Skip to main content

Zusammenfassung

In der Literatur wird bei den Beiträgen zur Schulterendoprothetik die Technik des Zugangsweges häufi g nur beiläufi g erwähnt. Dies ist umso erstaunlicher, wenn man berücksichtigt, dass ein technisch korrekt ausgeführter Zugang zum Gelenk die entscheidende Voraussetzung zur vollständigen Darstellung des Humeruskopfes und des Glenoids sowie zur Beseitigung der meist vorhandenen Innenrotationskontraktur darstellt. Ohne einen vollständigen Überblick über die anatomischen Landmarken ist eine anatomische Kalottenresektion und achsgerechte Fräsung des Glenoids und somit eine anatomische Implantation einer modularen Prothese nicht möglich (Bauer et al. 1997; Habermeyer 2002). Ein Glenoidersatz kann ohne radikales humeralseitiges und glenoidalseitiges Kapsel- Release erheblich erschwert oder unmöglich sein. Die Technik des Zugangsweges zur Schulter erfordert aufgrund der unmittelbaren Nähe zum Gefäßnervenstrang exakte Grundkenntnisse der regionalen Anatomie (Gardner et al. 2005; McFarland et al. 2001). Nachfolgend sollen Indikation, Technik und Besonderheiten des deltopektoralen, superioren sowie des transakromialen Zuganges dargestellt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Bauer R, Kerschbaumer R, Poisel S (1997) Orthopädische Operationslehre. Schulter und obere Extremität. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 2–7, 152–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Codman EA (1934) The shoulder, 2nd edn. Thomas Todd, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cofield RH (1982) Rotator cuff disease of the shoulder. Surg Gynecol Obstet 154:667–672

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Dines JS, Briggs SM, Weiland AJ, Lorich DG (2005) The extended anterolateral akromial approach allows minimally invasive access to the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 434:123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill DR, Cofield RH, Rowland C (2004) The anteromedial approach for shoulder arthroplasty: the importance of the anterior deltoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:532–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Habermeyer P (2002) Schulterchirurgie. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München, S 273–284, 531–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadic MA, Rozing PM, Obermann WR, Bloem JL (1992) A surgical approach in total shoulder arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 111:192–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klepps S, Auerbach J, Calhon O, Lin J, Cleeman E, Flatow E (2004) A cadaveric study on the anatomy of the deltoid insertion and its relationship to the deltopectoral approach to the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:322–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuz JE, Pierce TD, Braunhohler WM (1998) Coronal transacromial osteotomy surgical approach for shoulder Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 21:155–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levy O, Pritsch M, Oran A, Greental A (1999) A wide and versatile comibined surgical approach to the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:658–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie DB (1993) The antero-superior exposure for total shoulder replacement. Orthop Traumatol 2:71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland EG, Caicedo JC, Guitterez MI, Sherbondy PS, Kim TK (2001) The anatomic relationship of the brachial plexus and axillary artery to the glenoid. Implications for anterior shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med 29:729–733

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radkowski CA, Richards RS, Pietrobon R, Moorman CT (2006) An anatomic study of the cephalic vein in the deltopectoral shoulder approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:139–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rittmeister M, Kerschbaumer F (2001) Grammont reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and nonreconstructible rotator cuff lesions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:17–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner M, Eschbach N, Loew M (2008) Comparison of the short-term functional results after surface replacement and total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the Shoulder – a matched-pair analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:347–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland S (2006) The continuing development of shoulder replacement: „reaching the surface”. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:900–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cruess RL (1976) Steroid-induced avascular necrosis of the head of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 58:313–317

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fink B, Singer J, Lamla U, Rüther W (2004) Surface replacement of the humeral head in rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:366–373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel R, Knothe U, Ballmer FT (2002) Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:331–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levy O, Copeland C (2004) Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (Copeland CSRA) for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:266–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levy O, Funk L, Sforza G, Copeland SA (2004) Copeland surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:512–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loew M, Raiß R Rickert M (2007) Endoprothetik bei der Rotatorenmanschetten-Defektarthropathie der Schulter. Orthopäde 36:988–995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raiss R Kasten P, Baumann F, Moser M, Rickert, M, Loew M. (2009) Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head with Cementless Surface Replacement Arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg (A);91:340–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rydholm U, Sjögren J (1993) Surface replacement of the humeral head in the rheumatoid shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2:286–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walch G Boulahia A, Badet R, Riand N, Kempf JF (1999) Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: clinical and radiographic classification. In: Walch G, Boileau P (eds) Shoulder arthroplasty, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 195–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner A, Hedtmann A (2007) „Resurfacing” des Humeruskopfes, Indikationen und Grenzen. Orthopäde 36:996–1001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boileau P, Walch G (1997) The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:857–865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boileau P, Walch G (1999) Anatomical study of the proximal humerus: surgical technique considerations and prosthetic design rationale. In: Walch G, Boileau P (eds) Shoulder arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 69–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards TB, Boulahia A, Kempf JF, Boileau P, Nemoz C, Walch G (2002) The influence of rotator cuff disease on the results of shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:2240–2248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber A, Ghalambor N, Warner JJ (2001) Instability of Shoulder arthroplasty: balancing mobility and stability. Orthop Clin North Am 32:661–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harryman DT, Sidles JA, Harris SL, Lippitt SB, Matsen FA (1995) The effect of articular conformity and the size of the humeral component on laxity and motion after glenohumeral arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:555–563

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedtmann A, Heers G (2001) Prinzipien der Schulterendoprothetik. Orthopäde 30:354–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heers G, Grifka J, An KN (2001) Biomechanische Überlegungen zur Schultergelenksendoprothetik. Orthopäde 30:346–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel R, Knothe U, Ballmer FT (2002) Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:331–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irlenbusch U, Gebhardt K, Rott O, Werner A (2008a) Rekonstruktion des Humeruskopfdrehpunktes in Abhängigkeit vom Prothesendesign. Z Orthop Unfall 146:211–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ***Irlenbusch U, Fuhrmann U, Rott O (2008b) Differentialindikation anatomischer und inverser Schulterendoprothesen in der sekundären Frakturprothetik. Z Orthop Unfall (im Druck)

    Google Scholar 

  • Irlenbusch U, Irlenbusch L (2007) Aktueller Stand der Schulterendoprothetik. Z Orthop Unfall up2date 4:289–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson EJ, Friedman RJ, An YH, Chokesi R, Dooley RL (1997) Anthropometric study of normal glenohumeral relationships. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6:105–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mileti J, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Harrington JR, Hoskin TL (2005) Monoblock and total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:496–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neer CS, Watson KC, Stanton FJ (1982) Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:319–337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nyffeler WR, Sheikh R, Jacob HAC, Gerber C (2004) Influence of humeral prosthesis height on biomechanics of glenohumeral abduction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:575–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl MI, Kurutz S (1999) Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:660–671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SNJ, Foley APJ, Swallow HM, Wallace WA, Coughlan DP (1991) The geometry of the humeral head and the design of the prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:647–650

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GR, Wong KL, Pepe MD, Tan V, Silverberg D, Ramsey ML, Karduna A, Ianotti JP (2001) The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translations, range of motion and subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:399–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth MA, Ondrla J, Southworth C, Kaar K, Anderson BC, Rockwood CA III (2007) Replicating proximal humeral articular geometry with a third-generation implant: a radiographic study in cadaveric shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:111–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop JY, Flatow EL (2005) Humeral head replacement versus total shoulder arthroplasty: clinical outcomes-a review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boileau P, Avidor C, Krishnan SG, Walch G, Kempf JF, Molé D (2002) Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double blind, randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:351–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner M, Eschbach N, Loew M (2008) Comparison of short-term functional results after surface replacement and total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the shoulder – a matched pair analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:347–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards TB, Kadakia NR, Boulahia A, Kempf JF, Boileau P, Nemoz C, Walch G (2003) A comparison of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:207–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gartsman GM, Elkousy HA, Warnock KM, Edwards TB, O’Connor DP (2005) Radiographic comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:252–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber C, Yian EH, Pfirrmann CA, Werner CM, Zumstein MA (2005) Subscapularis muscle function and structure after total shoulder replacement with lesser tuberosity osteotomy and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1739–1745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Habermeyer P, Magosch P, Luz V, Lichtenberg S (2006) Three-dimensional glenoid deformity in patients with osteoarthritis: a radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1301–1307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klepps S, Chiang AS, Miller S, Jiang CY, Hazrati Y, Flatoe EL (2005) Incidence of early radiolucent glenoid lines in patients having total shoulder replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:118–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch J, Franta A, Montgomery W, Lenters T, Mounce D, Matsen F (2007) Self assessed outcome at two to four years after shoulder hemiarthroplasty with glenoid reaming. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1284–1292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin SD, Zurakowski D, Thornhill TS (2005) Uncemented glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship and outcomes. J Bone Join Surg Am 87:1284–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neer CS (1974) Replacement arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nyfeller R, Jost B, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C (2003) Measurement of glenoid version: conventional radiographs versus computed tomography scans. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:493–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyfeller R, Sheikh R, Atkinson TS, Jacob HA, Favre P, Gerber C (2006a) Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15: 625–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyfeller RW, Meyer D, Sheikh R, Koller BJ, Gerber C (2006b) The effect of cementing technique on structural fixation of pegged glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15: 106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setter K, Voloshin I, Ahmad C (2005) Glenoid component preparation and soft tissue releases. In: Bigliani L, Flatow E (eds) Shoulder arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 37–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro T, McGarry M, Gupta R, Lee Y, Lee T (2007) Biomechanical effects of Glenoid retroversion in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:90S-95S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walch G, Boulahia A, Badet R, Riand N, Kempf JF (1999a) Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: clinical and radiographic classification. In: Walch G, Boileau P (eds) Shoulder arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 195–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Walch G, Boileau P, Pozzi I (1999b) Glenoid resurfacing in shoulder arthroplasty: pro’s and con’s. In: Walch G, Boileau P (eds) Shoulder Aarthroplasty Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I (2006) Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:527–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley-Edwards T (2006) Which approach in primary reverse prosthesis? The deltopectoral approach. Why i like it! In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F (eds) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty – clinical results complications – revision. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 203–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhead WZ (2006) Why I like the superior approach. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F (eds) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty – clinical results complications – revision. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 199–200

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde L (2006) The reverse prosthesis in tumours: the Belgian experience. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F (eds) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty – clinical results – complications – revision. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 179–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekelund A, Osnes H, Haukeland E (2006) The reversed delta arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F (eds) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty – clinical results – complications – revision. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 163–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Favard L, Guery J, Bicknell R, Garaud P, Sirveaux F, Boileau P, Molé D, Walch G (2006) Survivorship of the reverse prosthesis. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F (eds) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty – clinical results – complications – revision. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 373–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Gohlke F, Rolf O (2007) Wechsel fehlgeschlagener Frakturprothesen auf inverse Revisionsimplantate über den transhumeralen Zugang unter Verwendung eine Musculus-pectoralisgestielten Knochenfensters. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19:185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gohlke F, Rolf O, Schuler S, Böhm D (2004) Wechseloperationen mit der reversen Endoprothese nach Grammont nach posttraumatischer Primärimplantation. In: Spezialgebiete aus der Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie, Steinkopff, Darmstadt, S 81–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Gohlke F, Rolf O, Werner Ch (2006) Results of reverse Arthroplasty in revision of failed hemiarthroplasties. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F (eds) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty – clinical results – complications – revision. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 209–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammont P, Trouillod P, Laffay JP, Deries X (1987) Etude et réalisation d’une nouvelle prothèse d’épaule. Rheumatologie 39:407–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Molé D, Navez G, Turell P, Roche O, Sirveaux F (2006) Reversed prosthesis for massive cuff tear without glenohumeral osteoarthritis. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F (eds) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty – clinical results – complications – revision. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 25–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottier F, Wall B, Liotard JP, Walch G (2006) Pathologic acromion in reverse shoulder arthroplasties. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F (eds) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty – clinical results – complications – revision. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 261–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard A, Sinnerton RJ (2006) Results of the use of reverse geometry arthroplasty in the treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F (eds) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty – clinical results – complications – revision. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 103–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Molé D (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:388–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sirveaux F, Navez G, Favard L, Boileau P, Walch G, Molé D (2006) Reverse prosthesis for acute proximal humerus fracture, the multicentric study. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F (eds) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty – clinical results – complications – revision. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Walch G, Wall B, Mottier F (2006a) Complications and revision of the reverse prosthesis: a multicenter study of 457 cases. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F (eds) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty – clinical results – complications – revision. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 335–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Walch G, Wall B, Mottier F (2006b) Reversed prosthesis for primary osteoarthritis. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F (eds) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty – clinical results – complications – revision. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 149–162

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Arbeitsgemeinschaft Endoprothetik

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ambacher, T., Loew, M., Irlenbusch, U., Rolf, O., Gohlke, F. (2010). Operationstechnik. In: Loew, M. (eds) AE-Manual der Endoprothetik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02854-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02854-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02853-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02854-0

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics