Skip to main content

Impact of Emergent Contaminants in the Environment: Environmental Risk Assessment

  • Chapter
Emerging Contaminants from Industrial and Municipal Waste

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC5,volume 5 / 5S / 5S/1))

Abstract

Human pharmaceuticals enter the environment mainly through regular domestic use. Their presence in the aquatic environment has been recorded in the range ng L−1 to μgL−1. Knowledge of the risk associated with the use of pharmaceuticals involves establishing the ratio between predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) and predicted no effect concentration (PNECs). The European Union (EMEA) and USA (FDA) have implemented two-tiered strategies for environmental risk assessment (ERA) of pharmaceuticals. Advances in analytical techniques have allowed us to measure pharmaceuticals in the environmental compartment and the refinement of ERA. On the other hand, for calculation of PNECs, acute and chronic toxicity tests are employed; a critical analysis of the available information was carried out, indicating that acute toxicity was only likely for spills, although an exception to this general behavior is shown by endocrine-active substances. Studies including mixtures of pharmaceuticals are not common in the study of pharmaceutical effects. Only for a limited number of drugs, are the ecotoxicity data available adequate for risk assessment. Selection of model compounds with a priori knowledge about the target biological compounds, and the selection of species, life stages and endpoints would be helpful. New technologies such as proteomics and genomics could be valuable resources to be included in the framework of pharmaceutical environmental risk assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Abbreviations

AF:

Assessment factor

BAF:

Bioaccumulation factor

CPMP:

Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products

EC50:

Effect concentration 50%

EE2:

Ethynilestradiol

EEC:

Expected environmental concentration

EIC:

Expected introduction concentration

EMC:

Endocrine modulating chemicals

EMEA:

European Medicines Agency

ERMS:

European Risk Management Strategy

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

GMOs:

Genetically modified organisms

ICH:

International Conference on Harmonization of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use

ISO:

International Organization for Standardization

LC50 :

Lethal concentration 50%

LC-MS:

Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

LOQ:

Limit of quantification

NOEC:

No observed effect concentration

OA:

Oxolonic acid

OECD:

Organization for Economic and Cooperation Development

OTC:

Oxytetracycline

PBDEs:

Polybromated diphenylethers

PEC:

Predicted environmental concentration

PNEC:

Predicted no effect concentration

PPCPs:

Pharmaceutical and personal care products

QSARs:

Quantitative structure—activity relationships

SSRI:

Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors

STP:

Sewage treatment plant

TGD:

Technical Guide Document in Support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC

References

  1. Field JA, Johnson CA, Rose JB (2006) Environment Sci Technol 40:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chapman PM (2006) Environ Toxicol Chem 25:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daughton CG, Termes TA (1999) Environ Health Perspect 107:907

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. CPMP (Committee for Propietary Medicinal Products) (2003) Note for Guidance on Environmental Risk Assessment of Medicinal Product for Human Use. CPMP/SWP/4447/00. EMEA, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Halling-Sorensen B, Nielsen SN, Lanzky PF, Ingerslev F, Holten Lützhoft HC, Jorgensen SE (1998) Chemosphere 36:357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Díaz-Cruz S, Barceló D (2004) Ocurrence and Analysis of Selected Pharmaceuticals and Metabolites as Contaminants Present in Waste Water, Sludge and Sediments. In: Barceló D (ed) The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 5. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 227

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ternes T, Hirsch R, Mueller JM, Haberer K (1998) Fresen J Anal Chem 362:329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ternes T, Bonerz M, Schmidt T (2001) J Chromatogr A 938:175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Zaugg SD, barber LB, Buxton HT (2002) Env Sci Technol 36:1202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fent K, Weston AA, Caminada D (2006) Aquat Toxicol 76:122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cunningham VL, Constable DJC, Hannah RE (2004) Environ Sci Technol 38:3351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Webb SF (2004) A data based perspective on the enviromental risk assessment of human pharmaceuticals I—Collation of available ecotoxicity data. In: Kümmerer K (ed) Pharmaceuticals in the Environment, Springer, Berlin, p 317

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Crane M, Watts C, Boucard T (2006) Sci Total Environ 367:23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. EMEA (European Medicines Angency) (2006) Guideline on the Environmental Risk Assessment of Medicinal Products for Human Use. Doc Ref EMEA/CHMP/SWP/4447/00. EMEA, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. US Environment Protection Agency (1998) Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment EPA/630/R-95/002F. USEPA, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  16. OECD (1996) Guidelines for testing chemicals. OCDE Publications Service, Paris, p 1040

    Google Scholar 

  17. EMEA (2007) European Risk Management Strategy: 2008–2009 work programme adopted. Doc Ref EMEA/564868/2007. EMEA, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Guidance for Industry Environmental Assessment of Human Drug and BiologicsApplication (1998) http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm, Accessed 25 March 2008

    Google Scholar 

  19. Webb SF (2004) A data based perspective on the enviromental risk assessment of human pharmaceuticals II—Aquatic Risk Characterisation. In: Kümmerer K (ed) Pharmaceuticals in the Environment, Springer, Berlin, p 345

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huschek G, Hansen PD, Maurer H, Krengel D, Kayser A (2004) Environ Toxicol 19:226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Carlsson C, Johansson AK, Alvan G, Bergman K, Kühler T (2006) Sci Total Environ 364:67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferrari B, Mons R, Vollar B, Frayse B, Paxeus N, Giudice RL, Garric J (2004) Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones OAH, Voulvoulis N, Lester JN (2002) Water Res 36:5013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dollery CT (1991) Therapeutic drugs, vol I and II. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richardson ML, Bowon JM (1985) J Pharm Pharmacol 37:1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ternes TA, Meisnhiemer M, McDowell D, Sacher F, Braunch HJ, Haist-Gulde B, Preuss G, Wilme U, Zulei-Seilbert N (2002) Environ Sci Technol 36:3855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kot-Wasik A, Debska J, Namiesnik J (2007) Trends Anal Chem 26:557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Santos JL, Aparicio I, Alonso E (2007) Env Int 33:596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Heberer T, Fhurmann B, Schmidt-Bäumler K, Tsipi D, Koutsouba V, Hiskia A (2001) Ocurrence of pharmaceuticals residues in sewage, river, ground and drinking water in Greece and Germany. In: Daughton CG, Jones-Leo T (eds) Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products in the Environment: Scientific and Regulatory Issues. Symposium Series 791. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, p 70

    Google Scholar 

  30. Farré M, Ferrer I, Ginebreda A, Figueras M, Olivella L, Tirapu M, Vilanova M, Barceló D (2001) J Chromatogr A 938:187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gros M, Petrovic M, Barcelo D (2007) Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jones OAH, Voulvoulis N, Lester JN (2003) Bull WHO 81:768

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sedlak DL, Gray JL, Pinkston KE (2000) Environ Sci Technol 34:509A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kolpin DW, Furlng ET, Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Zaug SD, Barber LB, Buxton HT (2002) Eviron Sci Technol 3:1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Brun GL, Bernier M, Losier R, Doe K, Jackman P, Lee HB (2006) Environ Toxicol Chem 25:2163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Buser HR, Poiger T, Müller MD (1999) Environ Sci Technol 33:2259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Weigel S, Kulhmann J, Hühnrfuss H (2002) Sci Total Environ 295:131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Thomas KV, Hilton MJ (2004) Mar Pollut Bull 49:436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Xu W, Zhang G, Zou S, Li X, Liu (2007) Environ Pollut 145:672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hamscher G, Pawelzik HT, Höper H, Nau H (2004). Antibiotics in soil: routes of entry, environmental concentration, fate and possible effects. In: Kümmerer K (ed) Pharmaceuticals in the Environment. Springer, Berlin, p 139

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Díaz Cruz MS, López de Alda MJ, Barceló D (2003) Trends Anal Chem 22:340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Golet EM, Sthehler A, Alder AC, Giger W (2002) Anal Chem 74:5455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bris HL, Puliquen H (2004) M Pollut Bull 48:434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Metcalfe CD, Miao XS, Koening BG, Struger J (2003) Environ Toxicol Chem 22:2281

    Google Scholar 

  45. Brooks BW, Chamblis CK, Stanley JK, Ramirez A, Banks KE Johnson RD, Lews RJ (2005) Environ Toxicol Chem 24:464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Nakamura Y Yamamoto H, Sekizawa J, Kond T, Hiai N, Tatarazako N (2008) Chemsphere 70:865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Fent K, Weston AA, Caminada D (2006) Aquat Toxicol 76:122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Calleja MC, Persoone G, Geladi P (1994) Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 26:69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Fong PP, Huminski PT, D’Urso ML (1998) J ExpZool 280:260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Halling-Sørensen B; Nielsen N, Lanzky PF, Ingerslev F, Holten-Lützhøft HC, Jørgensen SE (1998) Chemosphere 36:357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Boxakk ABA, Kolpin DW, Halling-Sørensen B, Tolls J (2003) Environ Sci Technol 37:286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Brian JV, Harris CA, Scholze M, Backhaus T, Booy P, Lamoree M, Pojana G, Jonkers N

    Google Scholar 

  53. Runnalls T, Bonfa A, Marcomini A, Sumpter JP (2005) Environ Health Perspect 113:721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Fenske M, Maack G, Schafers C, Segner H (2005) Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Schulte-Oehlmann U, Oekten M, Bauchmann J, Oehlmann J (2004) Effects of ethinyloestradiol and methyltetosterone in prosobranch snails. In: Kümmerer K (ed) Pharmaceuticals in the Environment. Springer, Berlin, p 237

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zerulla M, Länge R, Steger-Hartmann T, Panter G, Hutchinson T, Dietrich DR (2002) Toxicol Lett 131:51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ferrari B, Paxeus N, Lo Giudice R, Pollio A, Garric J (2003) Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 55:359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Schawaiger J, Ferling H, Mallow U, Wintermayr H, Negale RD (2004) Aquat Toxicol 68:141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Huggett DB, Brooks BW, Petreson B, Foran CM, Sclenk D (2002) Arch Environ Contam 43:229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Thaker PD (2005) Environ Sci Technol 39:193A

    Google Scholar 

  61. Iwamatsu T, Toya Y, Sakai N, Terada Y, Nagata R, Nahahama Y (1993) Dev Growth Differ 35:625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Cerda J, Subhedar N, Reich G, Wallace RA, Selman K (1998) Biol Reprod 59:53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Cleuvers M (2003) Toxicol Lett 142:185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Cleuvers M (2004) Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 59:309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Brain RA, Johnson DJ, Richards SM, Hanson ML, Sanderson H, Lam MW, Young C, Mabury SA, Sibley PK, Solomon KR (2004) Aquat Toxicol 70:23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Richards SM, Wilson CJ, Johnson DJ, Castle DM, Lam M, Mabury SA, Sibley PK, Solomon RK (2004) Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Jones OA, Volvoulis N, Lester J (2004) Cri Rev Toxicol 47:71

    Google Scholar 

  68. Hansen PD (2007) Trends Anal Chem 26:1095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Ankley GT, Brooks BW, Huggett DB, Sumpter JP (2007) Environ Sci Technol

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julián Blasco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blasco, J., DelValls, A. (2008). Impact of Emergent Contaminants in the Environment: Environmental Risk Assessment. In: Barceló, D., Petrovic, M. (eds) Emerging Contaminants from Industrial and Municipal Waste. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 5 / 5S / 5S/1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74795-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics