Abstract
Hennig’s (1966) concept of hierarchies of monophyletic taxons based on common ancestors (with plesiomorphies or retained primitive, ancestral characters) and shared synapomorphies (homologous shared characters inferred to have been present in the nearest common ancestor but not in earlier ancestors nor in the taxa outside this group), has provided the theoretical basis for taxa formation. During the first decades following its proposal, it resulted in the establishment of cladistic trees where recency of common ancestry is the sole criterion for grouping of the taxa. The problem of ranking taxa and tree formation in a Darwinian evolutionary context was the next scientific step (Eldridge and Cracraft 1980). Opinions about what different nodes represent, how to deal with branch lengths, and how to rank monophyletic entities, have become part of a scientific field of its own (Britton et al. 2007). Applying both morphologic and genetic taxonomic methods, and working with different groups of characters to reveal evolutionary relationships between insect orders or families as monophyletic groups, is now becoming standard. In the new millennium this work has resulted in several new hypotheses of phylogenetic trees of Insecta. Wheeler et al. (2001) established the relationship between Diptera and Strepsiptera. Grimaldi and Engel (2005) in their comprehensive work on extinct and extant Insecta, summarized different hypotheses for Diptera. They accepted five suborders of Lower Diptera (Nematocera): Tipulomorpha, Psychodomorpha, Culicomorpha, Blephariceromorpha and Bibionomorpha. They placed Anisopodidae as a sistergroup to Brachycera (all higher Diptera) and discarded Nematocera as a paraphyletic group (including a most recent common ancestor and some, but not all, of it descendants). This view has been strongly advocated by Amorim et al. (2006). They recognised seven suborders/infraorders instead of Nematocera and added Brachycera as the eighth suborder/infraorder for the rest of the Diptera.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amorim D, Souza DE, Yeates D (2006) Pesky Gnats: Ridding dipteran classification of the Nematocera. Studia Dipterologia 30:1–7
Becker N, Petrić D, Zgomba M, Boase C, Dahl C, Lane J, Kaiser A (2003) Mosquitoes and their control. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, p 498
Belkin JN (1962a) The mosquitoes of the South Pacific I. University of California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles, p 608
Cameron SL, Lambkin CL, Barker SC, Whiting MF (2007) A mitochondrial genome phylogeny of Diptera: whole genom sequence data accurately resolve relationships over broad timescales with high precision. Syst Entomol 32:40–52
Edwards FW (1932) Genera insectorum. Diptera. Fam. Culicidae, Fascicle 194, Bruxelles, Belgium: Desmet-Verteneuil, Imprimeur-Editeur, p 258
Eldridge N, Cracraft J (1980a) Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process. Colunbia University Press, New York, p 349
Foley DH, Wilkerson RC, Cooper RD, Volovsek ME, Bryan JH (2007) A molecular phylogeny of Anopheles annulipes (Diptera: Culidiae) sensu lato: The most species-rich anopheline complex. Mol Phylogen Evol 43:283–297
Gilbert, L, Kostas I, Gill SS (2005) Comprehensive molecular insect science vols 1–7. Elsevier Pergammon, Amsterdam
Grimaldi D, Engel MS (2005) Evolution of the insects. Cambridge Universtiy Press, p 75
Harbach RE, Kitching IJ (1998) Phylogeny and classification of the Culicidae. Syst Entomol 23:327–370
Harrison BA (2007) Will the real Anopheles crucians please step forward? Wing Beats 18(4):30–32
Hennig W (1973) Diptera (Zweiflügler). In: Helmcke JG, Starck D, Wermuth H (eds) Handbuch der Zoologie IV 2(31):1–19
Knight KL, Stone A (1977) A catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Diptera: Culicidae), 2nd edn. Thomas Say found. J Entomol Soc Am 6, xi+611p
Kumar NP, Rajavel AR, Natarajan R, Jambulingam P (2007) DNA barcodes can distinguish species of Indian mosquitoes (Diptera; Culicidae). J Med Entomol 44:1–7
Moulton JK (2001) Molecular sequence data resolves basal divergence within Simuliidae (Diptera). Syst Entomol 25(1):95–113
Reinert JF, Harbach RE, Kitching IJ (2004) Phylogeny and classification of Aedini (Diptera: Culicidae), based on morphological characters of all life stages. Zool J Linn Soc 142:289–368
Reinert JF, Harbach RE, Kitching IJ (2008) Phylogeny and classification of Ochlerotatus and allied taxa (Diptera: Culicidae: Aedini) based on morphological data from all life stages. Zool J Linn Soc 153:29–114
Russel RC (2006) Mosquito name changes: An Aedes by any other name will bite as bad. Mosq Bites Asia Pacif Reg 1(2):37–40
Saether OA (2000) Phylogeny of the Culicomorpha (Diptera). Syst Entomol 25:223–234
Shepard JJ, Andreadis TG, Vossbrinck CR (2006) Molecular phylogeny and evolutionary relationship among mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from the Northeastern United States based on small subunit ribosomal DNA (18rDNA) sequences. J Med Entomol 43(3):443–454
Wheeler CW, Whiting M, Wheeler QD, Carpenter JM (2001) The phylogeny of extant hexapod orders. Cladistics 17:113–169
Wilkerson RC, Foster PG, Cong L, Sallum MAM (2005) Molecular phylogeny of neotropical Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) albitarsis species complex (Diptera: Culicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 98(6):918–925
Yeats DK, Meier R, Wiegmann B (2006a) Phylogeny of true flies (Diptera) A 250 million years old sucess story in terrestrial diversification. In: FLYTREE phylogeny: entomologische Abhandlungen 61:119–172
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Becker, N. et al. (2010). Systematics. In: Mosquitoes and Their Control. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92874-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92874-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92873-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92874-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)