) Bone repair techniques, bone graft, and bone graft substitutes. Clin Orthop 360: 71–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pingsmann A, Blatt R, Jürgens C et al. (2005) Efficacy and safety of a novel mouldable, resorbable, and degradable sealant of bone surfaces for haemostasis after bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest. Spine 30: 1911–1917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Quarto R, Thomas D, Liang CT (1995) Bone progenitor cell deficits and the age-associated decline in bone repair capacity. Calf Tissue Int 56: 123–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Robertson PA, Wray AC (2001) Natural history of posterior iliac crest bone graft donation for spinal surgery. Spine 26: 1473–1476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sasso RC, Williams JI, Dimasi N, Meyer PR (1998) Postoperative drains at the donor sites of iliac-crest bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80: 631–635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sawin PD, Traynelis VC, Menezes AH (1998) A comparative analysis of fusion rates and donor-site morbidity for autogeneic rib and iliac crest bone grafts in posterior cervical fusions. J Neurosurg 88: 255–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schnee CL, Freese A, Weil RJ, Marcotte PJ (1997) Analysis of harvest morbidity and radiographic outcome using autograft for anterior cervical fusion. Spine 22: 2222–2227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Siebert CH, Höfler HR, Arens S, Hansis M (1995) Probleme bei der Knochenentnahme aus dem Beckenkamm — Sind Komplikationen vermeidbar? Osteosynthese 4S1: 106

    Google Scholar 

  34. Siebert CH, Niedhart C, Weber M, Niethard FU (1999) Ist ein Knochenersatzstoff aus Tricalciumphosphat wirklich eine Alternative? Ergebnisse einer Biosorb-clinical-trial. Orthop Praxis 35: 451–454

    Google Scholar 

  35. Skaggs DL, Samuelson MA, Hale JM, Kay RM, Tolo VT (2000) Complications of posterior iliac crest bone grafting in spine surgery in children. Spine 25: 2400–2402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Strates BS, Stock AJ, Connolly JF (1988) Skeletal repair in the aged: a preliminary study in rabbits. Am J Med Sci 296: 266–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Summers BN, Eisenstein SM (1989) Donor site pain from the ilium. A complication of lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71: 677–680

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tomford WW, Starkweather RJ, Goldman MH (1981) A study of the clinical incidence of infection in the use of banked allograft bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63: 244–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Uchida A, Araki N, Shinto Y, Yoshikawa H, Kurisaki E, Ono K (1990) The use of calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic in bone tumour surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72: 298–302

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Westrich GH, Geller DS, O’Malley MJ, Deland JT, Helfet DL (2001) Anterior ilac crest bone graft harvesting using the corticocancellous reamer system. J Orthop Trauma 15: 500–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Younger EM und Chapman MW (1989) Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma 3: 192–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ziegler S, Niedhart C, Wirtz DC, Siebert CH (2001) Augmentation der Spongiosaplastik durch Tricalciumphosphat bei dorsaler Spondylodese. Orthop Praxis 37: 401–404

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopädische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Lieckerstraße 23, D-52525, Heinsberg

    Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Christopher Niedhart

Authors
  1. Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Christopher Niedhart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niedhart, C. (2010). Vor- und Nachteile der autologen Spongiosaplastik. In: Fortbildung Osteologie. Fortbildung Osteologie, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05385-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05385-6_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05384-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-05385-6

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation