Skip to main content

Boundaries of Innovation and Social Consensus Building: Challenges for Japanese Firms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dynamics of Knowledge, Corporate Systems and Innovation

Abstract

This paper addresses challenges for Japanese firms in innovation, drawing on a framework to categorize innovation by its boundary and our understanding of organizational characteristics of Japanese corporate systems. Innovation can be categorized into four levels by its boundary, that is, the scope of changes to be involved. Four levels are of innovation within component, innovation between components (within product), innovation between products (within market), and innovation between markets (within institution). When the boundary of innovation is limited, necessary coordination could be made within a small group of people. Japanese firms are more likely to succeed in such innovations, since they have advantage in frontline-led consensus building based on long-term employment and inter-firm relations. Once the boundary of innovation exceeds such limited scope, particularly across two or more different markets, however, political reconciliation of different interests or charismatic leadership is necessary to build a consensus among heterogeneous social actors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Systems of collaboration here are similar to a cooperative system described by Barnard and Simon in their theories of organizational equilibrium, which includes customers as well.

  2. 2.

    Venture capital funding or corporate acquisition can be used as a market mechanism for building a consensus about a new idea with uncertainty. While firms in the United States are good at utilizing these systems, they are still under development in Japan.

References

  • Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1974). The limits of organizations. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity volume I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, M. A., & Nobeoka, K. (1998). Thinking beyond lean: How multi-project mananagement is transforming product development at toyota and other companies. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skills and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How intel, microsoft, and cisco drive industry innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1949). The meaning of competition, the stafford little lecture delivered at princeton university on May 20, 1946. In F. A. Hayek (ed.), Individualism and economic order (pp. 92–106). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1978). Competition as a discovery procedure. In F. A. Hayek (ed.), New studies in philosophy, politics, economics, and the history of ideas (pp. 179–190). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Spangler, W. D., & Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in the U. S. Presidency: A psychological theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 364–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, T., Numagami, T., & Karube, M. (2007). Organizational Deadweight and the Internal Functioning of Japanese Firms: An Explorative Analysis of Organizational Dysfunction. Paper submitted to the International Conference on “Dynamics of Knowledge, Corporate System, and Innovation.” Karuizawa, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston, MA: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. (2002). Reinventing the bazaar: A natural history of markets. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishina, K. (2002). Chronic failures of corporate strategy. Hitotsubashi Business Review, 50(1), 6–23 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numagami, T. (1999). Ekisho dispurei no gijutsu kaushinshi (history of liquid crystal display technology). Tokyo: Hakuto Shobo (in Japansese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Numagami, T., Karube, M., Kato, T., Tanaka, K., & Shimamoto, M. (2007). Organizational deadweight: organization of japanese firms reexamined. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shimbun (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: how american business can meet the japanese challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B. J. (1993). Mass customization: the new frontier in business competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, S., & Uzumeri, M. (1995). Managing product families: the case of the sony walkman. Research Policy, 24(5), 761–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Branswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1996, 1969). The science of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, Y. (2007). “Japanese corporation and employees: its historical transition” project report, Hitotsubashi university the 21 century COE program “dynamics of knowledge, corporate system, and innovation.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeishi, A., & Aoshima, Y. (2006). Case study shimano: market creation through component integration. In Herstatt, C., C. Stockstrom, H. Tschirky, and A. Nagahira (eds.), Management of technology and innovation in japan (pp. 29–48). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Takeishi, A., Aoshima, Y., & Karube, M. (2007). Reasons for innovation: legitimizing resource mobilization for innovation in the case of okochi memorial prize winners. Paper submitted to the international conference on “dynamics of knowledge, corporate system, and innovation.” Karuizawa, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Rosenkopf, L. (1992). Organizational determinants of technological change: toward a sociology of technological evolution. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in organizational behavior (311–347). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Garud, R. (1988). A framework for understanding the emergemce of new industries. In R. Rosenbloom & R. Burgelman (eds.), Research on technological innovation and management policy, 4, 195–225. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). In R. Guenther & C. Wittich (Trans. and Eds.), Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Takeishi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Takeishi, A., Numagami, T. (2010). Boundaries of Innovation and Social Consensus Building: Challenges for Japanese Firms. In: Itami, H., Kusunoki, K., Numagami, T., Takeishi, A. (eds) Dynamics of Knowledge, Corporate Systems and Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04480-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics