Skip to main content

Extracorporeal Therapies and Immunomodulation During Sepsis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Acute Kidney Problems
  • 2509 Accesses

Abstract

A hallmark in the pathophysiology of sepsis is the excessive release of endogenous and exogenous inflammatory mediators. Various blood purification techniques aiming at the removal of such mediators have been employed as adjunctive therapy in patients with sepsis. Renal-dose hemodialysis and hemofiltration with standard protocols and materials have proved ineffective. High-volume protocols and/or use of high cutoff membranes may offer better biochemical efficacy; however, their impact on clinical outcomes is unclear. Plasma separation, in particular when combined with (unselective or selective) (immuno-) adsorption procedures, are most promising in terms of mediator clearances. Until the clinical efficacy of extracorporeal therapies for immunomodulation during sepsis is demonstrated by clinical trials, they cannot be recommended as standard clinical procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE (2003) The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med 348:138–150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Annane D, Bellissant E, Cavaillon JM (2005) Septic shock. Lancet 365:63–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen J (2002) The immunopathogenesis of sepsis. Nature 420:885–891.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reith W, LeibundGut-Landmann S, Waldburger JM (2005) Regulation of MHC class II gene expression by the class II transactivator. Nat Rev Immunol 5:793–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pachot A, Monneret G, Brion A, et al. (2005) Messenger RNA expression of major histocompatibility complex class II genes in whole blood from septic shock patients. Crit Care Med 33:31–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tschaikowsky K, Hedwig-Geissing M, Schiele A, et al. (2002) Coincidence of pro- and anti-inflammatory responses in the early phase of severe sepsis: Longitudinal study of mononuclear histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-DR expression, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and changes in T-cell subsets in septic and postoperative patients. Crit Care Med 30: 1015–1023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Monneret G, Lepape A, Voirin N, et al. (2006) Persisting low monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR expression predicts mortality in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 32:1175–1183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lekkou A, Karakantza M, Mouzaki A, et al. (2004) Cytokine production and monocyte HLA-DR expression as predictors of outcome for patients with community-acquired severe infections. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 11:161–167.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Monneret G, Venet F, Pachot A, et al. (2008) Monitoring immune dysfunctions in the septic patient: a new skin for the old ceremony. Mol Med 14: 64–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Volk HD, Reinke P, Krausch D, et al. (1996) Monocyte deactivation – rationale for a new therapeutic strategy in sepsis. Intensive Care Med 22(Suppl 4):S474–481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Döcke WD, Höflich C, Davis KA, et al. (2005) Monitoring temporary immunodepression by flow cytometric measurement of monocytic HLA-DR expression: a multicenter standardized study. Clin Chem 51:2341–2347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Ronco C, et al. (2005) The 3rd International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI). Int J Artif Organs 28:441–444.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bellomo R, Honore PM, Matson J, et al. (2005) Extracorporeal blood treatment (EBT) methods in SIRS/Sepsis. Int J Artif Organs 28:450–458.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ronco C, Inguaggiato P, D’Intini V, et al. (2003) The role of extracorporeal therapies in sepsis. J Nephrol 16(Suppl 7):S34–S41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ronco C, Bonello M, Bordoni V, et al. (2004) Extracorporeal therapies in non-renal disease: treatment of sepsis and the peak concentration hypothesis. Blood Purif 22:164–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Venkataraman R, Subramanian S, Kellum JA (2003) Clinical review: extracorporeal blood purification in severe sepsis. Crit Care 7:139–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tetta C, D’Intini V, Bellomo R, et al. (2003) Extracorporeal treatments in sepsis: are there new perspectives? Clin Nephrol 60:299–304.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schefold JC, Hasper D, Storm C, et al. (2007) The extracorporeal treatment of septic patients: is there an extrarenal indication? Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin 44:57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kellum JA, Angus DC (2002) Patients are dying of acute renal failure. Crit Care Med 30:2156–2157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Druml W (2004): Acute renal failure is not a “cute” renal failure! Intensive Care Med 30: 1886–1890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gotloib L, Barzilay E, Shustak A, et al. (1986) Hemofiltration in septic ARDS. The artificial kidney as an artificial endocrine lung. Resuscitation 13:123–132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stein B, Pfenninger E, Grunert A, et al. (1990) Influence of continuous haemofiltration on haemodynamics and central blood volume in experimental endotoxic shock. Intensive Care Med 16:494–499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grootendorst AF, van Bommel EF, van der Hoven B, et al. (1992) High volume hemofiltration improves right ventricular function in endotoxin-induced shock in the pig. Intensive Care Med 18:235–240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Honore PM, Joannes-Boyau O (2004). High volume hemofiltration (HVHF) in sepsis: a comprehensive review of rationale, clinical applicability, potential indications and recommendations for future research. Int J Artif Organs 27:1077–1082.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Di Carlo JV, Alexander SR (2005) Hemofiltration for cytokine-driven illnesses: the mediator delivery hypothesis. Int J Artif Organs 28:777–786.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Olszewski WL (2003) The lymphatic system in body homeostasis: physiological conditions. Lymphat Res Biol 1:11–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brunet S, Leblanc M, Geadah D, et al. (1999) Diffusive and convective solute clearances during continuous renal replacement therapy at various dialysate and ultrafiltration flow rates. Am J Kidney Dis 34:486–492.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. De Vriese AS, Vanholder RC, Pascual M, et al. (1999) Can inflammatory cytokines be removed efficiently by continuous renal replacement therapies? Intensive Care Med 25:903–910.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. De Vriese AS, Colardyn FA, Philippe JJ, et al. (1999) Cytokine removal during continuous hemofiltration in septic patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:846–853.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kellum JA, Dishart MK (2002) Effect of hemofiltration filter adsorption on circulating IL-6 levels in septic rats. Crit Care 6:429–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ronco C, Bellomo R, Homel P, et al. (2000) Effects of different doses in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration on outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomised trial. Lancet 356:26–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cole L, Bellomo R, Journois D, et al. (2001) High-volume haemofiltration in human septic shock. Intensive Care Med 27:978–986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Honore PM, Jamez J, Wauthier M, et al. (2000) Prospective evaluation of short-term, high-volume isovolemic hemofiltration on the hemodynamic course and outcome in patients with intractable circulatory failure resulting from septic shock. Crit Care Med 28:3581–3587.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Bosman RJ, van der Spoel JI, et al. (1999): Outcome of critically ill patients treated with intermittent high-volume haemofiltration: a prospective cohort analysis. Intensive Care Med 25:814–821.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Honore PM, Joannes-Boyau O, Gressens B (2007): Blood and plasma treatments: High volume hemofiltration- a global view. Contrib Nephrol 156:371–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Laurent I, Adrie C, Vinsonneau C, et al. (2005) High volume hemofiltration after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:432–437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yekebas EF, Eisenberger CF, Ohnesorge H, et al. (2001) Attenuation of sepsis-related immunoparalysis by continuous veno-venous hemofiltration in experimental porcine pancreatitis. Crit Care Med 29:1423–1430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Haase M, Bellomo R, Morgera S, et al. (2007) High cut-off point membranes in septic acute renal failure: a systematic review. Int J Artif Organs 30: 1031–1041.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lonnemann G, Bechstein M, Linnenweber S, et al. (1999): Tumor necrosis factor-alpha during continuous high-flux hemodialysis in sepsis with acute renal failure. Kidney Int Suppl S84–S87.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Haase M, Bellomo R, Baldwin I, et al. (2007) Hemodialysis membrane with a high-molecular weight cutoff and cytokine levels in sepsis complicated by acute renal failure: A phase 1 randomized trial. Am J Kidney Dis 50:296–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Morgera S, Haase M, Kuss T, et al. (2006) Pilot study on the effects of high cutoff hemofiltration on the need for norepinephrine in septic patients with acute renal failure. Crit Care Med 34: 2099–2104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Morgera S, Slowinski T, Melzer C, et al. (2004) Renal replacement therapy with high-cutoff hemofilters: Impact of convection and diffusion on cytokine clearances and protein status. Am J Kidney Dis 43: 444–453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Leese T, Holliday M, Heath D, et al. (1987) Multicentre clinical trial of low volume fresh frozen plasma therapy in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 74:907–911.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Busund R, Koukline V, Utrobin U, et al. (2002) Plasmapheresis in severe sepsis and septic shock: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 28:1434–1439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bosch T (2003) Recent advances in therapeutic apheresis. J Artif Organs 6:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cruz DN, Perazella MA, Bellomo R, et al. (2007) Effectiveness of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column in sepsis: a systematic review. Crit Care 1:R47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Palmer JD, Rifkind D (1974) Neutralization of the hemodynamic effects of endotoxin by polymyxin B. Surg Gynecol Obstet 138:755–759.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yonekawa M (2005) Cytokine and endotoxin removal in critically Ill patients. Ther Apher Dial 9:A37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Uriu K, Osajima A, Hiroshige K, et al. (2002) Endotoxin removal by direct hemoperfusion with an adsorbent column using polymyxin B-immobilized fiber ameliorates systemic circulatory disturbance in patients with septic shock. Am J Kidney Dis 39:937–947.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Vincent JL, Laterre PF, Cohen J, et al. (2005) A pilot-controlled study of a polymyxin B-immobilized hemoperfusion cartridge in patients with severe sepsis secondary to intra-abdominal infection. Shock 23:400–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A, Beale R, et al. (2004) Open randomized phase II trial of an extracorporeal endotoxin adsorber in suspected Gram-negative sepsis. Crit Care Med 32:1662–1668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bengsch S, Boos KS, Nagel D, et al. (2005) Extracorporeal plasma treatment for the removal of endotoxin in patients with sepsis: clinical results of a pilot study. Shock 23:494–500.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Amoureux MC, Rajapakse N, Hegyi E, et al. (2004) Endotoxin removal from whole blood by a novel adsorption resin: efficiency and hemocompatibility. Int J Artif Organs 27:480–487.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Staubach KH, Boehme M, Zimmermann M, et al. (2003) A new endotoxin adsorption device in Gram-negative sepsis: use of immobilized albumin with the MATISSE adsorber. Transfus Apher Sci 29:93–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ronco C, Brendolan A, Lonnemann G, et al. (2002) A pilot study of coupled plasma filtration with adsorption in septic shock. Crit Care Med 30:1250–1255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tetta C, Gianotti L, Cavaillon JM, et al. (2000) Coupled plasma filtration-adsorption in a rabbit model of endotoxic shock. Crit Care Med 28:1526–1533.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tetta C, Cavaillon JM, Schulze M, et al. (1998) Removal of cytokines and activated complement components in an experimental model of continuous plasma filtration coupled with sorbent adsorption. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13: 1458–1464.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bellomo R, Tetta C, Ronco C (2003) Coupled plasma filtration adsorption. Intensive Care Med 29:1222–1228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Schefold JC, Hasper D, Volk HD, et al. (2008) Sepsis: Time has come to focus on the later stages. Med Hypotheses 71:203–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Schefold JC, von Haehling S, Corsepius M, et al. (2007) A novel selective extracorporeal intervention in sepsis: immunoadsorption of endotoxin, interleukin 6, and complement-activating product 5a. Shock 28: 418–425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg C. Schefold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schefold, J.C., Jörres, A. (2010). Extracorporeal Therapies and Immunomodulation During Sepsis. In: Jörres, A., Ronco, C., Kellum, J. (eds) Management of Acute Kidney Problems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69441-0_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69441-0_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69413-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69441-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics