Skip to main content

Pixelized Images Recognition in Simulated Prosthetic Vision

  • Conference paper
7th Asian-Pacific Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 19))

Abstract

A study and results about pixelized images recognition in simulated prosthetic vision were presented. Twenty object and five scene images were chosen from the databases which were almost familiar by everyone. Two kinds of image processing methods (binarization directly and edge extraction from low resolution images), two common shapes of pixel (square and circular) and six pixels numbers(8×8, 16×16, 24×24, 32×32, 48×48 and 64×64) were used to form pixelized images and presented on head-mounted display (HMD) one by one. According to the trials, the mean recognition accuracy increased with the increase of pixel array number. The threshold of objects recognition was within the interval of 16×16 to 24×24. For simple scenes, it was between 32×32 and 48×48. The images with the threshold resolution, binarization method and circular pixel shape have shown the best results for recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Humayun M. S., Weiland J. D., Fujii G.Y., Greenberg R., Williamson R., Little J., Mech B et al. (2003) Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res., vol. 43, no. 24, pp. 2573–2581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dobelle. W. H. (2000) Artificial Vision for the Blind by Connecting a Television Camera to the Visual Cortex. Amer. Soc. Artificial Internal Organs, vol. 46, pp. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Delbeke J., Oozeer M., and Veraart C.. (2003) Position, size and luminosity of phosphenes generated by direct optic nerve stimulation. Vision Res., vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1091–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Veraart C., Raftopoulos C., Mortimer J. T., Delbeke J., and Pins D. (1998) Visual sensations produced by optic nerve stimulation using an implanted self-sizing spiral cuff electrode. Brain Res., vol. 813, pp. 181–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rizzo J. F., Jensen R. J., Loewenstein J., and Wyatt J. (2003) Unexpectedly small percepts evoked by epi-retinal electrical stimulation in blind humans. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 4207–4207.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cha K, Horch KW. (1992). Normann RA. Simulation of a phosphenebased visual field: visual acuity in a pixelized vision system. Ann Biomed Eng 20, 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cha K et al. (1992). Mobility performance with a pixelized vision system. Vision Res 32, 1367–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayes J. S. et al. (2003). Visually guided performance of simple tasks using simulated prosthetic vision. Artif. Organs 27, 1016–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dagnelie, G. et al. (2007). Real and Virtual mobility performance in simulated prosthetic vision. Journeal of Neural Engineering 4, S92–S101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyle, J. R. et al.(2001). Challenges in Digital Imaging for Artificial Human Vision. Proceedings of SPIE 4299.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson R, et al.(2003). Facial recognition using simulated prosthetic pixelized vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Science, 44(11), 5035–5042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Snaith Martin et al. (1998). A low-cost system using spare vision for navigation in the urban environment. Image Vision and Computing 16, 225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Privitera C M, Stark L W. (2000). Algorithms for defining visual region of interest: comparison with eye fixations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22(9), 970–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Itti L, Koch C. (2000). A saliency based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research 40(10212), 1489–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhao, Y., Tian, Y., Liu, H., Ren, Q., Chai, X. (2008). Pixelized Images Recognition in Simulated Prosthetic Vision. In: Peng, Y., Weng, X. (eds) 7th Asian-Pacific Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 19. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79039-6_123

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79039-6_123

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79038-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79039-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics