Little Big Difference: Gender Aspects and Gender-Based Adaptation in Educational Games

  • Christina M. Steiner
  • Michael D. Kickmeier-Rust
  • Dietrich Albert
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5670)

Abstract

Computer games are tremendously successful and this is why the potential of using this medium for educational purposes is increasingly recognized and researched. However, as new learning technologies need to be appropriate for all students and ensure equal learning opportunities, it is important to take into account evidences on gender differences in the context of computer games. This paper reviews relevant research results on gender aspects. Aiming for the realization of gender-based adaptation in digital educational games, a model incorporating research evidences on gender aspects is elaborated and implications for adaptation are derived. Adaptation principles and game design are illustrated by means of the 80Days project.

Keywords

game-based learning educational game adaptation gender difference game design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Prensky, M.: Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon 9, 1–2 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Peirce, N., Conlan, O., Schwarz, D., Verpoorten, D., Albert, D.: Immersive Digital Games: The Interfaces for Next-Generation E-Learning? In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4556, pp. 647–656. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyle, E., Conolly, T.: Games for Learning: Does Gender Make a Difference? In: Conolly, T., Stansfield, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Games Based Learning, pp. 69–75. Academic Publishing Limited, Reading (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonanno, P., Kommers, P.A.M.: Exploring the Influence of Gender and Gaming Competence on Attitudes towards Instructional Games. British Journal of Educational Technology 39, 97–109 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gorriz, C.M., Medina, M.: Engaging Girls with Computers through Software Games. Communications of the ACM 43, 42–49 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ivory, J.D.: Still a Man’s Game: Gender Representation in Online Reviews of Video Games. Mass Communication & Society 9, 103–114 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bonanno, P., Kommers, P.A.M.: Gender Differences and Styles in the Use of Digital Games. Educational Psychology 25, 13–41 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Phillips, C.A., Rolls, S., Rouse, A., Griffiths, M.D.: Home Video Game Playing in Schoolchildren: A Study of Incidence and Patterns of Play. Journal of Adolescence 18, 687–691 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C.: Gender and Computer Games: Exploring Females’ Dislikes. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 11, 910–931 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McClelland, D.C.: Methods of Measuring Human Motivation. In: Atkinson, J.W. (ed.) The Achieving Society, pp. 41–43. D. Van Nostrand, Princeton (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., Rustichini, A.: Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 1049–1074 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zuckerman, M.: Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1979)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arnett, J.J.: Sensation Seeking, Aggressiveness, and Adolescent Reckless Behavior. Personality and Individual Differences 20, 693–702 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lucas, K., Sherry, J.L.: Sex Differences in Video Game Play: A Communication-Based Explanation. Communication Research 31, 499–523 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Slater, M.D.: Alienation, Aggression, and Sensation Seeking as Predictor of Adolescent Use of Violent Film, Computer, and Website Content. Journal of Communication 53, 105–121 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jansz, J.: The Emotional Appeal of Violent Video Games for Adolescent Males. Communication Theory 15, 219–241 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agosto, D.: Girls and Gaming: A Summary of the Research with Implications for Practice. Teacher Librarian 31, 8–14 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., Stansfield, M.H., Hainey, T.: A Survey of Students’ Computer Game Playing Habits. International Journal for Advanced Technology for Learning 4 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Passig, D., Levin, H.: Gender Interest Differences with Multimedia Learning Interfaces. Computers in Human Behavior 15, 173–183 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dickey, M.D.: Girl Gamers: The Controversy of Girl Games and the Relevance of Female-Oriented Game Design for Instructional Design. British Journal of Educational Technology 37, 785–793 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yee, N.: The Demographics, Motivations, and Derived Experiences of Users of Massively Multi-user Online Graphical Environments. Presence 15, 309–329 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hargittai, E., Shafer, S.: Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender. Social Science Quarterly 87, 432–448 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Halpern, D.F.: Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1992)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sherry, J.L.: Flow and Media Enjoyment. Communication Theory 14, 328–347 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Feng, J., Spence, I., Pratt, J.: Playing an Action Video Game Reduces Gender Differences in Spatial Cognition. Psychological Science 18, 850–855 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Graner Ray, S.: Gender Inclusive Game Design. Charles River Media Inc., Hingham (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    De Jean, J., Upitis, R., Koch, C., Young, J.: The Story of Phoenix Quest: How Girls Respond to a Prototype Language and Mathematics Computer Game. Gender and Education 11, 207–223 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Inal, Y., Sancar, H., Cagiltay, K.: Children’s Avatar Preferences and their Personalities. In: Crawford, C., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2006, pp. 4259–4266. AACE, Chesapeake (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nowak, K.L., Rauh, C.: The Influence of the Avatar on Online Perceptions of Anthropomorphism, Androgyny, Credibility, Homophily, and Attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (2005), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue1/
  30. 30.
    Cassell, J.: Genderizing HCI. In: Jacko, J., Sears, A. (eds.) The Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 402–411. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2002)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Laurel, B.: Utopian Entrepreneur. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Heller, J., Steiner, C., Hockemeyer, C., Albert, D.: Competence-Based Knowledge Structures for Personalised Learning. International Journal on E-Learning 5, 75–88 (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Hockemeyer, C., Albert, D., Augustin, T.: Micro Adaptive, Non-invasive Assessment in Educational Games. In: Eisenberg, M., Kinshuk, C.M., McGreal, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the second IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning, Banff, pp. 135–138 (2008)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Albert, D., Roth, R.: A Methodological Approach to Address Individual Factors and Gender Differences in Adaptive eLearning. In: Siebenhandl, K., Wagner, M., Zauchner, S. (eds.) Gender in E-Learning and Educational Games: A Reader, pp. 71–84. Studienverlag, Innsbruck (2007)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Albert, D., Lukas, J. (eds.): Knowledge Spaces: Theories, Empirical Research, and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1999)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Doignon, J.-P., Falmagne, J.-C.: Knowledge Spaces. Springer, Berlin (1999)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Melis, E., Ulrich, C.: Gender-Biased Adaptations in Educational Adaptive Hypermedia. In: Neijdl, W., De Bra, P. (eds.) AH 2004. LNCS, vol. 3137, pp. 425–428. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hall, R.H., Hickman, L.L.: Imagic and Textual Components of Web Page Design: The Role of Gender in Subjective Ratings. Virtual University Journal, 2 (1999), http://lite.mst.edu/documents/vuj_99_hall_gender.pdf
  39. 39.
    Cyr, D., Bonnani, C.: Gender and Website Design in E-business. International Journal of Electronic Business 3, 565–582 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Deaux, K., Farris, E.: Attributing Causes for One’s Own Performance: The Effects of Sex, Norms, and Outcome. Journal of Research in Personality 11, 59–72 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dickhäuser, O., Stiensmeier-Pelster, J.: Gender Differences in the Choice of Computer Courses: Applying an Expectancy-Value Model. Social Psychology of Education 6, 173–189 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ziegler, A., Stoeger, H.: Evaluation of an Attributional Retraining (Modelling Technique) to Reduce Gender Differences in Chemistry Instruction. High Ability Studies 15, 63–83 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dweck, C.S.: Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development. Psychology Press, Philadelphia (1999)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Danielsson, K., Wiberg, C.: Paricipatory Design of Learning Media: Designing Educational Computer Games with and for Teenagers. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 3, 275–291 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina M. Steiner
    • 1
  • Michael D. Kickmeier-Rust
    • 1
  • Dietrich Albert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Cognitive Science SectionUniversity of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations