Skip to main content

Zusammenfassung

Mit der zunehmenden Anerkennung psychosozialer Aspekte von Krebserkrankungen und ihrer Behandlung hat sich in den letzten 20 Jahren der Begriff der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität als Zielkriterium auch in onkologisch-chirurgischen Studien etabliert. Es liegen eine Reihe sowohl krankheitsübergreifender als auch krankheitsspezifischer Verfahren zur Erfassung der Lebensqualität in der Onkologie vor, die auf der Grundlage methodischer Richtlinien entwickelt wurden. Die meisten dieser Instrumente genügen psychometrischen Gütekriterien und sind damit zum Einsatz bei Krebspatienten geeignet. Obwohl die Anwendung von Lebensqualitätsmessinstrumenten in onkologischen Studien zunimmt, gibt es für den deutschen Sprachraum nach wie vor Entwicklungsbedarf in der Anwendung der Lebensqualitätsforschung im Bereich der Krebserkrankungen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai, S, Bullinger, M for the EORTC Quality of Life Group (1993) Validation of the EORTC QLQ 30. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aaronson NK, Beckmann J (1987) Quality of life of cancer patients. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaronson NK, Cull AM, Stein K, Sprangers MAG (1996) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology: An update. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 179–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Angermeyer MC, Kilian R, Matschinger H (2000) WHOQOL-100 und WHOQOL-BREF. Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Version der WHO Instrumente zur Erfassung von Lebensqualität. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Leplège AP, Wilkin D (1996) International use and application of generic health-related quality of life instruments. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 613–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Averbeck M, Grote-Kusch M, Leiberich P, Olbrich E, Schöbel S, Schröder A (1989) Skalen zur Erfassung der Lebensqualität (SELT). Institut für Psychologie I und Medizinische Kliniken. Friedrich-Alexander Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Barofsky I (1996) Cancer: Psychological aspects. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 993–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS (1981) The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 19:780–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard J, Hürny DT, Coates A, Gelber RD (1996) Applying quality of life principles in international cancer clinical trials. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials (pp. 693–706). Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, S 693–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Berzon RA, Mauskopf JA, Simeon GP (1996) Choosing a health profile (descriptive) and/or a patient-preference (utility) measure for a clinical trial. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 375–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom JR (2002) Surviving and thriving. Psychooncology 11:89–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonevski B, Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Burton L, Cook P, Boyes A (2000) Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group Cancer 88(1):217–225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner H (2002) Long-term survival rates of cancer patients achieved by the end of the 20th century: A period analysis. Lancet 360:1131–1135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M (1991) Quality of life — Definition, conceptualization and implications: A methodologists view. Theor Surg 6:143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M (1996) Methoden zur Lebensqualitätsbewertung in der Onkologie. In: Schmoll H-J, Höffgen K, Possinger K (eds) Kompendium Internistischer Onkologie. Springer, Berlin, S 1339–1351

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M (1997) Gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität und subjektive Gesundheit. Überblick über den Stand der Forschung zu einem neuen Evaluationskriterium in der Medizin. Zt Psychotherapie Psychosomatik und Medizinische Psychologie 47(3–4): 77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M, Kirchberger I (1998) Der SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand — Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Fragebogen-Version. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M, Kirchberger I, von Steinbüchel N (1993) Der Fragebogen Alltagsleben — ein Verfahren zur Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität. Z Med Psychol 2:121–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M, Kirchberger I, Ware J (1995) Der deutsche SF-36 Health Survey. Übersetzung und psychometrische Testung eines krankheitsübergreifenden Instrumentes zur Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität. Z f Gesundheitswiss 1:21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M, Power MJ, Aaronson NK, Cella DF, Anderson RT (1996) Creating and evaluating cross-cultural instruments. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, S 659–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Cella D, Tulsky DS, Gray G (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Scale: Development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11:572–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Cella DF, Bonomi AE (1996) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) and Functional Assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) quality of life measurement system. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, S 203–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers LW (1996) The McMaster Health Index Questionnaire. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 267–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieza A, Stucki G (2005) Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Qual Life Res 14(5):1225–1237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustün B, Stucki G (2005) ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 37(4):212–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clinch JJ (1996) The Functional Living Index-Cancer: Ten years later. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 215–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran D, Van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK on behalf of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (BCCG) (1998) Quality of early breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trials 10801. Eur J Cancer 34:307–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damiano AM (1996) The Sickness Impact Profile. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials (pp 347–354). Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haes J, Curran D, Young T, Bottomley A, Flechtner H, Aaronson N, Blazeby J, Bjordal K, Brandberg Y, Greimel E, Maher J, Sprangers M, Cull A, for the EORTC Quality of Life Study (2000) Quality of life evaluation in oncological clinical trials — the EORTC model. Eur J Cancer 36:821–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Haes JCJM, Curran D, Aaronson NK, Fentiman IS on behalf of the European Organisation fro Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (BCCG) (2003) Quality of life in breast cancer patients aged over 70 years, participating in the EORTC 10850 randomised clinical trial. Eur J Cancer 39:945–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Kroon L, Drent G, van den Berg AP, Haagsma EB, Liver Transplant Group Groningen (2007) Current health status of patients who have survived for more than 15 years after liver transplantation. Neth J Med 65(7):252–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsches Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information (DIMDI) (2004) ICF — Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit. DIMDI, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorval M, Maunsell E, Deschênes L, Brisson J, Mâsse B (1998) Longterm quality of life after breast cancer: Comparison of 8-year survivors with population controls. Journal of Clinical Oncology 16(2):487–496

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eiser C, Hill JJ, Vance YH (2000) Examining the psychological consequences of surviving childhood cancer: systematic review as a research method in pediatric psychology. J Pediatr Psychol 25(6):449–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellert U, Lampert T, Ravens-Sieberer U (2005) Measuring health-related quality of life with the SF-8. Normal sample of the German population. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 48:1330–1337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eypasch E, Troidl H, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Reinecke K, Ure B, Neugebauer E (1990) Quality of life and gastrointestinal surgery — A clinimetric approach to developing an instrument for its measurement. theoretical surgery 5:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Curran D, Groenvold M on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group (2001) EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3th ed. pp. 86). EORTC Quality of Life Group, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Fürlong WJ (1996) Health Utilities Index. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials (pp 239–252). Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganz PA (2005) Breast cancer, menopause, and long-term survivorship: critical issues for the 21st century. Am J Med 118:136–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Leedham B, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Belin, TR (2002) Quality of life in long-term, disease free survivors of breast cancer: a follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:39–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gelber RD, Cole BF, Gelber S, Goldhirsch A (1996) The Q-TWiST method. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 437–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear MDE, Fraumeni MA (1996) Incorporating quality of life assessment into clinical cancer trials. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1003–1014

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenbring M, Kurtz B, Marienfeld G (1989) Erfahrungen mit dem Kieler Interview zur subjektiven Situation (KISS). In: Verres R, Hasenbring M (eds) Psychosoziale Onkologie. Jahrbuch der medizinischen Psychologie (S 68–84). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich RL, Schag CC, Ganz PA (1984) Living with cancer: The Cancer Inventory of Problem Situations. J. Clin Psychol 40:972–980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson VS, Tomich PL (2005) Surviving cancer: comparison of 5-year disease-free breast cancer survivors with healthy women. Psychooncology 14:307–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich G, Herschbach P, von Rad M (1992) Lebensqualität in den alten und neuen Bundesländern. Psychother Med Psychol 42:31–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt M, Herdman R, Holland J (2004) Meeting psychosocial needs of women with breast cancer. The National Academies Press; National Cancer Policy Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JC (2002) History of psycho-oncology: overcoming attitudinal and conceptual barriers. Psychosom Med 64(2):206–221

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP, Williams J, Papp E (1981) The Nottingham Health Profile: Subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med 15a:221–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Hütter BO, Gilsbach JM (2001) Background and first results about methodological characteristics of the Aachen Life Quality Inventory. Zentralbl Neurochir 62(2):37–42 (Artikel auf deutsch)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24:2137–2150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC (1976) Health status: Types of validity and the Index of Wellbeing. Health Services Research 11:487–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiebert GM, de Haes JCJM, van de Velde CJH (1991) Quality of life after mastectomy and breast conserving surgery: a review. J Clin Oncol 9:1059–1070

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kind P (1996) The EuroQoL Instrument: An index of health-related quality of life. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials (pp 191–202). Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobf MT (2007) Psychosocial responses in breast cancer survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs 23:71–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlmann T, Bullinger M, Kirchberger-Bleimstein I (1997) Die deutsche Form des Nottingham Health Profiles — Skalenstruktur, Reliabilität und Validität. Soz-Präventiv Med 42:175–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurth BM, Lange C, Kamtsiuris P, Hölling H (2009) Health monitoring at the Robert Koch Institute: Status and perspectives. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz (Artikel auf deutsch)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurth BM, Ellert U (2002) The SF-36 questionnaire and its usefulness in population studies: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey 1998. Soz Praventivmed 47(4):266–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine RJ (1996) Quality of life assessments in clinical trials: An ethical perspective. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydick EG, Epstein RS (1996) Clinical significance of quality of life data. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 461–466

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen J, McKenna SP (1996) Nottingham Health Profile. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials (pp 281–286). Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehnert A, Petersen C, Koch U (2003) Empfehlungen zur psychoonkologischen Versorgung im Akutkrankenhaus. Z Med Psychologie 12:72–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehnert A, Koch U (2008) Psychological comorbidity and health-related quality of life and its association with awareness, utilization and need for psychosocial support in a cancer register based sample of long-term breast cancer survivors. J Psychosom Res 64(4):383–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mosconi P, Colozza M, De Laurentiis M, De Placido S, Maltoni M (2001) Survival, quality of life and breast cancer. Annals of Oncology 12(3):15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullan F (1985) Seasons of survival: reflections of a physician with cancer. N Engl J Med 313(4):270–273

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Najman JM, Levine S (1981) Evaluating the impact of medical care and technology on quality of life: A review and critique. Soc Sci Med 15F:107–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel (1992) pp 17

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health (NIH), www.cancer.gov, 2006 (http: //dccps.nci.nih.gov/ocs/)

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton MJ, Shumaker SA, Anderson RT, Czajkowski SM (1996) Psychological aspects of health-related quality of life measurement: Test and scales. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 117–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson EC, Wasson JH, Johnson DJ, Hays RD (1996) Dartmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts: Brief measures for clinical practice. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials (pp 161–168). Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Newschaffer CJ, Penberthy L, Desch CE, Retchin SM, Whittemore M (1996) The effect of age and comorbidity in the treatment of elderly women with nonmetastatic breast cancer. Arch Intern Med 156:85–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orley J and the WHOQOL Group (1994) The development of the WHO Quality of Life Assessment Instruments (The WHOQOL). In: Orley J, Kuyken W (eds) Quality of life assessment: International perspectives. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 41–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla GV, Grant MM, Ferrell BR, Presant CA (1996) Quality of life — Cancer. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials (pp 301–308). Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick DL, Erickson P (1992) Health status and health policy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzilli R, Fantini L, Morselli-Labate AM (2007) Pancreatectomy for pancreatic disease and quality of life. JOP 8(1):118–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen B, Graversen HP, Beckmann J, Blichert-Toft M (1997) A comparative study of postoperative psychosocial function in women with primary operable breast cancer randomized to breast conservation therapy or mastectomy. Eur J Sur Oncol 23:327–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey DR, Fries JF, Singh G (1996) The Health Assessment Questionnaire 1995 — Status and review. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 227–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Revicki DA (1996) Relationship of pharmaeconomics and health-related quality of life. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven. Philadelphia, pp 1077–1084

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Bonevski B, Burton L, Cook P (2000) The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group. Cancer 88(1): 226–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, Levitt M (1984) Messuring the quality of life of cancer patients: The Functional Living Index Cancer: Development and validation. J Clin Oncol 2: 472–483

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper H, Clinch JJ, Olweny ChLM (1996) Quality of life studies: Definition and conceptual issues. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 11–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz H, Winzer A, Koch U (2001) Beeinflussung der Lebensqualität von Tumorpatienten durch psychoonkologische Interventionen. Der Onkologe 2:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz CE, Sprangers MAG (1999) Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-oflife research. Soc Sci Med 48:1531–1548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sehlen S, Fahmuller H, Herschbach P, Aydemir U, Lenk M, Duhmke E (2003) Psychometrische Eigenschaften des Stress Index RadioOnkologie (SIRO) — ein neuer Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Lebensqualität bei Patienten unter Strahlentherapie. Strahlenther Onkol 179(4):261–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selby PJ, Chapman JA, Etazadi-Amoli J, Dalley D, Boyd NF (1984) The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. Br J Cancer 50:13–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman RA, Troyan SL, Guadagnoli E, Kaplan SH, Greenfield S (1997) The impact of age, marital status, and physician patient interactions on the care of older women with breast cancer. Cancer 80:1326–1334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman RA, Dukes KA, Sullivan LM, Kaplan SH (1998) Breast cancer care in older women: sources of information, social support, and emotional health outcomes. Cancer 83:706–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan JA, Cella D, Frost M, Guyatt GHJ, Sprangers M, Symonds T and the Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group (2002) Assessing clinical significance in measuring oncology patient quality of life: introduction to the symposium, content overview, and definition of terms. Mayo Clin Proc 77:367–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spilker B (1996) Introduction to the field of quality of life trials. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials (pp 1–10). Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J, Chesterman E, Levi J, Shepherd R, Battista RN, Catchlove BR (1981) Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients. A concise QL-Index for use by physicians. J CHron Dis 34:585–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sprangers MAG (2002) Quality of life assessment in oncology-achievements and challenges. Acta Oncologica 41(3):229–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart AL, Ware J (1992) Measuring Function and Wellbeing. Duke University Press, Durham/NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo S (the WHOQOL Group) (1996) The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Assessment Instrument. In: Spilker B (ed), Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 355–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Taupin D, Chambers SL, Corbett M, Shadbolt B (2006) Colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer improves quality of life measures: a population-based screening study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The WHOQOL Group (1998a) The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Sciences Medicine, 46(12):1569–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The WHOQOL Group (1998b) Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine 28(3):551–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thewes B, Butow P, Girgis A, Pendlebury S (2004) The psychosocial needs of breast cancer survivors; a qualitative study of the shared and unique needs of younger versus older survivors. Psychooncology 13:177–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek FJ, de Graaf EJ, Dijkgraaf MG, Reitsma JB, Haringsma J, Timmer R et al (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TRENDstudy). BMC Surg 9:4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Hooft JE, Bemelman WA, Breumelhof R, Siersema PD, Kruyt PM, van der Linde K et al (2007) Colonic stenting as bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for management of acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized trial (Stent-in 2 study). BMC Surg 7:12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verschuur EM, Steyerberg EW, Tilanus HW, Polinder S, Essink-Bot ML, Tran KT et al (2009) Nurse-led follow-up of patients after oesopha-geal or gastric cardia cancer surgery: a randomised trial. Br J Cancer 100(1):70–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE (1987) Standards for validating health measures. Definition and content. J Chron Dis 40:503–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE (1996) The SF-36 Health Survey. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials (pp 337–346). Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE, Keller SD (1996) Interpreting general health measures. In Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 445–460

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (WHO) (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organisation, Genf

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinopoulos D, Dimitroulopoulos D, Karanikas I, Fotopoulou A, Oikonomou N, Korkolis D et al (2008) Gemcitabine as palliative treatment in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer previously treated with placement of a covered metal stent. A randomized controlled trial. J BUON 13(3):341–347

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwingmann C, Moock J, Kohlmann T (2005) Patientennahe Assessmentinstrumente in der deutschsprachigen Rehabilitationsforschung — Aktuelle Entwicklungen aus dem Förderschwerpunkt »Rehabilitationswissenschaften«. Rehabilitation 44:e57–e68

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bullinger, M., Mehnert, A., Bergelt, C. (2010). Erfassung der Lebensqualität in der Onkologie. In: Siewert, J.R., Rothmund, M., Schumpelick, V. (eds) Praxis der Viszeralchirurgie Onkologische Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03808-2_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03808-2_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03807-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03808-2

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics